The outcome of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is closely related to the wound-healing response. The refractive results, as well as other aspects of quality of vision, depend on it.
In PRK, an excimer laser is the radiation source.1–4 Currently, a wavelength of 193 nm is used. The laser beam is delivered to the eye through a series of mirrors and lenses and finally to the cornea. From 0.2 to 0.3 μm of corneal stroma is ablated with each pulse. Approximately 0.07 μm of the adjacent tissue is affected.5–9
Various technical modalities are used to modify the delivery system, such as an iris diaphragm in a circular beam, a scanning-slit beam, or a flying-spot beam. The laser beam delivery system and the number of laser pulses administered are monitored by an algorithm. Laser beam quality, delivery system, pulse frequency, and algorithms have been the focus during the rapid development of this surgical instrument. New aiming devices and eye tracking have been developed to avoid dependence on patients' ability to fixate their eyes on a target during surgery.
Various types of epithelial ablation are used: manual with a blade or a rotating brush, manual after alcohol administration, or epithelial laser ablation. Cooling the cornea before and after surgery is also done. It is clear that varying the surgical technique influences the wound-healing response. The question is, how much of the variation in results can be attributed to imperfect surgical technique and how much to the healing response?
Pharmacological agents have been used to control the remaining variations in the wound-healing response. Corticosteroids had been used extensively as a postoperative treatment, but their use has diminished as the surgical technique has changed from steep ablations with a small diameter to flat large-diameter treatments.
As knowledge and understanding of corneal wound-healing increases, other types of treatment will emerge. Better selection of suitable PRK patients will probably result.
Wound healing of all body parts follows a similar pattern with local variations. Wound healing in the skin provides the standard description of the discernible phases: (1) inflammation—early, polymorphonuclear leukocyte invasion; late, monocyte invasion; (2) granular tissue formation and re-epithelialization; (3) new matrix formation and remodeling of the matrix; (4) wound contraction; (5) collagen accumulation and normalization of the number of cells in the scar.
All these wound-healing phases occur in the cornea, but not to the same extent. One reason is the lack of vessels in the cornea. There are also differences between a surface-parallel and an incisional wound.
This review will discuss the normal corneal wound-healing response and related it to developments in the surgical technique as well as the clinical problems that can occur after PRK.
Clinical Problems in PRK
Accuracy is the primary problem in PRK, and it is also the key to its success. The aim of all development is to improve the surgical outcome. Such improvements over the years have made PRK possible in patients with higher levels of myopia.10–12
Correction of astigmatism and hyperopia has also been added to the indications for PRK. In myopic eyes, most unsatisfactory results are regressions toward myopia. A small fraction of eyes end up with hyperopia. In general, the latter causes more patient dissatisfaction, especially in those who are presbyopic or close to being so. Accuracy is also a problem in astigmatic and hyperopic correction.
Wound healing cannot be blamed for all variations in PRK's outcome. Preoperative refraction also contributes to the result. In addition, the laser manufacturing company may adjust the algorithm so that the mean result is slightly undercorrected or the astigmatism reduced.
Nonetheless, it is clear that wound healing is an important contributor to the variations in outcome. Patients have been divided into normal responders, aggressive responders, and nonresponders.13 In myopic corrections, aggressive responders end up myopic and the nonresponders, hyperopic. Few factors explain a tendency to regress. One is the hormonal influences of oral contraceptives and another is pregnancy.14,15
Heredity may contribute to excessive healing or a nonresponsiveness. In general, if 1 eye regresses, the other eye is prone to do so.14 It is, however, more challenging to explain the opposite. Photorefractive keratectomy is performed in adults in whom the myopia has stabilized.16 Little is known about how the young cornea reacts to PRK. Environmental factors such as minitrauma or ultraviolet light exposure may explain why only 1 eyes regresses.
Ultraviolet light has been shown experimentally to induce renewed healing after PRK.17,18 Trauma to an eye that has had PRK can probably initiate a wound-healing response, causing haze and regression.19
Details of the surgical technique, such as drying of the stroma between epithelial debridement and stromal ablation, may increase the ablation per pulse. This shifts the outcome to the hyperopic side.
Irregular Healing and Decentration
The cornea constitutes about 65% of the refractive power of the eye and has high-quality refractive properties. Most of the refraction occurs in the interphase between air and the tear film.
The cornea must be restored to its original refractive quality after PRK; however, this does not occur in all cases. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) sometimes worsens.20 Computerized corneal videokeratography may show a decentered treatment area.21–23 Healing can also be irregular (Figure 1). 24
In my experience, it is difficult to clinically separate irregular healing from a decentered ablation by corneal topography alone. I always manually debride the wound as a first step.25 Then, I can see whether the original treatment was well centered. The surgical correction principle for decentered treatment areas should be the same as that for irregular healing, and much hope is placed on computer-topography-assisted phototherapeutic programs being developed by several excimer laser manufacturers.26
Postoperatively, some patients report symptoms similar to those of recurrent erosions, even though they do not have a real wound. Their eyes feel gritty and dry in the morning. At times, epithelial defects can be identified. These problems usually subside during the first year.27,28 Epithelial defects are rarely found.
Haze is normally associated with wound healing after PRK.29 With modern techniques, significant haze rarely occurs in eyes with low myopia after PRK. It can, however, be a major problem in eyes treated for high myopia. Persistent haze also occurs in patients who have PRK after radial keratotomy or after previous PRK in eyes with scarred or grafted corneas.
The Initial Wound
The energy distribution in the laser beam, the type of delivery system, and the algorithm determine how the wound looks immediately after ablation. The ablation imprint in the stromal surface was very evident with early iris-diaphragm delivery systems. The stepwise opening left concentric rings in the stroma.30 The epithelial coverage helped even the surface to create a smooth optical working surface. When these eyes had surgery years later, the concentric rings could still be identified after manual epithelial debridement.31
Bowman's layer is always ablated to bare stroma, even in eyes with very low myopia. Improvements have aimed at creating an even stromal surface to minimize the wound-healing reaction,32 facilitate wound healing, and optimize the optical quality of the refractive corneal surface.
One example of this was to allow the iris diaphragm to open several times during surgery (multizone treatment) and even more times for more myopic ablation (multizone, multipass).33 Similar effects have been sought with the flying-spot treatment and by modifying the scanning-mode ablation.34 Involuntary eye movements always occur during the ablation. These involuntary movements help smooth the ablated surface.35
The homogeneity of the laser beam, especially of broad-beam lasers, must be monitored. Hot spots in a beam may create an uneven ablation.36
In high resolution, the newly ablated stromal surface will appear very even, covered with an ultrathin homogenous membrane of unknown composition.5 Epithelial cells will migrate on this surface to cover the wound.
Pain from corneal injury is the consequence of excitation of corneal nerve terminals by a noxious stimulus or by locally released inflammatory substances. The latter prostaglandins, neuropeptides, biogenic amines, and kinins can also sensitize the nerves by decreasing the threshold for excitation.
Postoperative pain is a primary drawback of PRK.37 The corneal nerves are ablated,38 and inflammatory factors inducing pain are released, among them prostaglandins such as prostaglandin-2 (PGE2). The prostaglandins are found first in the cornea39 and then in the aqueous humor.40 They break down the blood–aqueous barrier (BAB), and flare can be recorded41 as a sign of keratouveitis.
The initial pain lasts 12 to 24 hours and is followed by irritation and tearing until epithelial coverage is complete after 48 to 72 hours. Photophobia is present until epithelial coverage is complete and then subsides rapidly.
Pain therapy is aimed locally or centrally. Local anesthetic agents and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) can stop pain if given topically.42 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs act as local anesthetic agents and can also prevent the release of prostaglandins.43 Topical diclofenac or other NSAIDs combined with a resorbable contact lens has been 1 treatment of choice. Topical diclofenac given postoperatively efficiently blocks the release of PGE2 in rabbits.40 This drug, however, slows epithelial closure,43 and when combined with a contact lens, necessitates checkups until epithelial closure because the risk of infection appears to be greater.
Long-term use of topical local anesthetic agents has been considered hazardous.44 The fear of short-term use is probably overrated, and they could probably be given as an adjunct in specific cases.45
The epithelial covering of the ablated area is an early and important step in wound healing. When coverage is complete, the barrier against infection is restored; irritation, tearing, and photophobia stop; injection subsides; and vision returns. This process takes 48 to 72 hours. Epithelial healing is not really complete until permanent anchoring is restored, which requires about 6 weeks. The epithelial healing can be divided into a latent phase, lasting about 8 hours, followed by a linear healing phase of migration and proliferation, and finally the establishment of permanent cell attachments (adhesion).46
During the first hours after injury, the wound area is constant or slightly larger because of retraction of the wound edge and gathering of cells in that area.47 During the latent phase, the epithelial cells prepare to migrate onto the wound surface.48 The hemidesmosomal attachments between the basal cells and the basement membrane disappear 50 to 70 μm from the wound edge and are significantly reduced up to 200 μm from the edge.47 The cells become more round, but desmosomal attachments do not disappear completely.48
Superficial cells are desquamated, leading to a thinner epithelium at the wound edge.49,50 Two or 3 cell layers develop at the wound margin, with a single layer at the leading edge. The cells synthesize structural proteins, and actin filaments are assembled in the basal region of the migrating cells.
During the latent phase, the concentration of fibronectin, fibrinogen, and fibrin on the wound surface increases.49,51 Tenascin is also found at the surface at this early stage.52 Migration of epithelial cells onto the wound surface begins the linear healing phase.
Interleukins are present in the wound and regulate the healing process. The wound surface is also important in this regulation via integrins, which are cell surface receptors.53
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) stimulates migration and suppresses proliferation of corneal epithelial cells.54–56 Fibronectin at the surface via integrins also stimulates migration.57
Other interleukins are produced locally, present via the tear film, or are produced by leukocytes. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) produced by keratocytes is present in tears after PRK and is thought to stimulate both migration and proliferation of the epithelium and to inhibit differentiation.58–60 Synthesis of HGF is increased by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF),61 also present in tears after PRK.62 Platelet-derived growth factor also enhances extracellular matrix (ECM) production and remodeling.63,64 Tumor necrosis factor-alpha stimulates fibronectin-induced epithelial cell migration.54 Tumor necrosis factor-β and PDGF act as chemoattractants for neutrophils and macrophages,65–67 probably by increasing the synthesis of interleukin-8 (IL-8) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.62,68,69
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) also illustrates the complexity of the regulatory mechanisms of the epithelial healing process. Epidermal growth factor is present in tears.70–73 A 1998 study found that the individual response of EGF concentration in tears varies a great deal and that a high concentration increases the risk of a deviating refractive outcome.74 The number of EGF receptors on the epithelial cell increased 10-fold in rabbit corneas after keratectomy.75 Epidermal growth factor stimulates DNA synthesis as well as epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation.57,76–78 Keratinocyte growth factor is secreted by keratocytes and stimulates epithelial cell proliferation at the site of the receptor.79,80
Interleukin-6 has been detected in tear fluid samples after PRK. Interleukin-6 stimulates collagen, especially collagen I synthesis. It also reduces matrix metalloprotease (MMP) in vitro, in this case MMP-2. Interleukin-6 is also known to cause uveitis in animals after intracameral injection.81 Many details regarding interleukin regulation of wound healing remain to be clarified. The contribution of each interleukin and of the substrate in the epithelial wound-healing response is not clear.
The formation of lamellopodia and filopodia marks the beginning of the migration phase of epithelial healing. The actin filaments are considered to make the cells move.49 In addition to migration, the cells can also increase their volume or surface and cover a large area. During the first 24 hours, there is no cell division in the epithelium close to the wound. In the limbal area, however, early proliferative activity spreads to engage the entire epithelium.82 After wound closure, when the epithelium consists of 1 to 2 cell layers, basal cells proliferate to restore normal thickness. Small-diameter laser treatment is associated with increased epithelial thickness, while expanding the treatment diameter makes the epithelium heal to a normal thickness.83 Focal contacts are formed between the migrating cell and the wound surface substrate. These are first established by lamellopodia and filopodia. These adhesion plaques connect the surface substrate via the cell membrane to the intracellular cytoskeletal fibers.84,85
Fibrin and fibronectin stimulate epithelial cells to release plasminogen activator. The formed plasmin lyses the cell to substrate adhesions, allowing the cells to move forward and form new adhesions. These repeated events stop when the epithelial wound is closed.52 Imbalance in this system in mice leads to defective corneal healing.86 Tenascin is considered to promote migration over the wound surface.87,88 In PRK, the basement membrane is ablated. The advancing cell front produces a new basement membrane. New hemidesmosomes are then established from the periphery to the center of the cornea 4 to 6 weeks after PRK in the rabbit cornea.89,90 Symptoms such as foreign-body sensation, watering, and tenderness on rubbing the eye are sometimes encountered after PRK. These symptoms have been attributed to epithelial adhesion problems. Epithelial breakdown after PRK has been reported to occur in about 3% of eyes.27,28
Inflammation starts when the wound occurs. Prostaglandin-2 is present in the cornea after fewer then 24 hours39 and subsequently in the aqueous,40 where the BAB has broken down.41,91 The injured corneal cells produce vasoactive mediators and chemotactic factors. These cause local vessels to dilate and the vascular endothelium to express selectin. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) circulating in the blood thereby roll on the cell wall and migrate out of the vessel.92,93 The cells enter the limbal area and tears and then invade the corneal wound. After PRK, PMNs appear to invade the wound mainly via the tears.94 Mononuclear leukocytes reach the wound via the same route a few days later.
The leukocytes clean the wound from debris and bacteria. The monocytes can be transformed into macrophages.95 The leukocytes furthermore produce interleukins. After PRK epithelial closure, the leukocytes disappear. This means that PMNs, by timing and number, influence wound healing, possibly by local production of TGF-β, which in turn may influence epithelial migration and keratocytes. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes can be excluded from a corneal wound by blocking selectin, the molecule that causes the cells to roll on and adhere to the vascular endothelium before leaving the vessel through diapedes. In the absence of PMNs, a corneal epithelial wound heals slower.94 This suggests that the sum of the interleukins, among them TGF-β, thought to be produced by PMNs, stimulates epithelial cell proliferation.
In the stroma, underlying the ablated surface, the keratocytes disappear to a depth of about 50 to 200 μm.96–99 The cell death occurs by apoptosis or programmed cell death. Injury-related release of interleukin-1 and the Fas ligand100 from the epithelium mediates keratocyte apoptosis. This type of cell death induces minimal local damage to surrounding cells. The extent of apoptosis disappearance is related to the type of epithelial removal, and transepithelial PRK is associated with comparatively low levels of central corneal apoptosis (Figure 2). 101,102
The volume void of keratocytes is repopulated within a few days after surgery, but the keratocytes now contain abundant cell organelles and dark nuclei.103 These activated keratocytes have been associated with increased collagen deposition after PRK.104,105 It has been suggested that the extent of apoptosis is an important determinant of corneal wound healing.106
Other surgical variations in removing the epithelium (e.g., use of a brush or alcohol) have been suggested to improve the outcome after PRK, as has cooling the cornea preoperatively.107–111
The healing reaction between the epithelium and the superficial stroma continues after epithelial coverage. These events eventually decide the refractive outcome.
When a small-diameter treatment is used, a thick epithelium sometimes contributes to a myopic outcome.112 With enlargement of the treatment zone, epithelial thickness becomes normal.83 The large diameter, and thus the flat ablation profile, cause little wound-healing reaction, and the refractive results in eyes with low myopia are very good. Still, some patients express high concentrations of EGF in their tears after PRK, and the tendency for the correction to regress may be an epithelial response.76
When a small-diameter treatment with a steep ablation profile is used, the outcome depends on the healing reaction. This is expected as the refraction shows a significant hyperopic shift soon after surgery.113 During the following months, the average outcome is close to emmetropia, a regression that depends on a wound-healing reaction. Formation of new stroma and hypertrophic epithelium accomplishes the shift in the refractive surface. A steep ablation curve is now needed in eyes with higher myopia, in which regression is still a quantitative problem.
The formation of new stroma after PRK follows a specific pattern. Water is most prominent in the subepithelial zone.114 The water content is much higher than in normal corneal stroma. The zones or volumes of high water content are sharply delineated at the light microscopic level (Figure 3). Newly formed hyaluronan,115,116 which is highly water binding, is strictly co-localizing to the high-water-content zones.114 In rabbits, this zone is then repopulated by keratocytes117 that alone or with the epithelium produce collagen types I, III, IV, V, and VI, and proteoglycans.118–120 The initially disorganized collagen and cells are subsequently organized. The subepithelial zone or volume subsequently takes on the light-microscopic appearance of normal stroma.117
Formation of new stroma in the rabbit after PRK is more evident when a steep ablation profile is used.121 The same type of reactivity can be provoked by creating a very uneven ablation surface.117 A flat ablation surface causes little wound-healing reactivity.122 Thereby, the original stroma ablation surface and profile will determine the reactive outcome.
The disappearance and return of stromal keratocytes can be followed using the confocal microscope. The activated keratocytes scatter light and are more evident102; as they reappear in the wound area, they may contribute to haze.
The formation of the subepithelial volume and its subsequent consolidation corresponds to the granulation tissue formation, the production of new matrix, and the remodeling of this matrix in the skin wound.
The contraction phase of the new matrix seen in corneal incisional wounds122 seems to be an abortive phenomenon in PRK wounds. It has not been documented clinically to my knowledge. The contraction phase is accomplished by activated keratocytes or fibroblasts containing myocontractile elements, myofibroblasts. The contraction phase is modulated by a secreted protein that is acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC).123 After PRK, the SPARC protein is expressed at the basal aspect of the recently healed epithelium during the first week after surgery in rabbits.124
Myofibroblasts have been associated with solid haze or scar formation. This resistant, dense haze is sometimes seen in eyes with high myopia after PRK. It is also thought to occur when corneas with pre-existing scars are treated with phototherapeutic keratectomy or a PRK retreatment of radial keratectomy. The myofibroblasts may already exist in these scars.
It has been shown that TGF-β initiates the activation of keratocytes into myofibroblasts.125 Therefore, neutralizing antibodies against TGF-β have been used to reduce haze formation in rabbits after PRK.125,126 Mannos 6-phosphate, a competitor for receptor binding with TGF-β, has been evaluated for the same purpose.127
Large-diameter ablation profiles are expected to heal with little or no new stromal haze formation. With this in mind, the historical division of patients into nonresponders, normal healers, and aggressive responders13 can now be reduced to normal and aggressive responders. A hyperopic outcome is likely to be caused by an erroneous refraction, at least in eyes with low myopia. Aggressive responders are still found in all grades of preoperative myopia. A high concentration of EGF in tears preoperatively may thus be a way to identify the aggressive responders.74
If new stroma is formed under the epithelium, it will develop from a high-water-content zone to a solid tissue containing activated keratocytes and all the collagen components and ECM components that exist in the normal stroma. The new stroma will not contain the regularly arranged collagen-containing lamella.128 However, the stroma will be clear, although some collagen fibril irregularity will remain. The increased density of activated keratocytes in the wound area will eventually, probably by apoptosis, return to normal density.
Matrix metalloproteinases are active in remodeling the scar after corneal injuries. Their action is balanced by tissue inhibitor metalloproteinases (TIMPs), which may guard against excessive ECM breakdown. Samples taken at reoperation from corneal wounds 20 or 30 months after PRK expressed mRNA for TIMP1 but not MMP-2 or -9.129 Both MMP-2 and -9 were, however, expressed in the epithelium of the rat cornea after PRK. In the rabbit cornea, a synthetic inhibitor of matrix metalloproteases was shown to delay epithelial healing.130 Matrix metalloprotease (gelatinase B) expression was found upregulated in both the epithelium and the stroma after PRK.131,132 A synthetic inhibitor of metalloproteinases has been found to reduce corneal haze after PRK in rabbits as well as the synthesis of type II collagen.133
Role of Postoperative Steroids
Steroids are known to delay wound healing in the cornea. They reduce wound infiltration of leukocytes134 and limit the subepithelial deposition of collagen and ECM135,136 including hyaluronan.115 Epithelial and keratocyte migration and proliferation are also suppressed.
In prospective clinical trials, the influence of steroids on refractive results is significant. However, after cessation of the drug, the difference often diminishes or disappears.
Steroids are able to suppress the movement and reparative efforts of activated keratocytes and, typically, haze formation is shifted until 1 or 2 months after the topical steroids are stopped.29,137 This means that some regression can occur after cessation of the drug and that stable refractive results cannot be counted on until a few month after steroids have been stopped.
The development toward large-diameter flat-profile treatments has made postoperative steroids unnecessary in eyes with up to –5.00 diopters (D) of myopia. In eyes with higher myopia, the steep type of treatment required necessitates steroids138 or the choice of another technique such as laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
When evaluating studies on the possible effect of steroids, it is important to remember that the drug exists in various forms. The degree of potency and penetrability varies greatly.
The corneal nerves are ablated when PRK is performed. As soon as 7 days after surgery, generating nerve fibers can be identified in both the human and rabbit cornea.139
The morphology of the regenerating corneal nerves, which is not restored to normal,140 can be studied with the confocal microscope. Corneal sensitivity is decreased in the operated area about 1 month after PRK.39,141,142 Ablation depth and degree of haze will influence the recovery of sensation, which is usually restored after 1 to 3 months.39 The clinical data on recovery of sensitization correlate well with histologic findings.140,143
It is well known that denervation somewhat impairs corneal wound healing. However, the influence of corneal nerve damage on corneal wound healing after PRK is not understood. This is different in LASIK,144 after which the morphology of the regenerating nerves are closer to normal.
After PRK, calcitonin gene-related peptide is released in excess from damaged nerves as assessed in tears. The substance may promote wound healing. It is also a potent vasodilator.145,146
Late regression is a reactivation of the wound-healing process after PRK. It is a rare phenomenon that seems to occur more often after small-diameter laser treatment. Typically, the treatment is initially successful and the cornea is clear. Over a few days, visual acuity worsens and the eye becomes myopic (–1.00 to –3.00 D). Best corrected visual acuity also drops several lines because of intense haze in the treated area.147
Topical steroids in the form of dexamethasone 0.1% given 3 to 5 times a day usually result in rapid improvement, especially if given soon after the beginning of the regression. If the eye responds to steroids after 2 to 3 weeks, slowly tapering the steroids helps resolve the thick haze. My impression is that late regression occurs after sun exposure when skiing or sailing. Experimentally, it has been possible to provoke a healing reaction in PRK-treated rabbits by exposure to ultraviolet light.17,18 Regression can also be provoked by pregnancy15 and trauma.19 Clinically, late regression can occur up to 2 years after the initial surgery. It should not be confused with postponed haze formation and regression, which occur 1 or 2 months after the postoperative steroids have been tapered.
The haze phenomenon30 has interested surgeons and researchers perhaps more than deserved. Haze is clearly seen at the slitlamp but only rarely experienced by the patient. The phenomenon has, however, been a driving force in finding out what happens in the wound.
Haze is a normal companion to corneal wound healing and usually subsides after 1 to 2 years.29,148 With small-diameter treatment or in high myopia, the haze can persist. One debate has been whether haze should be regarded as a scar or something else, a passing phenomenon on the way to a clear cornea. It can be both.
The source of haze, or light scattering in the wound, has been attributed to the interface between the epithelium and stroma or from the keratocytes in the stroma underlying the wound.
Confocal microscopy has contributed to the knowledge about haze. To some extent, it has been possible to separate the contribution of subepithelial deposits from that of keratocytes.149 In the subepithelial zone, several substances are produced such as glycosaminoglycans,150,151 fibronectin, laminin, type III collagen,152 keratin sulfate, and hyaluronic acid.114,115 This zone may scatter light because of an irregular structure that does not possess the refractive properties of the normal cornea stroma. The subepithelial interface also accumulates a large amount of water that co-localizes with the hyaluronan.114 The sharp demarcations of these zones creates sharp shifts in refractive index in these areas, causing light scattering. The resolution of the technique used to assess water content in the cornea is slightly lower than that of light microscopy. If the shifts in refractive index reach between lamellae, it would further induce light scattering by disturbing the structure.
Keratocytes disappear in the stroma under the wound after PRK.111 However, they rapidly repopulate the area and significantly increase in volume.159 They also increase their reflectivity,102,153,154 which contributes to light scattering in the area. The keratocytes repopulate the wound area to a much greater density than in the normal corneal stroma.29 The density then decreases to normal levels after about 6 months. The altered keratocytes are, to various extents, changed into myofibroblasts that deposit collagen and in the skin wound cause wound contraction. The action of these myofibroblasts is thought to cause the type of dense haze that is more or less persistent and that could be defined as scar tissue.
Interleukins are active in attracting human keratocytes. In a collagen gel model and using a Boyden blind-well chemotaxis chamber PDFG+BB, EGE, TSF-α, IGF-I and TFG-β increased keratocyte chemotaxis.155,156
Role of PRK in Refractive Surgery
Photorefractive keratectomy is an attractive refractive surgery technique. The procedure is fast and easy to perform. For the technique to maintain or improve its position in refractive surgery, the drawbacks must be addressed. These drawbacks do not seem insurmountable. The long time to obtain stability in the healing process is worrisome, as is the possibility of provoking renewed healing reactions 1 to 2 years after surgery.
It should be possible to identify aggressive responders before surgery. To be successful in higher myopia, pharmacological means to control wound healing are needed. Several possibilities have been described including antibodies to TFG-β,120,122 mannos 6-phosphate,123 and synthetic inhibitors of MMPs.123,130
Interferons can inhibit many aspects of the fibrotic response of fibroblasts including chemotaxis,157 proliferation,158 and collagen production.159 Interferon-alpha 2 inhibits fibroblast glycosaminoglycan production and increases collagenase production.160 Interferon-alpha 2 applied topically reduces the corneal haze in rabbits after PRK.161
Mitomycin-C as an adjunct to topical steroid therapy reduces the new production of collagen in rabbit corneas after PRK compared to the use of steroids alone. In another study of rabbits, mitomycin reduced scar tissue but not haze.162 Topical application of basic fibroblasts growth factor reduces the amount of haze in rabbits.163
Highly reactive free radicals are liberated during PRK. Intraoperative applications of antioxidants in rabbits have been tried to evaluate the effect on wound healing. Both dimethylsulfoxide and superoxid dismultase were applied, reducing the degree and extent of postoperative haze in the treated groups.164
There are many ways to influence wound healing to reduce its harmful consequences. The ideal way is to select patients before surgical intervention to a suitable technique. Improvements in the surgical technique have aimed at creating as little reactivity in the cornea as possible. The stromal ablation performed at the time of surgery should reflect, via the epithelium, the new permanent refractive surface. Stopping corneal reactivity to surgery in all patients may seem difficult in view of the extremely complicated wound-healing mechanisms. However, fewer than 10 years ago, steroids were the only option; since then, knowledge has grown exponentially.
1. Trokel SL, Srinivasan R, Braren B. Excimer laser surgery of the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol 1983; 710-715
2. Seiler T, Bende T, Wollensak J, Trokel S. Excimer laser keratectomy for correction of astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105:117-124
3. L'Esperane FA Jr, Taylor DM, et al. Human excimer laser corneal surgery; preliminary report. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1988; 86:208-275
4. McDonald MB, Kaufman HE, Frantz JM, et al. Excimer laser ablation in a human eye; case report. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107:641-642
5. Marshall J, Trokel S, Rothery S, Schubert H. An ultrastructural study of corneal incisions induced by an excimer laser at 193 nm. Ophthalmology 1985; 92:749-758
6. Puliafito CA, Steinert RF, Deutsch TF, et al. Excimer laser ablation of the cornea and lens; experimental studies. Ophthalmology 1985; 92:741-748
7. Cotliar AM, Schubert HD, Mandel ER, Trokel SL. Excimer laser keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1985; 92:206-208
8. Krauss JM, Puliafito CA, Steinert RF. Laser interactions with the cornea. Surv Ophthalmol 1986; 31:37-53
9. Marshall J, Trokel S, Rothery S, Kreuger RR. Photoablative reprofiling of the cornea using an excimer laser: photorefractive keratectomy. Lasers Ophthalmol 1986; 1:21-48
10. McCarty CA, Aldred GF, Taylor HR. Comparison of results of excimer laser correction of all degrees of myopia at 12 months postoperatively. Am J Ophthalmol 1996; 121:372-383
11. Corbett MC, Verma S, O'Brart DP, et al. Effect of ablation profile on wound healing and visual performance one year after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80:224-234
12. O'Brart DP, Corbett MC, Lohmann CP, et al. The effects of ablation diameter on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy; a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113:438-443
13. Durrie DS, Lesher MP, Cavanaugh TB. Classification of variable clinical response after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg 1995; 11:341-347
14. Corbett MC, O'Brart DP, Warburton FG, Marshall J. Biologic and environmental risk factors for regression after photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1996; 103:1381-1391
15. Sharif K. Regression of myopia induced by pregnancy after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1997; 13(suppl):S445-S446
16. Hamberg-Nyström H. Refractive Surgery with the ArF Excimer Laser (Photorefractive Keratectomy): Surgical Technique, Wound Healing and Refractive Results (thesis). Stockholm, Karolinska Institutet, 1997
17. Nagy ZZ, Hiscott P, Seitz B, et al. Ultraviolet-B enhances corneal stromal response to 193-nm excimer laser treatment. Ophthalmology 1997; 104:375-380
18. Nagy ZZ, Hiscott P, Seitz B, et al. Clinical and morphological response to UV-B irradiation after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Surv Ophthalmol 1997; 42(suppl 1):S64-S76
19. Campos M, Takahashi R, Tanaka H, et al. Inflammation-related scarring after photorefractive keratectomy. Cornea 1998; 17:607-610
20. Seiler T, McDonnell PJ. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Surv Ophthalmol 1995; 40:89-118
21. Uozato H, Guyton DL. Centering corneal surgical procedures. Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 103:264-275
22. Seiler T, Reckmann W, Maloney RK. Effective spherical aberration of the cornea as a quantitative descriptor in corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19:155-165
23. Wilson SE, Klyce SD. Quantitative descriptors of corneal topography; a clinical study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109:349-353
24. Grimm B, Waring GO III, Ibrahim O. Regional variation in corneal topography and wound healing following photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1995; 11:348-357
25. Thomas-Barberan S, Fagerholm P. Haze affects refraction, corneal topography and decentration after photorefractive keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39:351
26. Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, Harrer M. Experimental correction of irregular corneal astigmatism using topography-based flying-spot-mode excimer laser photoablation. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 125:252-256
27. Gartry DS, Kerr Muir MG, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy with an argon fluoride excimer laser: a clinical study. Refract Corneal Surg 1991; 7:420-435
28. Seiler T. Photorefractive keratectomy: European experience. In: Thompson FB, McDonnell PJ, eds, Color Atlas/Text of Excimer Laser Surgery: the Cornea. New York, NY, Igaku-Shoin, 1993; 53-62
29. Lohmann C, Gartry D, Kerr Muir M, et al. “Haze” in photorefractive keratectomy: its origins and consequences. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 1991; 4:15-34
30. Marshall J, Trokel SL, Rothery S, Krueger RR. Long-term healing of the central cornea after photorefractive keratectomy using an excimer laser. Ophthalmology 1988; 95:1411-1421
31. Epstein D, Tengroth B, Fagerholm P, Hamberg-Nyström H. Excimer PRK for myopia (letter). Ophthalmology 1993; 100:1605-1606
32. Hanna KD, Pouliquen Y, Waring GO III, et al. Corneal stromal wound healing in rabbits after 193-nm excimer laser surface ablation. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107:895-901
33. Pop M, Aras M. Multizone/multipass photorefractive keratectomy: six month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995; 21:633-643
34. Seiler T. Gegenwärtige Einschätzung der Myopiekorrektur mit dem Excimerlaser. Ophthalmologe 1995; 92:379-384
35. Hamberg-Nyström H, Rol P, Fagerholm P. How important are autonomous head and eye movements in achieving a smooth corneal surface after photorefractive keratectomy? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39(4):70
36. Fantes FE, Waring GO III. Effect of excimer laser radiant exposure on uniformity of ablated corneal surface. Lasers Surg Med 1989; 9:533-542
37. Handwerker HO, Reeh PW. Pain and inflammation In: Bond MR, Charlton JE, Woolf CJ, eds, Proceedings of the VI World Congress on Pain. Amsterdam, Elsevier North Holland, 1991; 59-70
38. Campos M, Hertzog L, Garbus JJ, McDonnell PJ. Corneal sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 114:51-54
39. Phillips AF, Szerenyk K, Campos M, et al. Arachidonic acid metabolites after excimer laser corneal surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111:1273-1278
40. Tomas-Barberan S, Törngren L, Lundberg K, et al. Effect of diclofenac on prostaglandin liberation in the rabbit after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1997; 13:154-157
41. Tomas-Barberan S, Fagerholm P. Anterior chamber flare after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1996; 12:103-107
42. Sher NA, Frantz JM, Talley A, et al. Topical diclofenac in the treatment of ocular pain after excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Refract Corneal Surg 1993; 9:425-436
43. Tomas-Barberan S, Fagerholm P. Influence of topical treatment on epithelial wound healing and pain in the early postoperative period following photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77:135-138
44. Willis WE, Laibson PR. Corneal complications of topical anesthetic abuse. Can J Ophthalmol 1970; 5:239-243
45. Verma S, Corbett MC, Marshall J. A prospective randomized double-masked trial to evaluate the role of topical anesthetics in controlling pain after photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1995; 102:1918-1924
46. Dua HS, Gomes JAP, Singh A. Corneal epithelial wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78:401-408
47. Crosson CE, Klyce SD, Beuerman RW. Epithelial wound closure in the rabbit cornea; a biphasic process. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27:464-473
48. Gipson IK, Anderson RA. Actin filaments in normal and migrating corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16:161-166
49. Fujikawa LS, Foster CS, Harrist TJ, et al. Fibronectin in healing rabbit corneal wounds. Lab Invest 1981; 45:120-129
50. Gipson IK, Kiorpes TC. Epithelial sheet movement: protein and glycoprotein synthesis. Dev Biol 1982; 92:259-262
51. Arffa RC. Grayson's Diseases of the Cornea, 3rd ed. St Louis, MO, Mosby, 1991; 1
52. Tervo K, van Setten GB, Beuerman RW, et al. Expression of tenascin and cellular fibronectin in the rabbit cornea after anterior keratectomy; immunohistochemical study of wound healing dynamics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32:2912-2918
53. Latvala T, Tervo K, Tervo T. Reassembly of the α6
integrin and laminin in rabbit corneal basement membrane after excimer laser surgery: a 12-month follow-up. CLAO J 1995; 21:125-129
54. Grant MB, Khaw PT, Schultz GS, et al. Effects of epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor and transforming growth factor-β on corneal cell chemotaxis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33:3292-3301
55. Kruse FE, Tseng SCF. Transformierender Wachstumsfaktor beta 1 und 2 hemmen die Proliferation von Limbus - und Hornhautepithel. Ophthalmologe 1994; 91:617-623
56. Schultz G, Chegini NS, Grant M, et al. Effects of growth factors on corneal wound healing. Acta Ophthalmol 1992; 202(suppl):60-66
57. Wang X, Kamiyama K, Iguchi I, et al. Enhancement of fibronectin-induced migration of corneal epithelial cells by cytokines. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35:4001-4007
58. Tervo T, Vesaluoma M, Bennett GL, et al. Tear hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) availability increases markedly after excimer laser surface ablation. Exp Eye Res 1997; 64:501-504
59. Wilson SE, He Y-G, Weng J, et al. Effect of epidermal growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, and keratinocyte growth factor on proliferation, motility, and differentiation of human corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res 1994; 59:665-678
60. Li Q, Weng J, Mohan RR, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor receptor in the lacrimal gland, tears, and cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37:727-739
61. Li D-Q, Tseng SCG. Differential regulation of cytokine and receptor transcript expression in human corneal and limbal fibroblasts by epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-α, platelet-derived growth factor B, and interleukin-1β. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37:2068-2080
62. Vesaluoma M, Teppo A-M, Grönhagen-Riska C, Tervo T. Platelet derived growth factor-BB in tear fluid: a potential modulator of corneal wound healing following photorefractive keratectomy. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16:825-831
63. Blatti SP, Foster DN, Ranganathan G, et al. Induction of fibronectin gene transcription and in mRNA is a primary response to growth-factor stimulation of AKR-2B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:1119-1123
64. Chua CC, Geiman DE, Keller GH, Ladda RL. Induction of collagenase secretion in human fibroblast cultures by growth promoting factors. J Biol Chem 1985; 260:5213-5216
65. Deuel TF, Senior RM, Huang JS, Griffin GL. Chemotaxis of monocytes and neutrophils to platelet-derived growth factor. J Clin Invest 1982; 69:1046-1049
66. Ming WJ, Bersani L, Mantovani A. Tumor necrosis factor is chemotactic for monocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Immunol 1987; 138:1469-1474
67. Wahl SM. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) in inflammation: a cause and a cure. J Clin Immunol 1992; 12:61-74
68. Cubitt CL, Lausch RN, Oakes JE. Differential regulation of granulocyte-macrophage colony—stimulating factor gene expression in human corneal cells by pro inflammatory cytokines. J Immunol 1994; 153:232-240
69. Cubitt CL, Tang Q, Monteiro CA, et al. IL-8 gene expression in cultures of human corneal epithelial cells and keratocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34:3199-3206
70. van Setten GB, Viinikka L, Tervo T, et al. Epidermal growth factor is a constant component of normal human tear fluid. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1989; 227:184-187
71. Ohashi Y, Motokura M, Kinoshita Y, et al. Presence of epidermal growth factor in human tears. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30:1879-1882
72. van Setten GB. Epidermal growth factor in human tear fluid: increased release but decreased concentrations during reflex tearing. Curr Eye Res 1990; 9:79-83
73. van Setten GB, Tervo T, Viinikka L, et al. Ocular disease leads to decreased concentrations of epidermal growth factor in the tear fluid. Curr Eye Res 1991; 10:523-527
74. Lohmann C, Hoffman E, Reischl U. Epidermaler Wachstumsfaktor (EGF) in der Tränenflüssigkeit bei der Excimerlaser-PRK. Verantwortlich für postoperative Refraktion und “Haze”? Ophthalmologe 1998; 95:80-87
75. Steinemann TL, Thompson HW, Maroney KM, et al. Changes in epithelial epidermal growth factor receptor and lacrimal gland EGF concentration after corneal wounding. ARVO abstract 267. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31:55
76. Knorr M, Schüller S, Steuhl K-P, Thiel H-J. EFG in der Therapic von Hornhauterkrankungen; Grundlagen und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Ophthalmologe 1992; 89:119-127
77. Schultz G, Rotatori DS, Clark W. EFG and TGF-α in wound healing and repair. J Cell Biochem 1991; 45:346-352
78. Schultz G, Khaw PT, Oxford K, et al. Growth factors and ocular wound healing. Eye 1994; 8:184-187
79. Aaronson SA, Bottaro DP, Miki T, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor; a fibroblast growth factor family member with unusual target cell specificity. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991; 638:62-77
80. Sotozono C, Kinoshita S, Kita M, Imanishi J. Paracrine role of keratinocyte growth factor in rabbit corneal epithelial cell growth. Exp Eye Res 1994; 59:385-391
81. Malecaze F, Simorre V, Chollet P, et al. Interleukin-6 in tear fluid after photorefractive keratectomy and its effects on keratocytes in culture. Cornea 1997; 16:580-587
82. Dua HS, Forrester JV. The corneoscleral limbus in human corneal epithelial wound healing. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 110:645-656
83. Gauthier CA, Holden BA, Epstein D, et al. Factors affecting epithelial hyperplasia after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23:1042-1050
84. Soong HK. Vinculin in focal cell-to-substrate attachments of spreading corneal epithelial cells. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105:1129-1132
85. Lauweryns B, van den Oord JJ, Volpes R, et al. Distribution of very late activation integrins in the human cornea; an immunohistochemical study using monoclonal antibodies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32:2079-2085
86. Kau WW, Kao CW, Kaufman AH, et al. Healing of corneal epithelial defects in plasminogen-and fibrinogen-deficient mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39:502-508
87. Erickson HP, Bourdon MA. Tenascin: an extracellular matrix protein prominent in specialized embryonic tissue and tumors. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1989; 5:71-92
88. Latvala T, Tervo K, Mustonen R, Tervo T. Expression of cellular fibronectin and tenascin in the rabbit cornea after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: a 12 month study. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79:65-69
89. Khodadoust AA, Silverstein AM, Kenyon DR, Dowling JE. Adhesion of regenerating corneal epithelium; the role of the basement membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 1968; 65:339-348
90. Fountain TR, de la Cruz Z, Green WR, et al. Reassembly of corneal epithelial adhesion structures after excimer laser keratectomy in humans. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112:967-972
91. Vita RC, Campos M, Belfort R Jr, Paiva ER. Alterations in blood-aqueous barrier after corneal refractive surgery. Cornea 1998; 17:158-162
92. Osborn L. Leukocyte adhesion to the endothelium in inflammation. Cell 1990; 62:3-6
93. Springer TA. Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell 1994; 76:301-314
94. Gan L, Fagerholm P, Kim J-H. Effect of leukocytes on corneal cellular proliferation and wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40:578-581
95. O'Brien TP, Li Q, Ashraf MF, et al. Inflammatory response in the early stages of wound healing after excimer laser keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116:1470-1474
96. Nakayasu K. Stromal changes following removal of epithelium in rat cornea. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1988; 32:113-125
97. Crosson CE. Cellular changes following epithelial abrasion. In: Beuerman RW, Crosson CE, Kaufman HE, eds, Healing Processes in the Cornea. Houston, TX, Gulf Publishing, 1989; 3-14
98. Campos M, Szerenyi K, Lee M, et al. Keratocyte loss after corneal deepithelialization in primates and rabbits. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112:254-260
99. Wilson SE, He Y-G, Weng J, et al. Epithelial injury induces keratocyte apoptosis: hypothesized role for the interleukin-1 system in the modulation of corneal tissue organization and wound healing. Exp Eye Res 1996; 62:325-337
100. Wilson SE, Li Q, Weng J, et al. The Fas-Fas ligand system and other modulators of apoptosis in the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37:1582-1592
101. Kim WJ, Shah S, Wilson SE. Differences in keratocyte apoptosis following transepithelial and laser-scrape photorefractive keratectomy in rabbits. J Refract Surg 1998; 14:526-533
102. Møller-Pedersen T, Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM, Jester JV. Corneal haze development after PRK is regulated by volume of stromal tissue removal. Cornea 1998; 17:627-639
103. Matsuda H, Smelser GK. Electron microscopy of corneal wound healing. Exp Eye Res 1973; 16:427-442
104. Hanna KD, Pouliquen YM, Waring GO III, et al. Corneal wound healing in monkeys after repeated excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110:1286-1291
105. Del Pero RAH, Gigstad JE, Roberts AD, et al. A refractive and histopathologic study of excimer laser keratectomy in primates. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 109:419-429
106. Helena MC, Baerveldt F, Kim WJ, Wilson SE. Keratocyte apoptosis after corneal surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39:276-283
107. Helena MC, Filatov VV, Johnston WT, et al. Effects of 50% ethanol and mechanical epithelial debridement on corneal structure before and after excimer photorefractive keratectomy. Cornea 1997; 16:571-579
108. Abad JC, An B, Power WJ, et al. A prospective evaluation of alcohol-assisted versus mechanical epithelial removal before photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1997; 104:1566-1574; discussion by JJ Salz, 1574-1575
109. Griffith M, Jackson WB, Lafontaine MD, et al. Evaluation of current techniques of corneal epithelial removal in hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24:1070-1078
110. Kitazawa Y, Tokoro T, Ito S, Ishii Y. The efficacy of cooling on excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy in the rabbit eye. Surv Ophthalmol 1997; 42(suppl 1):S82-S88
111. Amoils SP. Using a Nidek excimer laser with a rotary epithelial brush and corneal chilling: clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25:1321-1326
112. Gauthier CA, Epstein D, Holden BA, et al. Epithelial alterations following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg 1995; 11:113-118
113. Kim WJ, Chung ES, Lee JH. Effect of optic zone size on the outcome of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996; 22:1434-1438
114. Weber B, Fagerholm P, Johansson B. Colocalization of hyaluronan and water in rabbit corneas after photorefractive keratectomy by specific staining for hyaluronan and by quantitative microradiography. Cornea 1997; 16:560-563
115. Fitzsimmons T, Fagerholm P, Härfstrand A, Schenholm M. Hyaluronic acid in the rabbit cornea after excimer laser superficial keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33:3011-3016
116. Weber B, Fagerholm P. Presence and distribution of hyaluronan in human corneas after phototherapeutic keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76:146-148
117. Weber BA, Fagerholm P. The fate of irregularities in the corneal stroma after excimer laser ablation. ARVO abstract 2328. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38:S505
118. Marshall GE, Konstas AG, Lee WR. Immunogold fine structural localization of extracellular matrix components in aged human cornea. I. Types I-IV collagen and laminin. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1991; 229:157-163
119. Marshall GE, Konstas AG, Lee WR. Immunogold fine structural localization of extracellular matrix components in aged human cornea. II. Collagen types V and VI. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1991; 229:164-171
120. Hassell JR, Schrecengost PK, Rada JA, et al. Biosynthesis of stromal matrix proteoglycans and basement membrane components by human corneal fibroblasts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33:547-557
121. Weber BA, Fagerholm PP. Plano and refractive keratectomy. Comparison of the wound healing response. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76:537-540
122. Jester JV, Petroll WM, Barry PA, Cavanagh HD. Expression of α-smooth muscle (α-SM) actin during corneal stromal wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36:809-819
123. Mishima H, Hibino T, Hara H, et al. SPARC from corneal epithelial cells modulates collagen contraction by keratocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39:2547-2553
124. Latvala T, Puolakkainen P, Vesaluoma M, Tervo T. Distribution of SPARC protein (osteonectin) in normal and wounded feline cornea. Exp Eye Res 1996; 63:579-584
125. Jester JV, Petroll WM, Barry PA, et al. Inhibition of corneal fibrosis by topical application of blocking antibodies to TGF-β in the rabbit LK model. ARVO abstract 3972. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36:S867
126. Jester JV, Barry-Lane PA, Petroll WM, et al. Inhibition of corneal fibrosis by topical application of blocking antibodies to TGF−β in the rabbit. Cornea 1997; 16:177-187
127. Sutton G, Patmore AL, Joussen AM, Marshall J. Mannose 6-phosphate reduces haze following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 1996; 7:117-119
128. Cintron C, Hassinger LC, Kublin CL, Cannon DJ. Biochemical and ultrastructural changes in collagen during corneal wound healing. J Ultrastruct Res 1978; 65:13-22
129. Tomas-Barberan S, Schultz GS, Tarnuzzer RW, Fagerholm P. Messenger RNA levels for genes involved in extracellular matrix from human corneal scrapings before and after photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76:568-572
130. Azar DT, Hahn TW, Jain S, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases are expressed during wound healing after excimer laser keratectomy. Cornea 1996; 15:18-24
131. Azar DT, Pluznik D, Jain S, Khoury JM. Gelatinase B and A expression after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116:1206-1208
132. Ye HQ, Azar DT. Expression of gelatinases A and B, and TIMPs 1 and 2 during corneal wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39:913-921
133. Chang JH, Kook MC, Lee JH, et al. Effects of synthetic inhibitor of metalloproteinase and cyclosporin A on corneal haze after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy in rabbits. Exp Eye Res 1998; 66:389-396
134. Campos M, Abed HM, McDonnell PJ. Topical fluorometholone reduces stromal inflammation after photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmic Surg 1993; 24:654-657
135. Tuft SJ, Zabel RW, Marshall J. Corneal repair following keratectomy in the rabbit; a comparison between conventional surgery and laser photoablation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30:1769-1777
136. Talamo JH, Gollamudi S, Green WR, et al. Modulation of corneal wound healing after excimer laser keratomileusis using topical mitomycin C and steroids. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109:1141-1146
137. You X, Bergmanson JP, Zheng X-M, et al. Effects of corticosteroids on rabbits corneal keratocytes after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1995; 11:460-467
138. Baek SH, Chang JH, Choi SY, et al. The effect of topical corticosteroids on refractive outcome and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1997; 13:644-652
139. Linna T, Tervo T. Real-time confocal microscopic observations on human corneal nerves and wound healing after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16:640-649
140. Tervo K, Latvala TM, Tervo TM. Recovery of corneal innervation following photorefractive keratoablation. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112:1466-1470
141. Kohlhaas M, Klemm M, Böhm A, et al. Corneal sensitivity after refractive surgery. Eur J Implant Refract Surg 1994; 6:319-323
142. Ishikawa T, Park SB, Cox C, et al. Corneal sensation following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy in humans. J Refract Corneal Surg 1994; 10:417-422
143. Trabucchi G, Brancato R, Verdi M, et al. Corneal nerve damage and regeneration after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy in rabbit eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35:229-235
144. Latvala T, Baraguer-Coll C, Tervo K, Tervo T. Corneal wound healing and nerve morphology after excimer laser in situ keratomileusis in human eyes. J Refract Surg 1996; 12:677-683
145. Tervo TM, Mertaniemi P, Ylätupas S, et al. Release of calcitonin gene-related peptide in tears after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1995; 11:126-128
146. Mertaniemi P, Ylätupa S, Partanen P, Tervo T. Increased release of immunoreactive calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in tears after excimer laser keratectomy. Exp Eye Res 1995; 60:659-665
147. Fitzsimmons TD, Fagerholm P, Tengroth B. Steroid treatment of myopic regression: acute refractive and topographic changes in excimer photorefractive keratectomy patients. Cornea 1993; 12:358-361
148. Corbett MC, Marshall J. Corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy; a review of etiological mechanisms and treatment opinions. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 1996; 7:173-176
149. Corbett MC, Prydal JI, Verma S, et al. An in vivo investigation of the structures responsible for corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy and their effect on visual function. Ophthalmology 1996; 103:1366-1380
150. Lohmann CP, MacRobert I, Patmore A, et al. A histopathological study of photorefractive keratectomy. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 1994; 6:149-158
151. Fagerholm P, Hamberg-Nyström H, Tengroth B. Wound healing and myopic regression following photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol 1994; 72:229-234
152. Malley DS, Steinert RF, Puliafito CA, Dobi ET. Immunofluorescense study of corneal wound healing after excimer laser anterior keratectomy in the monkey eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108:1316-1322
153. Møller-Pedersen T, Li HF, Petroll WM, et al. Confocal microscopic characterization of wound repair after photorefractive keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39:487-501
154. Böhnke M, Schipper I, Thaer A. Konfokale Mikroskopie du Hornhaut nach PRK mit dem Excimer-Laser. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1997; 211:159-167
155. Andresen JL, Ledet T, Ehlers N. Keratocyte migration and peptide growth factors: the effect of PDGF, β FGF, EGE, IGF-J, αFGE and TGF-β on human keratocyte migration in a collagen gel. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16:605-613
156. Andresen JL, Ehlers N. Chemotaxis of human keratocytes is increased by platelet-derived growth factor-BB, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-α, acidic fibroblast growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-I, and transforming growth factor−β. Curr Eye Res 1998; 17:79-87
157. Adelmann-Grill BC, Hein R, Wach F, Krirg T. Inhibition of fibroblast chemotaxis by recombinant human interferon gamma and interferon alpha. J Cell Physiol 1987; 130:270-275
158. Duncan MR, Berman B. Gamma interferon is the lymphokine and beta interferon the monokine responsible for the inhibition of fibroblast collagen production and late but not early fibroblast proliferation. J Exp Med 1985; 162:516-527
159. Duncan MR, Berman B. Short-term keloid treatment in vivo with human interferon α−2B results in a selective and persistent normalization of keloidal fibroblast collagen, glycosaminoglycan, and collagenase production in vitro. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21:694-702
160. Latina MA, Belmonte SJ, Park C, Crean E. Gamma-interferon effects on human fibroblasts from Tenon's capsule. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32:2806-2815
161. Morlet N, Gillies MC, Crouch R, Maloof A. Effect of topical interferon-alpha 2b on corneal haze after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy in rabbits. Refract Corneal Surg 1993; 9:443-451
162. Schipper I, Suppelt C, Gebbers JO. Mitomycin C reduces scar formation after excimer laser (193 nm) photorefractive keratectomy in rabbits. Eye 1997; 11:649-655
163. Rieck P, David T, Hartmann C, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor modulates corneal wound healing after excimer laser keratomileusis in rabbits. Ger J Ophthalmol 1994; 3:105-111
164. Jain S, Hahn TW, McCally RL, Azar DT. Antioxidants reduce corneal light scattering after excimer keratectomy in rabbits. Lasers Surg Med 1995; 17:160-165