Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Intra-Articular Distal Ulnar Sliding Osteotomy for Ulnar Shortening

Honigmann, Philipp, MD1; Steiger, Regula, MD1

JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques: March 26, 2019 - Volume 9 - Issue 1 - p e7
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00024
Subspecialty Procedures
Buy
SDC
Disclosures

Background: Ulnocarpal impaction is the most common reason to perform ulnar shortening osteotomy. There are 3 osteotomy techniques for ulnar shortening: transverse, step-cut, and oblique cut1-3.

First described by Milch4 in 1941, extra-articular diaphyseal oblique or transverse shortening is the most frequently performed type of shortening. However, it is associated with a nonunion rate of up to 10%, and irritation by implants requiring removal occurs in up to 28% of cases5,6. Intra-articular procedures such as the wafer procedure affect the distal ulnar joint surface, which can lead to stiffness of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) due to scar tissue formation and adhesion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC)7. Lapner et al.8 described increased pressure in the DRUJ after the wafer procedure, which may lead to an early onset of osteoarthritis. Complication rates between 8% for open wafer procedures and 21% for arthroscopic wafer procedures have been described9.

Intra-articular shortening has also been described by Slade and Gillon10 in 2007 and Hammert et al.11 in 2012 and was tested in cadavers by Greenberg et al.12 in 2013. This closing wedge technique preserves the distal joint surface of the ulna and also allows for easy correction of the inclination of the hub joint surface of the ulna.

In contrast to the technique of Slade, our described osteotomy is steeper and longer proximally, which allows for fixation with >2 screws13-16. Rapid healing of the metaphyseal bone compared with diaphyseal bone is described, and implant removal is necessary less often14,17,18.

With the described procedure, the interosseous membrane remains untouched, especially the distal oblique bundle, which additionally provides stability of the DRUJ in 40% of patients19.

Description: A dorso-ulnar approach through the fifth extensor sheath is performed. The ulnocarpal joint and the DRUJ are accessed through an arthrotomy distal and proximal to the TFCC. The foveal attachment of the TFCC and the subsheath of the sixth extensor sheath are visualized. The osteotomy is intra-articular oblique from distal ulnar to proximal radial. Sliding the head of the ulna proximally achieves the desired shortening of up to 5 mm, and the head is fixed using 2, 3, or 4 cannulated headless screws. A slight correction of the axis of the ulnar head is also possible.

Alternatives: An alternative to this procedure is extra-articular osteotomy using a palmar or dorsal ulnar approach. If necessary, additional ulnocarpal procedures can be performed in an open or arthroscopically assisted manner.

Rationale: The shortening takes place only in the articular part of the distal aspect of the ulna. This procedure can easily be combined with TFCC repair, synovectomy of the DRUJ, or repair or reconstruction of the lunotriquetral ligament if needed. Shortening of up to 5 mm is possible.

1Hand Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland

E-mail address for P. Honigmann: philipp.honigmann@ksbl.ch

Disclosure: The authors indicated that no external funding was received for any aspect of this work. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A239).

Copyright © 2019 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article: