Secondary Logo

Fatigue and measurement of fatigue

a scoping review protocol

Walters, Stephen John; Stern, Cindy; Stephenson, Matthew

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports: March 2019 - Volume 17 - Issue 3 - p 261–266
doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003699
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOLS
Free

Review question/objective: The objectives of this review are to identify and present definitions of fatigue and theoretical, conceptual and mechanistic models of fatigue, and to identify the commonly used instruments that measure fatigue in humans and the settings in which they are used.

Specifically, the review questions are:

  1. How is fatigue defined?
  2. What theories, conceptual and mechanistic models of fatigue that underpin the understanding of fatigue have been posited?
  3. What are the most commonly used instruments that measure human fatigue and in which settings are they used?

Joanna Briggs Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Correspondence: Stephen John Walters, camroc@iinet.net.au

There is no conflict of interest in this project.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Fatigue is the state of weariness that may result from prolonged physical or mental effort, anxiety and lack of adequate sleep or exposure to harsh environments.1 Fatigue is both a normal response in healthy people and a symptom of illnesses such as cancer,2,3 multiple sclerosis,4-7 chronic fatigue syndrome8 and fibromyalgia syndrome.9,10 Fatigue is broadly classified as acute/transient fatigue (e.g. after exercise), chronic fatigue (lasting unabated for more than six months) or chronic fatigue syndrome (chronic fatigue with co-morbidity).

It is well recognized within the literature that the level of human fatigue is correlated with performance indicators such as athletic results and injury,11-17 work productivity, performance and injury,18-23 decision making/cognitive performance,24-28 and mistakes and accidents.29-35 Therefore, it is important to understand the implications and consequences of fatigue within various settings and to minimize the impact of fatigue on catastrophic outcomes. The ability to quantify fatigue allows for the measurement of fatigue severity, and the subsequent identification of health and safety issues, and the need for treatment or testing the efficacy of any treatment for fatigue. There are many instruments available to measure fatigue, both psychometric instruments, such as the Fatigue Severity Scale,36 and objective tests, such as the hand grip strength dynamometer37 and Root Mean Square (RMS) value of electromyographic signals.38,39

Fatigue may be conceptualized relative to different biopsychosocial aspects and fatigue research may focus on a specific aspect. For example, research into the involvement of the brain in fatigue would conceptualize fatigue relative to a pathophysiological model and attempt to understand biological mechanisms.40 In a contrasting example, the role of psychological stress in causing fatigue conceptualizes fatigue as a symptom or consequence of the stressor.41,42 Although different, the two conceptualizations of fatigue are not mutually exclusive or conflicting, but are instead connected. This current review will include research that focuses on any biopsychosocial aspect of fatigue using physiological, psychological or sociological models.

Physiological models may define fatigue as the loss of force generating capacity during muscular activity or relating to organ failure due to lack of physiological substrates.43Central models of fatigue are those that are based on the involvement of the central nervous system's contribution to fatigue.43 Imaging research suggests the significant involvement of the brain in fatigue. For example, Brodmann's area 10/11 is associated with fatigue sensation and motivation.44 These models contrast with peripheral models that emphasize the metabolic exhaustion of the muscles or involve impaired motor-neuron end plate deficits, for example.43,45 Other models propose a model of complexity that includes control over fatigue processes which places the brain as a governor of exercise fatigue (Central Governor Theory).46,47

Psychological fatigue is different to mental fatigue in that mental fatigue relates to weariness that develops as a result of cognitive or mental work.48 Psychological fatigue is associated with stress and emotions and has been defined as a “…feeling of fatigue caused by things such as lack of exercise, boredom, or mental stress that results in lack of energy and depression.”49(para.1) It has been shown that depression may increase the risk of unexplained fatigue and the presence of unexplained fatigue may cause depression.50

Loriol places the study of fatigue into a sociological perspective: “...fatigue must be studied as a subjective feeling of tiredness related in complex and diverse manners to physical muscular effort, motivation processes and performances, and subject to socio-historical framing.”51(p.2),52 This point of view alludes to the influence of social settings and history on the meaning of fatigue. Therefore, it is important to consider any study of fatigue in the context of the social setting in which the study took place. The meaning of fatigue will be shaped by each unique social setting. For example, fatigue in aviators (setting = workplace/health and safety)53 has a different meaning and consequence than fatigue in children with cancer (setting = healthcare/family).54

This review seeks to scope the scientific literature related to the conceptual, theoretical and mechanistic knowledge of fatigue and identify instruments used to measure fatigue. This is intended to inform the future development of a theoretical model of fatigue and a systematic review of the measurement properties of instruments. To achieve these objectives, a scoping review of the literature is proposed.

The procedure and method for conducting a scoping review is published in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual55,56 upon which this scoping review will be founded. Essentially, scoping reviews are conducted to map specific knowledge domains. The purpose of a scoping review can include (one or all): the mapping of key concepts within a knowledge domain, clarifying definitions of terms, and defining the boundaries of the knowledge domain. Therefore, scoping reviews are useful in identifying key concepts and gaps in knowledge.

A search of PubMed and the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports using the search term “fatigue” revealed no current scoping reviews about fatigue, fatigue modelling or fatigue measurement. A systematic review published in 2009 considered fatigue measurement instruments,57 looking at validity of instruments assessing fatigue in chronic illnesses but it is not a scoping review, does not address the broader criteria of this current scoping review and is not current. A bibliographic study of fatigue measurement scales was conducted by Hjollund et al.58 and is also not current. Therefore, this current scoping review is timely.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Inclusion criteria

Participants

Articles that include humans may be included in this current review. Participants can be from any population, age, gender and with any health status.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Concept

The concept of interest is the definition of fatigue, the theoretical, conceptual and mechanistic models upon which fatigue is understood, and the measurement of fatigue. This current review will consider any of the different classifications of human fatigue, but not fatigue related to materials (“...[material] damage accumulate[d] due to the repetitive application of loads...”),59(p.1) auditory fatigue (temporary loss of hearing sensitivity resulting from exposure to a loud tone)60 or fatigue related to other disciplines such as engineering and physics etc.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Context

Articles will be considered for inclusion in this review within the context of biological/physiological mechanisms, psychological expression or causes or the effect of fatigue on human function in social settings, such as the workplace or sports arena. Articles examining fatigue in states of health or illness may be included.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Types of studies

Systematic reviews, any quantitative or qualitative research studies, and expert opinion articles will be considered.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

Search strategy

The search strategy will aim to find published and unpublished articles using a three-phase strategy. The first phase was a limited search of PubMed and Web of Science followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract and of the index terms used to describe the articles. This informed the development of the search strategy which will be tailored for each information source (second phase).

The results of each search will be loaded into EndNote V X.8 (Clarivate Analytics, PA, USA).

A third-phase search will look at the references in the articles included into the review for further articles.

Articles with titles and abstracts published in English will be included. Articles published in any year may be included because the development of theories and models of fatigue has publication history as early as the late 1800 s.61 The chronological history of fatigue research is useful to identify the evolving understanding from an earlier reductionist model towards a biopsychosocial-complexity model.

A full search algorithm for PubMed is detailed in Appendix I.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Information sources

The databases/sources to be searched include: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports.

The search for unpublished articles will include: EThOS (Electronic Thesis Online Service), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses: Global.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Study selection

Titles and abstracts or the full citation record will be screened for assessment against the inclusion criteria for the review. Articles that meet the inclusion criteria will be classified and retained in the Endnote library database. Studies that do not meet the inclusion criteria will be excluded and reasons for exclusion will be provided in an appendix in the final review report. Results of the search will be reported in full in the final report and presented in a PRISMA flow diagram.62

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data extraction

Data about definitions of fatigue and theoretical models will be extracted from the first search results through evaluation of titles and abstracts and full text articles. This includes text defining fatigue, information describing the development of fatigue theories including history, pivotal commentaries, and mechanisms central to fatigue physiology. Data about measurement instruments and test methods will be extracted from the second search results through assessment of the contents of titles and abstracts or the full citation record. An Excel spreadsheet will be used to collect information, including: the name of the measurement instrument or test method; the number of articles mentioning each instrument or test method; the range of years of publications relative to each measurement instrument or test method; diagnostic categories based on World Health Organization Classification of Diseases (ICD-11)63 for which a specific psychometric instrument was applied; the settings in which the instrument or test method has been used; and the definition of specific test methods.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data presentation

Data will be presented using, but not limited to: tables, figures, citation maps, word clouds, concept network maps and glossaries. In addition to this presentation, a discussion of the data and the significance of the findings will be given.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

This study contributes to the Doctor of Philosophy (Medicine) at the University of Adelaide for SJW.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Appendix I: Search strategy for PubMed

Search 1:

(((((((“fatigue”[mh:noexp] OR “mental fatigue”[mh:noexp] OR “muscle fatigue”[mh] OR “fatigue syndrome, chronic”[mh] OR fatigu[ti] OR lack of energy[ti] OR lassitude[ti] OR weariness[ti])))) AND ((defin*[ti] OR concept*[ti] OR theor*[ti] OR model*[ti] OR mechanism)))))

Search 2:

(((((((“fatigue”[mh:noexp] OR “mental fatigue”[mh:noexp] OR “muscle fatigue”[mh] OR “fatigue syndrome, chronic”[mh] OR fatigu*[ti] OR lack of energy[ti] OR lassitude[ti] OR weariness[ti])))) AND ((“reproducibility of results”[mh]) OR (measure*[ti] OR valid*[ti] OR reliab*[ti] OR tool[ti] OR instrument[ti] OR questionnaire[ti] OR assess*[ti] OR scale[ti] OR score[ti]))

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Sadeghniiat-Haghighi K, Yazdi Z. Fatigue management in the workplace. Ind Psychiatry J 2015; 24 1:12–17.
2. De Waele S, Van Belle S. Cancer-related fatigue. Acta Clin Belg 2010; 65 6:378–385.
3. Bower JE. Cancer-related fatigue-mechanisms, risk factors, and treatments. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 11 10:597–609.
4. Kluger BM, Krupp LB, Enoka RM. Fatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses: Proposal for a unified taxonomy. Neurology 2013; 80 4:409–416.
5. Braley TJ, Chervin RD. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Mechanisms, evaluation, and treatment. Sleep 2010; 33 8:1061–1067.
6. Krupp LB, Serafin DJ, Christodoulou C. Multiple sclerosis-associated fatigue. Expert Rev Neurother 2010; 10 9:1437–1447.
7. Wijenberg ML, Stapert SZ, Kohler S, Bol Y. Explaining fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Cross-validation of a biopsychosocial model. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2016; 39 5:815–822.
8. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: A comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121 12:953.
9. Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell IJ, Hebert L. The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general-population. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38 1:19–28.
10. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Katz RS, Mease P, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res 2010; 62 5:600–610.
11. Enoka RM, Duchateau J. Translating fatigue to human performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48 11:2228–2238.
12. Hurdiel R, Van Dongen HP, Aron C, McCauley P, Jacolot L, Theunynck D. Sleep restriction and degraded reaction-time performance in Figaro solo sailing races. J Sports Sci 2014; 32 2:172–174.
13. Hagin V, Gonzales BR, Candau RB, Groslambert A. Influence of a conservative sleep management strategy during a solo Pacific Ocean crossing on anxiety and perceived fatigue: A case study. J Sports Sci 2012; 30 4:395–402.
14. Barbas I, Fatouros IG, Douroudos II, Chatzinikolaou A, Michailidis Y, Draganidis D, et al. Physiological and performance adaptations of elite Greco-Roman wrestlers during a one-day tournament. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111 7:1421–1436.
15. Cresswell SL. Possible early signs of athlete burnout: A prospective study. J Sci Med Sport 2009; 12 3:393–398.
16. Reilly T, Piercy M. The effect of partial sleep deprivation on weight-lifting performance. Ergonomics 1994; 37 1:107–115.
17. Hill DW, Hill CM, Fields KL, Smith JC. Effects of jet lag on factors related to sport performance. Can J Appl Physiol 1993; 18 1:91–103.
18. Allen P, Wadsworth E, Smith A. Seafarers’ fatigue: A review of the recent literature. Int Marit Health 2008; 59 (1–4):81–92.
19. Lee CK, Cha JM, Kim WJ. Endoscopist fatigue may contribute to a decline in the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49 6:e51–e56.
20. Lombardi DA, Jin K, Courtney TK, Arlinghaus A, Folkard S, Liang Y, et al. The effects of rest breaks, work shift start time, and sleep on the onset of severe injury among workers in the People's Republic of China. Scand J Work Environ Health 2014; 40 2:146–155.
21. van den Berg MJ, Signal TL, Mulrine HM, Smith AA, Gander PH, Serfontein W. Monitoring and managing cabin crew sleep and fatigue during an ultra-long range trip. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2015; 86 8:705–713.
22. Weaver MD, Patterson PD, Fabio A, Moore CG, Freiberg MS, Songer TJ. An observational study of shift length, crew familiarity, and occupational injury and illness in emergency medical services workers. Occup Environ Med 2015; 72 11:798–804.
23. Yamany T, Woldu SL, Korets R, Badani KK. Effect of postcall fatigue on surgical skills measured by a robotic simulator. J Endourol 2015; 29 4:479–484.
24. Doppelmayr MM, Finkernagel H, Doppelmayr HI. Changes in cognitive performance during a 216 kilometer, extreme endurance footrace: A descriptive and prospective study. Percept Mot Skills 2005; 100 2:473–487.
25. Barker LM, Nussbaum MA. Fatigue, performance and the work environment: A survey of registered nurses. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67 6:1370–1382.
26. Anderson C, Sullivan JP, Flynn-Evans EE, Cade BE, Czeisler CA, Lockley SW. Deterioration of neurobehavioral performance in resident physicians during repeated exposure to extended duration work shifts. Sleep 2012; 35 8:1137–1146.
27. Amirian I. The impact of sleep deprivation on surgeons’ performance during night shifts. Dan Med J 2014; 61 9:B4912.
28. Saadat H, Bissonnette B, Tumin D, Thung A, Rice J, Barry N, et al. Time to talk about work-hour impact on anesthesiologists: the effects of sleep deprivation on Profile of Mood States and cognitive tasks. Paediatr Anaesth 2016; 26 1:66–71.
29. Baker K, Olson J, Morisseau D. Work practices, fatigue, and nuclear power plant safety performance. Hum Factors 1994; 36 2:244–257.
30. Barger LK, Cade BE, Ayas NT, Cronin JW, Rosner B, Speizer FE, et al. Extended work shifts and the risk of motor vehicle crashes among interns. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 2:125–134.
31. Ben-Aroya Z, Segal D, Hadar A, Hallak M, Friger M, Katz M, et al. Effect of OB/GYN residents’ fatigue and training level on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2002; 17 3:177–181.
32. Chen C, Xie Y. The impacts of multiple rest-break periods on commercial truck driver's crash risk. J Safety Res 2014; 48:87–93.
33. Herman J, Kafoa B, Wainiqolo I, Robinson E, McCaig E, Connor J, et al. Driver sleepiness and risk of motor vehicle crash injuries: A population-based case control study in Fiji (TRIP 12). Injury 2014; 45 3:586–591.
34. Lim SM, Chia SE. The prevalence of fatigue and associated health and safety risk factors among taxi drivers in Singapore. Singapore Med J 2015; 56 2:92–97.
35. Torregroza-Vargas NM, Bocarejo JP, Ramos-Bonilla JP. Fatigue and crashes: The case of freight transport in Colombia. Accid Anal Prev 2014; 72:440–448.
36. Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 1989; 46 10:1121–1123.
37. Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: Towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 2011; 40 4:423–429.
38. Vollestad NK. Measurement of human muscle fatigue. J Neurosci Methods 1997; 74 2:219–222.
39. De Luca CJ. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech 1997; 13 2:135–163.
40. DeLuca J, Genova HM, Capili EJ, Wylie GR. Functional neuroimaging of fatigue. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2009; 20 2:325–337.
41. Pawlikowska T, Chalder T, Hirsch SR, Wallace P, Wright DJM, Wessely SC. Population based study of fatigue and psychological distress. BMJ 1994; 308 6931:763.
42. Pi IG, Sein-Echaluce MLG, Aubach LR, Puig-Gros JT, Sola JF. Stressful events in the onset of chronic fatigue syndrome. Revista Espanola De Salud Publica 2016; 90:E1–E7.
43. Shen J, Barbera J, Shapiro CM. Distinguishing sleepiness and fatigue: focus on definition and measurement. Sleep Med Rev 2006; 10 1:63–76.
44. Tanaka M, Tajima S, Mizuno K, Ishii A, Konishi Y, Miike T, et al. Frontier studies on fatigue, autonomic nerve dysfunction, and sleep-rhythm disorder. J Physiol Sci 2015; 65 6:483–498.
45. Watanabe Y, Evengard B, Kuratsune H, Jason LA, Natelson BH. Fatigue science for human health. 2008; Tokyo: SpringerLink, 236 p.
46. Noakes TD. The central governor model and fatigue during exercise. Regulation of fatigue in exercise: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2011. p. 1–26.
47. Noakes TD, Gibson AS, Lambert EV. From catastrophe to complexity: A novel model of integrative central neural regulation of effort and fatigue during exercise in humans. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38 4:511–514.
48. Earle F. The construct of psychological fatigue: A psychometric and experimental analysis [Ph.D.]. Ann Arbor: University of Hull (United Kingdom); 2004.
49. Oxford University Press, The Oxford Dictionary of Sports Science and Medicine. 2006; psychological fatigue.
50. Skapinakis P, Lewis G, Mavreas V. Temporal relations between unexplained fatigue and depression: Longitudinal data from an international study in primary care. Psychosom Med 2004; 66 3:330–335.
51. Loriol M. A sociological stance on fatigue and tiredness: Social inequalities, norms and representations. Neurophysiol Clin 2017; 47 2:87–94.
52. Hockey R. The psychology of fatigue: Work, effort and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
53. Caldwell JA, Mallis MM, Caldwell JL, Paul MA, Miller JC, Neri DF. Fatigue countermeasures in aviation. Aviat Space Environ Med 2009; 80 1:29–59.
54. Tomlinson D, Zupanec S, Jones H, O'Sullivan C, Hesser T, Sung L. The lived experience of fatigue in children and adolescents with cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24 8:3623–3631.
55. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Baldini Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017. Available from https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/.
56. Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 2015; 13 3:141–146.
57. Whitehead L. The measurement of fatigue in chronic illness: A systematic review of unidimensional and multidimensional fatigue measures. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009; 37 1:107–128.
58. Hjollund NH, Andersen JH, Bech P. Assessment of fatigue in chronic disease: a bibliographic study of fatigue measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007; 5 12:1–5.
59. Roylance D. Fatigue: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2001 [cited 2017 July]. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/course/3/3.11/www/modules/fatigue.pdfDavidRoylance.
60. Colman AM. A Dictionary of Psychology Oxford University Press; 2009 [cited 2017 July]. 3rd: Available from: http://www.oxfordreference.com/search?source=%2F10.1093%2Facref%2F9780199534067.001.0001%2Facref-9780199534067&q=auditory+fatigue.
61. Waller AD. The sense of effort: an objective study. Brain 1891; 14 (2–3):179–249.
62. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine 2009; 6 7:e1000097.
63. World Health Organisation, WHO. International Classification of Diseases. 2018.
Keywords:

Conceptual modelling; definition; fatigue; measurement instruments; mechanism

© 2019 by Lippincott williams & Wilkins, Inc.