Trends and Outcomes of Cranioplasty Alone Versus Single-Stage Composite Scalp and Calvarial Reconstruction : Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles

Trends and Outcomes of Cranioplasty Alone Versus Single-Stage Composite Scalp and Calvarial Reconstruction

Cormier, Nicholas S. MD, MPH*; Lin, Samuel J. MD, MBA

Author Information
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 33(5):p 1271-1275, July/August 2022. | DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008395

Abstract

Background: 

Cranioplasty is a critical intervention to restore the calvarium using autologous or alloplastic materials with single-stage composite scalp and calvarial reconstruction reserved for complex cases. This study aims to identify 30-day outcomes in scalp and calvarial reconstruction using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Methods: 

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2010 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adult patients who underwent cranioplasty were identified using current procedural terminology coding and included by exposure type (autologous, alloplastic, composite, or other). Subjects with missing exposure or outcome data were excluded. Primary outcome was 30-day reoperation, whereas secondary outcomes were 30-day unplanned readmission and transfusion. Univariate analysis was completed to assess differences in demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for confounders.

Results: 

In total, 1719 patients underwent cranioplasty (mean age 54.7 ± 15.3 years, 43.5% male), including 169(9.8%) autologous, 1303(75.8%) alloplastic, 32(1.9%) composite, and 215(12.5%) other procedures. Cranioplasty procedures were associated with 30-day complication and mortality rate of 16.5% and 2.4%, respectively. Composite cranioplasty was associated with decreased 30-day reoperation (adjusted odds ratios 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.014–0.94, P = 0.044). There was no statistically significant difference in readmission between cranioplasty groups. Alloplastic cranioplasty was associated with decreased odds of postoperative transfusion (adjusted odds ratios 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.27â0.84, P= 0.01).

Conclusions: 

Cranioplasty is an increasingly common procedure. Alloplastic cranioplasty is associated with decreased 30-day transfusion requirement, whereas single-stage composite reconstruction is a viable option and associated with decreased 30-day reoperation with no difference in readmission.

Copyright © 2021 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid