Arthroscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Fixation of a Femoral Head Fracture (Pipkin II): A Case Report : JBJS Case Connector

Journal Logo

Case Reports

Arthroscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Fixation of a Femoral Head Fracture (Pipkin II)

A Case Report

Rojas-Sayol, Roger MD1,a; De Caso, J. MD2; Valera, M. MD, PhD3

Author Information
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.22.00194
  • Open
  • Disclosures

Abstract

Femoral head fractures are uncommon fractures that are usually related to hip joint dislocation from a high-energy trauma. Moreover, they tend to affect young high-functioning demanding patients1-5. This type of lesion is associated with a high rate of severe complications such as posttraumatic osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis of the femoral head6.

The first and most widely used classification of this type of fracture was described by Pipkin in 1957. The fractures are classified according to the relationship between the fracture line and the fovea and the presence of an associated femoral neck fracture or a posterior hip dislocation7 (Fig 1). If a fracture of the femoral head is suspected, a computed tomography (CT) scan study is essential for proper classification and correct treatment5.

fig1
Fig. 1:
Pipkin classification of femoral head fractures.

The treatment of these fractures remains controversial in the literature. Thus, aspects such as the indication for surgical treatment, convenience of fixing or excising the fracture fragment, or even the surgical approach to be used have not yet been clearly established8. However, like in any intraarticular fracture, the principle that an anatomical reduction likely leads to better outcomes also applies to these fractures9.

If surgical treatment is necessary, it may require aggressive approaches that increase the possibility of therapeutic morbidity10. Although it has become more common for the treatment of various hip disorders in the recent years11, arthroscopy is not widespread in trauma applications and a few cases have been reported4,12-15. In this study, we present a case report of arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous fixation of a type II Pipkin femoral head fracture.

The patient was informed that data concerning the case would be submitted for publication, and he provided consent.

Case Report

A 45-year-old man presented with a posterior hip fracture dislocation due to a motorcycle accident (Figs. 2-A and 2-B). The CT scan showed a Pipkin type II fracture of the right femoral head with a free fragment affecting 40% of the femoral head (Figs. 2-C and 2-D). A plain x-ray showed the presence of an ipsilateral intramedullary femoral nail that had been put in place as the treatment of a diaphyseal fracture the patient had sustained 10 years before the present episode.

A 45-year-old man. Hip anteroposterior view (Fig. 2-A) and computed tomography (Fig. 2-B) shows a posterior fracture dislocation of the hip. Computed tomography after emergent reduction shows a Pipkin type II fracture affecting 40% of the femoral head (Figs. 2-C and 2-D). Arthroscopic view from the midanterior portal of the fracture line before (Fig. 2-E) and after (Fig. 2-F) fixation. Note effective fracture site compression (arrows). Intraoperative fluoroscopic images after fixation (Figs. 2-G and 2-H). Radiographic consolidation of the fracture without signs of avascular necrosis in the 72-month follow-up (Figs. 2-I, 2-J, and 2-K).

fig2a
Fig. 2-A
fig2b
Fig. 2-B
fig2c
Fig. 2-C
fig2d
Fig. 2-D
fig2e
Fig. 2-E
fig2f
Fig. 2-F
fig2g
Fig. 2-G
fig2h
Fig. 2-H
fig2i
Fig. 2-I
fig2j
Fig. 2-J
fig2k
Fig. 2-K

After an emergent closed reduction, fixation of the fracture was indicated and performed within 24 hours of the trauma. For this purpose, an outside-inside hip arthroscopy was performed. The patient was placed on a traction table although no traction was initially applied. An anterolateral portal (ALP) was used as a viewing portal, and midanterior (MAP) and posterolateral (PLP) portals were used as working portals. From the ALP and MAP, a fluoroscopic-assisted triangulation was performed in the extracapsular space of the anterior aspect of the hip joint. Muscle and soft tissue were removed from the hip capsule with a shaver, and the reflected head of the rectus femoris was identified. Then, a capsulotomy perpendicular to the rectus femoris head was performed using a radio frequency hook probe and traction sutures were placed on both sides of the capsulotomy for better visualization. In that way, the fracture site was exposed. From there, with direct vision of the fracture site along with fluoroscopic guidance, gentle reduction maneuvers were performed until the best reduction was obtained with complete extension and slight internal rotation of the hip.

Fixation was performed through the PLP under fluoroscopic control using 2 headless compression screws (Acutrak-Acumed, 4.7 × 40 mm and 4.7 × 45 mm). After careful evaluation of the fracture line in the CT scan, the PLP was chosen because it offered the best angle for screw insertion. Direct vision through the ALP made it possible to check for effective compression at the fracture site (Figs. 2-E and 2-F). Once performed, stability for hip flexion, extension, and rotation maneuvers was checked. Fluoroscopic images in the anteroposterior and lateral views were obtained to check accuracy of reduction on both planes (Figs. 2-G and 2-H).

Next, gentle traction was applied, and the central hip compartment was revised. Some blood clots caused by ligamentum teres disruption were found above the acetabular pulvinar. Small chondral fragments, which came from the fracture site, were debrided. No labral detachment was found. Finally, capsule closure was performed using nonabsorbable sutures.

The postoperative CT scan showed correct screw positioning and optimal fracture reduction. At 8 weeks, the patient began weight-bearing. At the 72-month follow-up visit, the patient remained asymptomatic, had an excellent functional score (96 on the non-Arthritic Hip Score), and showed radiographic consolidation of the fracture without signs of avascular necrosis in x-rays and CT scans (Figs. 2-I, 2-J, and 2-K).

Discussion

This is a case of a type II Pipkin fracture treated with arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous fixation under fluoroscopic guidance. The fixation approach used is uncommon for this type of fractures. No evidence of similar cases has been found in the literature.

Pipkin fractures have been associated with devastating consequences with varying incidence rates depending on the series: posttraumatic osteoarthritis (8%-94%), avascular necrosis of the femoral head (0%-23%), nerve injury (10%-23%), and heterotopic ossification formation (6%-64%)9,10,16-19.

The treatment of femoral head fractures is controversial. Nonsurgical management of femoral head fractures is acceptable for Pipkin type I fractures (infrafoveal fractures) or for nondisplaced type II fractures. However, conservative treatment can lead to secondary displacement or suboptimal consolidation and requires a long non–weight-bearing and rehabilitation period14.

Surgery is indicated in the case of nonanatomic reductions, in the presence of intraarticular free fragments or a suprafoveal fracture line. There is a lack of consensus on whether type I fracture fragments should be fixed internally or simply removed5. There is also no consensus on the optimal approach for this type of fracture because osteonecrosis or heterotopic ossification is a frequent complication after surgery and is associated with poor functional results20. Surgical dislocation by digastric trochanteric osteotomy has been postulated as the approach that allows for the best visualization of the fracture while respecting the vascularization of the femoral head21.

A few cases of other femoral head fractures treated with arthroscopic assistance have been described in the literature. Park et al. and Kekatpure et al. satisfactorily treated Pipkin type 1 fractures4,12. Lansford and Munns treated 2 Pipkin type I fractures with hip arthroscopic excision of the fragments8. In addition, Matsuda reported a rare case of an osteochondral fracture in the suprafoveal area13 (Table I).

TABLE I - Summary of Cases Reported in the Literature About ARIF in Femoral Head Fractures*
Author Pipkin Type Hardware Portals Used for Fixation Outcome
Park et al. 4 Pipkin type I 1 cortical screw (3.5 × 30 mm length) Distal accessory anterior portal Full weight-bearing after 6 weeks. No scales measured
Kekatpure et al. 12 Pipkin type I 1 headless compression screw (3.0 mm long) Distal accessory anterior portal Partial weight-bearing after 8 weeks. Full weight-bearing after 2 months. No scales measured
Matsuda 13 Osteochondral fracture in the suprafoveal area 1 Herbert screw (3.0 mm)
1 mini-Herbert screw
Distal accessory anterior portal
Fifth portal
Full weight-bearing after 6 weeks. No scales measured
Lansford and Munns 8 Pipkin type I Excision of the fragments Accessory anterior portal Immediate weight-bearing. No scales measured
Current case Pipkin type II 2 headless compression screws (4.7 × 40 mm and 4.7 × 45 mm) PLP Full weight-bearing after 8 weeks. Non-Arthritic Hip Score: 96
*ARIF = Arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation, PLP = posterolateral portal.

In the present case, several factors favored surgical treatment. The factors were the presence of a suprafoveal fracture line affecting the loading area (Pipkin II), a large-sized fragment (40% of the femoral head) suitable for screw fixation, and a suboptimal reduction after the closed reduction of hip dislocation. The use of arthroscopy was considered because of the absence of concomitant lesions such as ipsilateral limb fractures or pelvis fracture that would have been a contraindication to such a procedure. In the authors' opinion, comminution at the fracture site, small fracture fragments (less than 15% of the femoral head), or fracture fragments that are not accessible percutaneously (e.g., those located at the superior pole of the head) should be considered as relative contraindications for an arthroscopic approach.

Arthroscopy without initial traction was chosen to avoid further fracture displacement and to minimize vascular damage to the femoral head caused by traction. Although abdominal trauma was not present in this case, the use of an outside-inside technique favors lower water pressure and minimizes intra-abdominal fluid extravasation (Table II).

TABLE II - Pearls and Pitfalls of a Pipkin Type II ARIF*
Pearls Pitfalls
Consider fragment size and orientation “suitable” before indicating percutaneous OS Limb traction may increase fracture displacement and vascular damage on the femoral head
Analyze CT to choose an adequate portal for screw insertion Misreading of screw length may lead to poor fixation or intraarticular protrusion
Use of a traction table to get optimal fluoroscopic views
*ARIF = Arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation, CT = computerized tomography, OS = osteosynthesis.

Arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous fixation is an effective treatment that allows for direct control of the quality of the reduction and minimizes surgical morbidity in selected cases of a fracture of the femoral head4,12,13,15. Although it has not been often reported, arthroscopic-assisted fixation of femoral head factures should be considered in selected cases. As has been the case with other joints, arthroscopic-assisted techniques will gain more relevance in traumatic pathology in the hip.

References

1. Butler JE. Pipkin type-II fractures of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:1292-6.
2. Lang-Stevenson A, Getty CJM. The Pipkin fracture-dislocation of the hip. Injury. 1987;18:264-9.
3. Epstein HC, Wiss DA, Cozen L. Posterior fracture dislocation of the hip with fractures of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;201:9-17.
4. Park MS, Her IS, Cho HM, Chung YY. Internal fixation of femoral head fractures (Pipkin I) using hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:898-901.
5. Ross JR, Gardner MJ. Femoral head fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5:199-205.
6. Sahin V, Karakas ES, Aksu S. Traumatic dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the hip: a long-term follow-up study. J Trauma. 2013;54:520-9.
7. Pipkin G. Treatment of grade IV fracture-dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957;39-A:1027-42.
8. Lansford T, Munns SW. Arthroscopic treatment of Pipkin type I femoral head fractures: a report of 2 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:e94-6.
9. Giannoudis PV, Kontakis G, Christoforakis Z, Akula M, Tosounidis T, Koutras C. Management, complications and clinical results of femoral head fractures. Injury. 2009;40:1245-51.
10. Henle P, Kloen P, Siebenrock KA. Femoral head injuries: which treatment strategy can be recommended? Injury. 2007;38:478-88.
11. Hwang DS, Noh CK. Comprehensive review of advancements in hip arthroscopy. Hip Pelvis. 2017;29:15-23.
12. Kekatpure A, Ahn T, Lee SJ, Jeong MY, Chang JS, Yoon PW. Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation for Pipkin type I femoral head fracture: technical note. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e997-1000.
13. Matsuda DK. A rare fracture, an even rarer treatment: the arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation of and isolated femoral head fracture. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:408-12.
14. Park MS, Yoon SJ, Choi SM. Hip arthroscopic management for femoral head fractures and posterior acetabular wall fractures (Pipkin type IV). Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2:e221-5.
15. Yamamoto Y, Ide T. Usefulness of arthroscopic surgery in hip trauma cases. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:269-73.
16. Wang CG, Li YM, Zhang HF, Li H, Li ZJ. Anterior approach versus posterior approach for Pipkin I and II femoral head fractures: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;27:176-81.
17. Oransky M, Martinelli N, Sanzarello I, Papapietro N. Fractures of the femoral head: a long-term follow-up study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2012;96:95-9.
18. Stannard JP, Harris HW, Volgas DA. Functional outcome of patients with femoral head fractures associated with hip dislocations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;377:44-56.
19. Droll KP, Broekhuyse H, O'Brien P. Fracture of the femoral head. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:716-27.
20. Marchetti ME, Steinberg GG, Coumas JM. Intermediate-term experience of Pipkin fracture-dislocations of the hip. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:455-61.
21. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP. Use of a trochanteric flip osteotomy improves outcomes in Pipkin IV fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:929-33.
Keywords:

pipkin fracture; hip arthroscopy; percutaneous fixation; intraarticular hip approach; femoral head fracture; parcelar head femoral fracture

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.