The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of two combinational surgeries for involutional entropion: Inferior retractor tightening (IRT) + lateral tarsal strip (LTS) + skin muscle excision (SME) vs LTS + SME. The authors reviewed the records of 2 groups which were made up of 80 (85 eyelids) and 58 (63 eyelids) involutional entropion patients with 71.4 and 71.8 years on average respectively. The 2 groups were categorized into Group A and Group B by different surgical techniques. The former underwent IRT + LTS + SME surgery between April 2004 and February 2014, while the latter received LTS + SME surgery between March 2014 and February 2018. The authors evaluated the surgical outcomes of 2 combinational surgeries. In Group A, 84 out of 85 (98.8%) lids were successfully corrected and 1 (1.2%) lower eyelid suffered from recurrence during the follow-up period of 26.5 ± 4.6 months. Two canthal deformity cases occurred in this group. In Group B, 62 out of 63 (98.2%) lids were successfully treated and there was 1 (1.8%) case of recurrence during the follow-up period of 21.0 ± 10.0 months. No cases of complications were noted. IRT + LTS + SME procedure took 26.4 ± 2.4 minutes and LTS + SME procedure took 20.6 ± 3.9 minutes (P < 0.001). The LTS + SME technique exhibited a comparable success rate with the IRT + LTS + SME operation. LTS + SME appeared to be significantly faster and safer compared to the IRT + LTS + SME procedure.
Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sehyun Baek, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received 15 February, 2019
Accepted 22 April, 2019
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supplemental digital contents are available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.jcraniofacialsurgery.com).