Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Articles

Association of metabolic syndrome with erosive esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus in a Chinese population

Lee, Shou-Wua,b,*; Lien, Han-Chunga,c; Chang, Chi-Sena,b; Lee, Teng-Yua,b; Peng, Yen-Chuna,c; Yeh, Hong-Zena,c

Author Information
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: January 2017 - Volume 80 - Issue 1 - p 15-18
doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.08.007

    Abstract

    1. Introduction

    Metabolic syndrome is described in association with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, where the usual screening variables are waist circumference, circulating levels of triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting glycemia, and blood pressure.1 Metabolic syndrome has become a major public health challenge worldwide. In Taiwan, the prevalence rate of metabolic syndrome is 20%.2,3 Metabolic syndrome has been highlighted as a risk factor for some gastrointestinal diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett’s esophagus (BE).4 Patients with GERD may present with a broad range of troublesome symptoms that can damage quality of life, and BE is associated with the presence of premalignant lesions that lead to adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. BE is defined by the pathological phenotype of specialized intestinal metaplasia.5 The aim of this study was to investigate the association between metabolic syndrome and erosive esophagitis (EE) or BE in a Chinese population.

    2. Methods

    Data from patients who visited the Medical Screening Center at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan were retrospectively collected from January 2006 to December 2009. The general data of enrolled patients were recorded, including age, gender, body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting glucose, TG, and HDL. All patients underwent an open-access transoral upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and the findings of each case were collected. The exclusion criteria included prior gastric surgery, or presence of esophageal varices or peptic ulcers.

    All endoscopic procedures were performed by experienced endoscopists. The patients were assigned to groups according to whether upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed normal appearance (normal group), EE, or BE. BE was defined as endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia with specialized intestinal metaplasia documented by biopsy pathology.

    Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed based on the 2005 International Diabetes Federation criteria with ethnicity-specific values: central obesity (waist circumference ≥ 90 cm for men and ≥ 80 cm for women), combined with any two of the following four conditions: (1) TG levels ≥ 150 mg/dL); (2) HDL levels < 40 mg/dL for men and < 50 mg/dL for women; (3) fasting glucose levels > 100 mg/dL); and (4) systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg.

    Data are expressed as standard deviation of the mean for each of the measured parameters. Gender, positive ratio of metabolic syndrome and its associated components are expressed as a percentage of the total patient number. Statistical comparisons were made using Pearson’s χ2 test to compare the effects of gender and positive ratio of metabolic syndrome and individual components. Independent t test was used to analyze age, body weight, and BMI. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariate Cox’s regression was used to examine the strength of association between metabolic syndrome and EE or BE, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.

    3. Results

    Among all 7712 enrolled patients, there were 6499 (84.3%), 1118 (14.5%), and 95 (1.2%) in the normal, EE, and BE groups, respectively. The characteristics of these patients are summarized in Table 1. The mean ages of the three groups were similar. The patients in the EE group (69.52 kg, 25.1 kg/m2) had significantly higher body weight and BMI than patients in the normal group (64.3 kg, 24.07 kg/m2) and BE group (65.38 kg, 23.92 kg/m2). The male predominance was significant in the EE (80.2%) and BE (64.2%) groups. The propotion of patients with EE L.A. Grades A/B and C/D were 81.7% (913 cases) and 18.3% (205 cases), respectively.

    Table 1
    Table 1:
    The characteristics of enrolled patients.

    Among all of the enrolled cases, there were 686 individuals (8.9%) with metabolic syndrome; the associations of normal cases, EE, and BE with metabolic syndrome are displayed in Table 2. There were 560 (8.6%) cases, 214 (9.6%) cases, and 19 (20%) cases with metabolic syndrome in the normal, EE and BE groups, respectively. The difference was significant (p=0.001). Among individuals in the BE group, there were significantly higher percentages of abnormal waist circumference (33%) and hypertension (29.5%) compared with those of the other groups. The EE group had the highest prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia (61.7%), which was statistically significant.

    Table 2
    Table 2:
    The association of cases with normal, erosive esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus with metabolic syndrome.a

    The strength of the association between each group and metabolic syndrome is disclosed in Table 3. After adjustment for measured potential confounders, including age, sex, and body weight, a significant positive association with metabolic syndrome was found in the EE group (adjusted OR=2.43; 95% CI=1.02–3.44) and BE group (adjusted OR=2.82; 95% CI=2.05–3.88).

    Table 3
    Table 3:
    The strength of the association between cases with normal, erosive esophagitis or Barrett's esophagitis and metabolic syndrome.

    4. Discussion

    Among all 7712 enrolled cases in our study, the rates of EE and BE were 14.5% and 1.2%, respectively. According to the results of a large series reported in an epidemiological study, the frequency of EE in Western countries was in the upper range, with rates between 7% and 22%; but in Eastern countries, similar large endoscopic series revealed a lower frequency of EE. Furthermore, studies on the prevalence of BE in Asians are scarce. One previous report in Taiwan found nine (2%) cases diagnosed with BE among 464 patients underwent endoscopy for a variety of upper gastrointestinal symptoms.6 However, with changes in lifestyle, dietary habits, and body mass, an increasing trend of GERD has been reported,7 which may potentially increase the prevalence rates of BE in the future.8

    With respect to EE, a significant positive association with male gender and increased BMI were reported.9 Obesity is associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure, impaired gastric emptying, decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and increased frequency of transient sphincter relaxation, thus leading to increased esophageal acid exposure and esophagitis.10 A retrospective case–control study in Taiwan found that more patients with metabolic syndrome had EE compared with those without metabolic syndrome (OR=1.76; 95% CI=1.27–2.44).11 A cross-sectional study of 7078 South Korean individuals undergoing upper endoscopy during a health check-up reported metabolic syndrome was associated with EE (OR=1.42; 95% CI=1.26–1.60).12 Another cross-sectional study in South Korea involving 1679 cases with EE and 3358 control cases, also found a positive association between EE and metabolic syndrome (OR=1.25; 95% CI=1.04–1.49).13 Regarding BE, obesity was associated with a 2.5-fold increase in the risk of BE.14

    In our study, the percentages of patients with metabolic syndrome were 9.6% and 20% in the EE and BE groups, respectively, which were significantly higher than that found in the normal group. The strength of the association between metabolic syndrome and both EE and BE was strongly positive. Our result provides evidence that up to 20% of patients with BE could have concurrent metabolic syndrome, but the prevalence rate was lower in EE patients (9.6%).

    Among the individual components of metabolic syndrome, previous studies found central obesity and hypertriglyceridemia were significantly associated with EE.11,12 Our results indicated that hypertriglyceridemia, but not waist circumference, was significantly associated with EE. The reason for the high prevalence of elevated serum TG levels in patients with EE might reflect lifestyle factors including consumption of high-fat meals, which could delay gastric emptying, thus leading to EE.11 Another Japanese study reported that BMI and triglyceride levels were predictors of an increased prevalence of EE, but central obesity did not show a similar prevalence after adjusting for confounders.15

    By contrast, the enrolled cases with BE in our study had significantly higher rates of central obesity and hypertension. Interestingly, body weight and BMI were significantly higher in individuals with EE, but not in cases with BE. One previous retrospective case–control study showed that visceral obesity, measured by computed tomography scan, was an even stronger independent risk factor for BE than BMI.16 These findings imply that central obesity plays a major a role in the risks of BE, but only a partial role in EE. For example, male gender, hiatal hernia, Helicobacter pylori infection, smoking, and alcohol consumption were also reported as risk factors of EE.17,18

    There were several limitations in this study. First, potential risk factors for EE and BE, such as H. pylori, hiatal hernia, lifestyle, and dietary habits, were not assessed. Second, we did not determine if patients were on medications to control blood pressure, lipids, or glucose, which might have underestimated the ratio of metabolic syndrome. In addition, those patients on medication with anti-acid secretory agents were not adjusted. Third, our study was hospital based and all participants were enrolled from a self-paid health check-up. Selection bias might have existed due to the relatively high socioeconomic status of these individuals. Finally, our study was not intended to clarify the prevalence of EE among metabolic syndrome patients because GERD is considered to be a risk factor for metabolic syndrome. However, further community-based research with analysis of more variables is needed.

    In conclusion, our study found that patients with EE as well as those with BE had a higher prevalence rate of metabolic syndrome. A large proportion of cases with EE had hypertriglyceridemia, and there was a greater prevalence of central obesity and hypertension in patients with BE.

    References

    1. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome – a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005;366:1059-1062.
    2. Lin RT, Lee WJ, Jeng CY, Sheu WH, Chen YT. Metabolic syndrome and its contribution to coronary artery disease in non-diabetic subjects. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004;103:317-320.
    3. Nestel P, Lyu R, Low LP, Sheu WH, Nitiyanant W, Saito I, et al. Metabolic syndrome: recent prevalence in East and Southeast Asian populations. Asia Pac Clin Nutr. 2007;16:362-367.
    4. Watanabe S, Hojo M, Nagahara A. Metabolic syndrome and gastrointestinal diseases. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:267-274.
    5. Ryan AM, Healy LA, Power DG, Byrne M, Murphy S, Byrne PJ, et al. Barrett esophagus: prevalence of central adiposity, metabolic syndrome, and a proinflammatory state. Ann Surg. 2008;247:909-915.
    6. Yeh C, Hsu CT, Ho AS, Sampliner RE, Fass R. Erosive esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus in Taiwan: a higher frequency than expected. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:702-706.
    7. Lien HC, Chang CS, Yeh HZ, Ko CW, Chang HY, Cheng KF, et al. Increasing prevalence of erosive esophagitis among Taiwanese aged 40 years and above: a comparison between two time periods. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:926-932.
    8. Fock KM, Ang TL. Global epidemiology of Barrett’s esophagus. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;5:123-130.
    9. Hampel H, Abraham NS, El-Serag HB. Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:199-211.
    10. Barak N, Ehrenpreis ED, Harrison JR, Sitrin MD. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in obesity: pathophysiological and therapeutic considerations. Obes Rev. 2002;3:9-15.
    11. Chua CS, Lin YM, Yu FC, Hsu YH, Chen JH, Yang KC, et al. Metabolic risk factors associated with erosive esophagitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1375-1379.
    12. Chung SJ, Kim D, Park MJ, Kim YS, Kim JS, Jung HC, et al. Metabolic syndrome and visceral obesity as risk factors for reflux oesophagitis: a cross-sectional case-control study of 7078 Koreans undergoing health check-ups. Gut. 2008;57:1360-1365.
    13. Loke SS, Yang KD, Chen KD, Chen JF. Erosive esophagitis associated with metabolic syndrome, impaired liver function, and dyslipidemia. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:5883-5888.
    14. Stein DJ, El-Serag HB, Kuczynski J, Kramer JR, Sampliner RE. The association of body mass index with Barrett’s esophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:1005-1010.
    15. Gunji T, Sato H, Iijima K, Fujibayashi K, Okumura M, Sasabe N. Risk factors for erosive esophagitis: a cross-sectional study of a large number of Japanese males. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:448-455.
    16. El-Serag HB, Kvapil P, Hacken-Bitar J, Kramer JR. Abdominal obesity and the risk of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2151-2156.
    17. Moki F, Kusano M, Mizuide M, Shimoyama Y, Kawamura O, Takagi H, Imai T, et al. Association between reflux oesophagitis and features of the metabolic syndrome in Japan. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1069-1075.
    18. Wong BC, Kinoshita Y. Systematic review on epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:398-407.
    Keywords:

    Barrett’s esophagus; erosive esophagitis; metabolic syndrome

    © 2017 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.