Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

School-based obesity prevention programs in rural communities

a scoping review protocol

Robinson, Jennifer C.1,7; Lim, Crystal S.2,7; Hinton, Elizabeth1,3,7; Pintado, Irene4; Gamble, Abigail5; Compretta, Caroline2,7; Ravola, Martha6

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports: July 2019 - Volume 17 - Issue 7 - p 1326–1333
doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003957
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOLS
Free

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to map the available literature on school-based obesity prevention programs in rural communities.

Introduction: Significant health disparities are associated with childhood obesity, and these disparities disproportionately affect children in disadvantaged communities, such as rural areas. Youth in rural areas are 26% more likely to be obese than youth in urban communities. To combat obesity in children, schools have become an avenue for educating children about the importance of healthy diet and physical activity. Although many school-based obesity prevention programs have been implemented in recent years, more information is needed on programs in rural communities.

Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider studies that include children 5 to 18 years of age who are enrolled in elementary, middle or high school in a rural setting and that investigate school-based obesity prevention programs. Studies that include children who are in non-rural areas, who are home-schooled, who are in an alternative setting (e.g. juvenile detention) or who are hospitalized will be excluded. Studies published in English since 1990 will be included.

Methods: Multiple databases will be searched, including PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Embase, Scopus and Academic Search Premier. Trials registers and gray literature will also be searched. After screening the titles and abstracts of identified citations, potentially relevant studies will be retrieved in full. Data will be extracted by independent reviewers and presented in a diagrammatic or tabular form, accompanied by a narrative summary.

1School of Nursing, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA

2School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA

3Rowland Medical Library, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA

4College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Mississippi University for Women, Columbus, USA

5School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA

6School of Agriculture and Applied Sciences, Alcorn State University, Lorman, USA

7Mississippi Centre for Evidence Based Practice: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence

Correspondence: Jennifer C. Robinson, jcrobinson@umc.edu

There is no conflict of interest in this project.

Online date: May 9, 2019

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Pediatric overweight and obesity continue to be a major public health concern in the United States as well as internationally. In the United States, 35.1% of youth 2–19 years of age are overweight (i.e., body mass index [BMI] at or above the 85th percentile for age and sex) and 18.5% are obese (i.e., BMI at or above the 95th percentile for age and sex).1 According to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2016, more than 340 million youth 5–19 years of age worldwide were overweight, and more than 124 million were obese.2 Despite previous reports that the prevalence of overweight and obesity in youth has become stable or even declined, more recent examination reveals continued increases in prevalence rates of overweight and obesity severity classes in youth.1

These increases are concerning because of the significant negative impact on physical and mental health.3 Increased weight status in children is associated with increased risk of abnormal glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, polycystic ovary syndrome, and sleep-disordered breathing, as well as later risk for heart disease, stroke and some cancers.4,5 In addition, psychosocial difficulties such as peer victimization, symptoms of depression and anxiety, body image concerns and difficulties in school are more common in children who are overweight and obese.4,6,7 Taken together, these co-morbidities significantly impact the quality of life in youth. Previous research demonstrated that youth with obesity had a quality of life similar to children with cancer who were receiving chemotherapy.8 Overweight and obesity are also associated with increased morbidity and mortality9 and, not surprising, with increased healthcare costs.10-12

Worldwide, there are significant health disparities associated with childhood obesity that disproportionately impact children from socially and economically disadvantaged communities, such as those in rural areas. Almost 20% of the U.S. population lives in rural areas,13 and about 3.4 billion people live in rural areas across the world.14 However, the definition of rural is ambiguous and is defined by each country.15,16 Generally, countries define rural by exclusion; any area that is not urban is considered rural.17,18 Many larger developed countries define urban based on total population within a geographical area created by the census. In general, Australia considers bounded localities and rural balance with an approximate population from 200–999 residents as rural,19 the United Kingdom defines output areas and wards with fewer than 10,000 residents as rural,18,20 and the United States considers census blocks with fewer than 2,500 residents as rural.17 Criteria other than population thresholds are often also considered such as population density, distance from urban areas and land use.17

People living in designated rural areas are one of the largest medically underserved populations.21 Research suggests that youth living in rural areas have a 26% greater chance of being obese compared to those living in urban areas,22 and youth from rural areas may engage in more unhealthy behaviors (such as spending more time in sedentary activities) than those from non-rural areas.23 There is also evidence that in some countries, rural communities are becoming more racially and ethnically diverse.24 This may result in an additional health disparity, as there is recent evidence to suggest that prevalence rates of overweight and obesity in racial and ethnic minority youth are increasing, while prevalence rates in non-Hispanic white youth are stabilizing.1 Thus, racial/ethnic minority youth living in rural areas may be at increased risk of obesity and obesity-related co-morbid health conditions.

To combat the obesity epidemic, there is a need for prevention efforts in rural and underserved communities.22 Schools may be one possible avenue for intervening, given that children spend a large amount of time in school each week, many children eat breakfast and lunch at school, and education about healthy nutrition and physical activity can be implemented in academic subjects. In addition, rural community school personnel are often well-respected and viewed as important sources of information by parents.25 Thus, schools may be able to provide parents with general education regarding current healthy lifestyle recommendations for children. The WHO's Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity provided six recommendations for policy makers worldwide, including one recommendation specific to the roles of schools in the fight to combat obesity in youth. The school-specific recommendation is to “implement comprehensive programmes that promote healthy school environments, health and nutrition literacy and physical activity among school-age children and adolescents”.2(p.XI) The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) model26 also emphasizes the role schools play in promoting health in children and adolescents, especially given that health behaviors are easier to modify in youth and can have a more significant impact than attempting to change unhealthy behaviors in adults.26 In recent years, researchers have developed, implemented and evaluated school-based obesity prevention programs focused on healthy diet, increased physical activity, creating a motivating environment and training of teachers, in addition to educational curricula for use27-31; however, it is unclear what has been implemented in rural communities.

A preliminary search for existing systematic and scoping reviews was conducted to locate literature related to rural school-based obesity prevention programs. The search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Campbell Collaboration and PsycINFO. Search terms used were school-based AND prevention AND obesity AND rural and limited to reviews. No systematic reviews were identified. The current review is needed to increase understanding regarding the types of school-based obesity prevention programs that have been implemented in rural schools to inform future development of school-based obesity prevention programs in rural communities.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Review objective/questions

The objective of this review is to explore existing literature related to school-based obesity prevention programs implemented in rural communities, to examine and conceptually map the evidence, and to identify any gaps in the literature.

The three questions of this review are: i) What types of school-based obesity prevention programs have been implemented in rural schools? ii) What specific elements/components are found in school-based obesity prevention programs that have been implemented in rural schools? and iii) What outcomes have been reported with the use of school based-obesity prevention programs implemented in rural schools?

Back to Top | Article Outline

Inclusion criteria

Participants

The review will consider studies that include children five to 18 years of age who are enrolled in an institution that provides instruction and teaching of children and includes elementary, middle or high school in a rural setting. Elementary schools are those that generally provide instruction to children in the first four years of instruction and may also include schools that teach children through the first eight years of instruction and self-identify as elementary. High schools generally include grades 9–12 or 10–12. Middle schools usually include grades 5–8 or 6–8. Schools may include those classified as private, parochial or publicly funded. Private schools are defined as schools that are supported by a nongovernmental agency, public schools are free and tax-supported and controlled by a local governmental authority, and parochial schools are defined as a private school maintained by a religious body. Children who are home-schooled or in an alternative setting, such as juvenile detention, or who are hospitalized for prolonged periods will be excluded.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Concept

This review will consider studies about school-based obesity prevention programs implemented in rural schools including, but not limited to, programs focused on nutrition and dietary changes, physical activity or exercise, decreasing screen-time, or mixed nutrition and physical activity. Physical activity is defined as bodily movement produced by skeletal muscle contraction with increased energy expenditure, while exercise, a kind of physical activity, is planned, structured, repetitive movement that is often intentionally aimed at improving or maintaining health or fitness. The school-based programs may be designed and delivered by health professionals, members of a community organization or via educators whose occupation is to teach, but the programs must be delivered in the school setting. Health professionals may be registered dieticians, occupational therapists, physical therapists, public health practitioners, licensed nurses, dentists, physicians, pharmacists, nutritionists, mental health providers (counselors, psychologists) or health educators. Studies that focus on physical fitness as an outcome and those conducted by health paraprofessionals, such as dental hygienists and nursing assistants, will be excluded. Studies with obesity programs delivered to children outside of elementary, middle, or high schools or those offered at community facilities will also be excluded.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Context

The context for this review will include studies conducted in schools in rural settings in any country. Rural is usually defined by each country,15,16 and is often defined by exclusion such that any area that is not urban is considered rural.17,18 This review will consider any study in which the authors conducting the study classify the area as rural or the area is designated as rural by the country's census geographic entity.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Types of studies

This review will consider quantitative, qualitative and text and opinion data. This review will consider both experimental and quasi-experimental quantitative study designs published in English including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, before and after studies and interrupted time-series studies. In addition, analytical observational studies including prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies and systematic reviews will be considered for inclusion. This review will also consider descriptive observational study designs including case series, individual case reports and descriptive cross-sectional studies for inclusion.

Studies that focus on qualitative data including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, qualitative description, action research and feminist research will be considered.

Studies published in English since 1990 will be included, as the rise in prevalence of childhood obesity began to be recognized during the 1980s in the United States, closely followed by recognized increases in trends in other developed countries. In addition, surveillance data and analysis of rates commonly use the baseline comparator of 1990 or later.32-36

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology will be used to complete this scoping review.37

Back to Top | Article Outline

Search strategy

The search strategy will aim to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step strategy will be used and will include electronic and manual searches of reference lists, as well as government or agency websites. The aim is to identify published and gray literature. The initial step included a limited search of PubMed (MEDLINE) and CINAHL and analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe the article. This informed the development of a search strategy, which will be tailored for each information source. The second step will be a search using all keywords and index terms identified in the electronic databases identified below. The third step will be to search reference lists, trial registers and unpublished studies. A proposed search strategy for PubMed is detailed in Appendix I.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Information sources

The databases to be searched include PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, Embase, Scopus and Academic Search Premier. The trial registers to be searched include Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and clinicaltrials.gov. The search for unpublished studies will include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, OpenGrey, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, Directory of Open Access Journals and PapersFirst. Organizational websites to be searched include the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Education.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Study selection

Following the search, all identified citations will be imported into EndNote X8 (Clarivate Analytics, PA, USA). Duplicate citations will be removed. Titles and abstracts of citations will be screened by two independent reviewers and compared to the inclusion criteria for the review. Potentially relevant studies will be retrieved in full and their citation details imported into the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI; Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide, Australia). The full text of selected citations will be assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria for review by two independent reviewers. Reasons for exclusion of full-text studies not meeting inclusion criteria will be recorded and reported in the scoping review. Disagreements that arise between the reviewers at each stage of the study selection process will be resolved through consensus or by the decision of a third reviewer. The results of the search will be reported in full in the final report and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) flowchart.38

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data extraction

Data will be extracted from papers included in the scoping review by two independent reviewers using the draft data extraction tool listed in Appendix II. The data extracted will include specific details about the populations, concept, context, defined rural designation and study methods of significance to the scoping review question and specific objectives. The specific details extracted will include the year or period of publication, countries of origin, method of rural designation, type of school-based prevention intervention used, intervention components, duration of intervention, provider of the intervention, study sample and size when reported, types of outcomes and key findings. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Authors of papers will be contacted to request missing or additional data where required. The draft data extraction tool will be modified and revised as necessary during the process of extracting data from each included study. Modifications will be detailed in the full scoping review report.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Presentation of results

The extracted data will be presented in a diagrammatic or tabular form in a manner that aligns with the objective and scope of this scoping review. The tables and charts will report on the distribution of studies by year or period of publication, countries of origin, method of rural designation, type of school-based prevention intervention used, intervention components, duration of intervention, provider of the intervention, study sample and size when reported, types of outcomes and key findings. Qualitative thematic analysis will be undertaken to provide an overview of the literature. A narrative summary will accompany the tabulated and/or charted results and will describe how the results relate to the review objective and questions. The findings will be discussed as they relate to practice and research.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Robin Christian and Dr. Michelle Palokas for their thoughtful suggestions on this manuscript.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Funding

JR and AG are partially supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 1U54GM115428. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Appendix I: Search strategy for PubMed

  1. prevention OR intervention
  2. “rural population”[MeSH] OR rural
  3. preschool OR schools[MeSH] OR “school based” OR “head start” OR school-based OR “school health services”[MeSH]
  4. obes* OR “childhood obesity” OR obesity[MeSH] OR “pediatric obesity”[MeSH] OR “pediatric obesity/prevention & control”[MeSH]
  5. teen* OR child OR children OR “school age” OR child[MeSH] OR “child, preschool”[MeSH] OR adolescent[MeSH] OR adolescent
  6. 1 AND 2 AND 3 AND 4 AND 5
Back to Top | Article Outline

Appendix II: Data extraction tool

Figure

Figure

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Skinner AC, Ravanbakht SN, Skelton JA, Perrin EM, Armstrong SC. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity in US Children, 1999–2016. Pediatrics 2018; 141 (3): pii: e20173459.
2. World Health Organization. Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity [Internet]. 2017 [cited 14 May 2018]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204176/1/9789241510066_eng.pdf.
3. Pizzi MA, Vroman K. Childhood obesity: effects on children's participation, mental health, and psychosocial development. Occup Ther Health Care 2013; 27 (2):99–112.
4. Daniels SR. The consequences of childhood overweight and obesity. Future Child 2006; 16 (1):47–67.
5. Estrada E, Eneli I, Hampl S, Mietus-Snyder M, Mirza N, Rhodes E, et al. Children's Hospital Association consensus statements for comorbidities of childhood obesity. Child Obes 2014; 10 (4):304–317.
6. Lim CS, Espil FM, Viana AG, Janicke DM. associations between anxiety symptoms and child and family factors in pediatric obesity. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2015; 36 (9):664–672.
7. Puhl RM, Luedicke J. Weight-based victimization among adolescents in the school setting: emotional reactions and coping behaviors. J Youth Adolesc 2012; 41 (1):27–40.
8. Schwimmer JB, Burwinkle TM, Varni JW. Health-related quality of life of severely obese children and adolescents. JAMA 2003; 289 (14):1813–1819.
9. Reilly JJ, Kelly J. Long-term impact of overweight and obesity in childhood and adolescence on morbidity and premature mortality in adulthood: systematic review. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011; 35 (7):891–898.
10. Cawley J. The economics of childhood obesity. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (3):364–371.
11. Seidell JC, Halberstadt J. The global burden of obesity and the challenges of prevention. Ann Nutr Metab 2015; 66 (Suppl 2):7–12.
12. Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Liang L, Caballero B, Kumanyika SK. Will all Americans become overweight or obese? estimating the progression and cost of the US obesity epidemic. Obesity 2008; 16 (10):2323–2330.
13. New census data show differences between urban and rural populations [Internet]. U.S. Census Bureau. 8 December 2016 [cited 30 May 2018]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2016/cb16-210.html.
14. World Bank. World development indicators: Rural population [Internet]. World Bank Group; 2018 [cited 19 December 2018]. Available from: https://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&series=SP.RUR.TOTL.
15. Rural Health Information Hub. What is rural? [Internet]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS); 2018 [updated 2018; cited 17 November 2018]. Available from: https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/topics/what-is-rural#differing-definitions.
16. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population density and urbanization [Internet]. United Nations; 2017 [cited 17 November 2018]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/UNSD/Demographic/sconcerns/densurb/densurbmethods.htm#B.
17. Ratcliffe M, Burd C, Holder K, Fields A. Defining rural at the U.S. Census Bureau [Internet]. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2016 [cited 17 November 2018]/Available from: https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/reference/ua/Defining_Rural.pdf.
18. Office for National Statistics. Census geography [Internet]. United Kingdom: Crown Publishing; 2011 [cited 17 November 2018]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/ukgeographies/censusgeography.
19. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census dictionary, 2011 [Internet]. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia; 2011 [updated August 22, 2016; cited 17 November 2018]. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2901.0Chapter23102011.
20. Office for National Statistics. A beginner's guide to UK geography [Internet]. United Kingdom: Crown Publishing; 2015 [cited 17 November 2018]. Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/geography/beginner-s-guide/glossary/glossary-r.html.
21. Meit M, Knudson A, Gilbert T, Yu AT, Tanenbaum R, Ormson E, et al. The 2014 update of the rural-urban chartbook. University of North Dakota: Rural Health Reform Policy Research Center; 2014.
22. Johnson JA III, Johnson AM. Urban-rural differences in childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Obes 2015; 11 (3):233–241.
23. Davis AM, Bennett KJ, Befort C, Nollen N. Obesity and related health behaviors among urban and rural children in the United States: data from the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2004 and 2005–2006. J Pediatr Psychol 2011; 36 (6):669–676.
24. Lichter DT. Immigration and the new racial diversity in rural America. Rural Sociol 2012; 77 (1):3–35.
25. Witte AL, Sheridan SM. Familty engagement in rural schools. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska; 2011: Contract No.: No. 2011–2.
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Whole school, whole community, whole child (WSCC) [Internet]. Atlanta, Ga.: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018 [cited 30 May 2018]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/wscc/index.htm.
27. Hu Y, He JR, Liu FH, Li WD, Lu JH, Xing YF, et al. Effectiveness of a kindergarten-based intervention for preventing childhood obesity. Pediatrics 2017; 140 (6): pii: e20171221.
28. Wang Y, Wu Y, Wilson RF, Bleich S, Cheskin L, Weston C, et al. Childhood obesity prevention programs: comparative effectiveness review and meta-analysis. Rockville Md.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
29. Yang Y, Kang B, Lee EY, Yang HK, Kim HS, Lim SY, et al. Effect of an obesity prevention program focused on motivating environments in childhood: a school-based prospective study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2017; 41 (7):1027–1034.
30. Zahner L, Puder JJ, Roth R, Schmid M, Guldimann R, Puhse U, et al. A school-based physical activity program to improve health and fitness in children aged 6–13 years (“Kinder-Sportstudie KISS”): study design of a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN15360785]. BMC Public Health 2006; 6:147.
31. Adab P, Pallan MJ, Lancashire ER, Hemming K, Frew E, Barrett T, et al. Effectiveness of a childhood obesity prevention programme delivered through schools, targeting 6 and 7 year olds: cluster randomised controlled trial (WAVES study). BMJ 2018; 360:k211.
32. Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. Facts and figures on childhood obesity [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2017 [cited 30 May 2018]. Available from: http://www.who.int/end-childhood-obesity/facts/en/.
33. von Hippel PT, Nahhas RW. Extending the history of child obesity in the United States: The Fels Longitudinal Study, birth years. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013; 21 (10):2153–2156.
34. Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents: United States, 1963–1965 through 2011–2012. Atlanta, Ga.: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
35. Lazzeri G, Rossi S, Pammolli A, Pilato V, Pozzi T, Giacchi MV. Underweight and overweight among children and adolescents in Tuscany (Italy). Prevalence and short-term trends. J Prev Med Hyg 2008; 49 (1):13–21.
36. Martinez-Vizcaino V, Sanchez Lopez M, Moya Martinez P, Solera Martinez M, Notario Pacheco B, Salcedo Aguilar F, et al. Trends in excess weight and thinness among Spanish schoolchildren in the period 1992–2004: the Cuenca study. Public Health Nutr 2009; 12 (7):1015–1018.
37. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, Khalil H, McInerney P, Baldini Soares C, Parker D. Aromataris E, Munn Z. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute, Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual [Internet]. Adelaide: 2015.
38. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension from scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169 (7):469–473.
Keywords:

Child health; pediatric obesity; preventive health programs; rural health; school health promotion

© 2019 by Lippincott williams & Wilkins, Inc.