Secondary Logo

Smoking and the Increased Risk for Serrated Polyps

Implications for Screening and Surveillance

Anderson, Joseph C., MD*,†,‡; Alpern, Zvi A., MD§

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology: May/June 2019 - Volume 53 - Issue 5 - p 319–321
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001207
EDITORIAL
Free

*Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT

The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT

§Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY

The contents of this work do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.

Address correspondence to: Joseph C. Anderson, MD, VA Medical Center, 215 North Main Street, White River Junction, VT 05009 (e-mail: joseph.anderson@dartmouth.edu).

Identifying risk factors that can predict which individuals are at risk for colorectal neoplasia can be used to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) more efficiently. Assigning numerical values, that are based on results from models, to these factors can help stratify individuals into high and low-risk groups. One potential strategy could involve adults with high-risk scores receiving more sensitive but more invasive tests such as colonoscopy, while those in the low-risk group undergo fecal immunochemical test (FIT) testing. In the current paper, the authors examine an important colorectal neoplasia risk factor, smoking and its association with colorectal neoplasia.1

Using a case-control design, the investigators examined data from 828 consecutive participants and compared the risk factors in adults with adenomas and serrated polyps with those in adults without any polyps. Smoking exposure was quantified by status, duration, and intensity. They also examined other important risk factors such as sex, ethnicity, alcohol use,2 obesity,3 physical activity, family history of CRC, and medication use. After adjusting for the covariates, they observed that current smoking was strongly associated with conventional adenomas [odds ratio (OR)=3.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.90-4.74). In addition, smoking >20 years had a similar increase in risk (OR=2.98; 95% CI: 1.85-4.79), as compared with nonsmokers or those who had smoked for <1 year. They also observed that smoking >20 pack years was significantly associated with having serrated polyps (OR=5.91; 95% CI: 2.64-13.22). Of note, the point estimate for the risk for serrated polyps was higher than that for conventional adenoma, suggesting a stronger link between tobacco exposure and serrated polyps. However, the 95% CIs for the 2 risks overlapped. Overall, the findings of the study suggest that smokers with a 20-year or greater exposure had an elevated risk for conventional adenomas as well as several polyps.

These data support the findings of a meta-analysis based on data from several screening studies4–6 that demonstrated that smoking exposure is associated with a 2-fold increase for colorectal neoplasia.7 A threshold exposure of about 20 pack years or greater has been observed in other studies.6,8 This exposure level is consistent with the findings of the current study, as the individuals in the current study smoked for an average of 28 years, and the intensity was ∼1 pack per day.

The study also demonstrated that serrated polyps were significantly associated with smoking. Smoking has been shown to be associated with the serrated pathway and, in fact, has been linked with even small serrated lesions known as aberrant crypt foci9 or abnormalities in the mucosa, which are only a few crypts in size. Smoking has also been linked with having sessile serrated polyps,10 especially those large lesions on the right side of the colon.11

There are important implications for these data, as serrated polyps are part of a pathway that may account for up to 30% of all CRCs.12 Serrated polyps are a family of colorectal lesions that include the commonly detected hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated polyps, and the much less commonly encountered traditional serrated polyps.13 Sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are of the greatest concern for endoscopists, as they can develop dysplasia and thus CRC. In addition, they are flat and can be easily missed. However, as it can be difficult to distinguish between some hyperplastic polyps and SSPs, other factors that are predictive of SSPs, such as larger size and proximal location,14 may be used to identify clinically significant serrated polyps. An analysis of a screening trial in Europe demonstrated that individuals with large (≥1 cm) serrated polyps may be at a similar risk for CRC as those individuals with advanced adenomas on index exam.15 While the current study did not examine serrated polyps by size or histology, they did analyze by location and observed that smokers were at an ∼6-fold increased risk for proximally located serrated polyps. Thus, the current study suggests that smokers are at significantly increased risk for clinically important serrated polyps that might be SSPs.

As smokers appear to be at an increased risk for serrated polyps, the choice for a screening test may be an important consideration. It has been shown that fecal immunochemical testing may not be as sensitive for flat polyps,16 especially those that are serrated.17,18 This is because they tend to bleed less than protruding or conventional adenomas. Conversely, fecal DNA testing may be more sensitive than FIT due to the presence of 2 methylation markers.19 Thus, the fecal DNA may be a better stool-based test to screen smokers than FIT. In addition, as serrated polyps and other lesions observed in smokers tend to be flat,20 CT colonography may not be an appropriate screening test.21 Therefore, colonoscopy that has the best sensitivity for serrated polyps may be the test of choice for smokers (Table 1).

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

Smoking may also have an important impact on screening and surveillance with colonoscopy, because their increased risk for adenomas and serrated polyps will allow for higher detection rates.22 Given the importance of achieving adequate adenoma detection rate (ADR) in ensuring protection from interval cancers,23 adjustment in ADR benchmarks to appropriately account for these factors may be indicated in populations with particularly high prevalence of these risk factors. For example, a population in which 50% of the screening population has a 20–pack-year or greater smoking exposure, such as those observed in a population such as that of the Veterans Affairs,24 might require a higher ADR to ensure adequate protection from interval CRC. In addition, given the difficulty in detecting serrated polyps, careful attention to quality measures such as adequate bowel preparation and withdrawal time will be crucial in detecting serrated polyps.25,26 More recently, a study demonstrated that smoking had a stronger link with individuals who had both clinically significant serrated polyps as well as conventional advanced adenomas, as compared with even those individuals with high-risk adenomas alone.27 This group of individuals with both lesions of the separated and conventional pathway have been shown to have an increased risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia28; thus, smoking may have a significant impact on risk for future lesions as well as index lesions.

Finally, as smoking may increase the risk of individuals for adenomas and serrated polyps, should they be screened at an earlier age? This question is of great concern given the recent reports of an increased prevalence of CRC in adults less than 50 years of age.29 The American College of Gastroenterology 2009 guidelines suggested that smokers who had a 20–pack-year history of smoking should be considered high risk.30 The guidelines fell short of recommending that those individuals with a 20–pack-year history of smoking receive CRC screening at 45 years of age due to lack of data. Thus, more data are needed regarding the age at which smokers should start screening and which tests are the most effective in this population.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Fliss-Isakov N, Zelber-Sagi S, Webb M, et al. Smoking habits are strongly associated with colorectal polyps in a population-based case-control study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52:805–811.
2. Anderson JC, Alpern Z, Sethi G, et al. Prevalence and risk of colorectal neoplasia in consumers of alcohol in a screening population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2049–2055.
3. Anderson JC, Messina CR, Dakhllalah F, et al. Body mass index: a marker for significant colorectal neoplasia in a screening population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:285–290.
4. Anderson JC, Attam R, Alpern Z, et al. Prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in smokers. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2777–2783.
5. Anderson JC. Detection of serrated polyps: How do endoscopists rate? Endoscopy. 2018;50:950–952.
6. Anderson JC, Latreille M, Messina C, et al. Smokers as a high-risk group: data from a screening population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:747–752.
7. Botteri E, Iodice S, Raimondi S, et al. Cigarette smoking and adenomatous polyps: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:388–395.
8. Anderson JC, Moezardalan K, Messina CR, et al. Smoking and the association of advanced colorectal neoplasia in an asymptomatic average risk population: analysis of exposure and anatomical location in men and women. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:3616–3623.
9. Anderson JC, Pleau DC, Rajan TV, et al. Increased frequency of serrated aberrant crypt foci among smokers. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1648–1654.
10. Anderson JC, Rangasamy P, Rustagi T, et al. Risk factors for sessile serrated adenomas. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:694–699.
11. Rustagi T, Rangasamy P, Myers M, et al. Sessile serrated adenomas in the proximal colon are likely to be flat, large and occur in smokers. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:5271–5277.
12. O’Brien MJ, Zhao Q, Yang S. Colorectal serrated pathway cancers and precursors. Histopathology. 2015;66:49–65.
13. Lindholm CR, Anderson JC, Srivastava A. The dark side of the colon: current issues surrounding the significance, prevalence, detection, diagnosis and management of serrated polyps. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019;35:34–41.
14. Anderson JC, Lisovsky M, Greene MA, et al. Factors associated with classification of hyperplastic polyps as sessile serrated adenomas/polyps on morphologic review. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52:524–529.
15. Holme O, Bretthauer M, Eide TJ, et al. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with serrated polyps. Gut. 2015;64:929–936.
16. van Doorn SC, Stegeman I, Stroobants AK, et al. Fecal immunochemical testing results and characteristics of colonic lesions. Endoscopy. 2015;47:1011–1017.
17. Chang LC, Shun CT, Hsu WF, et al. Fecal immunochemical test detects sessile serrated adenomas and polyps with a low level of sensitivity. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:872.e1–879.e1.
18. Anderson JC, Robertson DJ. Serrated polyp detection by the fecal immunochemical test: an imperfect FIT. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:880–882.
19. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1287–1297.
20. Anderson JC, Stein B, Kahi CJ, et al. Association of smoking and flat adenomas: results from an asymptomatic population screened with a high-definition colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1234–1240.
21. IJspeert JE, Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Kuipers EJ, et al. CT-colonography vs. colonoscopy for detection of high-risk sessile serrated polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:516–522.
22. Anderson JC, Weiss JE, Robinson CM, et al. Adenoma detection rates for screening colonoscopies in smokers and obese adults: data from the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51:e95–e100.
23. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–1306.
24. Lieberman DA, Prindiville S, Weiss DG, et al. Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA. 2003;290:2959–2967.
25. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, et al. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:463–470.
26. Butterly L, Robinson CM, Anderson JC, et al. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:417–426.
27. Anderson JC, Calderwood AH, Christensen BC, et al. Smoking and other risk factors in individuals with synchronous conventional high-risk adenomas and clinically significant serrated polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1828–1835.
28. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, et al. Risk of metachronous high-risk adenomas and large serrated polyps in individuals with serrated polyps on index colonoscopy: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:117–127.e2.
29. Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:250–281.
30. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:739–750.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.