To evaluate the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and risk of Barrett esophagus (BE) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database compared with 2 control groups—Medicare population controls and endoscopy controls.
BE principally arises as an adaptation to the proinflammatory state induced by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The relationship between obesity and BE is presumed to be mediated by GERD. However, evidence suggests central adiposity also increases risk of BE independent of GERD. Central adiposity is one risk factor defining MetS, which confers a systemic proinflammatory state—a potential GERD-independent mechanism by which obesity could increase the risk of BE.
MetS was defined as diagnosis of at least 3 of the following conditions: obesity, elevated triglycerides, high blood pressure, and elevated fasting glucose. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
In 2198 incident BE cases, prior MetS was significantly associated with BE (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval: 1.07, 1.36) compared with population controls. However, GERD status modified the association; among those without prior GERD, MetS increased risk of BE by 34%; however, no association was observed among those with a prior GERD diagnosis (P-value for effect modification <0.001). MetS was not associated with risk of BE compared with endoscopy controls.
MetS increased the risk of BE compared with population controls, an association driven by and confined to the non-GERD stratum. MetS may mediate an association between central adiposity and BE for those without GERD.
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
Divisions of *Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
‡Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
†Information Management Services, Rockville, MD
Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website, www.jcge.com.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institutes of Health.
Supported by the Intramural Program of the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health and Department of Health and Human Services.
The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.
Reprints: Jennifer Drahos, PhD, MPH, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rm 7-E226, MSC 9774, Bethesda, MD 20892 (e-mail: email@example.com).
Received October 21, 2013
Accepted February 10, 2014