Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

The Influence of Gastric Cancer Screening on the Stage at Diagnosis and Survival: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies in the Far East

Khanderia, Esha MBBS; Markar, Sheraz R. MRCS, MSc, MA, MBBChir; Acharya, Amish MBBS, BSc; Kim, Yeol MD, MPH, PhD; Kim, Young-Woo MD, PhD; Hanna, George B. PhD, FRCS

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology: March 2016 - Volume 50 - Issue 3 - p 190–197
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000466
Clinical Review

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effect of gastric cancer screening on the stage at diagnosis and survival from disease. A systematic review of the literature between January 1995 and December 2014 was performed. Studies that compared screened versus nonscreened populations for the diagnosis of gastric cancer and included the stage at diagnosis were analyzed. The QUADAS-2 and the ROBANS tools were used to assess the quality of the studies. A total of 11 studies from the Far East comprising 4039 participants in the screened and 6635 in the nonscreened groups were included. Screening was associated with a significant increase in the detection of early gastric cancer (EGC) [pooled odds ratio (POR)=3.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.01-5.06; P<0.0001] and reduction in the incidence of advanced gastric cancer (POR=0.27; 95% CI, 0.20-0.35; P<0.0001). Furthermore, screening improved the 5-year survival significantly (hazard ratio=0.56; 95% CI, 0.48-0.66; P<0.0001). About 73% of the screened patients were found to have EGC compared with 43% of the nonscreened patients. About 8% of the screened patients were found to have advanced gastric cancer compared with 54% of the nonscreened patients. Screening for gastric cancer is useful in detecting asymptomatic patients with EGC in high-prevalence areas. This in turn increases the number of treatable cancers and improves the 5-year survival. There is a need for the development and the validation of alternative risk-stratification tools in low-incidence areas to allow for similar benefits.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

*Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK

Division of Cancer Policy & Management, National Cancer Control Institute, Seoul, Korea

Division of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea

Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website,

Supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Diagnostic Evidence Co-operative London at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. S.R.M. is funded by the NIHR Doctoral Research Fellowship.

The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily represent those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.

The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.

Reprints: George B. Hanna, PhD, FRCS, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, South Wharf Road, London W2 1NY, UK (e-mail:

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.