Combination and rotational therapy in androgenetic alopecia : Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

View Point

Combination and rotational therapy in androgenetic alopecia

Mysore, Venkatram1; Kumaresan, Muthuvel2,; Dashore, Shuken3; Venkatram, Aniketh1

Author Information
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 16(2):p 71-80, April-June 2023. | DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_212_22
  • Open



Combinational and rotational therapy is a concept that has been widely used in medicine and dermatology, and cancer treatment, particularly in chronic and unresponsive conditions.[1] Rotational therapy consists of using drugs and procedures or their combinations at different periods, with the following objectives: minimize the side effects of the different modalities, optimize the efficacy of the modalities, and prevent resistance, ensure maximum patient comfort and benefit, reduce the cost of treatment, and enhance patient compliance.

These objectives are relevant for any long-term treatment of a chronic condition, and when multiple modalities with different mechanisms of actions and pharmacological properties are available to treat. The concept is based on the following:

  • a. Efficacy profile
  • b. Mechanisms of actions of different drugs
  • c. Side effect profile
  • d. Pharmacokinetics and dynamics
  • e. Duration of action and duration for which such treatments are needed
  • f. Ease and cost of treatments
  • g. Course of disease and its outcome

The concept of combination and rotational therapy is therefore useful and hence has been adapted to several diseases such as psoriasis, pemphigus, and Lupus erythematosus.[2-4]

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a disease that is chronic, often with a variable course, with multiple modalities of treatment, and hence fits into this category. It has some additional features––It is a cosmetic disease, affects the younger patients more, and affects them socially and psychologically. These patients are very internet savvy and information hungry, are very conscious of adverse effects, and very often are reluctant to take medicines. It is a problem where exaggeration and misinformation are prevalent on social media––a case in point is the adverse publicity on finasteride, particularly post-finasteride syndrome.[5-7] In this field, often new off-label treatments get introduced ahead of good evidence and achieve internet publicity. It is also a field that is practiced by different specialties such as dermatology, and plastic surgery.

Hence, a concept such as rotational therapy would benefit these patients, due to the advantages mentioned above, help in enhancing long-term compliance, and achieve clarity for the practitioners. This paper explains how existing modalities can be adapted to this concept.

The different modalities that can be part of such systematic combinational and rotational approaches include the following:

  • a. Minoxidil: Topical formulation with/without modifications; minoxidil finasteride combinations, minoxidil boosters such as tretinoin and dermaroller, and oral minoxidil,
  • b. Finasteride, oral and topical, alternate regimes of oral administration, oral dutasteride, and topical dutasteride
  • c. Hair transplantation
  • d. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
  • e. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
  • f. Vitamins, peptides, and other treatments
  • g. Diet and lifestyle

This paper will discuss how these modalities can be used either together or rotated sequentially or at intervals based on the current knowledge of the course and pathogenesis of AGA, mechanisms, and duration of actions of each treatment. As the scheme is based on the pathophysiology of AGA, the mechanisms of actions, pharmacokinetic data, and side effect profile it is important to understand these aspects and are discussed first.

Pathogenesis of androgenetic alopecia

AGA is characterized by continuous and progressive, but variable androgen-mediated miniaturization due to decreasing number of stem cells, with exacerbations and remissions. There are often variable periods of rapid progress, and stability. Other factors such as systemic diseases nutrition, lifestyle, stress, etc., may play a role. The key pathophysiological features of AGA are alteration in hair cycle development, follicular miniaturization, and inflammation. The anagen phase decreases with each cycle, while the length of telogen remains constant or is prolonged; this results in a reduction of the anagen to telogen ratio.[8-10] Prolongation of the kenogen phase, the lag phase or the delayed replacement of telogen hair, seems to last longer in AGA leaving a higher percentage of empty hair follicles contributing to balding.[10-13] This further reduces hair numbers contributing to the balding process.[10,11] Ultimately, anagen duration becomes so short that the growing hair fails to achieve sufficient length to reach the surface of the skin, leaving an empty follicular pore. Hair follicle miniaturization is hence the histological hallmark of AGA. Once the arrector pili muscle, which attaches circumferentially around the primary follicle, has detached from all secondary follicles and primary follicles have undergone miniaturization and detachment, hair loss is irreversible.[8] Traditional models of AGA show follicular miniaturization occurring in a stepwise fashion. This has recently been contested, and it is now believed that the transition from terminal to vellus hair can also occur as an abrupt, large-step process.[13] Thus follicular miniaturization occurs between anagen cycles rather than within the anagen phase. This short window of androgen effect may also explain the lengthy delay experienced between clinical response and the commencement of therapy, as any pharmacological intervention will only have an effect at the point of miniaturization.[13]

Hence, effective, therapy would need treatments that affect androgen, stem cells, growth factors, and anagen prolongers, which are discussed below. Trichoscopy can be used at every visit to provide an objective evaluation of the various treatments.

Different treatment approaches which are useful for rotational therapy

The medical management of AGA consists of different agents shown in Table 1 which also shows their mechanisms of action, their evidence levels, and side effects and limitations. The combination of these modalities helps us to counter the different underlying processes in AGA simultaneously. The authors consider finasteride, topical minoxidil, PRP, and LLT to be core modalities, while others are alternative options. The authors consider PRP to be a primary core treatment in the management of AGA, in view of recent guidelines which advocate Level 2 evidence by Sharma et al.,[17]; level 1 by Gentile et al.,[18] Level of evidence: 2 Category of Recommendation: B by Mysore et al.,[19]

Table 1::
Medical management in AGA and their evidence levels

There are specific aspects of each modality that are relevant in combinational and rotational therapy and are considered below.

  • demonstrated in a study


Finasteride is perhaps the most important treatment modality because of its proven action, long-term efficacy, ease of administration, and its action on the basic pathophysiology. However, it is also the most difficult of the treatments to prescribe over long term not only because of its side effect profile, but also the fear of its side effect profile. Minimum period of 3 months of therapy is required for clinical response.[25] Finasteride needs to be continued indefinitely and efficacy seems to improve with time and consistent use prevents deterioration of miniaturization[26-29] The effects of the drug are reversed within 12 months after treatment cessation.[25]

  • The mean terminal elimination half-life of 1 mg daily finasteride after repeated administration is 4.8 h and tissue binding is 4–5 days.[25,30] Steady-state trough plasma finasteride concentrations are reached within 3 days.[31]
  • Serum DHT levels returned to baseline values within 14 days after drug withdrawal irrespective of the dosage.[31]
  • Doses of 0.2 mg are adequate to suppress both scalp skin and serum DHT levels.[30]
  • Suppression of DHT levels persists for 14 days after drug withdrawal irrespective of the dosage administered before returning to normal.[31]
  • Intermittent therapy has been shown to be effective. Intermittent discontinuation of the drug does not lead to loss of efficacy.[32] Hence drug holidays to create drug washout is feasible.
  • Side effects of finasteride include lowered libido, erectile dysfunction, reduced ejaculatory volume, temporary reduction in sperm count, testicular pain, depression, and gynecomastia.[33] Sexual events resolved in many patients who reported them but remained on therapy.[33] Central side effects include depression, mood changes. These need to be considered before starting treatment.
  • An important predictor of development of side effects was use of the drug for at least 7 months suggesting that administration of several months was necessary for the development of side effect.[34]
  • Existence of post-finasteride syndrome (PFS) has been questioned[35-37]
  • Current FDA guidelines stress that patient needs to be given full information about finasteride side effects and the final decision to take the drugs rests with the patient.

Based on these findings it can be summarized that:

  1. Finasteride is a highly effective, easy-to-administer, cheap drug
  2. Its effect is sustained over long duration
  3. It increases hair counts and reverses miniaturization
  4. It may work at does lower than FDA recommended dose of 1mg daily
  5. It may also work if discontinued and reintroduced, and used intermittently
  6. The onset of side effects is after about 7 months
  7. Since, its side effective profile is of concern to many patients, and is a deterrent in acceptance of this drug, alternative strategies are necessary to enhance its acceptance. These include topical therapy. Administration of lower doses, intermittent therapy with drug holidays


  • Is a safe and proven topical drug in 5% concentration.
  • Minoxidil causes frequent though minor side effects such as irritation, headache, initial transient hair loss, dryness, etc., leading to poor compliance. These can be minimized by initiating once-daily administration alongside the use of cosmetically acceptable peptide therapy.
  • Minoxidil boosters such as 0.01% tretinoin, dermaroller elevate the level of follicular sulfotransferase enzyme levels which remain unchanged throughout even up to 8 weeks post-therapy after administration of boosters.[38,39] Hence, the boosters can be used intermittently, particularly in nonresponsive cases.
  • Does not affect the primary miniaturization process which continues unabated and hence its effects taper off when used for 3–4 years continuously.[40-43]Thus minoxidil cannot be an effective solo treatment for AGA.
  • If treatment is ceased, any positive effect on hair growth is lost in 4-6 months.[44,45]
  • Initial effects are noticed by approximately 8 weeks while the maximum effects after 4 months.[46] The effects peak by the 12th month.[47,48]
  • Non-responders may have a clinical response with higher concentration of minoxidil.[49,50]

Thus, the above summary shows that minoxidil has a high quality of evidence, is safe, but has compliance issues in the early phase of therapy and efficacy issues in later phases of therapy. It is also not an effective solo treatment when used long term. There may be an additional role for use of minoxidil boosters in nonresponder and when plateau effect is reached.


PRP is a well-accepted and safe modality and is backed by 19 systematic reviews, 9 meta-analysis, and 12 clinical trials.[18] However, there is variability in its administration and preparation and hence levels of evidence. PRP has received level 3 evidence in 2018 European S3 guidelines on the treatment of AGA, because of the heterogeneity of methods of preparation of PRP.[14] Recently, the Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists (IADVL) has come out with recommendations on the preparation of PRP which will pave the way for a more standardized PRP preparation.[51] The authors consider PRP to be a primary core treatment in the management of AGA, in view of recent guidelines which advocate Level 2 evidence by Sharma et al.,[17]; level 1 by Gentile et al.,[18] Level of evidence: 2 Category of Recommendation: B by Mysore et al.,[19]

  • The onset of effect of PRP in hair growth is quick, about 2–3 weeks, with some effects seen as early as 5 days.[52-54]
  • Most studies have recommended three sessions at one month apart.[55] The maintenance of sessions of PRP has been advised to be once in six months.[56]
  • Duration of action of one single session of PRP may persist till 6 months after the procedure.[56,57]
  • Thus, there is an opinion that minimum three-five sessions are required prerequisite for a significant increase in hair density.[58]
  • Maintenance treatments have been carried at intervals of 3–6 months[17] beyond six months of therapy.
  • Long-term effects beyond 16 months are not known.[54]

In summary, it can be said that PRP has been shown to have increasingly better evidence and hence is included as a core treatment by authors. Its onset of action is once in 2-3 weeks and is given in 3-5 monthly sessions. The actions can persist for many months and hence can be repeated once in six months. Longer-term data beyond 16 months is not yet available.

Low-level laser therapy

  • LLLT is typically administered through home-use devices that are available in the forms of combs, helmets, and caps and hence are an acceptable treatment, particularly to patients who are apprehensible to drug treatments.
  • The mechanism of action is not completely elucidated, but is believed to be increased ATP production, reactive oxygen species modulation, and transcription factor induction, protein synthesis, and NO-related vasodilation.[59-61]
  • LLLT increases the terminal hair count and reduces hair fall with minimal adverse effects.[62-64]
  • The most widely used regimen is alternate days for a period of at least 4 months to start seeing the results and to be continued indefinitely.[65-67]
  • Most reports are in patients with early thinning.
  • Combining LLLT with other standard medical management has proven to give superior results.[68,69]
  • European S3 guidelines gave evidence level 2 for the device.[14]

LLLT is an option for management in those in whom drug therapy is contraindicated or not feasible. It is also an option for long-term management. It may not work well in patients with significant thinning.

Hair transplantation (HT): HT by either FUT or FUE with scalp or body hair is a safe, acceptable option yielding cosmetically acceptable and lasting results. The choice of HT depends on the stage of baldness, age of the patient, psychological requirement of the patient, availability of donor, etc.

A recent publication provides logic for use of multitherapies sequentially or rotationally. Studies have demonstrated that, hairs could recover their original dimensions if there was a less than two-thirds decrease of the dermal papilla cells; but beyond this, the hairs went into vellus in dimension, suggesting the need for early specific therapeutic intervention.[70]Another publication by Paul Kemp hypothesized that the scalp may contain four types of cells:[70]

  • Type 1: Hair follicles containing DHT-insensitive DP cells that will not miniaturize.
  • Type 2: Hair follicles containing DHT-sensitive DP cells that are not miniaturizing yet but probably will in the future.
  • Type 3: Hair follicles containing DHT-sensitive DP cells that are actively miniaturizing but can be rejuvenated.
  • Type 4: Hair follicles containing DHT-sensitive DP cells that have miniaturized too far that cannot be rejuvenated.

Most of the therapies in rotational and combinational therapy act on follicle types 2 and 3 which are most susceptible to miniaturization and most amenable for therapeutic intervention. Judicious use of above modalities in combination/ drug holidays/ intermittent usage can therefore help in sustaining results by preventing miniaturization of DP cells beyond the point of recovery over long time, and we propose the following scheme.

Figure 1 shows core treatments (treatments commonly used and with evidence) and noncore treatments (treatments that are off label, and used as an alternative option).

Figure 1::
Treatments divided on the basis of evidence and use. Core treatments are commonly used and with evidence shown in the innermost circle. Peripheral circles show non-core treatments which are either off-label or used as alternative options

These different treatments are used in a combination approach, based on above properties, with treatments entering and exiting at different time zones. Noncore treatments are added on need basis based on the judgment of the physician. The proposed scheme is shown in Figures 2,34.

Figure 2::
Treatment algorithm using rotational therapy for androgenetic alopecia group A (patients who accept and tolerate finasteride)
Figure 3::
Treatment algorithm using rotational therapy for androgenetic alopecia group B (patients who are apprehensive about taking finasteride)
Figure 4::
Treatment algorithm using rotational therapy for androgenetic alopecia group C (patients who either refuse or develop side effects of finasteride and who need alternative treatments)

There are four phases in the management. Table 2 outlines these phases and their options in tabular manner. It needs to be recognized that the principal issues are:

Table 2::
Various phases in AGA therapy
  1. Acceptability and tolerance of finasteride: Three categories exist.

Group A patients who accept and tolerate finasteride [Figure 2].

Group B patients who are apprehensive but are willing to try low dose and other alternative regimes such as topical finasteride initially. These patients may accept and tolerate finasteride in course of time and hence full dose may be acceptable at a later date [Figure 3].

Group C patients who either refuse or develop side effects of finasteride and who need alternative treatments [Figure 4].

In group A and B, in the longer run in phases 3–4, finasteride will be administered intermittently with 1 month drug holidays to avoid possibilities of side effects.

  • 2. PRP is introduced as core treatment with an intensive phase of 3–5 sessions in phase 2 and later maintenance once in 3–6 months in phases 3–4, particularly in the finasteride holiday month
  • 3. LLLT and HT are needed in addition to above treatments depending on requirements of a given case.

Different phases are given below.

Phase 1: Initial 1–2 months of treatment: Initiation phase

At this stage, primary concern is smooth initiation of treatment, with minimum side effects, preventing any patient dropout due to side effects that may be minor, but may affect quality of life, such as dryness, irritation, temporary shedding, etc., and education of the patient for long term therapy. So, the authors recommend initiation with topical minoxidil 5% local application once daily, with or without a peptide serum once daily with supplements of vitamins, micronutrients and protein-rich diet as necessary in the patient. Finasteride is not recommended at this stage. Patients are encouraged to read and get informed about different modalities with counselling is done about different options for therapy.

Phase 2: 2–5 months of treatment––Consolidation phase

At this stage, as patients are getting accustomed to the schedule and are beginning to see early result, peptide is stopped and topical minoxidil 5%application is increased to twice daily (which is indeed the recommended dose). At this stage, a modality that affects the basic pathogenesis; oral 1mg finasteride (if patient is accepting it) and/or PRP (once a month for 3–4 months) is initiated. If patient is apprehensive of finasteride, he is encouraged to use an alternative regime for finasteride such as alternate days or low dose (0.5mg daily) or topical finasteride till he finds confidence to accept oral finasteride. No effort is made to compel the patient to take finasteride. The emphasis is on education and compliance. If patient refuses to accept finasteride, PRP is initiated once a month. LLLT is an option if both finasteride and PRP are not feasible or acceptable.

Phase 3: Beyond 5/6 months of treatment maintenance phase 1

At this stage, most patients have seen the results and can be shifted on to maintenance regimes;

  • A) Topical minoxidil+ oral finasteride daily (in finasteride accepting patients. Since there is evidence that drug-induced side effects are seen after 6-7 months of therapy, intermittent therapy as stated earlier, with a drug holiday period of 1 month for washing out the drug is introduced once every 3-4 months. The authors also recommend PRP in the month of drug holiday to compensate for lack of finasteride effects. This is logical since onset of PRP is seen in 2 stated above.
  • B) For patients who do not accept finasteride, Topical minoxidil with LLT and PRP once in 3-4 months.
  • C) Topical minoxidil 5% with LLT for patients who do not accept Finasteride and PRP is not feasible.
  • D) HT may be needed in selected cases as per requirements of the patient and discretion of treating physician.

Phase 4: 18–24 months and beyond. Maintenance phase 2

If patient continues to respond well, above treatment as in phase 3 is continued. Currently, the maximum duration for which PRP effect has been followed up is 16 months and hence there is no evidence to state how long PRP can work in the long run––but there is no evidence to state it does not work either. Hence this is left to the discretion of the treating physician. However, this is when effect of minoxidil may begin to wane, and patients may see deterioration of results and hence alternative options may be are needed:

  • A) Introduce a higher percentage of minoxidil
  • B) Addition of minoxidil boosters
  • C) In case of nonresponder, HT may be needed as per the decision of the treating physician.
  • D) Oral dutasteride and oral minoxidil are options available in this phase in nonresponder who do not want surgery. Both the drugs, however, carry the risk of potentially serious side effects and hence need to be given after proper counseling.


Thus the scheme provides a framework for physicians to introduce, combine, alternate, and rotate different treatments, to minimize side effects, render the regime acceptable to patients, and to minimize costs. However, as in all regimes, this is a general scheme and may need to be tailored/modified depending on the needs of a given patient. The authors agree that the outlined schema is not necessarily fully perfect (no scheme is) and is not necessarily applicable or can be effective in all cases. Nor is the authors claim that this is an original discovery. It is only an attempt at formulating a systematic approach based on available data and much of what is already in practice by many dermatologists. It renders the approach to patient management simple and systematic, which can be followed easily.

The authors would like to clarify that these recommendations/proposals are an effort to systematize the approach based on currently available evidence and logic, to minimize side effects, and to enhance patient acceptability. These could change as further data become available.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1. Choi CW, Kim BR, Ohn J, Youn SW. The Advantage of Cyclosporine A and Methotrexate Rotational Therapy in long-term systemic treatment for chronic plaque psoriasis in a real world practice. Ann Dermatol 2017;29:55-60
2. Weinstein GD, White GM. An approach to the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis with rotational therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;28:454-9
3. Fanouriakis A, Tziolos N, Bertsias G, Boumpas DT. Update οn the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:14-25
4. van de Kerkhof PC. Therapeutic strategies: Rotational therapy and combinations. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001;26:356-61
5. Traish AM. Post-finasteride syndrome: A surmountable challenge for clinicians. Fertil Steril 2020;113:21-50
6. Pereira AFJR, Coelho TOA. Post-finasteride syndrome. An Bras Dermatol 2020;95:271-7
7. Maksym RB, Kajdy A, Rabijewski M. Post-finasteride syndrome - does it really exist?. Aging Male 2019;22:250-9
8. Torkamani N, Rufaut NW, Jones L, Sinclair R. Destruction of the arrector pili muscle and fat infiltration in androgenic alopecia. Br J Dermatol 2014;170:1291-8
9. Guarrera M, Rebora A. Anagen hairs may fail to replace telogen hairs in early androgenic female alopecia. Dermatology 1996;192:28-31
10. Sinclair R, Torkamani N, Jones L. Androgenetic alopecia: New insights into the pathogenesis and mechanism of hair loss. F1000Res 2015;4F1000 Faculty Rev585
11. Prieto VG, Sadick NS, Shea CR. Androgenetic alopecia: Analysis of proliferation and apoptosis. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:1101-2
12. Sinclair R. Male pattern androgenetic alopecia. BMJ 1998;317:865-9
13. Whiting DA. Possible mechanisms of miniaturization during androgenetic alopecia or pattern hair loss. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:S81-86
14. Kanti V, Messenger A, Dobos G, Reygagne P, Finner A, Blumeyer A, et al. Evidence-based (S3) guideline for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in women and in men - short version. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018;32:11-22
15. Mysore V, Shashikumar BM. Guidelines on the use of finasteride in androgenetic alopecia. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2016;82:128-34
    16. Lee SW, Juhasz M, Mobasher P, Ekelem C, Mesinkovska NA. A systematic review of topical finasteride in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men and women. J Drugs Dermatol 2018;17:457-63
      17. Sharma A, Chouhan K, Bhatia S, Dashore S. Platelet-rich plasma in androgenetic alopecia. Indian Dermatol Online J 2021;12Suppl 1S31-S40
      18. Gentile P, Garcovich S. Systematic review of platelet-rich plasma use in androgenetic alopecia compared with minoxidil®, finasteride®, and adult stem cell-based therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:2702
      19. Mysore V, Kumaresan M, Garg A, Dua A, Venkatram A, Dua K, et al. Hair transplant practice guidelines. J CutanAesthet Surg 2021;14:265-84
      20. Clark RV, Hermann DJ, Cunningham GR, Wilson TH, Morrill BB, Hobbs S. Marked suppression of dihydrotestosterone in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia by dutasteride, a dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:2179-84
        21. Arif T, Dorjay K, Adil M, Sami M. Dutasteride in androgenetic alopecia: An update. Curr Clin Pharmacol 2017;12:31-5
          22. Marihart S, Harik M, Djavan BD. A review of current data on a novel dual inhibitor of 5α reductase. Rev Urol 2005;7:203-10
            23. Gisleskog PO, Hermann D, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Karlsson MO. The pharmacokinetic modelling of GI198745 (dutasteride), a compound with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999;4753-8.
              24. Zhou Z, Song S, Gao Z, Wu J, Ma J, Cui Y. The efficacy and safety of dutasteride compared with finasteride in treating men with androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging 2019;14:399-406
                25. McClellan KJ, Markham A. Finasteride: A review of its use in male pattern hair loss. Drugs 1999;57:111-26
                26. Kaufman KD, Rotonda J, Shah AK, Meehan AG. Long-term treatment with finasteride 1 mg decreases the likelihood of developing further visible hair loss in men with androgenetic alopecia (male pattern hair loss). Eur J Dermatol 2008;18:400-6
                27. Rossi A, Cantisani C, Scarnò M, Trucchia A, Fortuna MC, Calvieri S. Finasteride, 1 mg daily administration on male androgenetic alopecia in different age groups: 10-year follow-up. Dermatol Ther 2011;24:455-61
                28. Shin JW, Chung EH, Kim MB, Kim TO, Kim WI, Huh CH. Evaluation of long-term efficacy of finasteride in korean men with androgenetic alopecia using the basic and specific classification system. J Dermatol 2019;46:139-43
                29. Yoshitake T, Takeda A, Ohki K, Inoue Y, Yamawaki T, Otsuka S, et al. Five-year efficacy of finasteride in 801 Japanese men with androgenetic alopecia. J Dermatol 2015;42:735-8
                30. Drake L, Hordinsky M, Fiedler V, Swinehart J, Unger WP, Cotterill PC, et al. The effects of finasteride on scalp skin and serum androgen levels in men with androgenetic alopecia. J Am Acad of Dermatol 1999;41:550-4
                31. Gormley GJ, Stoner E, Rittmaster RS, Gregg H, Thompson DL, Lasseter KC, et al. Effects of finasteride (MK-906), a 5α-reductase inhibitor, on circulating androgens in male volunteers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70:1136-41
                32. Tartagni M, Schonauer MM, Cicinelli E, Petruzzelli F, De Pergola G, De Salvia MA, et al. Intermittent low-dose finasteride is as effective as daily administration for the treatment of hirsute women. Fertil Steril 2004;82:752-5
                33. Wessells H, Roy J, Bannow J, Grayhack J, Matsumoto AM, Tenover L, et alPLESS Study Group. Incidence and severity of sexual adverse experiences in finasteride and placebo-treated men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2003;61:579-84
                34. Kiguradze T, Temps WH, Yarnold PR, Cashy J, Brannigan RE, Nardone B, et al. Persistent erectile dysfunction in men exposed to the 5α-reductase inhibitors, finasteride, or dutasteride. PeerJ 2017;5:e3020
                35. Irwig MS, Kolukula S. Persistent sexual side effects of finasteride for male pattern hair loss. J Sex Med 2011;8:1747-53
                36. Irwig MS. Persistent sexual side effects of finasteride: Could they be permanent?. J Sex Med 2012;9:2927-32
                37. Kiguradze T, Temps WH, Yarnold PR, Cashy J, Brannigan RE, Nardone B, et al. Persistent erectile dysfunction in men exposed to the 5α-reductase inhibitors, finasteride, or dutasteride. PeerJ 2017;5:e3020
                38. Shin HS, Won CH, Lee SH, Kwon OS, Kim KH, Eun HC. Efficacy of 5% minoxidil versus combined 5% minoxidil and 0.01% tretinoin for male pattern hair loss: A randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical trial. Am J Clin Dermatol 2007;8:285-90
                39. Gugle AS, Jadhav VM, Kote RP, Deshmukh MD, Dalvi AV. Comparative study of efficacy of topical minoxidil 5% and combination of topical minoxidil 5%, topical azelaic acid 1.5% and topical tretinoin 0.01% on the basis of dermoscopic analysis in androgenetic alopecia. MVP Journal of Med Sci 2015;2:90-9
                40. Olsen EA, Weiner MS, Amara IA, DeLong ER. Five-year follow-up of men with androgenetic alopecia treated with topical minoxidil. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;22:643-6
                41. Varothai S, Bergfeld WF. Androgenetic alopecia: An evidence-based treatment update. Am J Clin Dermatol 2014;15:217-30
                42. Katz HI, Hien NT, Prawer SE, Goldman SJ. Long-term efficacy of topical minoxidil in male pattern baldness. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;16:711-8
                43. Price VH, Menefee E, Strauss PC. Changes in hair weight and hair count in men with androgenetic alopecia, after application of 5% and 2% topical minoxidil, placebo, or no treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:717-21
                44. Olsen EA, Weiner MS, Amara IA, DeLong ER. Five-year follow-up of men with androgenetic alopecia treated with topical minoxidil. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;22:643-6
                45. Olsen EA, Weiner MS. Topical minoxidil in male pattern baldness: Effects of discontinuation of treatment. J Am Acad of Dermatol 1987;17:97-101
                46. Ferry JJ, Shepard JH, Szpunar GJ. Relationship between contact time of applied dose and percutaneous absorption of minoxidil from a topical solution. J Pharm Sci 1990;79:483-6
                47. Kubba R. Topical minoxidil in androgenetic alopecia, how good is it?. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1990;56:187-92
                48. Rossi A, Cantisani C, Melis L, Iorio A, Scali E, Calvieri S. Minoxidil use in dermatology, side effects and recent patents. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov 2012;6:130-6
                49. McCoy J, Goren A, Kovacevic M, Shapiro J. Minoxidil dose response study in female pattern hair loss patients determined to be non-responders to 5% topical minoxidil. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2016;30:1153-5
                50. Suchonwanit P, Thammarucha S, Leerunyaku K. Minoxidil and its use in hair disorders: A review. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2019;13:2777-86
                51. Dashore S, Chouhan K, Nanda S, Sharma A. Preparation of platelet-rich plasma: National IADVL PRP taskforce recommendations. Indian Dermatol Online J 2021;12Suppl 1S12-S23
                52. Miao Y, Sun Y-B, Sun X-J, Du B-J, Jiang J-D, Hu Z-Q. Promotional effect of platelet-rich plasma on hair follicle reconstitution in vivo. Dermatol Surg 2013;39:1868-76
                53. Xiao SE, Miao Y, Wang J, Jiang W, Fan ZX, Liu XM, et al. As a carrier-transporter for hair follicle reconstitution, platelet-rich plasma promotes proliferation and induction of mouse dermal papilla cells. Sci Rep 2017;7:1125
                54. Gentile P, Garcovich S, Bielli A, Scioli MG, Orlandi A, Cervelli V. The effect of platelet-rich plasma in hair regrowth: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stem Cells Transl Med 2015;4:1317-23
                55. Girijala RL, Riahi RR, Cohen PR. Platelet-rich plasma for androgenic alopecia treatment: A comprehensive review. Dermatol Online J 2018;24:13030/qt8s43026c
                56. Gkini MA, Kouskoukis AE, Tripsianis G, Rigopoulos D, Kouskoukis K. Study of platelet-rich plasma injections in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia through an one-year period. J CutanAesthet Surg 2014;7:213-9
                57. Stevens J, Khetarpal S. Platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia: A review of the literature and proposed treatment protocol. Int J Womens Dermatol 2018;5:46-51
                58. Alves R, Grimalt R. Randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind, half-head study to assess the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma on the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Dermatol Surg 2016;42:491-7
                59. Eells JT, Wong-Riley MT, VerHoeve J, Henry M, Buchman EV, Kane MP, et al. Mitochondrial signal transduction in accelerated wound and retinal healing by near-infrared light therapy. Mitochondrion 2004;4:559-67
                60. Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang Y-Y, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng 2012;40:516-33
                61. Avci P, Gupta GK, Clark J, Wikonkal N, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss. Lasers Surg Med 2014;46:144-51
                62. Jimenez JJ, Wikramanayake TC, Bergfeld W, Hordinsky M, Hickman JG, Hamblin MR, et al. Efficacy and safety of a low-level laser device in the treatment of male and female pattern hair loss: A multicenter, randomized, sham device-controlled, Double-blind Study. Am J Clin Dermatol 2014;15:115-27
                63. Leavitt M, Charles G, Heyman E, Michaels D. HairMaxLaserComb® laser phototherapy device in the treatment of male androgenetic alopecia: A randomized, double-blind, sham devicecontrolled. Multicentre Trial Clin Drug Investig 2009;29:283-92
                64. Kim H, Choi JW, Kim JY, Shin JW, Lee SJ, Huh CH. Low-level light therapy for androgenetic alopecia: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled multicenter trial. Dermatol Surg 2013;39:1177-83
                65. Suchonwanit P, Chalermroj N, Khunkhet S. Low-level laser therapy for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in Thai men and women: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, sham devicecontrolled trial. Lasers Med Sci 2019;34:1107-14
                66. Suchonwanit P, Chalermroj N, Khunkhet S. Low-level laser therapy for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in Thai men and women: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci 2019;34:1107-14
                67. Lanzafame RJ, Blanche RR, Bodian AB, Chiacchierini RP, Fernandez-Obregon A, Kazmirek ER. The growth of human scalp hair mediated by visible red light laser and LED sources in males. Lasers Surg Med 2013;45:487-95
                68. Faghihi G, Mozafarpoor S, Asilian A, Mokhtari F, Esfahani AA, Bafandeh B, et al. The effectiveness of adding low-level light therapy to minoxidil 5% solution in the treatment of patients with androgenetic alopecia. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2018;84:547-53
                69. Pillai JK, Mysore V. Role of Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) in Androgenetic Alopecia. J CutanAesthet Surg 2021;14:385-91
                70. Kemp P. The evolution of the promise of hair cloning. How hair cell cloning will fit into your practice. Hair Transplant Forum International 2022;32:37-43

                AGA; combination therapy; rotational therapy

                © 2023 Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery