Bradykinin and Renal Fibrosis: Have We ACE’d it? : Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Journal Logo

EDITORIALS

Bradykinin and Renal Fibrosis

Have We ACE’d it?

Bascands, Jean-Loup; Schanstra, Joost P.

Author Information
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 15(9):p 2504-2506, September 2004. | DOI: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000143721.71748.30
  • Free

In parallel with the increase in overall life expectancy, the number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has significantly increased over the last decade (1). The best possible outcome for these patients is to undergo kidney transplantation, but in the interim they are dependent on life-long dialysis treatment (2,3). Forestalling, slowing down and, if possible, reversing the progression of renal disease to ESRD is thus the major challenge facing clinicians and researchers in nephrology daily. Any progress in this field will have major social and economic impact.

Regardless of the initial insult, most forms of renal disease progress to ESRD with irreversible loss of renal tissue and function even after the initial renal insult has subsided. A hallmark of ESRD is the appearance of tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and this has been shown to be associated with a poor long-term prognosis (4). Thus all reports that demonstrate a halting or reversal of renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis by pharmacological means are of great potential interest. One such study is reported by Okada et al. (5) in this issue of JASN.

Tubulointerstitial fibrosis is characterized by the progressive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in the tubulointerstitial compartment. Two main enzyme systems are involved in ECM degradation: the plasminogen activation system and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). These two pathways are closely interlinked and can function in cascade (6). Urokinase-type and tissue-type (tPA) plasminogen activator convert plasminogen to plasmin, which in turn activates latent MMPs into activated MMPs, including MMP2 and MMP9. Of particular interest is the fact that this cascade is tightly regulated at the level of the plasminogen activators by the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). PAI-1 appears to play a key role in the development of renal fibrosis as described in a number of recent studies. PAI-1-/- mice had attenuated renal interstitial fibrosis in a model of unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) compared to wild type mice (7). Furthermore it was shown that inhibition of endogenous PAI-1 by a noninhibitory PAI-1 mutant decreased ECM accumulation in a model of experimental glomerulonephritis (8). Surprisingly, the effect of PAI-1 blockade on renal fibrosis in the UUO model occurred independently of the generation of plasmin (7). Such plasmin independent effects have also been observed using the UUO model in tPA (9) and plasminogen (10) knockout mice. However, despite these apparent contradictions concerning the role of the plasminogen activator system in ECM degradation, the induction of PAI-1 in a number of renal diseases leading to fibrosis and ESRD makes inhibition of PAI-1 expression and/or activity an interesting therapeutic target (6,11–13).

The multitude of events and factors (14–16) involved in the development of renal fibrosis is reflected by the increasing number of studies suggesting the potential anti-fibrotic effect of a number of compounds (17). However, in the majority of these studies, the protective effect of the drug in question was evaluated by administration either before, or at the time of, induction of the pathology. Such experimental therapeutic interventions do not truly mimic human pathology where treatment starts only after disease identification. This is particularly true for renal interstitial fibrosis, which is often detected at a late stage (by histological examination of renal biopsies).

Despite the impressive amount of data published over the last two decades demonstrating the ability to arrest disease progression and renal fibrosis in animal models, the only clinically used drugs with, although not initially designed to do so, anti-fibrotic properties are angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEi). ACEi were primarily designed as antihypertensives, but have since been shown to also slow down the progression of renal fibrosis in man (18–20). The study of Okada et al. (5) in this issue of JASN provides new insights on the mechanism by which ACEi could exert this anti-fibrotic effect.

The pharmacological effects of ACEi have long been attributed to the blockade of the conversion of angiotensin I (AI) to angiotensin II (AII). However, ACE also degrades the biologically active nonapeptide bradykinin (BK) with, interestingly, a 10x higher efficiency than for AI (21). Indeed, it has been shown in both animals and humans that BK concentrations are increased after ACEi treatment (22, 23) and there is now clear evidence that in humans BK actively participates in this protective effect (24–28).

Consistent with the anti-fibrotic effect of BK in cardiac fibrosis (29) we have recently reported that BK reduced renal fibrosis (30). Using the UUO-induced model for renal fibrosis we showed that BK B2-/- mice have significantly higher tubulointerstitial fibrosis than wild type mice. Interestingly this was accompanied by decreased renal activity of plasminogen activator and MMP2. Additional in vitro data showed that BK via its B2 receptor stimulated plasminogen activator activity. Taken together these data strongly suggested that the anti-fibrotic effect of BK involved a B2 receptor-plasminogen activator-MMP2 cascade.

Okada et al. (5) show compelling data that ACEi reduces renal fibrosis progression. Using a more chronic model that mimics progressive renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis occurring in patients treated with cyclosporin, the study shows that ACE inhibition significantly reversed ECM accumulation in the kidney. This study is of particular interest, since administration of the drug occurred only after induction of the pathology and after tubulointerstitial fibrosis was detected. Whilst AII type 1 receptor antagonists were without effect, the protective effect of ACEi was blocked by a BK-B2 receptor antagonist, and this was also accompanied by attenuated PAI-1 expression and an increase in plasmin activity suggesting increased ECM degradation. Inhibition of PAI-1 expression by BK treatment was confirmed in tubular epithelial cells in vitro.

In an arena where the role of BK in ACEi-mediated renal beneficial effects is not yet clearly established (31,32), and where there is continued controversy about the role of plasmin in ECM degradation (13,33), there is now a growing body of experimental arguments, including the Okada paper, that assign an anti-fibrotic role to BK and its B2 receptor. This effect seems to be exerted through a complex interplay with the plasminogen activation system.

Further in vivo studies (other models, different doses of ACEi,) are needed to confirm the role of BK in the anti-fibrotic effects of ACEi and to elucidate, quite who has the ace!

See related editorial, “Bradykinin Decreases Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Expression and Facilitates Matrix Degradation in the Renal Tubulointerstitium under Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Blockade,” on pages 2404–2413.

1. U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2003
2. Klahr S, Schreiner G, Ichikawa I: The progression of renal disease. N Engl J Med 318: 1657–1666, 1988
3. Owen WF Jr: Patterns of care for patients with chronic kidney disease in the United States: dying for improvement. J Am Soc Nephrol 14 [Suppl 2]: S76–80, 2003
    4. Nath KA: Tubulointerstitial changes as a major determinant in the progression of renal damage. Am J Kidney Dis 1: 1–17, 1992
    5. Okada H, Watanabe Y, Kikuta T, Kobayashi T, Kanno Y, Sugaya T, Suzuki H: Bradykinin decreases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression and facilitates matrix degradation in the renal tubulointerstium under angiotensin converting enzyme blockade. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 2404–2413, 2004
    6. Rerolle JP, Hertig A, Nguyen G, Sraer JD, Rondeau EP: Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 is a potential target in renal fibrogenesis. Kidney Int 58: 1841–1850, 2000
    7. Oda T, Jung YO, Kim HS, Cai X, Lopez-Guisa JM, Ikeda Y, Eddy AA: PAI-1 deficiency attenuates the fibrogenic response to ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int 60: 587–596, 2001
    8. Huang Y, Haraguchi M, Lawrence DA, Border WA, Yu L, Noble NA: A mutant, noninhibitory plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 decreases matrix accumulation in experimental glomerulonephritis. J Clin Invest 112: 379–388, 2003
    9. Yang J, Shultz RW, Mars WM, Wegner RE, Li Y, Dai C, Nejak K, Liu Y: Disruption of tissue-type plasminogen activator gene in mice reduces renal interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. J Clin Invest 110: 1525–1538, 2002
    10. Edgtton KL, Gow RM, Kelly DJ, Carmeliet P, Kitching AR: Plasmin is not protective in experimental renal interstitial fibrosis. Kidney Int 66: 68–76, 2004
    11. Ingelfinger JR: Forestalling fibrosis. N Engl J Med 349: 2265–2266, 2003
      12. Fogo AB: Renal fibrosis: not just PAI-1 in the sky. J Clin Invest 112: 326–328, 2003
        13. Hertig A, Rondeau E: Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1: the two faces of the same coin. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 13: 39–44, 2004
        14. Eddy AA: Molecular basis of renal fibrosis. Pediatr Nephrol 15: 290–301, 2000
        15. Iwano M, Neilson EG: Mechanisms of tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 13: 279–284, 2004
          16. Liu Y: Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in renal fibrogenesis: pathologic significance, molecular mechanism, and therapeutic intervention. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1–12, 2004
            17. Strutz F: Potential methods to prevent interstitial fibrosis in renal disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 10: 1989–2001, 2000
            18. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD: The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med 329: 1456–1462, 1993
            19. Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Gherardi G, Garini G, Zoccali C, Salvadori M, Scolari F, Schena FP, Remuzzi G: Renoprotective properties of ACE-inhibition in non-diabetic nephropathies with non-nephrotic proteinuria. Lancet 354: 359–364, 1999
              20. Hebert LA, Wilmer WA, Falkenhain ME, Ladson-Wofford SE, Nahman NS Jr, Rovin BH: Renoprotection: one or many therapies? Kidney Int 59: 1211–1226, 2001
                21. Jaspard E, Wei L, Alhenc-Gelas F: Differences in the properties and enzymatic specificities of the two active sites of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (kininase II). Studies with bradykinin and other natural peptides. J Biol Chem 268: 9496–9503, 1993
                22. Campbell DJ, Kladis A, Duncan AM: Effects of converting enzyme inhibitors on angiotensin and bradykinin peptides. Hypertension 23: 439–449, 1994
                23. Duncan AM, Kladis A, Jennings GL, Dart AM, Esler M, Campbell DJ: Kinins in humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 278: R897–904, 2000
                  24. Remme WJ: Bradykinin-mediated cardiovascular protective actions of ACE inhibitors. A new dimension in anti-ischaemic therapy? Drugs 54 [Suppl 5]: 59–70, 1997
                  25. Gainer JV, Morrow JD, Loveland A, King DJ, Brown NJ: Effect of bradykinin-receptor blockade on the response to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. N Engl J Med 339: 1285–1292, 1998
                    26. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study investigators: Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Lancet 355: 253–259, 2000
                      27. Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Segal R, Martinez FA, Dickstein K, Camm AJ, Konstam MA, Riegger G, Klinger GH, Neaton J, Sharma D, Thiyagarajan B: Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial– the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II. Lancet 355: 1582–1587, 2000
                        28. Witherow FN, Helmy A, Webb DJ, Fox KA, Newby DE: Bradykinin contributes to the vasodilator effects of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with heart failure. Circulation 104: 2177–2181, 2001
                          29. Silva JA Jr, Araujo RC, Baltatu O, Oliveira SM, Tschope C, Fink E, Hoffmann S, Plehm R, Chai KX, Chao L, Chao J, Ganten D, Pesquero JB, Bader M: Reduced cardiac hypertrophy and altered blood pressure control in transgenic rats with the human tissue kallikrein gene. FASEB J 14: 1858–1860, 2000
                          30. Schanstra JP, Neau E, Drogoz P, Arevalo Gomez MA, Lopez Novoa JM, Calise D, Pecher C, Bader M, Girolami JP, Bascands JL: In vivo bradykinin B2 receptor activation reduces renal fibrosis. J Clin Invest 110: 371–379, 2002
                          31. Nabokov A, Amann K, Gassmann P, Schwarz U, Orth SR, Ritz E: The renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in experimental chronic renal failure is not dependent on enhanced kinin activity. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13: 173–176, 1998
                          32. Schanstra JP, Duchene J, Desmond L, Neau E, Calise D, Estaque S, Girolami JP, Bascands JL: The protective effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in experimental renal fibrosis in mice is not mediated by bradykinin B2 receptor activation. Thromb Haemost 89: 735–740, 2003
                            33. Zheng G, Haris DCH: Plasmin in renal interstitial fibrosis: innocent or guilty? Kidney Int 66: 455–456, 2004
                              Copyright © 2004 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.