Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Acute Hemorrhagic Apoplectic Pituitary Adenoma: Endoscopic Management, Surgical Outcomes, and Complications

Zhan, Rucai MD, PhD*,†; Zhao, Yanxin MD, PhD; Wiebe, Timothy M. MD§; Li, Xingang MD, PhD*

doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002026
Brief Clinical Studies
Open

Objective: To assess safety and effectiveness of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) for acute hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary adenoma.

Methods: Eighty nine patients with hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary tumor undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery were included into a retrospective chart of this study. Charts were reviewed for patient age, sex, presentation, lesion size, surgical procedure, extent of resection, clinical outcome, and surgical complications.

Results: Seventy eight (87.7%) patients achieved total resection, 9 (10.1%) had subtotal resection, and 2 (2.2%) patients had partial resection; no patient experienced insufficient resection. After surgery, 65 (90.3%) of 72 patients who had visual acuity deterioration preoperatively normalized and improved significantly; the rate for remission of visual field was 87.7%. All other acute symptoms, such as severe headache, nausea, vomiting, alteration of mental status, and loss of consciousness, vanished postoperatively. Twenty eight (90.4%) of 31 patients with active secreting adenoma had hormonal remission based on endocrinological evaluation. Three (3.4%) patients incurred CSF leakage which was managed with lumbar drainage. Nine (10.1%) patients incurred transient DI postoperatively, and 2 (2.2%) of them developed permanent DI. Seven (7.9%) patients developed hypopituitarism which was treated with replacement therapy of hormone. One (1.1%) experienced craniotomy for intracranial hemorrhage and died from severe surgical complications postoperatively. There were no patients of meningitis or carotid artery injury.

Conclusion: Early detection and emergent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery provided a safe and effective surgical option for hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary tumor with a low morbidity and mortality.

*Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Brain Science Research Institute, Shandong University

Department of Neurosurgery, The Third People's Hospital of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong, China

Department of Neurology, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China

§Private Practice, Bakersfield, CA.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Xingang Li, MD, PhD, 107 Wenhua Xilu Rd, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China; E-mail: lixg@sdu.edu.cn

Received 18 May, 2014

Accepted 28 June, 2015

Dr R.Z. and Dr Y.Z. contributed equally to this paper and shared first authorship.

Financial support: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) (No. 81172404) Special Foundation for Taishan Scholars (No. ts20110814).

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Pituitary tumor apoplexy, especially acute hemorrhagic apoplexy, is infrequent and life-threatening medical condition that requires emergent neurosurgical intervention, which may lead to catastrophic consequence, such as permanent blindness, coma, and even death if misdiagnosed and untreated.1,2 An appropriate and effective approach is crucial to manage the lesion with better outcomes. The original introduction into resection for the pituitary region of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) can be backed to the last half of the 20th century;3 now ETS has obtained significant popularity for the management of pituitary lesions.4,5 Is ETS also an option to treat hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary adenoma that carries significant morbidity and mortality if untreated, especially for patients with altered consciousness, and visual loss? There was little information in the literature6 which exists applying ETS for management of hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary adenoma in a high-volume series. In this study, we presented a series of 89 patients who were diagnosed hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary adenoma and underwent an emergent operation through ETS for resection of the lesion with favorable results in a period of 10 years, which may answer the above question.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Experimental Design

A retrospective chart analysis was performed to identify 89 patients who presented acute symptoms due to hemorrhagic pituitary adenoma and underwent a TTEA for resection of the lesion at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University between July 2004 and June 2014. Records of those patients were evaluated for patient age, sex, presentation, tumor size, extent of resection, clinical outcomes, and surgical complications. Patients without any acute symptom who preoperatively, however, informed apoplexy intraoperatively were excluded from this study, because those patients were asymptomatic and treated as general pituitary adenoma. The protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (No. KYLL-2013-010).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Endoscopic Technique

Patients were diagnosed as having acute symptoms of headache and visual loss, signs of hemorrhage on imaging examinations, and subsequent course, such as informed findings intraoperative. All the patients were performed emergent EETA for resection of hemorrhagic pituitary adenoma in 24 hours of initial symptoms. The detailed endoscopic procedure was described in our previous report.7 In most patients, the dural of the sellar floor was bluish violet and under high tension. Cruciate durotomy followed with drainage of dark red bloody fluid from sella turcica. Tumor with old blood clot was removed with curettage and/or suction, and a 30° endoscope was used to inspect the sellar region for residual tumor—which was removed. Skull base was reconstructed by the multilayered technique.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Postoperative Management

Intravenous infusion of a third-generation cephalosporin was continued for 3–7 days. Fluid intake and urine output were monitored. Hormones were replaced as necessary. MR imaging was performed within 1–3 days and at 3 months after surgery to evaluate the extent of tumor resection. Extent of resection was classified into 4 categories: total resection, subtotal resection, partial resection, and insufficient resection.8 Nasal packing was generally removed endoscopically 1–3 days after surgery. Patients were instructed to avoid any activity that can raise intracranial pressure such as Valsalva maneuvers or nose blowing. Lumbar drainage was applied for patients who developed CSF leakage postoperatively. Early postoperative diabetes insipidus (DI) was treated with subcutaneous injection of Hypophysin for 3 days. Persistent DI was treated with daily administration of Minirin. We do not use controlled released vasopressin tannate because its effects may be difficult to control, and because it is an inconvenient method of treatment for patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Illustrative Case

This 43-year-old female patient presented with severe headache and acute deterioration of visual acuity and field. Visual acuity was 0.1/0.3 bilaterally, with bitemporal hemianopia. Admission T1-weighted MR imaging demonstrated hemorrhage in a pituitary tumor and obvious compression of the optic chiasm (Fig. 1A-B). The patient was treated with emergent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery within 24 hours of initial presentations. Intraoperative endoscopic views showed dural of the sellar floor was bluish violet and under high tension (Fig. 1C- D). After surgery, her headache disappeared and visual acuity obviously improved to 0.5/0.8 bilaterally, with resolution of hemipanopia. On follow-up at 6 months postoperatively, MR imaging demonstrated no recurrence or residual adenoma (Fig. 1E-F).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Cohort consisted of 37 (41.6%) male and 52 (58.4%) female patients aged 14–73 years (mean 41.8 years). Follow-up ranged from 6 to 125 months (mean 51 months). The most frequent clinical presentation was onset of severe headache, 86 (96.6%) patients experienced headache in this series, followed by nausea and vomiting (93.3%), and then deterioration of visual acuity and visual field with rates of 80.9% and 73.0%, respectively. As results of the preoperative radiological study, 46 (51.7%) showed suprasellar extension, 15 had cavernous sinus invasion, 20 showed suprasellar and cavernous sinus extension, and only 8 patients were intrasellar. Thirty one (34.8%) of the 89 adenomas were active secreting, most of which were PRL-secreting adenoma, accounting for 19.1% of 89 patients (Table 1).

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

Seventy eight (87.7%) patients achieved total resection, 7 (7.9%) had subtotal resection, and 2 (2.2%) patients had partial resection; no patient experienced insufficient resection. After surgery, 57 (90.5%) of 63 patients who had visual acuity deterioration preoperatively obtained visual acuity improvement and normalization, and the rate for visual field improvement was 87.5%. Other symptoms, such as severe headache, mental status alteration, and loss of consciousness, had recovery with 100% of the rates. Endocrinological remission encountered in 28 (90.4%) of 31 patients with active secreting adenoma. Three (3.4%) patients incurred CSF leakage which was managed with lumbar drainage. Nine (10.1%) patients incurred transient DI postoperatively, and 2 (2.2%) of them developed persistent DI. Seven (7.9%) patients developed hypopituitarism which was treated with replacement therapy of hormone. One (1.1%) experienced craniotomy for intracranial hemorrhage and died from severe surgical complications postoperatively. There were no patients of meningitis or carotid artery injury (Table 2).

TABLE 2

TABLE 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Apoplectic pituitary adenoma consists of approximately 10% of pituitary adenoma,9 and is associated with severe morbidity and potential fatality.10 The pathophysiological mechanism of the lesion is not being explained clearly, although pregnancy, trauma, surgery, dynamic endocrine testing, and stress can be precipitating factors.11–15 Apoplectic pituitary adenoma was classified into hemorrhagic and infarcted.16 Hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary adenoma may consist of majority of these fatal clinical syndromes,17,18 and may present a series of acute symptoms including onset of severe headache, sudden decreased vision, nausea and vomiting, altered consciousness,19,20 and infrequently cranial nerve palsy.21 Most pituitary tumor apoplexy occurs in pituitary adenoma, although ectopic pituitary apoplexy has been described in the cavernous sinus21 and the clivus.22 The management of hemorrhagic pituitary adenoma usually involves medical treatment and emergent transsphenoidal resection of lesion, early detection and effective decompression of the optic chiasm and optic nerve may be crucial to prevent mortality.23–25

Back to Top | Article Outline

Surgical Results

Hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary adenoma can occur in any age group; the majority of this population was middle-aged patients who aged 30–49 years, which accounted for 61.8% of 89 patients and was consistent with prior reports.25 The most frequent complaint was onset of severe headache, 86 (96.6%) patients presented above symptom in this series, followed by nausea and vomiting with rate of 93.3%, headache and nausea were associated with rapid compression of sellar and parasellar structures due to expansion of hemorrhagic pituitary adenoma,26,27 and headache may also have resulted from meningeal irritation.1 Optic chiasm and optic nerve compression from hemorrhagic pituitary adenoma also result in sudden deterioration of visual acuity and visual field,28,29 with rates of 80.9% and 73.0%, respectively, in our series. Alerted mental status was uncommon, which occurred in 5 (5.6%) patients in the current study, but more likely to indicate damage to hypothalamus and emergent surgical management.30 Apoplectic hemorrhage of pituitary adenoma most typically encountered in macroadenoma, with predominance of inactive secreting adenoma.31 The rates of macroadenoma and inactive secreting adenoma were 91% and 65.2% in the present study in agreement with prior reports.25,31,32 Of active secreting adenomas accounted for 34.8% of the pituitary adenomas with hemorrhagic apoplexy, the majority was prolactin (PRL) secreting adenomas with a rate of 19.1%, which is correlated with the high prevalence of PRL-adenoma.33,34 The rate of biochemical remission for active secreting adenoma was 90.4% in our series.

During follow-up period of mean 51 months, 87.7% patients obtained total resection (Table 2), which is comparable with prior reports of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.23,35 The rate of resection may be associated with appropriate approach, surgeon's experience, morphological and biological characteristics of tumor, such as volume, location, and adherence. In our opinion, good lighting and panoramic view provided by the endoscope allows a neurosurgeon to obtain a better surgical condition, which together with meticulous and precise manipulation permits the neurosurgeon to resect lesion more extensively with less injury. During the operation, the use of angled endoscopes allows the surgeon to remove the tumor around corners of surgical field. Moreover, hemorrhage from pituitary adenoma apoplexy may be helpful to resection with lower risk of impairment to parasellar neurovasculature.16,36 Acute deterioration of visual acuity and visual field may be associated with rapid compression of chiasm and optic nerve due to sudden extension of the adenoma caused by intratumoral hemorrhage. Cardoso et al37 indicated in a review that the level of visual recovery depended mainly on early and effective transsphenoidal decompression rather than on the severity of initial visual loss. All the patients underwent emergent endoscopic transsphenoidal decompression of optic chiasm or nerve in 24 hours of onset of initial symptoms. Preoperative deterioration visual acuity and visual field were normalized or improved significantly with 90.5% and 87.5% of rates respectively, which supported previous reports.23,38 As our experience, timely and effective endoscopic transsphenoidal decompression facilitated improvement of visual symptoms.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Morbidity Related to Surgery

Despite techniques of skull base reconstruction,39–41 CSF leak remains a considerable associated complication of ETS. Three (3.4%) patients in this series experienced postsurgical CSF leak which was managed successfully with lumbar drainage, which is comparable to previously reported rates of CSF leak from ETS for the sellar and parasellar region.42,43 Factors that may lead to CSF leak include surgical manipulation, surgeon's experience, tumor's location, volume, and relationship to surrounding neurovascular structures. The most important factor that leads to postoperative CSF leakage might be repair technique of the skull base, although feature of the tumor and surgeon's preference may affect surgical result. In our institute, we routinely used reconstruction of skull base on the basis of the multilayered technique with or without PNSF resulting in an excellent result, which showed that hemorrhage from pituitary tumor apoplexy did not affect reconstruction of the skull base or increase occurrence of CSF leakage. Furthermore, the unparalleled panoramic endoscopic view in ETS enables detection of tiny fistulas which can be repaired with skull base reconstruction.

Transient DI also is a common complaint related to endoscopic approach. It is possible that surgical manipulation to the sellar in the context of preexisting compromise of the blood supply to the magnocellular neurons of the hypothalamus from apoplexy manifested as a reversible disturbance of arginine vasopressin (AVP) transport to the posterior pituitary gland. In this study, transient DI was 10.1% which was consistent with most reported results.44,45 However, the presence of permanent DI (2.2%) is lower than most reported rates,46,47 and indicates that most surgical injury is reversible. Pituitary dysfunction may be associated with compression or destruction of the posterior labe of pituitary gland from hemorrhagic apoplexy. Chowdhury et al observed in a series of 152 patients that 71% of the patients with apoplexy encountered postsurgical DI.48 Also, 16% incidence of transient DI in patients of pituitary apoplexy was reported in a series of Randeva et al.49 The above observations may indicate that incurrence of DI was associated with pituitary apoplexy; therefore, timely decompression was crucial for saving endocrinological function of pituitary gland. Besides interruption of the blood supply to pituitary gland due to hemorrhage, injury or edema of pituitary stalk is an important reason that results in postoperative DI.48,50 Nemergut et al51 found that postoperative DI, both transient and permanent, may be associated with intraoperative leak resulting from aggressive manipulation; however, our results did not support the above conclusion. Meticulous manipulation to avoid track injury of pituitary stalk may decrease the risk of postoperative endocrinological complication. All the patients encountering hypopituitarism postoperatively were managed by replacement of hormone with better outcomes.

Intracranial hemorrhage after endoscopic resection of acute hemorrhagic pituitary tumor is uncommon and lethal, which often occurs in 12 hours after surgery, and also often encounters in the patients who experienced subtotal removal of macroadenoma. Patel and colleagues52 reported a patient of delayed postoperative pituitary hemorrhagic apoplexy treated by emergent reexploration. In our series, 1 (1.1%) patient incurred postoperative intracranial hematoma and died following transcranial approach. Any acute complication from hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary tumor can lead to death; cares should be taken to prevent perioperative hemorrhage.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

In the current series, we obtained excellent surgical outcomes and comparable lower complications after ETS for management of hemorrhagic apoplectic pituitary adenoma. Acute hemorrhage from apoplectic pituitary tumor is an emergent and life-threatening condition that may require surgical intervention to prevent progression and morbidity. On the contrary, ETS provided a safe and effective surgical option for acute hemorrhagic apoplexy of pituitary adenoma. Early detection and timely emergent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery resulted in a favorable surgical outcome with low rate of surgical complications.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Bills DC, Meyer FB, Laws ER Jr, et al. A retrospective analysis of pituitary apoplexy. Neurosurgery 1993; 33:602–609.
2. Bonicki W, Kasperlik-Zaluska A, Koszewski W, et al. Pituitary apoplexy: endocrine, surgical and oncological emergency. Incidence, clinical course and treatment with reference to 799 cases of pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir 1993; 120:118–122.
3. Apuzzo ML, Heifetz MD, Weiss MH, et al. Neurosurgical endoscopy using the side-viewing telescope. J Neurosurg 1977; 46:398–400.
4. Powell M, Gnanalinghan KK. Endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: is it here to stay? Br J Neurosurg 2007; 21:315–317.
5. Jho HD, Carrau RL. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg 1997; 87:44–51.
6. Hasegawa Y, Yano S, Sakurama T, et al. Endoscopic surgical treatment for pituitary apoplexy in three elderly patients over the age of 80. Acta Neurochir 2011; Suppl. 111:429–433.
7. Zhan R, Chen S, Xu S, et al. Postoperative low-flow cerebrospinal fluid leak of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: wait and see, or lumbar drain? J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26:1261–1264.
8. Frank G, Pasquini E. Endoscopic endonasal cavernous sinus surgery, with special reference to pituitary adenomas. Front Horm Res 2006; 34:64–82.
9. Turgut M, Ozsunar Y, Başak S, et al. Pituitary apoplexy: an overview of 186 cases published during the last century. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152:749–761.
10. Johnston PC, Hamrahian AH, Weil RJ, et al. Pituitary tumor apoplexy. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22:939–944.
11. Okuda O, Umezawa H, Miyaoka M. Pituitary apoplexy caused by endocrine stimulation tests: a case report. Surg Neurol 1994; 42:19–22.
12. Fyrmpas G, Constantinidis J, Foroglou N, et al. Pituitary apoplexy following endoscopic sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2010; 124:677–679.
13. Proust F, Hannequin D, Bellow F, et al. Stress-induced pituitary apoplexy in 2 phases. Neurochirurgie 1995; 41:372–376.
14. Sun T, Liu L, Sunnassee A, et al. Sudden death in custody due to pituitary apoplexy during long restriction in a sitting position: a case report and review of the literature. J Forensic Leg Med 2013; 20:812–815.
15. de Heide LJM, van Tol KM, Doorenbos B. Pituitary apoplexy presenting during pregnancy. The Netherlands J Med 2004; 62:393–396.
16. Chang CV, Felicio AC, Toscanini AC. Pituitary tumor apoplexy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2009; 67:328–333.
17. Elias WJ, Laws ER Jr. Schmidek A, Sweet WH. Transsphenoidal approaches to lesions of the sella. Operative Neurosurgical Techniques. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders; 2000; 373–384.
18. Lazaro CM, Guo WY, Sami M, et al. Haemorrhagic pituitary tumours. Neuroradiology 1994; 36:111–114.
19. Sibal L, Ball SG, Connolly V, et al. Pituitary apoplexy: a review of clinical presentation, management and outcome in 45 cases. Pituitary 2004; 7:157–163.
20. Dubuisson AS, Beckers A, Stevenaert A. Classical pituitary tumour apoplexy: clinical features, management and outcomes in a series of 24 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007; 109:63–70.
21. Zoli M, Mazzatenta D, Pasquini E, et al. Cavernous sinus apoplexy presenting isolated sixth cranial nerve palsy: case report. Pituitary 2012; 15 (Suppl 1):S37–40.
22. Mudd PA, Hohensee S, Lillehei KO, et al. Ectopic pituitary adenoma of the clivus presenting with apoplexy: case report and review of the literature. Clin Neuropathol 2012; 31:24–30.
23. Zhang X, Zhang W, Fu LA, et al. Hemorrhagic pituitary macroadenoma: characteristics, endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery, and outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:246–252.
24. Ayuk J, McGregor EJ, Mitchell RD, et al. Acute management of pituitary apoplexy-surgery or conservative management? Clin Endocrinol 2004; 61:747–752.
25. Randeva HS, Schoebel J, Byrne J, et al. Classical pituitary apoplexy: clinical features, management and outcome. Clin Endocrinol 1999; 51:181–188.
26. da Motta LA, de Mello PA, de Lacerda CM, et al. Pituitary apoplexy: clinical course, endocrine evaluations and treatment analysis. J Neurosurg Sci 1999; 43:25–36.
27. Rolih CA, Ober KP. Pituitary apoplexy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1993; 22:291–302.
28. Semple PL, Webb MK, de Villiers JC, et al. Pituitary apoplexy. Neurosurgery 2005; 56:65–73.
29. Sibal L, Ball S, Connolly V, et al. Pituitary apoplexy: a review of clinical presentation, management and outcome in 45 cases. Pituitary 2004; 7:157–163.
30. Rajasekaran S, Vanderpump M, Baldeweg S, et al. UK guidelines for the management of pituitary apoplexy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2011; 74:9–20.
31. Arita K, Tominaga A, Sugiyama K, et al. Natural course of incidentally found nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma, with special reference to pituitary apoplexy during follow-up examination. J Neurosurg 2006; 104:884–891.
32. Hewidy MS. An urgent trans-sphenoidal approach for surgical treatment of pituitary apoplexy: is it life saving? Egypt J Neurol Surg 2009; 24:45–53.
33. Dessimoz C, Browaeys P, Maeder P, et al. Transformation of a microprolactinoma into a mixed growth hormone and prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma. Front in Endocrinol 2012; 12:1–5.
34. Arafah BM, Nasrallah MP. Pituitary tumors: pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and management. Endocrine-Related Cancer 2001; 8:287–305.
35. Gondim JA, Schops M, de Almeida JP, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: surgical results of 228 pituitary adenomas treated in a pituitary center. Pituitary 2010; 13:68–77.
36. Onesti ST, Wisniewski T, Post KD. Clinical versus subclinical pituitary apoplexy: presentation, surgical management, and outcome in 21 patients. Neurosurgery 1990; 26:980–986.
37. Cardoso ER, Peterson EW. Pituitary apoplexy: a review. Neurosurgery 1984; 14:363–373.
38. Zhang X, Fei Z, Zhang W, et al. Emergency transsphenoidal surgery for hemorrhagic pituitary adenomas. Surg Oncol 2007; 16:115–120.
39. Eloy JA, Shukla PA, Choudhry OJ, et al. Assessment of frontal lobe sagging after endoscopic endonasal transcribriform resection of anterior skull base tumors: is rigid structural reconstruction of the cranial base defect necessary? Laryngoscope 2012; 122:2652–2657.
40. Greenfield JP, Anand VK, Kacker A, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal transcribriform transfovea ethmoidalis approach to the anterior cranial fossa and skull base. Neurosurgery 2010; 66:883–892.
41. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116:1882–1886.
42. Berker M, Aghayev K, Yücel T, et al. Management of cerebrospinal fluid leak during endoscopic pituitary surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 2013; 40:373–378.
43. Bokhari AR, Davies MA, Diamond T. Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a single surgeon experience and the learning curve. Br J Neurosurg 2013; 27:44–49.
44. Senior BA, Ebert CS, Bednarski KK, et al. Minimally invasive pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 2008; 118:1842–1855.
45. Sigounas DG, Sharpless JL, Cheng DM, et al. Predictors and incidence of central diabetes insipidus after endoscopic pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery 2008; 62:71–78.
46. Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, et al. Snyderman. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for giant pituitary adenomas: advantages and limitations. J Neurosurg 2013; 118:621–631.
47. Schreckinger M, Walker B, Knepper J, et al. Post-operative diabetes insipidus after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary 2013; 16:445–451.
48. Chowdhury T, Prabhakar H, Bithal PK, et al. Immediate postoperative complications in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a prospective study. Saudi J Anaesth 2014; 8:335–341.
49. Randeva HS, Schoebel J, Byrne J, et al. Classical pituitary apoplexy: clinical features, management and outcome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1999; 51:181–188.
50. Xiao G, Yuan X, Yuan J, et al. Pituitary stalk management during the microsurgery of craniopharyngiomas. Exp Ther Med 2014; 7:1055–1064.
51. Nemergut EC, Zuo Z, Jane JA Jr, et al. Predictors of diabetes insipidus after transsphenoidal surgery: a review of 881 patients. J Neurosurg 2005; 103:448–454.
52. Patel SK, Christiano LD, Eloy JA, et al. Delayed postoperative pituitary apoplexy after endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of a giant pituitary macroadenoma. J Clin Neurosci 2012; 19:1296–1298.
Keywords:

Acute; complications; endoscope transsphenoidal surgery; hemorrhage; outcomes; pituitary adenoma; pituitary apoplexy

© 2015 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.