To assess the cost-effectiveness of 3 models of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) compared with standard care in survivors of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within the public health system in Chile.
A Markov model was designed using 5 health states: ACS survivor, second ACS, complications, general mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. The transition probabilities between health states for standard care and corresponding relative risk for CR were calculated from a systematic review. Health benefits were measured with the EuroQol 5-dimensional 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) survey. Costs for each health state were quantified using the national cost verification study. The CR cost was estimated with a microcosting methodology. The time horizon was a lifetime and the discount rate was 3% per year for costs and benefits. Deterministic and probabilistic analyses were performed. Structural uncertainty was managed by designing 3 scenarios: CR as currently delivered in a specific Chilean public health center, CR as recommended by South American guidelines, and CR as proposed for low-resource settings.
Cardiac rehabilitation versus standard care showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the standard model of $722, for the South American model of $1247, and for the low-resource model of $666. The tornado diagram showed higher uncertainty in relative risk for the complications state and for the second ACS state.
Considering a cost-effectiveness threshold of 1 unit of gross domestic product per capita (∼$19 000), CR is highly cost-effective for the public health system in Chile.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation, a Markov model was developed using 5 health states and 3 models. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were as follows: $722 for the standard model, $1247 for the South American model, and $666 for the low-resource model, making cardiac rehabilitation a highly cost-effective alternative for the Chilean public health system.
Departamento de Medicina Interna—Centro de Excelencia CIGES, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile (Drs Seron and Lanas and Ms Velásquez); Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile (Mss Gaete and Oliveros); Complejo Hospitalario San José, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile (Ms Román); Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Empresariales, Centro de Excelencia CIGES, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile (Dr Reveco); Departamento de Salud Pública, Centro de Excelencia CIGES, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile (Mr Bustos); and Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile (Mr Rojas).
Correspondence: Pamela Seron, PhD, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Centro de Excelencia CIGES, Universidad de La Frontera, Claro Solar 115, Of 304, Temuco, Chile (email@example.com).
This study was funded by Fondo Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo en Salud FONIS—Chile (grant SA14ID0005).
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.jcrpjournal.com).