Anthropometric Precision and Accuracy of Digital Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry: Comparing the Genex and 3dMD Imaging Systems with One Another and with Direct Anthropometry : Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Anatomic Studies

Anthropometric Precision and Accuracy of Digital Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry

Comparing the Genex and 3dMD Imaging Systems with One Another and with Direct Anthropometry

Weinberg, Seth M. MA*†; Naidoo, Sybill RN, MSN, CPNP; Govier, Daniel P.§; Martin, Rick A. MD; Kane, Alex A. MD§; Marazita, Mary L. PhD*¶**††

Author Information
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 17(3):p 477-483, May 2006.


A variety of commercially available three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging systems are currently in use by craniofacial specialists. Little is known, however, about how measurement data generated from alternative 3D systems compare, specifically in terms of accuracy and precision. The purpose of this study was to compare anthropometric measurements obtained by way of two different digital 3D photogrammetry systems (Genex and 3dMD) as well as direct anthropometry and to evaluate intraobserver precision across these three methods. On a sample of 18 mannequin heads, 12 linear distances were measured twice by each method. A two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance was used to test simultaneously for mean differences in precision across methods. Additional descriptive statistics (e.g., technical error of measurement [TEM]) were used to quantify measurement error magnitude. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) mean differences were observed across methods for nine anthropometric variables; however, the magnitude of these differences was consistently at the submillimeter level. No significant differences were noted for precision. Moreover, the magnitude of imprecision was determined to be very small, with TEM scores well under 1 mm, and intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.98 to 1. Results indicate that overall mean differences across these three methods were small enough to be of little practical importance. In terms of intraobserver precision, all methods fared equally well. This study is the first attempt to simultaneously compare 3D surface imaging systems directly with one another and with traditional anthropometry. Results suggest that craniofacial surface data obtained by way of alternative 3D photogrammetric systems can be combined or compared statistically.

© 2006 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid