Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Review Articles

House dust mite-specific immunotherapy alters the natural course of atopic march

Tang, Ren-Bin,*

Author Information
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: February 2020 - Volume 83 - Issue 2 - p 109-112
doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000231
  • Open

Abstract

1. INTRODUCTION

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is done using injected aeroallergen extracts for IgE-mediated allergic diseases, such as rhinoconjunctivitis, allergic asthma, venom allergy, and in some regions included atopic dermatitis. It has a history of more than a century and has been widely used as a treatment for respiratory allergies,1–3 especially allergic rhinitis and asthma.3,4 The efficacy of AIT has been demonstrated rapidly during the past 30 years; numerous controlled trials have shown that immunotherapy, using high-quality extracts in sufficient doses, relieves the symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with minimal side effects.4,5 Studies on immunotherapy for allergic asthma have shown that specific immunotherapy reduces airway sensitivity to allergens, decreases symptoms and signs, and improves basal pulmonary function.6,7 The house dust mite (HDM) AIT has been used in allergic asthmatic children and adults demonstrating clinical improvement.8,9 AIT is effective when appropriate doses of allergens are administered, sharing clinical improvement in allergic rhinitis and asthma, such as reduced symptoms, decreased medication use, and improvement on quality of life, with a long-lasting effect even after cessation of treatment. Effective subcutaneous AIT appears to correlate with administration of an optimal maintenance dose of major allergen for inhalant allergens.10

2. THE PREVALENCE OF HDM ALLERGY

Over the past few decades, allergic diseases have become increasingly prevalent worldwide. The HDM is a major perennial allergen source and a significant cause of allergic diseases, such as allergic rhinitis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis.11,12 Environmental factors induced by industrialization and climate change in temperature, humidity, air pollution, or other environmental conditions could modify natural HDM growth, survival, and allergen production. This can partially explain the increase in prevalence and severity of allergic disease. HDMs has increased in some regions of the world, especially in the subtropical and tropical areas.13 Asthma has become the most prevalent chronic disease, especially in children.14,15 In Taiwan, the prevalence of asthma and other allergic diseases has been increasing, with surveys documenting an asthma prevalence of 1.3% in 1974, 5.3% in 1987, and 11.9% in 2007.16–19 Trends towards an increasing occurrence of asthma are not limited to Taiwan. Indeed, such trends seem to be global, the increase is associated with urbanization and the recent United States investigations have revealed rural pediatric asthma prevalence to be very similar to urban area and to be more closely correlated with socioeconomic and environmental factors than geographic location or population density.13,14 Parallel with increased urbanization, the increase in asthma prevalence in most areas of the world will also continue. However, studies performed in Australia and North-West Europe, particularly among children and adolescents, indicate that the increase in asthma prevalence may now be leveling off.15

3. ALLERGIC MARCH AND THE HYGIENE HYPOTHESIS

The allergic march refers to the natural history progression of atopic disorders. The allergic march is concerned with the development of atopic dermatitis and concomitant sensitization to food and HDM allergens in early childhood, progressing to asthma, and allergic rhinitis in later childhood or adult life.20,21 The hygiene hypothesis suggests that childhood asthma develops as a result of decreased exposure to infectious disease and other stimuli. As Westernization develops, the environment becomes cleaner, and people lack the immunologic and infectious stimuli needed for the immune systems to shift from the T-helper cell type (TH) 2 to TH1 response. The microbiota hypothesis, implicating non-pathogenic commensal microorganisms as the source of immunomodulatory signals necessary to prevent immune-mediated chronic disorders.22 Diversity in the mucosal microbiome probably reflects an undisturbed balance of beneficial microorganisms and pathogens such as Moraxella catarrhalis, which has been associated with subsequent development of asthma and pneumonia. In addition, specific fermenters of plant fibers, such as the genera Ruminococcus and Bacteroides, have been implied in creating asthma protection through production of short-chain fatty acids, reducing TH2-mediated allergic airway inflammation. Nonetheless, current available epidemiologic evidence does not support a mechanism of early life immune deviation. The principal environmental influences on atopic disease are likely to occur throughout life and involve interactions between microbes and non-infective and lifestyle factors.23,24

Exposure to indoor allergens during early life may play a role in the development of the immune system and inception of asthma.25 Current evidence suggests a combination of strategies, including natural childbirth, breast feeding, increased social exposure through sport and other outdoor activities, less time spent indoors, proper diet, and appropriate antibiotic use, may help restore the microbiome and perhaps reduce risk of allergic disease. Preventive efforts must focus on early life style change.26,27

4. ALLERGY TESTING

The selection on allergens for immunotherapy is based on clinical history, specific IgE antibodies, and allergen exposure. HDM, especially Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) and Dermatophagoides farinae (Df), have been shown to comprise the most important allergens in airway hypersensitivity,28 AIT in its subcutaneous and sublingual forms is currently a well-established and experimentally supported treatment for respiratory allergy disorders, such as allergic rhinitis and asthma.29 Currently, there are two main testing for IgE-mediated allergy diseases, including the in vivo skin prick test and the in vitro serum-specific antibody tests. It can precisely detect reactions to Dp and Df in allergic children. Compared with aeroallergen or medication provocation challenges test, both are less time consuming procedure and have lower risk of adverse reactions.30–32

5. MECHANISM OF AIT

Immunologic changes associated with immunotherapy are complex, and the exact mechanisms responsible for its clinical efficacy are continually being explored.33 The role of HDM allergen in allergic inflammation through innate immune system with toll-like receptors, protease-activated receptors, and local dendritic cells can be activated by different HDM major allergens and proinflammatory cytokines can also be upregulated. Immunotherapy provides an alternative option for treating HDM allergy by targeting the mechanisms of allergic reaction and presenting a long-term symptoms relief.12

Immunotherapy creates in immunologic tolerance. AIT is effective when appropriate doses of allergens are administered. There were no significant changes in serum-specific IgE antibody titer for a short course immunotherapy, lasting 1 year or less in mite-sensitive asthmatic children. But, significant reduction of specific IgE HDM in the immunotherapy group are shown after receiving long-term immunotherapy; namely 2–3 years.34 Till now, there are no current available validated biomarkers that can predict AIT success.3 Immunotherapy inhibits both early and late responses to allergen exposure. Immunotherapy is accompanied by increases in allergen-specific IgG, particularly the IgG4-blocking antibody, which blocks not only IgE-dependent histamine release from basophils but also IgE-mediated antigen presentation to T cells. The mean level of anti-mite-specific IgG4 tended to increase during immunotherapy with clinical improvement in asthmatic children during immunotherapy. It is suggested that the anti-mite-specific IgG4 antibody titer may serve as an indicator for clinical outcome of mite allergy during immunotherapy.35–37 Immunotherapy acts on T cells to modify peripheral and mucosal system from a TH2 to a TH1 cytokine profile. Regulatory T (Treg) cells and their cytokines, primarily interleukin (IL)-10, transforming growth factor beta, IL-2, and IL-2R suppress TH2 immune responses and control allergic diseases.38–40 Regulatory B (Breg) cells, which produce IL-10 and IgG4 and expressing CD25 on their surface, are also generated. Both Treg and Breg cells suppress allergen-specific effector TH2 cells and appear to be identified by the CD4+CD8+CD25+CD137 phenotype.41

6. PRACTICE GUIDELINES

AIT may be an option if allergy plays a prominent role in the disease, for example, asthma with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. AIT may also reduce the risk of progression from allergic rhinitis to asthma in children and prevent the onset of new sensitizations, thus representing a potentially preventive method of treatment. There are significant variations in the way of allergen-specific immunotherapy, including differences in schedules for injections, safety precautions, and training requirements. Since 1988, numerous AIT guidelines have been developed by national and international organizations to guide physicians in AIT. Even so, AIT is still severely underused, both in children and in adults.1–3

In North America; AIT: a practice parameter established in 2003 with standardized terminology for describing AIT extract dilutions, which is update in 2011.33 These parameters also provided specific recommendations for immunotherapy maintenance doses for some standardized allergens and is recommended as an adjunct to standard pharmacotherapy.

In Europe; a clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the use of HDM AIT as add-on treatment for HDM-driven allergic asthma. This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary working group using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. HDM AIT was evaluated separately by route of administration in children and adults.1–3

7. SUBCUTANEOUS OR SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY

AIT should be reserved for patients with moderate/severe rhinitis or for those with moderate asthma, despite appropriate pharmacotherapy and adherence, continue to exhibit exacerbations that appear to be related to allergen exposure.3 Several systemic reviews and meta-analysis indicate that both subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma for HDM sensitivity.1–3,42–44

SCIT has been the gold standard. It is effective for both seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. Sustained effectiveness will require several years of treatment. SCIT may prevent the development of allergic asthma in children with allergic rhinitis. In people with asthma and allergic sensitization, SCIT is associated with a reduction in symptom scores and medication requirements, and improved allergen-specific and nonspecific airway hyperresponsiveness. SCIT reduces the use of long-term control medications. It may also improve quality of life and reduces the use of quick-relief medications and systemic corticosteroids. Adverse effects include risk of both local and systemic adverse reactions, and uncommon systemic anaphylactic reactions which may be life-threatening. However, in most cases, symptoms are readily reversible if they are recognized early and treated promptly.

SLIT is currently considered an alternative treatment to the subcutaneous route. SLIT involves the regular self-administration and retention of allergen extract under the tongue for 1–2 minutes before the extract is swallowed. The allergen crosses the mucosa in 15–30 minutes and are then captured by tolerogenic dendritic cells and processed as small peptides. Next, via the lymphatic system, causes a systemic immune response to produce an early decrease in mast cell and basophil degranulation. The use of SLIT has been included in international guidelines for the treatment of allergic rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis. A study on SLIT for HDM in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis demonstrated a modest reduction of ICS.42 In patients sensitized to HDM with allergic rhinitis and persistent asthma requiring ICS, SLIT for HDM showed improvement in asthma symptoms, quality of life, and reduces the use of long-term control medications. It may also reduce the use of quick-relief medications, showing benefit in decreasing mild to moderate asthma exacerbations.43 Adverse effects include mild oral and gastrointestinal symptoms. The safety profile of SLIT is generally good; therefore, SLIT can be self-administered by patients in their homes.

8. FUTURE APPROACHES FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY

AIT provided an alternative option for treating HDM allergy and represented a long-term symptoms relief. Immunotherapy is the only current disease-modifying treatment option besides allergen avoidance.45 The allergenic potency of HD extracts was examined by comparing with a standardized HDM allergen extracts which have been used to provide efficacy and safer AIT preparations to lower or even totally overcome this risk.46 There are differences in clinical approach to SCIT for polysensitized patients. In the United States, mixed extracts containing multiple aeroallergens are used, whereas European allergists preferably administer separate injections of single allergen source or homologous group deemed to be clinically relevant. More product options are available, including adsorbed allergens, chemically modified allergens, or both.47 In the near future, novel approach to immunotherapy currently being explored include the use of adjuvants, such as monophosphoryl lipid A or nucleotide immunostimulatory sequences derived from bacteria that potentiate TH1 responses. New routes of administration (intralymphatic and epicutaneous) and new allergen preparations, including allergoids, peptides, and recombinant allergens, are used in subcutaneous as well as in mucosal immunotherapies (using bronchial, nasal, oral, and sublingual application) with sublingual being the established mucosal application route. Immune-modifying agents like virus-like particles and toll-like receptor ligands, also depot-forming adjuvants further enhances activation of innate as well as adaptive immune responses and direct the immunological response toward immunological tolerance.29,47 Gene-specific immunotherapy are currently being developed, and it can decrease allergic inflammation and improve the efficacy of treatment.12

References

1. Agache I, Lau S, Akdis CA, Smolinska S, Bonini M, Cavkaytar O, et al. EAACI guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: house dust mite-driven allergic asthma. Allergy 2019;74:855–73.
2. Larenas-Linnemann DES, Antolín-Amérigo D, Parisi C, Nakonechna A, Luna-Pech JA, Wedi B, et al; EAACI International Societies Council. National clinical practice guidelines for allergen immunotherapy: an international assessment applying AGREE-II. Allergy 2018;73:664–72.
3. Bousquet J, Pfaar O, Togias A, Schünemann HJ, Ansotegui I, Papadopoulos NG, et al; ARIA Working Group. 2019 ARIA care pathways for allergen immunotherapy. Allergy 2019;74:2087–102.
4. Oktemer T, Altintoprak N, Muluk NB, Senturk M, Kar M, Bafaqeeh SA, et al. Clinical efficacy of immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016;30:4–7.
5. Durham SR, Penagos M. Sublingual or subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis? J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016;137:339–49.e10.
6. Jacobsen L, Niggemann B, Dreborg S, Ferdousi HA, Halken S, Høst A, et al; (The PAT investigator group). Specific immunotherapy has long-term preventive effect of seasonal and perennial asthma: 10-year follow-up on the PAT study. Allergy 2007;62:943–8.
7. Inal A, Altintas DU, Yilmaz M, Karakoc GB, Kendirli SG, Sertdemir Y. Prevention of new sensitizations by specific immunotherapy in children with rhinitis and/or asthma monosensitized to house dust mite. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2007;17:85–91.
8. Zhang W, Lin C, Sampath V, Nadeau K. Impact of allergen immunotherapy in allergic asthma. Immunotherapy 2018;10:579–93.
9. Tsai TC, Lu JH, Chen SJ, Tang RB. Clinical efficacy of house dust mite-specific immunotherapy in asthmatic children. Pediatr Neonatol 2010;51:14–8.
10. Frew AJ, Powell RJ, Corrigan CJ, Durham SR; UK Immunotherapy Study Group. Efficacy and safety of specific immunotherapy with SQ allergen extract in treatment-resistant seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:319–25.
11. Calderón MA, Linneberg A, Kleine-Tebbe J, De Blay F, Hernandez Fernandez de Rojas D, Virchow JC, et al. Respiratory allergy caused by house dust mites: what do we really know? J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;136:38–48.
12. Huang FL, Liao EC, Yu SJ. House dust mite allergy: its innate immune response and immunotherapy. Immunobiology 2018;223:300–2.
13. Acevedo N, Zakzuk J, Caraballo L. House dust mite allergy under changing environments. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2019;11:450–69.
14. Estrada RD, Ownby DR. Rural asthma: current understanding of prevalence, patterns, and interventions for children and adolescents. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2017;17:37.
15. Lundbäck B, Backman H, Lötvall J, Rönmark E. Is asthma prevalence still increasing? Expert Rev Respir Med 2016;10:39–51.
16. Tang RB, Kho BJ. A survey of childhood asthma in the northern area of Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 1980;27:613–7.
17. Tang RB, Tsai LC, Hwang HM, Hwang B, Wu KG, Hung MW. The prevalence of allergic disease and IgE antibodies to house dust mite in school children in Taiwan. Clin Exp Allergy 1990;20:33–8.
18. Hsieh KH, Shen JJ. Prevalence of childhood asthma in Taipei, Taiwan, and other asian pacific countries. J Asthma 1988;25:73–82.
19. Hwang CY, Chen YJ, Lin MW, Chen TJ, Chu SY, Chen CC, et al. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis and asthma in Taiwan: a national study 2000 to 2007. Acta Derm Venereol 2010;90:589–94.
20. Spergel JM. From atopic dermatitis to asthma: the atopic march. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2010;105:99–106; quiz 107–9, 117.
21. Thomsen SF. Epidemiology and natural history of atopic diseases. Eur Clin Respir J 2015;24:2.
22. van Tilburg Bernardes E, Arrieta MC. Hygiene hypothesis in asthma development: is hygiene to blame? Arch Med Res 2017;48:717–26.
23. Ege MJ. The hygiene hypothesis in the age of the microbiome. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14Suppl 5348–53.
24. Tang RB. Risk factors associated with the development of asthma. J Chin Med Assoc 2005;68:199–201.
25. Casas L, Sunyer J, Tischer C, Gehring U, Wickman M, Garcia-Esteban R, et al. Early-life house dust mite allergens, childhood mite sensitization, and respiratory outcomes. Allergy 2015;70:820–7.
26. Gaffin JM, Phipatanakul W. The role of indoor allergens in the development of asthma. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;9:128–35.
27. Bloomfield SF, Rook GA, Scott EA, Shanahan F, Stanwell-Smith R, Turner P. Time to abandon the hygiene hypothesis: new perspectives on allergic disease, the human microbiome, infectious disease prevention and the role of targeted hygiene. Perspect Public Health 2016;136:213–24.
28. Tang RB, Wu KK. Total serum IgE, allergy skin testing, and the radioallergosorbent test for the diagnosis of allergy in asthmatic children. Ann Allergy 1989;62:432–5.
29. Passalacqua G, Bagnasco D, Ferrando M, Heffler E, Puggioni F, Canonica GW. Current insights in allergen immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018;120:152–4.
30. Tsai LC, Tang RB, Hung MW, Chen HM, Hwang LA. Correlation between serum IgE and specific IgE antibody titer to house dust mite in children with asthma. J Asthma 1988;25:7–13.
31. Tang RB, Wu KG, Hwang B. Comparison between skin testing and in vitro testing for diagnosis of allergen in asthmatic children. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1994;54:246–50.
32. Tang RB, Chen BS, Chen SJ, Wu KG, Hwang B. Determination of the food specific IgE antibodies: comparison of MAST-CLA and CAP systems. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1996;57:219–23.
33. Cox L, Nelson H, Lockey R, Calabria C, Chacko T, Finegold I, et al. Allergen immunotherapy: a practice parameter third update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;1271 SupplS1–55.
34. Tsai LC, Hung MW, Tang RB. Changes of serum-specific IgE antibody titer during hyposensitization in mite-sensitive asthmatic children. J Asthma 1990;27:95–100.
35. Till SJ, Francis JN, Nouri-Aria K, Durham SR. Mechanisms of immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;113:1025–34; quiz 1035.
36. Tsai LC, Tang RB, Hung MW, Chang ZN. Changes in the levels of house dust mite specific IgG4 during immunotherapy in asthmatic children. Clin Exp Allergy 1991;21:367–72.
37. Tang RB, Tsai LC, Chao PL, Hung MW. Significance of specific IgG subclass antibodies to house dust mites in asthmatic children. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 2000;63:440–6.
38. Jutel M, Akdis M, Budak F, Aebischer-Casaulta C, Wrzyszcz M, Blaser K, et al. IL-10 and TGF-beta cooperate in the regulatory T cell response to mucosal allergens in normal immunity and specific immunotherapy. Eur J Immunol 2003;33:1205–14.
39. Tsai LC, Tang RB, Hung MW, Chen HM, Tsai SJ. Expression of serum IL-2, IL-2R, and CD8 levels during hyposensitization in house-dust-sensitive asthmatics. J Asthma 1990;27:307–13.
40. Şahin E, Bafaqeeh SA, Güven SG, Çetinkaya EA, Muluk NB, Coşkun ZO, et al. Mechanism of action of allergen immunotherapy. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016;30:1–3.
41. Tsai YG, Yang KD, Wen YS, Hung CH, Chien JW, Lin CY. Allergen-specific immunotherapy enhances CD8+ CD25+ CD137+ regulatory T cells and decreases nasal nitric oxide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2019;30:531–9.
42. Virchow JC, Backer V, Kuna P, Prieto L, Nolte H, Villesen HH, et al. Efficacy of a house dust mite sublingual allergen immunotherapy tablet in adults with allergic asthma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;315:1715–25.
43. Mosbech H, Deckelmann R, de Blay F, Pastorello EA, Trebas-Pietras E, Andres LP, et al. Standardized quality (SQ) house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablet (ALK) reduces inhaled corticosteroid use while maintaining asthma control: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;134:568–75.e7.
44. Biagtan M, Viswanathan R, Bush RK. Immunotherapy for house dust mite sensitivity: where are the knowledge gaps? Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2014;14:482.
45. Klimek L, Pfaar O, Bousquet J, Senti G, Kündig T. Allergen immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: current use and future trends. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2017;13:897–906.
46. Du W, Fukano C, Yonemoto M, Matsuoka T, Masuyama K, Ohashi-Doi K. Comparison of the allergenic potency of house dust extract and house dust mite allergen extract for subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. Biol Pharm Bull 2019;42:601–6.
47. Mahler V, Esch RE, Kleine-Tebbe J, Lavery WJ, Plunkett G, Vieths S, et al. Understanding differences in allergen immunotherapy products and practices in north america and europe. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019;143:813–28.
Keywords:

Allergic diseases; Allergen immunotherapy; House dust mite; Subcutaneous immunotherapy; Sublingual immunotherapy

© 2020 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.