Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Editorial

Lactobacillusand health

Lee, Wen-Ling; Tsui, Kuan-Hao; Wang, Peng-Hui*

Author Information
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: December 2016 - Volume 79 - Issue 12 - p 639-641
doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.05.002

    Evidence shows that Lactobacillus species are the dominant vaginal bacteria in a majority of women, contributing to an acidic environment (pH 3.5–4.5) in the vaginal area. Lactobacillus also contributes to the production of hydrogen peroxide to inhibit overgrowth of other pathogens, including group B streptococci, Escherichia coli, Staphyococcus aureus, Gardnerella vaginalis, or other fastidious or uncultivated anaerobes.1 Lactic acid, through the production of Lactobacillus species, is a potent and broad-spectrum bactericide and virucide. Therefore, many interventional efforts have been and are being made to restore vaginal health through the application of oral or vaginal probiotic formulations of Lactobacillus species.2 In addition, the benefits of restoring vaginal microbiomes in women are not only related to the health status of women themselves but also to obstetric outcomes when these women get pregnant.3,4 Therefore, management, manipulation, and restoration of a robust vaginal microbiota might be advantageous in vastly improving women's health and disease prevention.2 This is because historically, the presence of Lactobacillus species has been thought to be the sine qua non of healthy vaginal microbial communities in women during the reproductive age,4 and it might also be useful in the prevention of the benign or malignant lower genital tract diseases, such as bacterial vaginosis, sexually transmitted disease, and possible neoplasms, such as cervical intraepithelial neoplasm or cervical cancers.5,6 However, a scientific level understanding of how the vaginal microbiota is associated with obstetric, gynecological, and reproductive health remains problematic and deficient. Furthermore, a big gap in the development of effective preventive approaches to improved women's health is that the normal distribution of Lactobacillus species within the healthy vagina of women, especially in the different geographic areas, is still uncertain. Actually, the detailed information about the Lactobacillus species in the vagina of healthy women in different geographic areas might be one of the critical steps. Therefore, it is acknowledged that all new information addressing this topic should be thoroughly reviewed.7

    The study by Mousavi et al8 in this issue of the Journal of the Chinese Medical Association focused on this issue to isolate and identify the Lactobacillus species in the vagina of healthy Iranian women who live in the Ahvaz area. The authors evaluated the 50 healthy women, and found that only 66% of those women were identified to have Lactobacillus species, which included the most common form as Lactobacillus crispatus (42.4%, n = 14). The second-most common form of Lactobacillus species was Lactobacillus rhamnosus (27%, n = 9), followed in order by Lactobacillus gasseri (18.2%, n = 6), and Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus platntarum (both 6%, n = 2).8 Furthermore, L. rhamnosus has the most powerful capacity to attach two epithelia cell lines, including Vero cells (African Green monkey kidney epithelium) and HeLa cells (human squamous cell carcinoma epithelium).8 This study is interesting and worthy of further discussion.

    First, it is not surprising to see the most frequently identified Lactobacillus species from the vagina of Iranian healthy women as L. crispatus and L. gasseri,8 because it has been reported that both species and another two unidentified species by the authors—Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus jensenii, seem to be specific to the human vagina, where they leverage a unique anaerobic nutritional environment to produce copious amounts of lactic acid as a fermentation product,2 suggesting that the probiotic formulations of Lactobacillus species marketing in Iran should include L. crispatus and L. gasseri. A recent publication also supported the positive role of L. crispatus in women’s health.9L. crispatus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota is considered more beneficial than L. iners-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota, because it is less likely to shift to dysbiosis and is associated with lower prevalence of sexually transmitted infections.9

    Second, Mousavi et al's8 study was consistent with our understanding that not all healthy reproductive-age women have the presence of Lactobacillus species in their vagina (only two-thirds of the women in the current study). It has been reported that a large proportion of women lack appreciable numbers of Lactobacillus species (10–42% of women).2 In fact, these women who lack appreciable numbers of Lactobacillus species are at risk for urogenital infection, and can remain asymptomatic for bacterial vaginosis.

    Third, it is important to find that L. rhamnosus attached more readily to the epithelial cells, including cervical cancer cell line (HeLa cells) than did the other Lactobacillus species.8 Audirac-Chalifour et al5 tried to investigate the relationship between high-risk human papillomavirus persistence in cervical cancer and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment mediated by cytokines, which is indirectly determined by vaginal microbeta. Audirac-Chalifour et al's5 study showed that human papillomavirus-negative women had an elevated proportion of L. crispatus (46%) and a lesser proportion of L. iners (14.9%), whereas human papillomavirus-positive women had proportions of 13.3% and 2.1%, respectively. In addition, these proportions seemed to switch with the presence of human papillomavirus, and L. crispatus was found in smaller proportions in squamous intraepithelial lesions (14.4%) and cervical cancers (1.3%), whereas L. iners dropped to 2.1% in squamous intraepithelial lesions and was totally absent in cervical cancers. It is also noted that other species of Lactobacillus, L. jensenii and Lactobacillus vaginalis, were found only in samples from women with normal cytology from Papanicolaou smear.5 In an early UK study, Mitra et al10 also found that increasing disease severity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was associated with a decreasing relative abundance of Lactobacillus species, supporting the importance of Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiota for regulating human papillomavirus persistence and progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Furthermore, one study showed that L. crispatus and L. rhamnosus culture supernatants can decrease expression of ATG14 (autophagy related 14) and BECN1 (beclin 1) as well as the human papillomavirus early 6 (HPV E6) oncogene, suggesting that downregulation of HPV E6 by Lactobacillus species may have therapeutic potential for cervical cancer.11

    In conclusion, the publication8 of the Journal of the Chinese Medical Association brings to mind the reconsideration of the important interaction between microorganisms and human beings. Besides use of the human papillomavirus vaccine to prevent the cervical intraepithelial neoplasm,12 restoration of good and healthy microbiota environments in human beings (probiotics)13 might reveal promising prospects for the future.

    Acknowledgments

    This article was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan (MOST 103-2314-B-010 -043 -MY3), and Taipei Veterans General Hospital (V103C-112; V104C-095; and V105C-096). We appreciate the Clinical Research Core Laboratory and the Medical Science and Technology Building of Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan for providing experimental space and facilities.

    References

    1. Al-Ghazzewi FH, Tester RF. Biotherapeutic agents and vaginal health. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;121:18-27.
    2. Ravel J, Brotman RM. Translating the vaginal microbiome: gaps and challenges. Genome Med. 2016;8:35.
    3. Lee WL, Yeh CC, Wang PH. Did self-sampling improve the adherence to group B streptococci screening in pregnant women? J Chin Med Assoc. 2016;79:51-53.
    4. Yeh CC, Tsui KH, Wang PH. Group B streptococci screening. J Chin Med Assoc. 2016;79:103-104.
    5. Audirac-Chalifour A, Torres-Poveda K, Bahena-Román M, Téllez-Sosa J, Martínez-Barnetche J, Cortina-Ceballos B, et al. Cervical microbiome and cytokine profile at various stages of cervical cancer: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0153274.
    6. Dols JA, Molenaar D, van der Helm JJ, Caspers MP, de Kat Angelino-Bart A, Schuren FH, et al. Molecular assessment of bacterial vaginosis by Lactobacillus abundance and species diversity. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:180.
    7. Su WH, Ho TY, Tsou TS, Lee WL, Wang KC, Yu YY, et al. Development of a chip-based multiplexed immunoassay using liposomal nanovesicles and its application in the detection of pathogens causing female lower genital tract infections. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;52:25-32.
    8. Mousavi E, Makvandi M, Teimoori A, Ataei A, Ghafari S, Najafian M, et al. In vitro adherence of lactobacilli strains isolated from Iranian healthy women's vagina. J Chin Med Assoc. 2016;79:665-671.
    9. Borgdorff H, Armstrong SD, Tytgat HL, Xia D, Ndayisaba GF, Wastling JM, et al. Unique insights in the cervicovaginal Lactobacillus iners and L. crispatus proteomes and their associations with microbiota dysbiosis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150767.
    10. Mitra A, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, Smith A, Marchesi JR, Lehne B, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia disease progression is associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16865.
    11. Motevaseli E, Azam R, Akrami SM, Mazlomy M, Saffari M, Modarressi MH, et al. The effect of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus culture supernatants on expression of autophagy genes and HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes in the HeLa cell line. Cell J. 2016;17:601-607.
    12. Tsai HJ. Clinical cancer chemoprevention: from the hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine to the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;54:112-115.
    13. Tang RB, Chang JK, Chen HL. Can probiotics be used to treat allergic diseases? J Chin Med Assoc. 2015;78:154-157.

    Conflicts of interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to the subject matter or materials discussed in this article.

    © 2016 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.