Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Prescribers' Knowledge and Skills for Interpreting Research Results

A Systematic Review

Kahwati, Leila MD, MPH; Carmody, Dennis MPH; Berkman, Nancy PhD; Sullivan, Helen W. PhD, MPH; Aikin, Kathryn J. PhD; DeFrank, Jessica PhD

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions: Spring 2017 - Volume 37 - Issue 2 - p 129–136
doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000150
Literature Review
Buy
SDC

Introduction: Appropriate medication prescribing may be influenced by a prescriber's ability to understand and interpret medical research. The objective of this review was to synthesize the research related to prescribers' critical appraisal knowledge and skills—defined as the understanding of statistical methods, biases in studies, and relevance and validity of evidence.

Methods: We searched PubMed and other databases from January 1990 through September 2015. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies of any design conducted in the United States, the United Kingdom, or Canada that involved prescribers and that objectively measured critical appraisal knowledge, skills, understanding, attitudes, or prescribing behaviors. Data were narratively synthesized.

Results: We screened 1204 abstracts, 72 full-text articles, and included 29 studies. Study populations included physicians. Physicians' extant knowledge and skills were in the low to middle of the possible score ranges and demonstrated modest increases in response to interventions. Physicians with formal education in epidemiology, biostatistics, and research demonstrated higher levels of knowledge and skills. In hypothetical scenarios presenting equivalent effect sizes, the use of relative effect measures was associated with greater perceptions of medication effectiveness and intent to prescribe, compared with the use of absolute effect measures. The evidence was limited by convenience samples and study designs that limit internal validity.

Discussion: Critical appraisal knowledge and skills are limited among physicians. The effect measure used can influence perceptions of treatment effectiveness and intent to prescribe. How critical appraisal knowledge and skills fit among the myriad of influences on prescribing behavior is not known.

Dr. Kahwati: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. Mr. Carmody: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. Dr. Berkman: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. Dr. Sullivan: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD. Dr. Aikin: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD. Dr. DeFrank: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Correspondence: Leila Kahwati, MD, MPH, RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; e-mail: lkahwati@rti.org.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US Food and Drug Administration (Contract no. HHSF223201510002B). L.K., D.C., N.B., and J.D. efforts on this study were supported through this funding source, and they declare no other conflicts of interest. H.W.S. and K.J.A. are employees of the US Food and Drug Administration. The funding agency had no role in the decision to submit the manuscript for peer-reviewed publication but did review and approve the final draft that was submitted.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (http://www.jcehp.org).

© 2017 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website