Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

Prevalence and risk factors of erosive esophagitis in Taiwan

Ou, Jian-Lina,b; Tu, Chin-Chiha,c,*; Hsu, Ping I.a; Pan, Min-Hsiungc; Lee, Chung-Chengb; Tsay, Feng-Woeia; Wang, Huay-Mina; Cheng, Lung-Chihd; Lai, Kwok-Hunga; Yu, Hsien-Chunga

Author Information
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: February 2012 - Volume 75 - Issue 2 - p 60-64
doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.12.008

    Abstract

    1. Introduction

    Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder in the western population, with a prevalence ranging from 14% to 31% for weekly reflux symptoms.1–9 The prevalence of GERD is considerably low in the Chinese population, in which symptoms of heartburn or acid regurgitation occur monthly or more frequently in 9.3% of subjects, according to a population survey.10

    GERD can be subdivided into erosive esophagitis and endoscopy-negative reflux disease (or nonerosive reflux disease). Patients with nonerosive reflux disease have no mucosal breaks in the esophagus but have typical reflux symptoms. In contrast, patients with erosive esophagitis have mucosal breaks in the lower esophagus, as seen by endoscopy.11 The prevalence of erosive esophagitis among dyspeptic patients has increased in recent decades in Taiwan, as revealed by comparing the data published in 1991 to those published in 1978.12–14 According to a report published in 1995, the prevalence of erosive esophagitis in Taiwan was 5% in subjects who underwent a physical check-up. This prevalence was lower than that in western countries (10–20%).15,16

    However, aging of the population, westernization of diet, and changes in lifestyles have been observed in the Taiwanese population in recent decades. It is reasonable to expect the prevalence of erosive esophagitis to be increasing now. Recently, a health screening program in a tertiary care center revealed 29% of subjects with manifestations suggesting GERD, including nonerosive reflux disease in 10.6%, symptomatic erosive esophagitis in 3.6%, and asymptomatic erosive esophagitis in 14.8%.17 Additionally, another recent study has demonstrated the time trend for the increase in the prevalence of erosive esophagitis in Taiwan from 2000 (14.5%) to 2007 (23.5%).18

    In addition to the prevalence of reflux esophagitis, risk factors of erosive esophagitis among the Taiwanese and Koreans have been reported.19 However, only the clinical parameters for reflux esophagitis have been studied in the Asian population. Whether the biochemical risk factors are relevant to erosive esophagitis in the general population remains unclear.

    The aims of this study were to investigate the current prevalence of erosive esophagitis in Taiwan, and to identify the clinical and biochemical risk factors for this disease.

    2. Methods

    2.1. Participants

    From January 2008 to May 2009, 2040 consecutive subjects who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during their annual self-paid health check-ups at the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan were enrolled in this study. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years old, subjects' refusal to participate, and history of esophageal stricture and laryngeal stenosis. The study was approved by the hospital's human subjects committee.

    2.2. Study design

    Three experienced endoscopists (Hsu PI, Cheng LJ, and Yu SC) performed endoscopy using the Olympus GIF XV10 and GIF XQ200 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) systems after subjects had fasted overnight. The presence of esophageal mucosal breaks and hiatus hernia were carefully examined, and the length of the breaks was measured by opening a pair of biopsy forceps of known size in front of the breaks. The severity of esophagitis was classified according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification (grades A–D),20 which is based on the length and confluence of mucosal breaks.

    To assess the association between clinical characteristics and asymptomatic esophagitis, the following data were recorded for each subject with a standardized questionnaire: age; sex; smoking habit; alcohol, tea and coffee consumption; betel nut chewing habit; history of hypertension and antihypertensive drugs; diabetes; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the following formula: BMI = weight (kg)/(height)2 (m2). The Department of Health (DOH) in Taiwan defines overweight individuals as those with a BMI ≥ 24 and obese individuals as those with a BMI ≥ 27; the subjects in our study were classified as thin, normal, overweight, and obese according to BMI. In addition, venous blood was drawn before endoscopy for determination of blood sugar, triglyceride, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. All variables were categorized for data analyses.

    2.3. Endoscopic findings

    The LA classification was used to evaluate the severity of erosive esophagitis. The criteria for the diagnosis of esophagitis were as follows: grade A, one or more mucosal breaks confined to the mucosal folds, each no longer than 5 mm; grade B, at least one mucosal break longer than 5 mm and confined to the mucosal folds; grade C, at least one mucosal break continuing between the tops of two or more mucosal folds but not circumferential; and grade D, circumferential mucosal break.

    2.4. Statistical analysis

    The χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was performed to investigate the relationships between the rate of erosive esophagitis and clinical characteristics. The following variables were included: sex; age (< 45, 45–60, or > 60 years); smoking history (yes or no); history of alcohol consumption (none, ≤3 times per week, or > 3 times per week); consumption of coffee (yes or no) and tea (yes or no); betel nut chewing (no, ≤3 times per week, or > 3 times per week); history of diabetes medication (yes or no); history of hypertension (yes or no); use of calcium channel blockers (yes or no); use of isosorbide dinitrate (yes or no); history of COPD (yes or no); BMI (< 18.5, 18.5–24, 24–27, or > 27); hiatus hernia (yes or no); fasting sugar levels (≤ 110 mg/mL or > 110 mg/mL); serum triglyceride levels (<150 mg/dL or ≥ 150 mg/dL); serum total cholesterol levels (≤ 240 mg/mL or > 240 mg/mL); serum HDL cholesterol levels in male subjects (<40 mg/dL or ≥ 40 mg/dL); serum HDL cholesterol levels in female subjects (<50 mg/dL or ≥ 50 mg/dL); and serum LDL levels (<160 mg/dL or ≥ 160 mg/dL). A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Those variables found to be significant by univariate analysis were subsequently assessed by a stepwise logistic regression method to identify independent clinical and biochemical factors predicting the presence of reflux esophagitis.

    3. Results

    3.1. Prevalence of erosive esophagitis

    A total of 2040 subjects (mean age, 51.4 ± 12.19 years; male/female, 1195/845) who underwent a medical check-up at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan were recruited for the study. Of these patients, 352 (17.3%) had erosive esophagitis (Table 1). The prevalence of erosive esophagitis in male and female subjects was 23.8% and 7.9%, respectively. The distribution of the esophagitis cases according to the LA classification was as follows: grade A, 71.6%; grade B, 27.8%; grade C, 0.5%; and Grade D, 0%.

    Table 1
    Table 1:
    Demographic data of the studied subjects (n = 2040).

    3.2. Independent clinical and biochemical factors predicting development of erosive esophagitis

    Table 2 shows the associations between clinical and biochemical characteristics and the presence of erosive esophagitis. The incidence of erosive esophagitis was higher in male than in female subjects. Additionally, history of smoking, alcohol consumption, betel nut chewing habit, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, use of calcium channel blockers, BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2, hiatus hernia, hyperglycemia (fasting sugar ≥ 110 mg/dL), and hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride ≥ 150 mg/dL) were significantly associated with erosive esophagitis (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.019, p = 0.002, p = 0.023, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). However, age, coffee and tea consumption, COPD, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol were not significantly associated with erosive esophagitis.

    Table 2
    Table 2:
    Univariate analysis of clinical and biochemical factors associated with development of erosive esophagitis.
    Table 2
    Table 2:
    Continued

    Multivariate analysis with stepwise logistic regression showed that only male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.013, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.439–2.815; p < 0.001], smoking (OR = 1.301, 95% CI = 1.089–1.555; p = 0.004), BMI > 27 (OR = 1.348, 95% CI = 1.138–1.598; p = 0.001), and hiatus hernia (OR = 4.331, 95% CI = 3.304–5.785; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the development of erosive esophagitis (Table 3).

    Table 3
    Table 3:
    Independent risk factors for development of erosive esophagitis in Taiwan.

    4. Discussion

    GERD has been traditionally considered less common in Asia, especially in East Asia, where a prevalence as low as 2.4% in the general population was reported in the 1970s.13 The prevalence rate of erosive esophagitis in this study was found to be 17.3%, which was higher than that reported in two previous studies conducted in 1995 (5%) and 1999 (12%) in Taiwan. Additionally, the prevalence rate was also higher than that in Koreans (3.4%) and Japanese (7.1%) and comparable to that in Swedes (15.5%) with the same background as the subjects of this study. This finding indicates that the prevalence of erosive esophagitis has increased in Taiwan in recent decades.

    The reasons for the increasing prevalence of erosive esophagitis remain unclear, but they are probably related to the changes in lifestyles, westernization of diet, lack of exercise, aging of the population, and a decrease in Helicobacter pylori infection. Improvement of diagnostic techniques such as endoscopy and increased medical attention to erosive esophagitis are other possible factors.

    In this study, multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, smoking, obesity, and hiatus hernia were four independent risk factors for the development of erosive esophagitis, with ORs of 2.013, 1.301, 1.348, and 4.331, respectively. The association of erosive esophagitis with male sex and smoking in our study was consistent with another recent study showing that male sex, smoking, and metabolic syndrome independently increased the likelihood of progressing from a nonerosive to an erosive stage of disease and/or lowered the likelihood of disease regession.21

    Although hyperglycemia (fasting sugar ≥ 110 mg/dL) and hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL) were two biochemical factors related to the development of erosive esophagitis, the two factors were excluded as independent factors following logistic regression.

    In the current study, hiatus hernia was the most important factor related to the development of erosive esophagitis. This finding is supported by other studies.19,22–24 It is believed that the crural diaphragm is important in the prevention of gastroesophageal reflux during periods of low lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure.25 Hiatus hernia results in malfunction of the gastroesophageal barrier. People with hiatus hernia have more reflux episodes during lower LES pressure, swallow-associated normal LES relaxation, deep inspiration, and strain in the presence of GERD. Hiatus hernia increases esophageal acid exposure because it impairs the LES, reduces LES pressure and length, and alters the opening characteristics of the gastroesophageal junction.26

    Male sex was also identified as an independent risk factor for erosive esophagitis in the present study. Several previous studies also have shown that male sex is a risk factor for reflux esophagitis.27 However, a population-based study in the United States failed to show any differences between male and female subjects with respect to the prevalence of reflux symptoms.28 Thus far, the reason for the higher frequency of asymptomatic erosive esophagitis in male subjects is unclear. However, lower parietal cell mass and better living habits in women may be two of the factors leading to the lower risk of erosive esophagitis.

    The overall prevalence of obesity in Taiwan was 19.2% and 13.4% in men and women, respectively. Obesity has been identified as an independent risk factor in several previous reports.29 In this study, we found a strong positive association between obesity and erosive esophagitis. These associations remained robust even after adjustments for several important potential confounding factors, including age, sex, and lifestyles. However, a previous study in Taiwan failed to identify obesity as a risk factor for the development of erosive esophagitis.19 The mechanism by which obesity increases the risk of erosive esophagitis is unknown. The possible explanations include the development of hiatus hernia, increased intra-abdominal pressure, increased frequency of transient LES relaxation,30 and high acid secretion rates. Moreover, the upper gastrointestinal tract of obese subjects seems to be more sensitive to acid.

    In the present study, smoking was also found to be a risk factor for the development of erosive esophagitis in Taiwan. Several experimental studies have revealed a reduction in LES pressure and frequent reflux episodes during smoking.31 Additionally, a previous study showed that GERD symptoms were related to the total amount of smoking.32

    In the present study, most erosive esophagitis cases were of mild to moderate severity; this finding was similar to those in studies from other Asian countries and Scandinavia.16,33,34

    It is important to note that 26.4% of the subjects did not have any symptoms, such as acid regurgitation and heartburn. Currently, the natural history of asymptomatic esophagitis remains unclear35 and merits further study to investigate the necessity of medical therapy.

    In conclusion, the current prevalence of erosive esophagitis in Taiwan is 17.3%. Male sex, smoking, obesity, and hiatus hernia are four independent risk factors for the development of erosive esophagitis in the Taiwanese. Adequate weight control and abstinence from smoking may be important steps for the prevention of erosive esophagitis in Taiwan.

    References

    1. Ruth M, Finizia C, Lundell L. Occurrence and future history of oesophageal symptoms in an urban Swedish population: results of a questionnaire-based, ten-year follow-up study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:629-635.
    2. Kennedy RJ. The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in a UK population and the consultation behaviour of patients with these symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:1589-1594.
    3. Diaz-Rubio M, Moreno-Elola-Olaso C, Rey E, Locke GR 3rd, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux: prevalence, severity, duration and associated factors in a Spanish population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19:95-105.
    4. Locke GR 3rd, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:448-456.
    5. Nocon M, Keil T, Willich SN. Prevalence and sociodemographics of reflux symptoms in Germany: results from a national survey. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:1601-1605.
    6. Watson DI, Lally CJ. Prevalence of symptoms and use of medication for gastroesophageal reflux in an Australian community. World J Surg. 2009;33:88-94.
    7. Chiocca JC, Olmos JA, Salis GB, Soifer LO, Higa R, Marcolongo M. Prevalence, clinical spectrum and atypical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in Argentina: a nationwide population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22:331-342.
    8. Rey E, Elola-Olaso CM, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Locke GR 3rd, Díaz-Rubio M. Prevalence of atypical symptoms and their association with typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in Spain. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:969-975.
    9. de Oliveira SS, dos Santos Ida S, da Silva JF, Machado EC. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence and associated factors. Arq Gastroenterol. 2005;42:116-121.
    10. Hu WH, Wong WM, Lam CL, Lam KF, Hui WM, Lai KC, et al. Anxiety but not depression determines health care-seeking behaviour in Chinese patients with dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16:2081-2088.
    11. Moayyedi P, Talley NJ. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet. 2006;367:2086-2100.
    12. Wang TH, Lai MY, Lin RT, Wu CF, Chen DS, Wang CY, et al. Clinical experience with the upper gastrointestinal panendoscope GIF-P2 (Olympus). J Formos Med Assoc. 1978;77:778-783.
    13. Chen PC, Wu CS, Chang-Chien CS, Liaw YF. Comparison of Olympus GIF-P2 and GIF-K panendoscopy. J Formos Med Assoc. 1979;78:136-140.
    14. Yeh C, Hsu CT, Ho AS, Sampliner RE, Fass R. Erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus in Taiwan: a higher frequency than expected. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:702-706.
    15. Inamori M, Togawa J, Nagase H, Abe Y, Umezawa T, Nakajima A, et al. Clinical characteristics of Japanese reflux esophagitis patients as determined by Los Angeles classification. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:172-176.
    16. Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T, Johansson SE, Lind T, Bolling-Sternevald E, et al. High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and esophagitis with or without symptoms in the general adult Swedish population: a Kalixanda study report. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:275-285.
    17. Lee YI, Lee YC, Wang HP, Chiu HM, Liao SC, Huang SP, et al. Comparative analysis between psychological and endoscopic profiles in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective study based on screening endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:798-804.
    18. Chen MJ, Lee YC, Chiu HM, Wu MS, Wang HP, Lin JT. Time trends of endoscopic and pathological diagnoses related to gastroesophageal reflux disease in a Chinese population: eight years single institution experience. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23:201-207.
    19. Chen TS, Chang FY. The prevalence and risk factors of reflux esophagitis among adult Chinese population in Taiwan. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:819-822.
    20. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45:172-180.
    21. Lee YC, Yen AM, Tai JJ, Chang SH, Lin JT, Chiu HM, et al. The effect of metabolic risk factors on the natural course of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut. 2009;58:174-181.
    22. Avidan B, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, Sontag SJ. Risk factors for erosive reflux esophagitis: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:41-46.
    23. Wilson LJ, Ma W, Hirschowitz BI. Association of obesity with hiatal hernia and esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2840-2844.
    24. Mishima I, Adachi K, Arima N, Amano K, Takashima T, Moritani M, et al. Prevalence of endoscopically negative and positive gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Japanese. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1005-1009.
    25. Van Herwaarden MA, Samsom M, Smout AJPM. Excess gastroesophageal reflux in patients with hiatus hernia is caused by mechanisms other than transient LES relaxations. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1439-1446.
    26. Gordon C, Kang JY, Neild PJ, Maxwell JD. The role of the hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:719-732.
    27. Du J, Liu J, Hong Zhang, Yu CH, Li YM. Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease, and non-erosive reflux disease among Chinese patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:6009-6015.
    28. Ecclissato C, Carvalho AF, Ferraz JG, de Nucci G, De Souza CA, Pedrazzoli J Jr. Prevalence of peptic lesions in asymptomatic, healthy volunteers. Dig Liver Dis. 2001;33:403-406.
    29. El-Serag HB, Graham DY, Satia JA, Rabeneck L. Obesity is an independent risk factor for GERD symptoms and erosive esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1243-1250.
    30. Wu JC, Mui LM, Cheung CM, Chan Y, Sung JJ. Obesity is associated with increased transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:883-889.
    31. Kadakia SC, Kikendall JW, Maydonovitch C, Johnson LF. Effect of cigarette smoking on gastroesophageal reflux measured by 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1785-1790.
    32. Nilsson M, Johnsen R, Ye W, Hveem K, Lagergren J. Lifestyle related risk factors in the aetiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut. 2004;53:1730-1735.
    33. Lee SJ, Song CW, Jeen YT, Chun HJ, Lee HS, Um SH, et al. Prevalence of endoscopic reflux esophagitis among Koreans. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:373-376.
    34. Chang CS, Poon SK, Lien HC, Chen GH. The incidence of reflux esophagitis among the Chinese. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:668-671.
    35. Nozu T, Komiyama HJ. Clinical characteristics of asymptomatic esophagitis. Gastroenterol. 2008;43:27-31.
    Keywords:

    body mass index; erosive esophagitis; gastroesophageal reflux disease; hiatus hernia

    © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.