A Randomized Study Examining the Effects of Mild-to-Moderate Group Exercises on Cardiovascular, Physical, and Psychological Well-being in Patients With Heart Failure : Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Heart Failure

A Randomized Study Examining the Effects of Mild-to-Moderate Group Exercises on Cardiovascular, Physical, and Psychological Well-being in Patients With Heart Failure

Redwine, Laura S. PhD; Wilson, Kathleen MS; Pung, Meredith A. PhD; Chinh, Kelly BS; Rutledge, Thomas PhD; Mills, Paul J. PhD; Smith, Barbara PhD, RN, FACSM, FAAN

Author Information
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention: November 2019 - Volume 39 - Issue 6 - p 403-408
doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000430

Heart failure (HF) is a worldwide public health problem associated with considerable morbidity, mortality, and diminished quality of life.1 Although medications can improve some symptoms, individuals with HF with either preserved or reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF, HFrEF) continue to experience debilitating symptoms, including exercise intolerance. In addition to physical symptoms, depressive symptoms are present in up to 30% of HF patients2,3 and are associated with increased mortality, clinical events, hospitalization, and general health care use.4 Yet, the efficacy of antidepressant therapy in patients with coronary heart disease has been limited.5 The goal of exercise interventions in this chronic disease group is primarily to improve symptoms and the quality and duration of life.6 Research literature suggests that vigorous exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness7 and can produce substantial reductions in depression symptoms in patients with HF.8–10 However, many exercise intervention studies consist of participants who are younger than the typical HF patient, with little comorbidity. The HF-ACTION study included participants with a median age of 59 yr (range: 51-67 yr) and excluded patients with major comorbidities or limitations that could interfere with exercise training and/or with devices that limited the ability to achieve target heart rates.11 Meanwhile, >80% of HF patients are >65 yr and approximately 50% are >80 yr.12 Many patients with HF have limited capacity for vigorous exercise due to comorbidities such as sarcopenia,13 anemia,14 obesity, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral artery disease, and advanced age.15,16

In contrast to conventional exercise, tai chi (TC) is composed of low-impact, mindfully meditative movements with integrated breathing techniques that generate a mild-to-moderate workout.17 Many TC interventions have been studied specifically in elderly and frail cohorts and are well tolerated across fitness levels.18 Research suggests that practicing TC is effective for reducing depression symptoms in a broad range of patients with HF, as compared with treatment as usual (TAU).17,19 Meanwhile, resistance exercise is effective for increasing muscle strength, endurance, and physical function (6-min walk test [6MWT]), and promoting favorable arterial remodeling.20 However, there are few if any studies that have examined resistance exercise for effects on depression symptoms in patients with HF.

Moreover, few studies have investigated whether TC differs from more conventional exercises for reducing depression symptoms, particularly in patients with HF. A small study (n = 16) examined effects of TC versus aerobic exercise in patients with HF and HFpEF, finding that TC was more effective in reducing depression symptoms.21

The overall goal of this investigation was to compare TC, resistance band (RB) exercise, and TAU for changes in physical, cardiac, and psychological function. Associated with the primary aims of our investigation, we hypothesized that mild-to-moderate exercise practices including TC and RB would be more effective in improving physical and cardiac function than TAU but would not differ from each other. Associated with our secondary aim, we hypothesized that TC would be more effective than RB and TAU for reducing depressive symptoms.

METHODS

This study was approved by the VA San Diego Healthcare System and University of California at San Diego Institutional Review Boards, and informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. All procedures performed were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Patients were recruited from VA San Diego Healthcare System and University of California at San Diego Healthcare System (between 2010 and 2015). At baseline and immediately after the 16-wk intervention, physical and cardiac function and depression symptoms were measured. This was a randomized trial and the study coordinator determined group allocation using computer-generated randomization algorithms and was responsible for all patient correspondence such as group assignment and testing appointments. Recruitment and assessment personnel were naïve to participant group assignment. Our original study protocol compared TC with health education. However, in response to National Institutes of Health grant reviewers' suggestions and discussions with the National Institutes of Health granting agency, the health education group was replaced with another mild exercise intervention to examine whether TC practice went beyond conventional exercise for outcomes, including depression symptoms. We also included a TAU control group in the study design as a comparator of the typical disease course in the absence of these interventions.

PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion criteria were diagnosis with American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Classification Stage C symptomatic HF (both HFpEF and HFrEF) for ≥3 mo, clinically stable (not having been hospitalized for a 3-mo period), on stable doses of neurohormonal blocking agents and diuretics for ≥3 mo, no cardiac surgical procedures for ≥6 mo, not in an exercise program, and ≥40 yr of age. Exclusion criteria included presence of a psychiatric diagnosis other than major depression including psychosis, bipolar disorder, and practicing TC within the previous year.

ASSESSMENTS

The following assessments were administered pre- and post-intervention period. A 6MWT test was used to assess physical functional capacity. It is a reliable and reproducible method to assess the severity of HF in patients, having high predictive value.22 Patients were instructed to walk as far as possible within 6 min in a straight corridor. The task was performed in a 25-ft walkway, blocked off from foot traffic. This method has been regularly used by our group for similar studies.17,23 Research assistants blinded to participant group assignment remained at one end of the hall recording the distance. Standardized encouragement was given at 3 min into the task, that is, “you are doing good”; “you have 3 more minutes left.” Echocardiography was performed by blinded assessors at University of California at San Diego Medical Center. All pre- and post-intervention echocardiograms were quantitatively analyzed by the same physician, who was also blinded to group allocation. Briefly, pulsed Doppler spectral recordings were obtained from 4 × 4-mm sample volume placed at the tips of the mitral leaflets and in the pulmonary vein and that were adjusted to yield the maximal amplitude velocity signals. Images were digitized to obtain endocardial contours and left ventricular (LV) cavity areas at end systole from the apical 4- and 2-chamber views. This method has been shown to be a reliable method of assessing LV function and predicting mortality in patients with HF.24 Ejection fractions were derived from biplane apical (2- and 4-chamber) views with use of modified Simpson's rule algorithm.25 Depression symptoms were assessed with the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-1A (BDI), which is recommended for measurement of depression in patients with cardiovascular disease, with reliability and capacity to discriminate between depressed and nondepressed participants with broad applicability for research and clinical practice.26 Cronbach α is 0.86 for the current study.

GROUP INTERVENTIONS

The intervention groups were Yang-style Tai Chi Chuan-Short Form (first third) and RB training (based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's “Move” program). Resistance band exercise was chosen as a comparison to TC due to the psychosocial and mild-to-moderate physical exertion–level similarities. Both exercises can be led by an experienced instructor, performed in a group, and provided at medical care or senior centers with minimal equipment and thus easily disseminated. Participants attended TC or RB training twice per week for 60 min/session for 16 wk. Tai chi and RB participants were asked to practice at home for 10-20 min/d on nonclass days. Descriptions of TC and RB class content are provided (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: https://links.lww.com/JCRP/A114). The TC instructor is a certified holistic health practitioner with >10 yr of experience teaching TC to chronically ill and older adults. The RB instructor has her master's degree in nutrition and taught physical fitness for 10 yr. Both groups were asked to exercise at a perceived exertion rating of “moderate difficult,” according to the Borg scale.27 Classes for the 2 groups were held on different days of the week at different locations within the University to avoid cross-contamination. Written materials were provided to support home practice for both groups. All participants continued to receive usual care, including regular visits to their cardiologists, primary care physicians, and other health specialists. Treatment as usual participants did not receive an active intervention.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Analyses were performed using SPSS version 24 (IBM Corp). Skewed data distribution was determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. All continuous variables approximated a normal distribution with skewness and kurtosis <1.0. Baseline differences between groups were examined using analysis of variance for continuously measured variables and χ2 statistics for noncontinuous variables. Mixed-effects models were used to analyze the efficacy of TC compared with RB exercises and TAU over 16 wk of treatment.28 The analysis for each outcome consisted of a model that included treatment, time, and treatment × time interaction as fixed effects with a heterogeneous covariance matrix. Post hoc analyses were performed to make specific group comparisons with repeated measures analysis of covariance using estimated mean imputation.

RESULTS

Of 135 individuals screened for eligibility (see Figure 1, flow diagram), 70 patients were enrolled into the study with a median age of 66 yr (range, 45-89 yr) and 89% were male. Beck Depression Inventory scores averaged 10 ± 7.3, suggesting that cohort scores were at the cutoff for clinically significant elevation of depression symptoms (≥10).29 Participants were assigned to TC (n = 25), RB training (n = 22), or TAU groups (n = 23) (Table).

F1
Figure 1.:
Participant flow diagram. HF indicates heart failure.
Table - Baseline Subject Characteristicsa
N Total 70 TC 25 RB 22 TAU 23 P Value
Age, yr 66 ± 10 63 ± 9 65 ± 9 67 ±7 .52
Sex, male 62 (89) 23 (92) 19 (86) 20 (87) .81
Race, white 48 (68) 17 (68) 18 (82) 12 (54) .29
LVEF 46 ± 14 44 ± 13 46 ± 14 46 ± 12 .85
HFpEF 30 (43) 11 (44) 10 (45) 8 (37) .79
BMI, kg/m2 32 ± 8 32 ± 8 33 ± 8 31 ± 6 .64
Marital, married 6 (30) 8 (32) 5 (23) 9 (29) .57
6MWT, ft 943 ± 336 938 ± 359 875 ± 407 1011 ± 336 .41
BDI 9 ± 7 10 ± 6 12 ± 8 8 ± 6 .17
Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Index; BMI, body mass index; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; RB, resistance band; 6MWT, 6-min walk test; TAU, treatment as usual; TC, tai chi.
aData are reported as mean ± SD or n (%). Independent t tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate group differences.

TREATMENT FIDELITY AND ADHERENCE

Of 70 participants enrolled, 16% dropped out (TC: n = 4; RB: n = 3; TAU: n = 4) and 59 participants completed the study (n = 21, 19, and 19, respectively). There were no group differences in dropout rates (P = .81). Tai chi participants attended a median of 87% of classes (28 sessions) and practiced a median of 74 min/wk. Whereas, the RB group attended a median of 81% of classes (26 classes) and practiced a median of 61 min/wk. There were no differences between the 2 active intervention groups for class attendance (P = .76) or practice time outside of class (P = .86). There were no differences in age, sex, % left ventricular ejection fraction (%LVEF), 6MWT, HFpEF or HFrEF subtypes, and BDI scores between those who dropped out from those who completed the study (P values >.10). There were no serious adverse events associated with the study.

PHYSICAL AND CARDIAC FUNCTION

Fixed effects group differences from pre- to post-intervention period were found with a mixed-models analysis, with 6MWT as the dependent variable (group × time interaction, F = 3.19, P = .03) (Figure 2). Estimated fixed effects revealed that TAU participants significantly declined in distance walked by 205 ft (95% confidence interval [CI], −35 to −374, P = .02) and the RB group with a slight increase of 70 ft (95% CI, 267 to −127, P = .48) and TC trending for a significant decrease of 162 ft (95% CI, 21 to −345, P = .08). Post hoc analyses revealed only RB and TAU group differences (η2 = 0.087, P = .05). There were no differences between RB and TC (η2 = 0.023, P = .33), or between TC and TAU (η2 = 0.009, P = .51). Also, there were no fixed effects group differences over time in cardiac function measured with end-systolic volume (P = .43) and %LVEF (P = .67).

F2
Figure 2.:
Changes in 6-min walk test (mean ± SE) from baseline to post-16-wk intervention period in patients with heart failure trained in tai chi (TC; circles), resistance bands (RB; diamonds) exercise, or treatment as usual (TAU; squares) controls.

DEPRESSION SYMPTOMS

There were fixed effects group differences over time for BDI scores (group × time interaction, F = 9.2, P < .01) (Figure 3). Estimated fixed effects revealed a decrease in BDI scores by TC (95% CI, 2-5, P < .01) and RB groups (95% CI, 1-5, P < .01) of 3.5 points, while the TAU group decreased by 1 point (95% CI, −1 to 3, P = .27). Post hoc analyses revealed that both TC (η2 = 0.096, P = .039) and RB (η2 = 0.11, P = .034) groups differed from TAU over time. There were no differences between TC and RB (η2 = 0.014, P = .45) groups.

F3
Figure 3.:
Changes in Beck Depression Inventory—IA scores (mean ± SE) from baseline to post-16-wk intervention period in patients with heart failure trained in tai chi (TC; circles), resistance band (RB; diamonds) exercise, or treatment as usual (TAU; squares).

DISCUSSION

The present investigation sought to compare TC, RB exercise, and TAU for changes in physical, cardiac, and psychological functions. Over the 16-wk study, attrition was 18%, which was slightly better than the 20% dropout rate that was predicted. There were no differences in dropout rates among the 3 groups and no differences between intervention groups in class attendance or practice times, with median class attendance >80%, and reported median practice times of >1 hr/wk. There were no serious adverse events associated with the study. The median age of the participants was 66 yr, an age group representative of most HF patients.

From our primary aims, we hypothesized that mild exercise practices including TC and RB would be more effective in improving physical and cardiac function than TAU but would not differ from each other. However, at the end of 16 wk, we failed to see improvements from baseline in physical function, measured with the 6MWT by any of the groups. Instead, we found that physical function did not decline in the TC and RB groups, and that RB and TAU differed significantly from each other over time. This may suggest that RB can hamper HF-related physical function decline. Our findings illustrate that the intensity and mode of exercise used in this study do not generate the level of effect on exercise capacity that has been seen in studies with higher-intensity aerobic exercise.30 Our findings correspond with Yeh et al,31 whose study included 100 patients with HF and found no significant differences in change in 6MWT distance when comparing TC with a health education control group. Also, our results corresponded with the literature in that RB had better outcomes on the 6MWT than TAU controls.32 Of note, the RB group had a lower functional capacity (6MWT) at baseline (albeit not significantly lower) than TAU and TC, and thus the magnitude of improvement by the RB group may have been influenced by a lower baseline state.

Our hypothesis that TC and RB would improve cardiac function compared with TAU was also not supported, since there were no changes in %LVEF and end-systolic volume in any of the groups over time. This agrees with the literature suggesting that more vigorous exercise interventions have a greater likelihood of improving cardiovascular function.7 Our physical and cardiac function findings should be replicated because of the small sample size but particularly regarding physical function that may be impacted by the older age of the participants and acute and chronic HF comorbidities (eg, claudication, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetic neuropathy) that can impact 6MWT results.

From our secondary aim, we hypothesized that TC would be more effective than RB and TAU for reducing depressive symptoms. This hypothesis was partially supported in that TC was superior to TAU for reducing depressive symptoms over time. This is consistent with our previously published work and findings from other investigators, observing that TC practice is associated with depression symptom reductions in patients with HF.17,33 However, RB was also superior to TAU and did not differ from TC in reducing depressive symptoms. The present investigation extends prior research by including RB as a conventional exercise condition and suggests that various mild-to-moderate exercises can reduce symptoms of depression in patients with HF. These findings may be clinically relevant since elevated depression symptoms in cardiovascular diseases such as HF are related to greater risk of cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality.34–36 More study is needed to determine the influence of exercising in groups on depression, since both interventions were group based.

A main limitation of the study includes a modest sample size resulting in limited statistical power. This precluded the inclusion of important covariates that may also influence physical and cardiac function and depression symptoms and ultimately lessens the certainty of the findings presented. Also, because of the small sample size, we could not adequately address differences between HFpEF and HFrEF. However, both groups are known to experience reduced physical function37 and depression.38 Therefore, the findings relating to physical function and depression are likely relevant to both groups. Other limitations include lack of measures for range of motion and exercise progression. Also, we had a small number of women in our study, since most patients were recruited from the Veterans hospital. In addition, it is unclear from patient records specifically how many were taking antidepressants.

CONCLUSION

In sum, this study found that 2 different types of mild-to-moderate exercise training were associated with reduced depression symptoms and a potential reduction of functional decline. Importantly, patients were willing to come into a facility for group exercise when specifically recruited from cardiac clinics. Future research is needed to replicate and expand upon our findings to more fully understand the mechanisms by which mild-to-moderate exercise may reduce functional decline and depression symptoms.

REFERENCES

1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Card Fail. 2017:23(8):628–651.
2. Jiang W, Kuchibhatla M, Clary GL, et al. Relationship between depressive symptoms and long-term mortality in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2007;154(1):102–108.
3. Friedmann E, Thomas SA, Liu F, Morton PG, Chapa D, Gottlieb SS. Relationship of depression, anxiety, and social isolation to chronic heart failure outpatient mortality. Am Heart J. 2006;152(5):940.e941–e948.
4. Sherwood A, Blumenthal JA, Trivedi R, et al. Relationship of depression to death or hospitalization in patients with heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(4):367–373.
5. Thombs BD, de Jonge P, Coyne JC, et al. Depression screening and patient outcomes in cardiovascular care: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008;300(18):2161–2171.
6. Bloom MW, Greenberg B, Jaarsma T, et al. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17058.
7. Ismail H, McFarlane JR, Nojoumian AH, Dieberg G, Smart NA. Clinical outcomes and cardiovascular responses to different exercise training intensities in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1(6):514–522.
8. Tu RH, Zeng ZY, Zhong GQ, et al. Effects of exercise training on depression in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):749–757.
9. Haykowsky MJ, Liang Y, Pechter D, Jones LW, McAlister FA, Clark AM. A meta-analysis of the effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients: the benefit depends on the type of training performed. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(24):2329–2336.
10. Blumenthal JA, Babyak MA, O'Connor C, et al. Effects of exercise training on depressive symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure: the HF-ACTION randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;308(5):465–474.
11. O'Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Lee KL, et al. Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301(14):1439–1450.
12. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett JC Jr, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Rodeheffer RJ. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA. 2003;289(2):194–202.
13. Bekfani T, Pellicori P, Morris DA, et al. Sarcopenia in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Impact on muscle strength, exercise capacity and quality of life. Int J Cardiol. 2016;222:41–46.
14. Ebner N, Jankowska EA, Ponikowski P, et al. The impact of iron deficiency and anaemia on exercise capacity and outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. Results from the Studies Investigating Co-morbidities Aggravating Heart Failure. Int J Cardiol. 2016;205:6–12.
15. Jolly K, Taylor R, Lip G, et al. The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM). Home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: cost-effectiveness and patient adherence. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(35):1–118.
16. Stahrenberg R, Duvinage A, Mende M, et al. Determinants of submaximal exercise capacity in patients at risk for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction-results from the DIAST-CHF study. ESC Heart Fail. 2015;2(2):76–84.
17. Redwine LS, Tsuang M, Rusiewicz A, et al. A pilot study exploring the effects of a 12-week t'ai chi intervention on somatic symptoms of depression in patients with heart failure. J Altern Complement Med. 2012;18(8):744–748.
18. Wang C, Collet JP, Lau J. The effect of Tai Chi on health outcomes in patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(5):493–501.
19. Barrow D, Bedford A, Ives G, O'Toole L, Channer K. An evaluation of the effects of Tai Chi Chuan and Chi Kung training in patients with symptomatic heart failure: a randomised controlled pilot study. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(985):717–721.
20. Mandic S, Myers J, Selig SE, Levinger I. Resistance versus aerobic exercise training in chronic heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2012;9(1):57–64.
21. Yeh GY, Wood MJ, Wayne PM, et al. Tai chi in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Congest Heart Fail. 2013;19(2):77–84.
22. Lipkin D, Scriven AJ, Crake T, Poole-Wilson PA. Six minute walking test for assessing exercise capacity in chronic heart failure. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6521):653–655.
23. Mills PJ, Dimsdale JE, Natarajan L, Ziegler MG, Maisel A, Greenberg BH. Sleep and health-related quality of life in heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2009;15(5):228–233.
24. Feigenbaum H. Three-dimensional ultrasonic imaging of blood flow. Eur Heart J. 1999;20(8):551–552.
25. Schiller N, Acquatella H, Ports TA, et al. Left ventricular volume from paired biplane two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1979;60(3):547–555.
26. Wang YP, Gorenstein C. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2013;35(4):416–431.
27. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377–381.
28. Gueorguieva R, Krystal JH. Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(3):310–317.
29. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996;67(3):588–597.
30. Davies EJ, Moxham T, Rees K, et al. Exercise based rehabilitation for heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(4):Cd003331.
31. Yeh GY, McCarthy EP, Wayne PM, et al. Tai chi exercise in patients with chronic heart failure: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(8):750–757.
32. Jewiss D, Ostman C, Smart NA. The effect of resistance training on clinical outcomes in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:674–681.
33. Yeh G, Wood MJ, Lorell BH, et al. Effects of tai chi mind-body movement therapy on functional status and exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med Sci. 2004;117(8):541–548.
34. Rutledge T, Reis VA, Linke SE, Greenberg BH, Mills PJ. Depression in heart failure a meta-analytic review of prevalence, intervention effects, and associations with clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(8):1527–1537.
35. Johnson TJ, Basu S, Pisani BA, et al. Depression predicts repeated heart failure hospitalizations. J Card Fail. 2012;18(3):246–252.
36. Kato N, Kinugawa K, Shiga T, et al. Depressive symptoms are common and associated with adverse clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. J Cardiol. 2012;60(1):23–30.
37. Dhakal BP, Malhotra R, Murphy RM, et al. Mechanisms of exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the role of abnormal peripheral oxygen extraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(2):286–294.
38. Hamo CE, Heitner JF, Pfeffer MA, et al. Baseline distribution of participants with depression and impaired quality of life in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(2):268–277.
Keywords:

depression; exercise; heart failure

Supplemental Digital Content

© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.