Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOLS

The effectiveness of orthopedic patient education in improving patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol

Majid, Norhaini RN, MN; Lee, Susan RN, PhD; Plummer, Virginia RN, PhD

Author Information
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports: January 2015 - Volume 13 - Issue 1 - p 122-133
doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1950
  • Free

Abstract

Inclusion criteria

Types of participants

This review will consider studies that include adult patients above 18 years old requiring elective orthopedic surgery in inpatient and outpatient settings.

Types of interventions

This review will consider studies that evaluate education programs of any type and any duration including:

1. Patient education (includes pre or post admission education interventions)

2. Perioperative education (includes pre or post-operative education interventions)

3. Discharge education.

Education program offered by multidisciplinary health professionals such as nurses, physiotherapists, or physicians will be included in this review.

Types of outcomes

This review will consider studies that include the following outcome measures:

1. Length of stay (e.g. discharge standard)

2. Satisfaction (e.g. Cantril Life Satisfaction Ladder)

3. Pain level (e.g. Visual Analogue Scale [VAS])

4. Cost of care (e.g. a Preoperative Costs [PC] instrument)

5. Functional abilities (e.g. the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC])

6. Knowledge (e.g. Orthopedic Patient Knowledge Instrument)

7. Anxiety (e.g. State-Trait Anxiety Scale Inventory [STAI])

8. Quality of life (e.g. Short Form [36] Health Survey [SF-36]).

Types of studies

This review will consider both experimental and epidemiological study designs including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, before and after studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case control studies and analytical cross-sectional studies for inclusion.

This review will also consider descriptive study designs including case series, individual case reports and descriptive cross sectional studies for inclusion.

Search strategy

The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies. Due to the limited resources available to undertake this review, only studies published in English will be considered for inclusion in this review. Studies from 2003 to 2013 will be included in this review following systematic review by Johansson et al.7 which had covered published studies until 2003.

The databases to be searched include:

CINAHL

EMBASE

ERIC

Ovid

MEDLINE

Scopus.

The search for unpublished studies will include:

ProQuest

Grey literature

National Medical Research Registry (Malaysia)

Monash repository.

Initial keywords to be used will be:

patient education

health education

discharge education

pre-operative education

post-operative education

orthopedic nursing

length of stay

satisfaction

pain level

cost of care

functional ability

knowledge

anxiety

quality of life.

Assessment of methodological quality

Papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (Appendix I). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer.

Data collection

Data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix II). The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question, and specific objectives.

Data synthesis

Quantitative data will, where possible be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using JBI-MAStARI. All results will be subject to double data entry. Effect sizes expressed as odds ratio (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed statistically using the standard Chi-square and also explored using subgroup analyses based on the different study designs included in this review. Where statistical pooling is not possible the findings will be presented in narrative form including tables and figures to aid in data presentation where appropriate.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant disclosures to make and there is no conflict of interest regarding this systematic review.

Acknowledgements

This review will partially fulfil degree requirements for successful completion of the Doctor of Philosophy at Monash University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Australia.

References

1. Redman BK. The practice of patient education: a case study approach. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001.
    2. Heikkinen K, Salantera S, Suomi R, Lindblom A, Leino-Kilpi H. Ambulatory orthopaedic surgery patient education and cost of care. Orthop Nurs. 2011;30(1):20-28.
    3. Huang SW, Chen PH, Chou YH. Effects of a preoperative simplified home rehabilitation education program on length of stay of total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:259-264.
    4. Jones S, Alnaib M, Kokkinakis M, Wilkinson M, Gibson AS, Kader D. Pre-operative patient education reduces length of stay after knee joint arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;93:71-75.
    5. McGregor AH, Rylands H, Owen A, Dore CJ, Hughes SP. Does preoperative hip rehabilitation advice improve recovery and patient satisfaction. J Arthroplasty. 2004;9(4):464-468.
    6. Siggeirsdottir K, Olafsson Ö, Jonsson H,Jr., Iwarsson S, Gudnason V, Jonsson BY. Short hospital stay augmented with education and home-based rehabilitation improves function and quality of life after hip replacement. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(4):555-562.
      7. Johansson K, Nuutila L, Virtanen H, Katajisto J, Salanterä S. Preoperative education for orthopaedic patients: systematic review [Internet]. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(2):212-223.
      8. Kruzik N. Benefits of preoperative education for adult elective surgery patients [Internet]. AORN J. 2009: 90(3):381-387.
      9. Bastable SB. Essentials of patient education. Sudbury: Jones and Barlett Publishers; 2006.
        10. Ben-Morderchai B, Herman A, Kerzman H, Irony A. Structured discharge education improves early outcome in orthopedic patients. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2010;14:66-74.
        11. Kearney M, Jenrich MK, Lyons S, Robinson R, Berger B. Effects of preoperative education on patient outcomes after joint replacement surgery. Orthop Nurs. 2011;30(6):391-396.
        12. Peterson MG, Cioppa-Mosca J, Finerty E, Graziano E, King S, Sculco TP. Effectiveness of best practice implementation in reducing hip arthroplasty length of stay. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(1):69-73.
        13. Thomas K, Burton D, Withrow L, Adkisson B. Impact of a preoperative education program via interactive telehealth network for rural patients having total joint replacement. Orthop Nurs. 2004;23(1):39-44.
        14. Yeh ML, Chen HH, Liu PH. Effect of multimedia with printed nursing guide in education on self-efficacy and functional activity and hospitalization in patient with hip replacement. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 57:217-224.
        15. Yoon RS, Nellans KW, Geller JA, Kim AD, Jacobs MR, Macaulay W. Patient education before hip or knee arthroplasty lowers length of stay. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(4):547-551.
        16. Nahm ES, Stevens L, Scott P, Gorman K. Effects of a web-based preoperative education program for patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: a preliminary study. J Hosp Adm. 2012;1(1):21-29.
          17. Papanastassiou I, Anderson R, Barber N, Conover C, Castellvi AE. Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients. Int J Spine Surg. 2011;5:120-124.
            18. Sjoling M, Nordahl G, Olofsson N, Asplund K. The impact of preoperative information on state anxiety, postoperative pain, and satisfaction with pain management. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 51:169-176.
            19. Thomas K, Sethares KA. An investigation of the effects of preoperative interdisciplinary patient education on understanding postoperative expectations following a total joint arthroplasty [Internet]. Orthop Nurs. 2008 [cited 2014 Feb 28];27(6):374-381.
              20. Quintrec JG, Coste J, Vastel L, Pacault V, Jeanne L, Lamas J, Kerboull L, Fougeray M, Conseiller C, Kahan A, Courpied J. Positive effect of patient education for hip surgery [Internet]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:112-120.
              21. Wong EM, Chan SW, Chair SY. Effectiveness of an educational intervention on levels of pain, anxiety and self-efficacy for patients with musculoskeletal trauma. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(5):1120-1131.
              22. Wong EM, Chan SW, Chair SY. The effect of educational intervention on pain beliefs and postoperative pain relief among Chinese patients with fractured limbs. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:2652-2655.
              23. Beaupre LA, Lier D, Davies DM, Johnston, DB. The effect of a preoperative exercise and education program on functional recovery, health related quality of life, and health service utilization following primary total knee arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:1166-1173.
              24. Clarke HD, Timm VL, Goldberg BR, Hattrup SJ. Preoperative patient education reduces in-hospital falls after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:244-249.
              25. Heikkinen K, Leino-Kilpi H, Salantera S.. Ambulatory orthopaedic surgery patients knowledge with Internet-based education. Methods Inf Med. 2012;51:295-300.
              26. Heikkinen K, Leino-Kilpi H, Taina N, Anne K. Salantera S. A comparison of two educational interventions for the cognitive empowerment of ambulatory orthopaedic surgery patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:272-279.
              27. Heikkinen K, Salantera S, Leppanen T, Vahlberg T, Leino-Kilpi H. Ambulatory orthopaedic surgery patients' emotion when using two different patient education methods. J Perioper Pract. 2012;22(7):226-231.
                28. Jlala HA, French JL, Foxall GL, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM. Effect of preoperative multimedia information on perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing procedures under regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(3):369-374.
                29. Gocen Z, Sen A, Unver B, Karatosun V, Gunal I. The effect of preoperative physiotherapy and education on the outcome of total hip replacement: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:353-358.
                30. Lubbeke A, Suva D, Perneger T, Hoffmeyer P. Influence of preoperative patient education on the risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum: Arthritis Care Res. 2009;61(4):552-558.

                  Appendix I: Appraisal instruments

                  MAStARI appraisal instrument

                  Figure
                  Figure:
                  no caption available.
                  Figure
                  Figure:
                  no caption available.
                  Figure
                  Figure:
                  no caption available.

                  Appendix II: Data extraction instruments

                  MAStARI data extraction instrument

                  Figure
                  Figure:
                  no caption available.
                  Figure
                  Figure:
                  no caption available.
                  Keywords:

                  orthopaedic; patient education; pre-operative education

                  © 2015 by Lippincott williams & Wilkins, Inc.