Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

High-sensitivity troponin in emergency room practice: pros and cons

Galvani, Marcello; Bachetti, Cristina

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine: February 2018 - Volume 19 - Issue - p e68–e71
doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000604
Supplement

Cardiology Unit, Cardiovascular Department ASL Romagna, GB Morgagni Hospital – Forlì, Forlì, Italy

Correspondence to Marcello Galvani, MD, Cardiology Unit, Cardiovascular Department ASL Romagna, GB Morgagni Hospital – Forlì, Forlì, Italy E-mail: marcello.galvani@auslromagna.it

Received 11 July, 2017

Accepted 14 November, 2017

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Chest pain is the second most common reason for emergency room visits. These patients are frequently admitted to the emergency room to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ACS is however diagnosed only in a minority (about 10–15%) and, as a consequence, a large number of patients is admitted to the hospital inappropriately. This practice produces an increase in costs and overcrowds the emergency rooms, with a negative impact on the patients1 and the healthcare system.

Troponin measurement is now a cornerstone in the diagnosis of ACS, complementing the clinical evaluation and the interpretation of the ECG.

The availability in Europe since 2011, but not yet in the United States, of the high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) assay (which allows a reliable detection of biomarker concentrations even in healthy asymptomatic patients) has substantially changed the management of patients presenting with chest pain, both from a diagnostic and therapeutic perspective.

Back to Top | Article Outline

High-sensitivity troponin assays

Through the years the analytic precision of the troponin assays has been progressively improved, thus now allowing the reliable (i.e. with a variation coefficient of the measurement <10%) measurement of even minimal concentration of the circulating biomarker.

As a reference, ‘normal’ concentrations of the marker are defined as those lower than the 99th percentile of the distribution of the values measured in a control population of healthy patients without cardiac diasease.1 As stated before, hs-cTn assays have an elevated sensitivity and analytic precision even at minimal concentration of the biomarker, often significantly lower than the 99th percentile of the reference population and frequently approximating the limit of detection (LoD).

There is substantial agreement about the concept that the sensibility of the assay is indicated by the percentage of healthy patients with measurable levels of troponin. According to this assumption, it is possible to differentiate, among the ‘high-sensitivity’ assays available on the market, those which are more or less sensitive. The clinical impact of those differences in sensitivity is probably minimal.

In patients with suspected ACS, detectable levels lower than the 99th percentile could represent either the baseline level for that particular patient, or an increase still not exceeding the reference limit, mainly because of a limited time elapsed since the onset of cardiac injury.

The high analytic sensibility of new troponin assays allows also the assessment of the biological variability of circulating troponin levels in healthy patients1 and in patients with heart disease.2 Accordingly, it is possible to define the ‘reference change value’ (RCV), representing both the biological and analytic variability. For the majority of assays, the RCV varies between 40 and 60% but can reach 86%. This variability should be taken into account when interpreting the temporal variations of the levels in an attempt to identify acute myocardial damage. When detectable or elevated levels are present, it is still necessary to obtain a second sample at an appropriate time interval2 to make the diagnosis of myocardial injury and to define whether it is acute or chronic.

The exceptions to this rule are:

  1. Significant high levels of the biomarker [more than five times over the 99th percentile according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC)1 Guidelines], which by itself are sufficient to rule in significant myocardial damage necessitating invasive evaluation by coronary angiography.
  2. Undetectable levels of the biomarker in patients with chest pain more than 2 h, which could allow the rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction (MI) or, even better, the exclusion of the occurrence of major myocardial events during the following days or months (this issue is still not addressed by the guidelines).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Diagnostic algorithms

In patients with suspected ACS, the first diagnostic algorithm outlined in the ESC Guidelines recommends the measurement of cardiac troponin with a high-sensitive assay upon emergency room admission and 3 h later. Significant temporal variation (rise or fall) from the baseline levels (according to the type of assay used) would indicate the need for an invasive approach, whether stable levels would suggest a conservative strategy. The algorithm provides two outstanding situations. The first covers patients presenting with more than 6 h since the onset of chest pain. In these patients when the initial serum levels are lower than the 99th percentile, the clinical risk is low (according to the risk score GRACE <140), and symptoms do not recur, an early discharge is possible, followed by noninvasive testing for definitive ACS exclusion. The second is represented by patients with very high levels of troponin (more than five times over the higher reference limit), in whom if the clinical presentation is consistent with ACS, the second troponin measurement is not necessary to determine the ensuing therapeutic strategy.

In view of the diagnostic accuracy of most hs-cTn assays and of the results of recent studies1–4 confirming its sensitivity and specificity in the detection of type 1 MI, the ESC Guidelines suggest the use of an alternative algorithm based on the biomarker levels obtained at the time of admission and after 1 h interval.5–8 According to this algorithm, the diagnosis of type 1 MI could be reasonably ruled out when the initial troponin levels are very low and remain unchanged after 1 h. The cut-off levels confirming the diagnosis of type 1 MI vary according to the type of assay used (Fig. 1). The algorithm generates three classes of patients: patients for whom MI is ruled out and can safely be discharged home (rule-out class); patients for whom MI is confirmed and require invasive testing the timing of which is dictated by their clinical risk profile (rule-in class); patients requiring longer observation to clarify the diagnosis (observe class).

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

The advantages and disadvantages of the algorithms are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Table 1

Supporting data are being collected for the rapid diagnosis algorithm.9,10 Recent investigations suggest that in patients with chest pain and serum levels of hs-cTn lower than LoD, type 1 MI as well as the risk of short-term cardiovascular events can be safely ruled out. The main study11 included 4870 patients admitted to the emergency room mainly for chest pain (82%) or other cardiovascular symptoms (18%) (syncope, dyspnoea or palpitations) with mean age of 64 years. Type 1 MI was diagnosed in 782 patients (16%). Thirty-two patients (1%) developed a recurrent MI and 75 (3.2%) died for cardiac causes during the first 30 days.

A troponin level less than 5 ng/l 1 (Abbott hs-cTn I) was found in 2311 (61%) of the 3799 patients with serum levels less than the 99th percentile at admission. The negative predictive value of this concentration was 99.6% [95% confidence interval (CI); 99.3–99.8] and did not change after correction for clinical covariates such as sex, age, cardiovascular risk factors and history of cardiac disease.

After 1 year, patients with troponin levels less than 5 ng/l had a low risk of MI and cardiac death as compared with patients with levels at least 5 ng/l (0.6 vs. 3.3%; corrected hazard ratio 0.41; 95% CI; 0.21–0.80; P < 0.0001). It should be considered that a significant interaction was found between time of symptoms onset and admission to the emergency room, in which the predictive negative value of troponin levels less than 5 ng/l was significantly less in patients with duration of symptoms less than 2 h (negative predictive value 97.5%), when compared with patients with symptom duration at least 2 h (negative predictive value 99.8%). Accordingly, in the attempt to mitigate the risk of discharging patients with shorter time (<2 h) of onset of chest pain too early, a second hs-cTn measurement could be crucial.

More recently the Hamburg's group1 documented the noninferiority of the 0–1-h algorithm compared with the 0–3-h algorithm using the Abbott troponin I assay with 6 ng/l taken as cut-off. The study included 1040 patients with a mean age of 65 years. The ECG evidence of ST elevation MI excluded 57 patients from the study. For the remaining 983 patients the diagnosis of type 1 MI was ruled out (rule-out group) when the troponin I level was less than 6 ng/l at the admission and after 1 h (or 3 h). Type 1 MI was confirmed (rule-in group) when the 1 h (or 3 h) hs-cTn levels were at least 6 ng/l and increased or decreased of at least 12 ng/l over baseline. In the rule-out group, the cut-off of 6 ng/l had a predictive negative value for type 1 MI of 99.8% (95% CI; 98.6–100.0%). On the other hand in the rule-in group, the cut-off troponin level had a positive predictive value of 82.8% (95% CI; 73.2–90.0%). The 0–1-h algorithm gave similar results when compared with the 0–3-h algorithm. Out of 983 patients, 406 (41%) belonged to the rule-out group and thus were discharged early. The follow-up mortality rate of this group was 1%; 116 patients (12%) who belonged to the rule-in group were treated for ACS and had a follow-up mortality rate of 6.7%. Four hundred and sixty-one patients (47%) had hs-cTn values falling in the so-called grey zone; their follow-up mortality rate was 8.2%. The results of this study suggest that the 0–1-h algorithm based on a low and sensitive cut-off may be the safest and faster approach to patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency room.

Similar results have been documented when using hs-cTnT assay.12,13

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusion

In patients presenting to the emergency room with suspected ACS, the hs-cTn assays allow:

  1. To rule out acute MI when troponin T levels are not measurable or extremely low (troponin I Abbott). This assertion holds true for patients with more than 2 h onset of chest pain; it is however often necessary to repeat the measurement after 1 h in early-presenters. In these patients, the probability of ensuing adverse cardiovascular events is very low (<1%) in the short term.
  2. When the probability of ACS is high, it is necessary to repeat the measurements after 3 h before considering type 1 MI definitively ruled out.
  3. Patients with detectable levels at admission followed by significant increase after 1 or 3 h are at high risk of type 1 MI and require a rapid evaluation which, based on their clinical risk profile, includes the decision for urgent invasive procedures. Nonetheless, the critical increase of hs-cTn levels (the so-called delta change) to accurately confirm the diagnosis varies according to the hs-cTn assay used and, even for the most studied assays, has not yet been sufficiently validated.
  4. Forty to 50% of the patients fall in the so-called grey zone and require prolonged observation. This group consists of some patients with type 1 MI undiagnosed with the diagnostic algorithm, many patients with type 2 MI and other acute cardiovascular conditions, and other patients with heart failure, renal insufficiency and so on. In this group of patients, further electrocardiographic and cardiac imaging tests are necessary to reach a correct diagnosis and to recommend the appropriate treatment.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Pines JM, Pollack CV Jr, Diercks DB, Diercks DB, Chang AM, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16:617–625.
2. Thygesen K, Mair J, Giannitsis E, et al. How to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J 2012; 33:2252–2257.
3. Wu AH, Lu QA, Todd J, Moecks J, Wians F. Short- and long-term biological variation in cardiac troponin I measured with a high sensitivity assay: implications for clinical practice. Clin Chem 2009; 55:52–58.
4. Frankenstein L, Wu AH, Hallermayer K, Wians FH Jr, Giannitsis E, Katus HA. Biological variation and reference change value of high-sensitivity troponin t in healthy individuals during short and intermediate follow-up periods. Clin Chem 2011; 57:1068–1071.
5. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2016; 37:267–315.
6. Rubini Gimenez M, Hoeller R, Reichlin T, et al. Rapid rule out of acute myocardial infarction using undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168:3896–3901.
7. Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172:1211–1218.
8. Body R, Carley S, McDowell G, et al. Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a high-sensitivity assay. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:1332–1339.
9. Rubini Gimenez M, Twerenbold R, Jaeger C, et al. One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am J Med 2015; 128:861–870.e4.
10. Neumann JT, Sörensen NA, Schwemer T, et al. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity troponin I 1-h algorithm. JAMA Cardiol 2016; 1:397–404.
11. Shah AS, Anand A, Sandoval Y, et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study. Lancet 2015; 386:2481–2488.
12. Charpentier S, Peschanski N, Chouihed T, Ray P, Chenevier-Gobeaux C. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Ann Emerg Med 2016; 67:793–794.
13. Bandstein N, Ljung R, Johansson M, Holzmann MJ. Undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T level in the emergency department and risk of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:2569–2578.
Keywords:

acute coronary syndrome; chest pain; high-sensitivity troponin; troponin

© 2018 Italian Federation of Cardiology. All rights reserved.