Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Risk factors for acute care hospital readmission in older persons in Western countries: a systematic review

Pedersen, Mona Kyndi; Meyer, Gabriele; Uhrenfeldt, Lisbeth

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports: February 2017 - Volume 15 - Issue 2 - p 454–485
doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003267
Systematic Reviews

Background Hospital readmission in older persons is common and reported as a post-discharge adverse outcome from hospitalization. Readmission relates to a mix of factors associated with increasing age, living conditions, progression of disease as well as factors related to the processes of care. To allow health professionals to focus more intensively on patients at risk of readmission, there is a need to identify the characteristics of those patients.

Objectives To identify and synthesize the best available evidence on risk factors for acute care hospital readmission within one month of discharge in older persons in Western countries.

Inclusion criteria Types of participants Participants were older persons from Western countries, hospitalized and discharged home or to residential care facilities.

Types of intervention(s)/phenomena of interest The factors of interest considered generic factors related to socio-demographics, health characteristics and clinical and organizational factors related to the care pathway.

Types of studies The current review considered analytical and descriptive epidemiological study designs that evaluated risk factors for acute care hospital readmission.

Outcomes The outcome was readmission to an acute care hospital within one month of discharge.

Search strategy A three-step search was utilized to find published and unpublished studies in English, French, German, Norwegian, Swedish or Danish. Five electronic databases were searched from 2004 to 2013, followed by a manual search for additional studies.

Methodological quality Methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers, using the standardized Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) critical appraisal tool.

Data extraction Data were extracted verbatim using a data extraction form, which identified the components from the standardized JBI data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI and was adapted to the needs of the present review.

Data synthesis Due to the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the studies included, a narrative summary and metasynthesis of the quantitative findings was conducted.

Results Based on a review of nine studies from ten Western countries, we found several significant risk factors pertaining to readmission to an acute care hospital within one month of discharge in persons aged 65 years and over. Factors associated with higher risk of hospital readmission covered socio-demographics such as higher age, male gender, ethnicity, living conditions, health characteristics such as poor overall condition and functional disability as well as prior admissions. Organizational factors including length of hospital stay, method of referral and discharge destination were associated with increased risk of acute care hospital readmission.

Conclusion We found several significant, but inconsistent, associations between readmission to an acute care hospital within one month of discharge in persons aged 65 years and over. These associations involved a mix of socio-demographic factors, factors related to health and illness, previous hospitalizations, length of stay as well as clinical and organizational determinants related to the index admission. Although more studies concluded that certain diagnoses or comorbid conditions affected the risk of readmission, they did not agree on any disease in particular.

Due to the breadth and diversity of variables examined and the lack of comparability of findings, the impact of these varying factors and their value as risk adjusters and application in different settings and populations are limited.

1Clinic for Internal Medicine and Clinical Nursing Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

2Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Medical Faculty, Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Halle (Saale), Germany

3Department of Health Science and Technology and Danish Centre of Systematic Reviews: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, The Center of Clinical Guidelines – Clearing house, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Correspondence: Mona Kyndi Pedersen, mokyp@rn.dk

There is no conflict of interest in this project.

© 2017 by Lippincott williams & Wilkins, Inc.
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website