N-Acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genetic variation and the susceptibility to noncardiac gastric adenocarcinoma in Taiwan : Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

N-Acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genetic variation and the susceptibility to noncardiac gastric adenocarcinoma in Taiwan

Chang, Chih-Haoa,b,c; Huang, Yi-Shina,b,*; Perng, Chin-Lina,b; Lin, Han-Chieha,b

Author Information
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: March 2016 - Volume 79 - Issue 3 - p 105-110
doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2015.08.011


    1. Introduction

    Aromatic amines (including heterocyclic amines and arylamines) formed from cigarette smoking and food cooked well-done are potent precarcinogens or carcinogens.1 Aromatic amines are principally disposed of by N-acetyltransferase (NAT), in cooperation with a few phase 1or 2 enzymes.2–5 The NAT enzymes are mainly encoded by the NAT2 gene, which has many functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). The number of wild-type NAT2*4 allele is divided in humans into rapid (2 alleles), intermediate (1 allele), and slow acetylators (none).3,5 These different acetylator statuses may carry different individual susceptibilities to many cancers and diseases.6–13 Among them, the association of gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) and NAT2 genotypes has recently garnered much attention.14–25

    GA is one of the most common cancers in many countries. The stomach is the primary gateway for nourishment, and thus speculated to be exposed to many precarcinogens and carcinogens. It is also believed that the pathogenesis of GA is multifactorial and interactive with genetic and environmental factors.26 Although heterogeneity exists in earlier studies, a meta-analysis has shown no association between NAT2 polymorphism and GA susceptibility.24 However, a more recent meta-analysis suggested that NAT2 acetylator status has an effect on the risk of GA among East Asians.25 In addition, lifestyle habit is a crucial environmental factor, which may interact with genetic factors to promote the development of GA.17–22 The information of lifestyle habit and other confounding factors was controversial and complex in the NAT2 gene–GA association studies.17–22 Furthermore, gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma (GCA) was believed to have different characteristics and risk factors from gastric noncardiac adenocarcinoma (GNA).27–29 However, all prior relevant literature did not further analyze the subgroups of GCA and GNA.14–25 The aims of this study were to explore the relationship between NAT2 genetic variation and GC in a Taiwanese population, with special reference to GNA, and also to investigate the gene-environment interactions with different lifestyle habits to the susceptibility of GA.

    2. Methods

    2.1. Study population

    A total of 368 consecutive patients with pathology-confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma were prospectively enrolled in this study from 2001 to 2005. The other 368 sex- and age-matched (±3 years) patients without GC were recruited as controls. These controls were the in- or out-patients of our hospital, who had received pan-endoscopy examination and the results turned out be no GA.

    GCA was defined as the tumor located only in the cardiac region of the stomach, or tumors located primarily in the cardiac region with slight involvement of the fundus.27

    The participants were interviewed after written consent was obtained, and they completed an abbreviated food frequency questionnaire. Those patients who declined to give consent or who failed to answer the questionnaire were excluded. This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

    2.2. Lifestyle evaluation

    The lifestyle evaluation of this study was mainly focused on dietary habits. These habits were assessed using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire, modified from a previously validated instrument.10,30 This questionnaire included common food items with specified serving sizes that were described using natural portions of standard weight and volume measures of the servings commonly consumed in this study population. Cue cards were used to help identify serving sizes of individual food. Participants were asked how often, on average over the past year, they consumed that amount of each food. Participants chose one of seven frequency categories, which ranged from “Never” to “Six or more times daily”. The selected frequency categories for most food items were converted to a daily intake. As the average level of alcohol consumption in Taiwan is modest, habitual alcohol drinking was defined as consuming at least 30 g of alcohol, on average, daily for >10 years.

    2.3. NAT2 genotyping

    DNA was isolated from frozen white blood cells of the participants. The NAT2 genotype was determined by the SNP-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), adopted from the studies by Hein and Doll.31,32 This method can identify the seven most frequent SNPs: 191G > A (rs1801279), 282C > T (rs1041983), 341T > C (rs1801280), 481C > T (rs1799929), 590G > A (rs1799930), 803A > G (rs1208), and 857G > A (rs1799931). The wild-type allele detected was NAT2*4. Both NAT2*4 and NAT2*13 were regarded as rapid acetylator alleles, with other genotypes noted as slow acetylator alleles.1,2 The presence of any two slow acetylator mutant alleles defines the slow acetylator genotype, whereas intermediate and rapid acetylators have one and zero slow acetylator alleles, respectively. Laboratory personnel were blinded to the case–control status.

    2.4. Statistical analysis

    Expected gene frequencies were calculated from respective single allele frequencies using the Hardy–Weinberg equation, wherein the observed and expected gene frequencies were compared using the chi-square goodness-of-fit test. Chi-square test was used for categorical data. The odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of the possible risk factors for GA was calculated by logistic regression. The effect of modifying the relationship between the NAT2 acetylator status and GA by lifestyle habit was assessed using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. This was done to compare the goodness of fit of the model containing an interaction term (NAT2 acetylator status × lifestyle habit) with a reduced model containing indicator variables of the main effects of acetylator status and lifestyle habit.10 Overall survival (OS) was estimated from survival curve based on the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log–rank test was used to compare the OS between different NAT2 acetylator statuses. Statistical tests were based on a two-tailed probability. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. All of the above-mentioned analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In addition, G*Power 3.1.7 (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, German) was used to estimate the required sample size. Under the assumption of effect size = 0.15, α = 0.05, and power = 0.80, the total sample size was 349.

    3. Results

    Among the lifestyle risk factors, habitual alcohol drinking, vegetable, fruit consumption, and Lauren's histological type were not shown to be associated with GA (Table 1). However, GA patients had elevated frequencies of smoking habit, salted food, and fried oily meat intake than controls.

    Table 1:
    Characteristics and risk factors of patients with gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma (GCA), gastric noncardiac adenocarcinoma (GNA) and controls.

    The NAT2 genotype was in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the GA and control groups (p = 0.87 and p = 0.06, respectively). There was no association between the susceptibility to GA and the NAT2 genotypes and three acetylators status (Table 2). However, if patients with GCA (n = 42) were excluded, the NAT2 slow acetylators (without rapid acetylator allele) had a higher risk of GA than intermediate and rapid acetylators (odds ratio = 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–2.23, p = 0.027, Table 3). In addition, there was significant interaction between NAT2 slow acetylator and high intake of well-done meat (odds ratio = 3.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.68–8.76, p = 0.001, Table 3).

    Table 2:
    Genotypes of NAT2 in patients with gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma (GCA), gastric noncardiac adenocarcinoma (GNA) and controls.a
    Table 3:
    Odds ratio of risk factors and interaction with NAT2 slow acetylator for gastric noncardiac adenocarcinoma.

    Table 4 shows that there was no association between Lauren's histological type and NAT2 acetylator status.

    Table 4:
    The association of NAT2 acetylator status and Lauren's histological type in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

    It was found that GNA patients with slow acetylators had a trend of poor OS, compared with those with rapid/intermediate acetylators. However, this finding did not reach a level of statistical difference (Fig. 1).

    Fig. 1:
    Overall survival in patients with noncardiac gastric adenocarcinoma. There was no statistical difference between rapid/intermediate acetylators and slow acetylators.

    4. Discussion

    The NAT enzyme is crucial to disposing of carcinogenic aromatic amines, which can arise from the extent to which meat is cooked well-done, and cigarette smoking. The present study suggests that NAT2 slow acetylators had a higher risk of GA than intermediate and rapid acetylators, after excluding the patients with GCA. In addition, well-done meat intake had a synergic effect with NAT2 slow acetylator status to confer the development of GNA.

    As to the GA and NAT2 genetic variation, the results of the previous studies were inconclusive. A few studies have suggested that slow or rapid acetylator status was related to the GA carcinogenesis.16,22,23 However, many other studies have disproved this association.14–21 One previous meta-analysis has shown no association of NAT2 polymorphism and GA susceptibility.24 However, considering the heterogeneity of the relevant studies, a more recent meta-analysis suggested that NAT2 acetylator status has an effect on the risk of GA among East Asians.25 Therefore, the real association of GA and NAT2 genetic polymorphism is still debatable.

    Consistent with most of the previous studies,14–21 we could not prove the association of GA and NAT2 acetylator status in the present study. However, we found the existence of this association in the patients with GNA. Although GCA is usually categorized into the scope of GA anatomically, many studies have regarded GCA as a different disease entity from GNA.27–29 This viewpoint is further supported from the fact that the rapid increase in the incidence of GCA worldwide in the past two decades, by contrast to the decline of GNA.28,29 Compared with GNA, GCA seems to have a higher incidence of salted food intake and well-done meat intake.27–29 All the previous NAT2-GA association studies have not specified the percentage of GCA in their GA patients.14–25 It is possible that GCA patients were enrolled into their statistical analysis, which made the different results from ours.

    Besides including GCA or not into the study, case number is another important factor that affects the results. Of the studies, the Chinese cohort had the largest case number (n = 503), which has shown the association of NAT2 slow acetylators with GA.22 This finding is compatible with ours, although the statistical significance only existed when GCS patients were excluded in our study. It is probable that the Chinese and Taiwanese share the similar NAT2 genetic distribution and dietary habits, therefore they confer to the same NAT2–GA association. Furthermore, the small sample size of most of the previous studies may easily lead to a Type II error, compared with the Chinese study.22

    Dietary habits are believed to be crucial environmental factors that may modify the risk of many cancers, such as GA and colorectal cancer.5,6,10,17–22 Aromatic amines or heterocyclic amines, derived from cooked meat, are the principal carcinogens metabolized by the NAT enzyme.1 The traditional Chinese method of cooking meat is to chop the meat into pieces and then fry it over a raging fire with plenty of animal oil. This culinary method of meat preparation is equivalent to cooking steak well done in Western cuisine, and may induce a high level of heterocyclic amines. Therefore, we specified the item of well-done meat consumption in our study and we found the synergic interaction of high intake of well-done meat and slow acetylator status in the development of GNA. The OR of GNA was 1.53 for slow acetylators, which was increased to 3.83 after interaction analysis. The result further supports the idea that genetic factors may interact with environmental factors to confer different susceptibility to cancers.

    The other two significant lifestyle risk factors found in this study were smoking habit and salted food intake, both of which were believed to produce many carcinogens and precarcinogens.1,26 However, both of them were found to have no additive effect on the NAT2 slow acetylators to the GNA (Table 3). It is possible that well-done meat intake can produce more aromatic amines than smoking and salted food can. Therefore, only the well-done meat can present the augmentative effect with slow acetylators to GNA.

    One recent study from Korea, which included patients with similar genetic background and dietary habits to China, did not demonstrate the association of NAT2 genotype alone with GA.21 However, they found that slow/intermediate acetylators have a higher risk of GA, after interaction with elevated intake of well-done meat, kimchi, and soybean pastes. This finding is consistent with our result. However, the limitation of this comparison is that the Korean study gathered the slow and intermediate acetylators into one group, whereas most of the previous studies, including ours, categorized the intermediate and rapid acetylators into one group.24,25 Furthermore, we do not know if the patients with GNA were enrolled into the Korean study or not, which may affect the results as earlier referenced.

    Genetic variation of NAT2 may alter enzymatic activity and affect the susceptibility to many other cancers and diseases.5,6 The previous studies have shown that slow acetylators have a higher risk of bladder cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC),6,7,11 which is compatible with the finding of the present study. However, rapid acetylators have been suggested to increase the susceptibility of colorectal cancer and HCC in other studies.6,8,10 It seems complicated and confusing that the NAT2 acetylator statuses have different impacts on the various cancers. This may in part be explained by the differences in the carcinogenesis of cancers, environmental factors, and NAT2 genetic distributions in varied ethnic populations. Furthermore, human acetylation polymorphism influences both the metabolic activation (O-acetylation) and deactivation (N-acetylation) of aromatic amines via the polymorphic expression of NAT2. It has been hypothesized that the increased susceptibility to bladder cancer for slow acetylators is associated with the decreased deactivation of aromatic amines by N-acetylation in the liver, so that excess aromatic amines can reach the bladder epithelium.6,11 The deactivation pathway (N-acetylation) may compete with the activation pathway (N-hydroxylation and O-acetylation), and both of the pathways are catalyzed by NAT and related to NAT2 genetic variation.1–6 Whether NAT primarily serves as an activating or a deactivating enzyme depends on the final consequence of the competition of all these pathways.

    In conclusion, the present study suggests that NAT2 slow acetylators have a higher risk of GNA than intermediate and rapid acetylators have in Taiwanese. Well-done meat consumption has a synergic interaction with slow acetylator status to the development of GNA.


    The authors thank Chew-Wun Wu, MD, former Director of Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, for the collection of patients and bio-specimen, and Tai-Ling Lin, RN, Division of Gastroenterology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, for technical assistance. This study was supported by a grant from the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (VGH90-323, 93-12-16A).


    1. Hein DW. Molecular genetics and function of NAT1 and NAT2: role in aromatic amine metabolism and carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 2002;506–507:65-77.
    2. Walraven JM, Zang Y, Trent JO, Hein DW. Structure/function evaluations of single nucleotide polymorphisms in human N-acetyltransferase 2. Curr Drug Metab. 2008;9:471-486.
    3. Hein DW. N-acetyltransferase SNPs: emerging concepts serve as a paradigm for understanding complexities of personalized medicine. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009;5:353-366.
    4. Sim E, Lack N, Wang CJ, Long H, Westwood I, Fullam E, et al. Arylamine N-acetyltransferases: structural and functional implications of polymorphisms. Toxicology. 2008;254:170-183.
    5. McDonagh EM, Boukouvala S, Aklillu E, Hein DW, Altman RB, Klein TE. PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for N-acetyltransferase 2. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2014;24:409-425.
    6. Agundez JA. Polymorphisms of human N-acetyltransferases and cancer risk. Curr Drug Metab. 2008;9:520-531.
    7. Agundez JA, Olivera M, Ladero JM, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Ledesma MC, Diaz-Rubio M, et al. Increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in NAT2-slow acetylators and CYP2D6-rapid metabolizers. Pharmacogenetics. 1996;6:501-512.
    8. Yu MW, Pai CI, Yang SY, Hsiao TJ, Chang HC, Lin SM, et al. Role of N-acetyltransferase polymorphisms in hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of smoking on risk. Gut. 2000;47:703-709.
    9. Huang YS, Chern HD, Su WJ, Wu JC, Lai SL, Yang SY, et al. Polymorphism of the N-acetyltransferase 2 gene as a susceptibility risk factor for antituberculosis drug-induced hepatitis. Hepatology. 2002;35:883-889.
    10. Huang YS, Chern HD, Wu JC, Chao Y, Huang YH, Chang FY, et al. Polymorphism of the N-acetyltransferase 2 gene, red meat intake, and the susceptibility of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1417-1422.
    11. Sanderson S, Salanti G, Higgins J. Joint effects of the N-acetyltransferase 1 and 2 (NAT1 and NAT2) genes and smoking on bladder carcinogenesis: a literature-based systematic HuGE review and evidence synthesis. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:741-751.
    12. Yang KC, Huang YS, Perng CL, Lin HC, Lee SD. Polymorphism of N-acetyltransferase 2 gene and the susceptibility to alcoholic liver cirrhosis: interaction with smoking. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35:1204-1208.
    13. Huang YS. Recent progress in genetic variation and risk of antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury. J Chin Med Assoc. 2014;77:169-173.
    14. Boissy RJ, Watson MA, Umbach DM, Deakin M, Elder J, Strange RC, et al. A pilot study investigating the role of NAT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms in gastric adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2000;87:507-511.
    15. Katoh T, Boissy R, Nagata N, Kitagawa K, Kuroda Y, Itoh H, et al. Inherited polymorphism in the N-acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1) and 2 (NAT2) genes and susceptibility to gastric and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2000;85:46-49.
    16. Ladero JM, Agundez JA, Olivera M, Lozano L, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Diaz-Rubio M, et al. N-acetyltransferase 2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and risk of gastric carcinoma. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;58:115-118.
    17. Suzuki S, Muroishi Y, Nakanishi I, Oda Y. Relationship between genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes (CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTM1, and NAT2), drinking habits, histological subtypes, and p53 gene point mutations in Japanese patients with gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:220-230.
    18. Agudo A, Sala N, Pera G, Capella G, Berenguer A, Garcia N, et al. No association between polymorphisms in CYP2E1, GSTM1, NAT1, NAT2 and the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1043-1045.
    19. Boccia S, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Persiani R, Gianfagna F, Rausei S, Arzani D, et al. Polymorphisms in metabolic genes, their combination and interaction with tobacco smoke and alcohol consumption and risk of gastric cancer: a case-control study in an Italian population. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:206.
    20. Kobayashi M, Otani T, Iwasaki M, Natsukawa S, Shaura K, Koizumi Y, et al. Association between dietary heterocyclic amine levels, genetic polymorphisms of NAT2, CYP1A1, and CYP1A2, and risk of stomach cancer: a hospital-based case-control study in Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:198-205.
    21. Zhang YW, Eom SY, Kim YD, Song YJ, Yun H, Park JS, et al. Effects of dietary factors and the NAT2 acetylator status on gastric cancer in Koreans Y. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:139-145.
    22. Shen X, Zhang J, Yan Y, Yang Y, Fu G, Pu Y. Analysis and estimates of the attributable risk for environmental and genetic risk factors in gastric cancer in a Chinese population. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2009;72:759-766.
    23. Malik MA, Upadhyay R, Modi DR, Zargar SA, Mittal B. Association of NAT2 gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to esophageal and gastric cancers in the Kashmir Valley. Arch Med Res. 2009;40:416-423.
    24. Zhong X, Hui C, Xiao-Ling W, Yan L, Na L. NAT2 polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Arch Med Res. 2010;41:275-280.
    25. Yu J, Deng Y, Chen JP. N-acetyltransferase 2 status and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:6861-6865.
    26. Wu MS, Chen CJ, Lin JT. Hostenvironment interactions: their impact on progression from gastric inflammation to carcinogenesis and on development of new approaches to prevent and treat gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1878-1882.
    27. Chen MJ, Wu DC, Lin JM, Wu MT, Sung FC. Etiologic factors of gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma among men in Taiwan. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5472-5480.
    28. Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, Cunningham D, Jankowski JA, Wong R. Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut. 2011;60:1449-1472.
    29. de Martel C, Forman D, Plummer M. Gastric cancer: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42:219-240.
    30. Feskanich D, Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Litin LB, et al. Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993;93:790-796.
    31. Doll MA, Hein DW. Comprehensive human NAT2 genotype method using single nucleotide polymorphism-specific polymerase chain reaction primers and fluorogenic probes. Anal Biochem. 2001;288:106-108.
    32. Hein DW, Doll MA. Accuracy of various human NAT2 SNP genotyping panels to infer rapid, intermediate and slow acetylator phenotypes. Pharmacogenomics. 2012;13:31-41.

    arylamine N-acetyltransferase; gastric adenocarcinoma; gastric cancer; stomach neoplasms

    © 2016 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.