Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Cyclic Loading of Olecranon Fracture Fixation Constructs

Hutchinson, Douglas T. MD; Horwitz, Daniel S. MD; Ha, Gregory MD; Thomas, Cameron W. BS; Bachus, Kent N. PhD

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery: May 2003 - Volume 85 - Issue 5 - p 831-837
Scientific Article
Buy
Supplementary Content

Background: Despite the good results that are usually reported after fixation at the sites of olecranon fractures and osteotomies, problems such as loss of fixation, nonunion, and the need for revision surgery are still encountered. Various types of fixation have been recommended, but few have been evaluated with use of clinically relevant cyclic load testing at appropriate levels of stress. The purpose of the present study was to test multiple olecranon fixation techniques under physiologic cyclic loads.

Methods: We studied ten cadaveric elbows with use of cyclic loading that simulated (1) active range of motion and (2) pushing up from a chair. Each specimen underwent fixation of a simulated 50% transverse olecranon fracture with use of intramedullary and cortically fixed tension band constructs (in randomized order) followed by fixation with a 7.3-mm-diameter cancellous screw with and without a tension band. Displacement transducers were placed posteriorly on the tension side and anteriorly near the articular surface.

Results: Both configurations involving the 7.3-mm-diameter cancellous screw provided the most stable fixation—nearly five times better than that provided by the Kirschner-wire techniques. Use of the tension band in conjunction with the intramedullary screw improved the stability of fixation. In none of the constructs did the AO tension band result in compression across the osteotomy gap.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: The use of a 7.3-mm screw in conjunction with a tension band provided better fixation of simulated displaced transverse fractures than did the use of Kirschner wires in conjunction with a tension band or the use of a screw only. The AO principle of converting posterior tensile forces to articular compressive forces was not demonstrated in this study. We therefore question the validity of the tension band concept in olecranon fracture fixation and recommend passive rather than active range of motion in the immediate postoperative period to limit fracture distraction.

Douglas T. Hutchinson, MD; Daniel S. Horwitz, MD; Gregory Ha, MD; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132

Cameron W. Thomas, BS; Kent N. Bachus, PhD; Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Laboratory, University of Utah, 20 South 2030 East (190 BPR), Salt Lake City, UT 84112

Copyright © 2003 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: