Effective salvage therapy of imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor with combination of imatinib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin : Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Case Report

Effective salvage therapy of imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor with combination of imatinib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

Hsieh, Yao-Yua, b; Yen, Chueh-Chuana, b; Yeh, Chun-Nanc; Tzen, Chin-Yuand; Liu, Jin-Hwanga, b; Lee, Hui-Jue; Teng, Hao-Weia, b; Tzeng, Cheng-Hwaia, b; Chiou, Tzeon-Jyeb, f; Chao, Ta-Chunga, b, *

Author Information
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association: June 2011 - Volume 74 - Issue 6 - p 272-274
doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.04.007

    Abstract

    1. Introduction

    Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, resulting from mutations in c-kit and platelet derived growth factor receptor.1 GISTs can arise anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract but are most common in the stomach (50%) and small bowel (25%).2 The primary treatment is curative surgery. When GIST became metastatic, it is generally considered chemo-resistant.3 The most common metastatic site are liver and peritoneum. Imatinib, which inhibits the activated mutant c-kit and platelet derived growth factor receptor, has become the first line treatment of advanced GISTs.4–6 The initial standard dose 400 mg/day was considered to be safe and to achieve response induction. Dose escalation to 80 mg/day is a reasonable option for patients progressing on 400 mg/day.4–8 However, some patients posses primary resistance and others may develop secondary resistance after several months of imatinib treatment. We here report a case with metastatic GIST developed secondary resistance after imatinib treatment successfully treated with combination of imatinib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD).

    2. Case report

    A 60-year-old Taiwanese man was diagnosed with an advanced GIST in March of 2008 after several months of abdominal fullness and poor appetite. A computed tomography (CT) guided biopsy of the abdominal mass was performed, and histopathological examination showed typical features of GIST with positive CD117 immuno-staining. Imatinib 400 mg per day was prescribed with good response. However, a follow-up abdominal CT scan 7 months after imatinib treatment showed progressive change and new liver metastases. All recurrent tumors were resected in the December of 2008. Mutation analysis of KIT gene in all the resected tumors revealed deletion mutations of codons 558–565 in exon 11 (Fig. 1A), whereas a missense mutation was also identified at codon 822 in exon 17 in one resected tumor (Fig. 1B). The daily imatinib dose was then increased to 800 mg. Unfortunately, abdominal CT scan, one month later, showed tumor progression in the liver and peritoneal seeding. Palliative surgery was performed, and imatinib was continued at the same dose. However, generalized disease progression over liver and peritoneum was found three months later (Fig. 2A and B). Therapy was then changed to 400 mg imatinib per day plus dasatinib 70 mg twice a day, but the patient experienced increased ascites. Positron emission tomography scan showed high uptake of flurodeoxyglucose 18 in the tumors. Dasatinib was discontinued, whereas imatinib was maintained at 400 mg per day. Furthermore, PLD50 mg/m2 every three weeks was administered as salvage chemotherapy. The ascites remarkably improved after one dose of PLD administration. The follow-up abdominal CT scan 2 months later revealed a marked decrease of ascites and shrinkage of the liver and peritoneal metastases (Fig. 2C and D, indicated by the arrows). Unfortunately, a CT scan of the abdomen five months later (after 7 doses of PLD) revealed disease progression. Combination of imatinib and PLD resulted in a 5-month progression free period for this patient with imatinib-resistant GIST.

    F1-7
    Fig. 1:
    Mutation analysis of all resected tumor showing codon 558–565 deletion in exon 11 in all resected tumor (A, arrow) and N mutation in exon 17 in one resected tumor (B, arrow).
    F2-7
    Fig. 2:
    Computed tomography scan showed the treatment response of the tumor burden before (A and B, arrow, April 2009) and after (C and D, arrow, Jun 2009) administration of Liposomal doxorubicin.

    3. Discussion

    Secondary resistance, which most often results from secondary mutations of KIT exon 13 or 17, is almost inevitable after imatinib treatment. For this case with exon 17 mutations, there are few treatment options available.9 Surgical intervention was performed for the first local recurrence, as recommended by previous publications.10,11 Unfortunately, as disease progressed, dasatinib was chosen based on its in vitro efficacy only.12–14 However, it did not produce any response and instead worsened patient’s condition. Previous studies failed to show efficacy of PLD alone in treating advanced GIST.15,16 However, in this particular case, combination of PLD with imatinib produced a dramatic response by halting the rapidly deteriorating disease course and inducing a sustained tumor-control period. PLD may indeed show efficacy in GIST when used in combination with imatinib. Furthermore, the use of PLD may result in a higher intra-tumor concentration of doxorubicin, which can overcome the chemotherapy resistance. The response seen in this patient is significant and provides evidence of clinical benefit of combining imatinib and PLD in treating imatinib-resistant GIST. This combination treatment warrants further study.

    References

    1. Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Demetri GD, Blanke CD, von Mehren M, Joensuu H, et al. Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4342-4349.
    2. Emory TS, Sobin LH, Lukes L, Lee DH, O’Leary TJ. Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: dependence on anatomic site. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:82-87.
    3. Dematteo RP, Heinrich MC, El-Rifai WM, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Antonescu CR. Clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: before and after STI-571. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:466-477.
    4. Blanke CD, Rankin C, Demetri GD, Ryan CW, von Mehren M, Benjamin RS, et al. Phase III randomized, intergroup trial assessing imatinib mesylate at two dose levels in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing the kit receptor tyrosine kinase. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:626-632.
    5. Zalcberg JR, Verweij J, Casali PG, Le Cesne A, Reichardt P, Blay JY, et al. Outcome of patients with advanced gastro-intestinal stromal tumours crossing over to a daily imatinib dose of 800 mg after progression on 400 mg. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:1751-1757.
    6. Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, Reichardt P, Blay JY, Issels R, et al. Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;364:1127-1134.
    7. Patel S, Zalcberg JR. Optimizing the dose of imatinib for treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: lessons from the phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:501-509.
    8. Park I, Ryu MH, Sym SJ, Lee SS, Jang G, Kim TW, et al. Dose escalation of imatinib after failure of standard dose in Korean patients with metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39:105-110.
    9. Heinrich MC, Maki RG, Corless CL, Antonescu CR, Harlow A, Griffith D, et al. Primary and secondary kinase genotypes correlate with the biological and clinical activity of sunitinib in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5352-5359.
    10. Raut CP, Posner M, Desai J, Morgan JA, George S, Zahrieh D, et al. Surgical management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after treatment with targeted systemic therapy using kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2325-2331.
    11. DeMatteo RP, Maki RG, Singer S, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Antonescu CR. Results of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy followed by surgical resection for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Ann Surg. 2007;245:347-352.
    12. Debiec-Rychter M, Cools J, Dumez H, Sciot R, Stul M, Mentens N, et al. Mechanisms of resistance to imatinib mesylate in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and activity of the PKC412 inhibitor against imatinib-resistant mutants. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:270-279.
    13. Prenen H, Cools J, Mentens N, Folens C, Sciot R, Schoffski P, et al. Efficacy of the kinase inhibitor SU11248 against gastrointestinal stromal tumor mutants refractory to imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:2622-2627.
    14. Guo T, Agaram NP, Wong GC, Hom G, D’Adamo D, Maki RG, et al. Sorafenib inhibits the imatinib-resistant KITT670I gatekeeper mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4874-4881.
    15. Le Cesne A, Judson I, Crowther D, Rodenhuis S, Keizer HJ, van Hoesel Q, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing conventional-dose doxorubicin plus ifosfamide versus high-dose doxorubicin plus ifosfamide plus recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2676-2684.
    16. Poveda A, Lopez-Pousa A, Martin J, Del Muro JG, Bernabe R, Casado A, et al. Phase II clinical trial with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (CAELYX(R)/Doxil(R)) and quality of life evaluation (EORTC QLQ-C30) in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a study of the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas (GEIS). Sarcoma. 2005;9:127-132.
    Keywords:

    GIST; Imatinib-resistant; kit mutation; Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

    © 2011 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.