Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Correctional nurse education and training for the care and support of prisoners with dementia

a systematic review of text and opinion protocol

Gaston, Sherryl; Porritt, Kylie; Jordan, Zoe

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports: June 2019 - Volume 17 - Issue 6 - p 1043–1050
doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004034
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOLS
Free

Review objective/questions: The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the best available evidence on the perceived education and training required for correctional nurses to care for and support prisoners with dementia in the Australian context. The review questions are:

  1. What education and training are required to enable correctional nurses to support and care for prisoners with dementia?
  2. What are the potential ways that dementia education and training can be delivered and facilitated for nurses working in correctional settings?

Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Correspondence: Sherryl Gaston, sherryl.gaston@unisa.edu.au

Conflicts of interest: KP is an Associate Editor of the JBISRIR and was blinded to the management and decision-making processes associated with this manuscript.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Worldwide, aged populations have increased substantially in most countries and regions leading up to 2017, and this increase is expected to accelerate in the future.1 In Australia, population trends showed a 36.8% increase in the number of Australians who are 50 years and older between the years 2000 and 2010.2,3 It is expected that the number of Australians over 65 years will double by 2055.4 This increase in the aging population is also occurring within the correctional setting.5,6 This is supported by the Bureau of Statistics in Australia, which showed an increase of 95% in older prisoners from 2000 to 2012.2,7

The increase in the aging population has given rise to increasingly complex healthcare needs, including dementia, both within the general and prisoner populations.8,9 The World Health Organization defines dementia as “a syndrome, usually of a chronic or progressive nature, caused by a variety of brain illnesses that affect memory, thinking, behavior and ability to perform everyday activities”.10(p.2) These impairments are irreversible and generally have a gradual onset and progression, leading to a decline in the person's ability to perform self-care activities.11,12 People with dementia have symptoms similar to those with cognitive impairment, including altered perceptions, memory loss (specifically short term), loss of cognitive skills, behavior changes, language difficulties, altered mobility and personality changes.11,12

The natural progression of dementia often results in difficulty following directions, as well as a decline in the ability to attend to simple hygiene tasks, or understand processes within the environment.7 Reports in the literature claim that prisoners who are unable to undertake these activities or follow directions are likely to receive punishment or disciplinary action for non-compliance, which could advance the progression of the disease.13-16 Failure to identify cognitive impairment and dementia in prisoners could lead to such adverse outcomes as victimization, inability to follow complex instructions, and poor judgment resulting in disciplinary actions.13,16-18

Research around dementia focuses on the older person in acute care and aged care settings; however, it is estimated that within the correctional population, there is a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment and dementia.13-15,19 A review of literature conducted in the United States reported that in the general population about 13% exhibit signs of dementia, while in the correctional population, it was estimated that up to 44% of people exhibit these same signs.13 It has been acknowledged that there could be many unrecognized instances of dementia in prisons, and this has been exacerbated by correctional healthcare services focusing on acute health care rather than long-term preventive measures.14,15

Nurses working in the correctional environment are integral to providing healthcare services to prisoners. However, they are often not educated to care for the complex needs of prisoners or the increasing aging population.20,21 It is acknowledged that there is a shortage of staff with geriatric training who can adequately care for the aging prisoner population and their increasing health problems.20 With the increase in chronic diseases including dementia in the prisoner population, healthcare professionals need to be provided with training in various specialty areas including aged and dementia care.12,22

Prisoner health care presents correctional nurses with challenges due to the diversity of existing problems ranging from substance abuse and mental health disorders to acute and chronic health issues.23 There are also differences within the population due to variations in their sentencing and the location of their incarceration, which can lead to prisoners developing a loss of normative behaviors.23 Some of these challenges for correctional nurses may impact the development of nurse-patient relationships and, ultimately, delivery of care.23 Correctional nurses require a broad scope of practice with a diverse skill set in order to provide quality care, although it is reported that they are not always able to source training specific to their role due to staffing requirements and heavy workload.21,24

Correctional nurses need to care for a group of people who are advancing in age and who exhibit higher morbidity rates than the general population, while being expected to deliver care that is equal to that provided in the general community setting.25 The World Health Organization has developed a guideline to promote health in prisons, which identifies the need for nurses to have professional independence equivalent to nurses in the general community.26 If nurses are restricted with their practice and lack professional independence, the health care they provide may be suboptimal.26 It has been recognized that the quality of nursing care provided in the correctional environment is fragmented and erratic, which impacts adversely on nurse education, job satisfaction and staff retention.23 There is minimal indication that evidence-based best practice is being integrated into correctional nursing practice.23

Furthermore, security requirements in the correctional environment can create barriers to the correctional nurse delivering safe and autonomous care.27 All nurses need autonomy in their practice to be able to provide and plan care for individuals; however, this autonomy is blocked in the correctional setting by the need to seek permission from security holders for any nursing actions.27 This lack of autonomy can create a conflict between the healthcare needs of the prisoners and the custody requirements of the system.28 Privacy for the prisoner in the correctional setting is absent, whereas within a healthcare setting, privacy is essential; therefore, nurses have an ethical dilemma.28,29 Providing compassionate care and developing a therapeutic relationship with patients is a core component of nursing practice.30,31 Security in the custodial environment creates difficulties for nurses to develop a therapeutic relationship with their patients, and it affects whether patients feel they can communicate openly about their concerns.27,32 These barriers to nursing care can generate problems with retention of staff, forcing correctional nurses to work longer shifts due to lower staffing levels.27

It is well known that the care of people with dementia can be of poor quality due to inadequate staff knowledge and skills, as well as lack of confidence to deliver care.33,34 It is recognized that providing person-centered dementia care improves the quality of life of those with dementia.33 There is limited research around person-centered dementia care training in relation to correctional nurses’ development of knowledge and skills, or how it supports their confidence to provide dementia care.33

To improve the quality of care provided to people with dementia, staff training and education are needed.35 To date, research on staff training in dementia care focused on aged and acute care areas.33-43 Therefore, the training and education needs of nurses in the correctional environment have not been adequately recognized or addressed. Studies have identified the need for dementia-specific training but fail to state what specific educational components should be included.35 For example, in the acute setting it has been acknowledged that people with dementia experience dehydration, falls, malnutrition, delirium and functional decline.35 Poor quality of care has been attributed to a negative attitude by caring staff, as well as poor knowledge and skills around caring for people with dementia.35 Although initiatives have been developed around staff training in the aged and acute setting for dementia care, there is limited information about the best and most effective approaches to training for correctional nurses.35

Research on dementia care education for nurses in aged and acute care settings could provide strategies to implement in the correctional environment.35-37,40,44 These approaches may be adapted to ensure staff are providing care equivalent to that in the general community. A cluster randomized controlled trial was used to develop an understanding around staff attitudes, their knowledge and their care approach.40 This study identified that knowledge translation and education specifically around dementia improved nurses’ attitudes, their approach to care and their knowledge base.40

This review will search the literature relating to correctional nurse education and training to care for prisoners in the correctional setting, including those with dementia. A preliminary search has been conducted and the databases/sources searched were the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, the Cochrane Library (which includes the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), PROSPERO and MEDLINE. One systematic review was identified that investigated the impact on dementia in the prison setting; however, this review did not explore nurse education and training needs around this population.45 Due to a lack of published studies or protocols registered for this topic, there is scope for a systematic review to inform correctional nurses and organizations about education needs for nursing staff. Due to a lack of primary studies and because personal experiences are not widely disseminated beyond the correctional setting, the opinions, comments and conclusions of government bodies and experts in the field will be explored. This will include criteria developed by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners in their Standards for health services in Australian prisons46, and the World Health Organization's47 guide for prison health.

A systematic review of available expert text and opinion would assist in formulating a training strategy for nurses working in the correctional setting with prisoners who are experiencing dementia. With the numbers of older prisoners growing at a faster rate than in the general population, this systematic review is timely and potentially valuable to policy makers within the correctional nursing environment. This could result in policy makers developing an education strategy to support nurses in an isolated work environment, thus resulting in better outcomes for vulnerable prisoners.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Inclusion criteria

Participants

The types of participants to be considered for inclusion for this review will be correctional nurses, regardless of gender, who are responsible for the health care of adult prisoners, including those with dementia.

For this review, a nurse is defined as a person who has completed a tertiary level program of study which has led to registration or licensing in his/her respective country.36,50 Due to the nature of the environment, correctional nurses will generally be identified as civilians working in the correctional setting. Correctional service officers/guards will be excluded. Papers exploring adult prisoners with diagnosed mental illness or substance misuse, and prisoners recently discharged from a correctional facility will be excluded.

Interchangeable terms have often been used to refer to prisoners in the correctional environment: prisoner, crim, criminal, inmate, offender, convict, incarcerated.49

Back to Top | Article Outline

Phenomena of interest

The phenomenon of interest for the review is the training and education requirements for correctional nurses working with prisoners with dementia. Education and training for prisoners, other healthcare professionals and correctional officers will be excluded.

The definition for education is the process where a person develops a body of knowledge through being systematically instructed.51 Training is where a person acquires knowledge, skills or experience for a particular behavior, such as nurses receiving “in-service training” within the hospital or correctional setting.52

Back to Top | Article Outline

Context

The context considered in this review is adult correctional settings. These settings are defined as “any building, enclosure or place legally declared to be a prison for the lawful custody of persons committed by lawful authority”.53(p.5)

Interchangeable terms have often been used to refer to the correctional environment: corrections, correctional setting, correctional facility, correctional institution, prison, jail, gaol, lock-up, penal institution, penitentiary, incarceration.48 This setting is characterized by having been developed to confine persons and segregate them from the general population.54 Any facility other than an adult correctional setting will be excluded, such as: juvenile detention center, prisoners in home detention, community corrections and prisoners in police lock-up.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Types of publications

The sources of information considered for this review will include text and narratives describing expert opinion pieces, expert opinion-based guidelines, expert consensus, published discussion papers, unpublished dissertations, reports accessed from professional organization websites and government policy documents. Only papers written in English will be included in this review.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

The proposed systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of text and opinion.55

Back to Top | Article Outline

Search strategy

The search strategy aims to locate both published and unpublished text and narratives. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken to identify articles on the topic. The text words contained in the titles and abstracts of relevant articles, and the index terms used to describe the articles, were used to develop a full search strategy for MEDLINE (see Appendix I). The search strategy, including all identified keywords and index terms, will be adapted for each included information source. The reference lists of all studies selected for critical appraisal will be screened for additional studies. Text and narratives published only in English will be considered for inclusion in this review. This search will not be limited by publication dates in order to find all available published and unpublished literature on correctional nurse education and training around caring for prisoners with dementia.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Information sources

Databases to be searched using the Ovid platform will be: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO.

The search for unpublished papers will include: Google Scholar, OpenGrey, ProQuest Health and Medical Complete and Criminal Justice Abstracts full text using the ProQuest platform and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Institutional websites to be accessed will be:

  • Dementia Australia website (formerly Alzheimer's Australia)
  • Alzheimer's Disease International
  • World Health Organization
  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
  • The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
  • National Commission on Correctional Health Care.

Initial search terms to be used will be: cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, education, training, staff education, development, correctional/corrections nurse, prison nurse, nurse, prison.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Paper selection

Following the search, all identified citations will be uploaded into EndNote (Clarivate Analytics, PA, USA) and duplicates removed. Titles and abstracts will then be screened by two independent reviewers for assessment against the inclusion criteria for the review. Potentially relevant studies will be retrieved in full and their citation details imported into JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide, Australia). The full text of selected studies will be assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers.

Full-text studies that do not meet the inclusion criteria will be excluded, and reasons for exclusion will be provided in an appendix in the final systematic review report. Included studies will undergo a process of critical appraisal. The results of the search will be reported in full in the final report and presented in a PRISMA flow diagram.56 Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Assessment of methodological quality

Text and opinion papers selected for inclusion will be assessed by two independent reviewers for authenticity prior to inclusion in the review, using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the JBI methodology of systematic reviews of text and opinion.57 Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer. Papers will not be excluded based on their quality. The results of the critical appraisal will be reported in narrative form and in a table.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Textual data extraction

Textual data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from the JBI methodology of systematic reviews of text and opinion.57 The following will be included in the data extraction form for textual data: types of text and the people represented, stated allegiance or position of the paper, setting and its geographical context, cultural context, logic of the argument and experts’ conclusions (where provided).55,57 If the expert does not specify a conclusion, it will be determined from the themes and metaphors identified in the paper. The conclusion will be supported, where possible, by a quotation from the source paper, and this quotation will be cited with the page number. During this process, each conclusion will be assigned a level of credibility depending on its consistency with supporting data within the text.55,57 Finally, a summary will be provided of the strengths and weaknesses of the paper and how they refer to the review objective and questions. Authors of papers will be contacted to request missing or additional data where required.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Textual data synthesis

Textual papers will, where possible, be pooled using JBI SUMARI. This will involve the synthesis of conclusions to generate a set of statements that represent that aggregation, through assembling and categorizing these conclusions on the basis of similarity in meaning. These categories will then be subjected to a meta-synthesis in order to produce a single comprehensive set of synthesized findings that can be used as a basis for evidence-based practice. Where textual pooling is not possible, the conclusions will be presented in narrative form. This review will follow the JBI approach to synthesizing information collated from textual and non-research papers to ensure credibility of each as a relevant source to guide practice.55,57

Back to Top | Article Outline

Assessing certainty in the findings

The synthesized findings will be graded according to the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in the output of text and opinion and presented in a Summary of Findings.58 The Summary of Findings includes the major elements of the review and details how the ConQual score is developed. Included in the table are the title, population, phenomena of interest and context for the specific review.59 Each synthesized finding from the review is then presented along with the type of expert opinion informing it, a score of dependability, credibility and the overall ConQual score.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgments

This systematic review will form part of the submission for the award of Doctor of Philosophy for the primary reviewer, and as such, a secondary reviewer will only be used to ensure validity of included papers.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Appendix I: Search strategy for MEDLINE

MEDLINE (Ovid MEDLINE[R] Epub ahead of print, in-process and other non-indexed citations, Ovid MEDLINE[R] daily and Ovid MEDLINE[R] 1946 to present)

Figure

Figure

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population prospects: the 2017 revision, key findings, and advance tables. New York: United Nations; 2017.
2. Goulding P. “Silver Bullet” Or confused greying fox?: Best Practice Support Model for Older Prisoners. Flemington, Victoria: Wintringham Specialist Aged Care; 2013.
3. Baidawi S, Turner S, Trotter C, Browning C, Collier P, O’Connor D, et al. Older prisoners - A challenge for Australian corrections. Trends Iss Crime Crim Just 2011; 426:1–8.
4. Australian Government. Intergenerational Report Australia in 2055. In: Australia Co, editor. Parkes, ACT. 2015.
5. Trotter C, Baidawi S. Older prisoners: Challenges for inmates and prison management. Aust NZ J Criminol 2015; 48 2:200–218.
6. Moll A. Losing track of time: Dementia and the ageing prison population treatment challenges and examples of good practice. United Kingdom: Mental Health Foundation; 2013.
7. Brown J. Dementia in Prison. North Ryde, NSW: Alzheimer's Australia NSW; 2014.
8. Harlin K, Montague C. Informing Prison Healthcare in South Australia, Planning, Professional Practice, Promotion, Patient Safety: Meeting the challenges of the next decade. 2011.
9. Turner S, Trotter C. Growing old in prison? A review of national and international research on Ageing Offenders. Correctional Research Paper Series. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Justice; 2010.
10. World Health Organization. Dementia: A public health priority. United Kingdom: Alzheimer's Disease International and World Health Organization; 2012.
11. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Dementia in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2012.
12. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Dementia: The NICE-SCIE Guidline on supporting people with dementia and their carers in health and social care. Great Britain: The British Psychological Society and Gaskell; 2007.
13. Maschi T, Kwak J, Ko E, Morrissey M. Forget me not: Dementia in Prison. Gerontologist 2011; 52 4:441–451.
14. Baldwin J, Leete J. Behind bars: the challenge of an ageing prison population. AJDC 2012; 1 2:16–19.
15. de Viggiani N. Unhealthy prisons: exploring structural determinants of prison health. Sociol Health Ill 2007; 29 1:115–135.
16. Williams B, Stern M, Mellow J, Safer M, Greifinger R. Aging in Correctional Custody: Setting a Policy Agenda for Older Prisoner Health Care. Am J Public Health 2012; 102:1475–1481.
17. Feczko A. Dementia in the incarcerated elderly adult: innovative solutions to promote quality care. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2014; 26 12:640–648.
18. Yorston G. Abou-Saleh MT, Katona C, Kumar S. The Elderly Offender. Principles and Practice of Geriatric Psychiatry John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 3 edLondon: 2011.
19. Kingston P, Le Mesurier N, Yorston G, Wardle S, Heath L. Psychiartic morbidity in older prisoners: unrecognized and undertreated. Int Psychogeriatr 2011; 23 8:1354–1360.
20. Lawson J. Inside grey walls: unprepared for an aging inmate population. CMAJ 2014; 186 6:E191–E192.
21. Bennett C, Perry J, Lapworth T, Davies J, Preece V. Supporting prison nurses: an action research approach to education. Br J Nurs 2010; 19 12:782–786.
22. Royal College of Nursing. Health and nursing care in the criminal justice service. RCN guidance for nursing staff. London; 2009.
23. Shelton D, Reagan L, Weiskopf C, Panosky D, Nicholson M, Diaz D. Baseline Indicators and Implementation Strategies in a Statewide Correctional Nurse Competencies Program: Mid-Year Report. J Contin Educ Nurs 2015; 46 10:455–461.
24. Almost J, Gifford WA, Doran D, Ogilvie L, Miller C, Rose DN, et al. Correctional nursing: a study protocol to develop an educational intervention to optimize nursing practice in a unique context. Implement Sci 2013; 8:71.
25. Choudhry K, Armstrong D, Dregan A. Prison Nursing: Formation of a Stable Professional Identity. J Forensic Nurs 2017; 13 1:20–25.
26. Baybutt M, Acin E, Hayton P, Dooris M. World Health Organization. Promoting health in prisons: a settings approach. Prisons and Health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional office for Europe; 2014. 180–184.
27. Sasso L, Delogu B, Carrozzino R, Aleo G, Bagnascl A. Ethical issues of prison nursing: A qualitative study in Northern Italy. Nurs Ethics 2018; 25 3:393–409.
28. Crampton R, Turner D. Caring for Prisoners-patients: A Quandary for Registered Nurses. J Perianesth Nurs 2014; 29 2:107–118.
29. International Council of Nurses. The ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses. Switzerland: International Council of Nurses; 2012.
30. Richardson C, Percy M, Hughes J. Nursing therapeutics: Teaching student nurses care, compassion and empathy. Nurse Educ Today 2015; 35 5:e1–e5.
31. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Registered Nurse standards for practice. Victoria: Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia; 2016.
32. Mahoney S. The Challenges of Correctional Nursing. Magnificat: a journal of undergraduate nonfiction; 2015.
33. Surr CA, Smith SJ, Crossland J, Robins J. Impact of a person-centred dementia care training programme on hospital staff attitudes, role efficacy and perceptions of caring for people with dementia: A repeated measures study. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 53:144–151.
34. Smythe A, Jenkins C, Galant-Miecznikowska M, Bentham P, Oyebode J. A qualitative study investigating training requirements of nurses working with people with dementia in nursing homes. Nurse Educ Today 2017; 50:119–123.
35. Surr CA, Gates C. What works in delivering dementia education or training to hospital staff? A critical synthesis of evidence. Int J Nurs Stud 2017; 75:172–188.
36. Chenoweth L, Jeon Y, Merlyn T, Brodaty H. A systematic review of what factors attract and retain nurses in aged and dementia care. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19 (1–2):156–167.
37. Chenoweth L, Merlyn T, Jeon Y, Tait F, Duffield C. Attracting and retaining qualified nurses in aged and dementia care: outcomes from an Australian study. J Nurs Manag 2014; 22 2:234–247.
38. Edberg A, Bird M, Richards RA, Woods R, Keeley P, Davis-Quarrell V. Strain in nursing care of people with dementia: Nurses’ experience in Australia, Sweden and United Kingdom. Aging Ment Health 2008; 12 2:236–243.
39. Houghton C, Murphy K, Brooker D, Casey D. Healthcare staffs’ experiences and perceptions of caring for people with dementia in the acute setting: Qualitative evidence synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 61:104–116.
40. Wang Y, Xiao LD, Ullah S, He G, De Bellis A. Evaluation of a nurse-led dementia education and knowledge translation programme in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Today 2017; 49:1–7.
41. Macaden L. Being Dementia Smart (BDS): A Dementia Nurse Education Journey in Scotland. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2016; 13 1:45–53.
42. Galvin JE, Kuntemeier B, Al-Hammadi N, Germino J, Murphy-White M, McGillick J. Dementia-friendly Hospitals: Care not Crisis” An Educational Program Designed to Improve the Care of the Hospitalized Patient With Dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2010; 24 4:372–379.
43. Dewing J, Dik S. What is the current state of care for older people with dementia in general hospitals? A literature review Dementia 2014; 15 1:106–124.
44. Palmer JL, Lach HW, McGillick J, Murphy-White M, Carroll MB, Armstrong JL. The Dementia Friendly Hospital Initiative education program for acute care nurses and staff. J Contin Educ Nurs 2014; 45 9:416–424.
45. Brooke J, Diaz-Gil A, Jackson D. The impact of dementia in the prison setting: A systematic review. Dementia 2018; 0 0:1–23.
46. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Standards for health services in Australian prisons. Australia: The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; 2011.
47. World Health Organization. Health in prisons: A WHO guide to the essentials in prison health. In: Moller L, Stover H, Jurgens R, Gatherer A, Nikogosian H, editors. Denmark; 2007.
48. McMillian Dictionary [Internet]. Springer Nature Limited; 2009-2019. Correctional facility; [cited 2017 Jun 24]; about 1 screen. Available from: www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/correctional-facility.
49. Merriam-Webster Thesaurus. [Internet]. Springfield (MA): Merriam-Webster Incorporated; 2019. Prisoner [cited 2017 Jun 24]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/prisoner.
50. Wosinski J, Cordier SB, Bachmann AO, Gagnon M, Kiszio B. Effectiveness of nurse-led healthy aging strategies for older adults living in the community: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2016; 14 2:5–15.
51. Merriam-Webster Thesaurus. [Internet]. Springfield (MA): Merriam-Webster Incorporated; 2019. Education; [cited 2018 Jun 24]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/education.
52. English Oxford Living Dictionaries [Internet]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2019. Training; [cited 2018 Jun 24]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/training.
53. Correctional Administrators. Standard Guidelines for Corrections in Australia. Australia 2012.
54. Dhaliwal K, Hirst S. Caring in Correctional Nursing: A systematic search and narrative synthesis. J Forensic Nurs 2016; 12 1:5–12.
55. McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, Florescu S. Aromataris E, Munn Z. Chapter 4: Systematic reviews of text and opinion. The Joanna Briggs Institute, Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual [Internet]. Adelaide: 2017.
56. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 7:e1000097.
57. McArthur A, Klugarova J, Yan H, Florescu S. Innovations in the systematic review of text and opinion. Int J of Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13 3:188–195.
58. Munn Z, Porritt K, Lockwood C, Aromataris E, Pearson A. Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14:108.
59. The Joanna Briggs Institute. The JBI approach: Grades of recommendation [Internet] 2014 [cited 2018 Jun 24]; Available from: http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/approach/JBI-grades-of-recommendation_2014.pdf.
Keywords:

Cognitive impairment; correctional nurse; dementia; education; prison

© 2019 by Lippincott williams & Wilkins, Inc.