Identification of Receptor Ligands by Screening Phage-Display Peptide Libraries Ex Vivo on Microdissected Kidney Tubules : Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Journal Logo

Molecular Medicine, Genetics, and Development

Identification of Receptor Ligands by Screening Phage-Display Peptide Libraries Ex Vivo on Microdissected Kidney Tubules

ODERMATT, ALEX*; AUDIGÉ, ANNETTE*; FRICK, CHRISTOPH*; VOGT, BRUNO*; FREY, BRIGITTE M.*; FREY, FELIX J.*; MAZZUCCHELLI, LUCA

Author Information
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 12(2):p 308-316, February 2001. | DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V122308
  • Free

Abstract

The coordinated action of a variety of specialized cells is required to mediate the complex and highly regulated functions of the kidney. Each nephron segment contains one or several specific cell types, each expressing a unique set of cell surface receptors and membrane proteins, involved in functions such as regulation of salt retention, hormone action, and cell-adhesion and cell-matrix interactions (1,2,3). The identification and characterization of ligands and cell surface receptors that show differential expression in the nephron is a prerequisite for understanding the functional differences between defined nephron segments in both normal and pathologic processes.

Phage-display peptide libraries have been applied successfully to identify peptide-binding domains on purified proteins (4) or of peptide ligands with binding preference for selected tissues in vivo (5,6) or cells in vitro (7,8,9). For instance, in vivo screening of phage-display peptide libraries demonstrated the molecular heterogeneity of endothelial cells in different organs (6), suggesting that the vasculature of each organ could be targeted by specific ligands. Two peptide ligands preferentially homing to kidney endothelium in the glomerulus and mediating up to sevenfold increased binding compared with control were selected by this approach (5).

Knowledge about specific basolateral tubular epithelial markers is limited. The basolateral surface of cells grown on culture dishes is not directly accessible for analysis, and evidence exists for the loss of tissue-specific traits of isolated cells upon culture (10,11). To identify ligands that bind selectively to receptors with a differential expression on the basolateral cell surface of defined nephron segments, we incubated phage-display peptide libraries with microdissected intact cortical collecting ducts (CCD) or proximal convoluted tubules (PCT). By using the approach presented in this study, the identification of ligands specific for the basolateral membrane of kidney epithelium should increase knowledge about interactions between the membrane domain and extracellular matrix. It might also contribute to the future development of kidney cell-specific vectors for drug delivery or gene transfer, making a possibility the treatment for diseases including tubulointerstitial fibrosis, polycystic kidney disease, and genetic disorders of salt balance causing hypertension.

Materials and Methods

Phage-Display Libraries and Peptides

LL9, a library that displays linear random nonapeptides, and CL10, which expresses random decapeptides with a structural constraint imposed by a disulfide bond between two cysteine residues flanking the variable region, have been described previously (8,12). Synthetic peptides were purchased from Macromolecular Resources (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO).

Microdissection of Rat Kidney Tubules

Rat CCD and PCT were microdissected as described earlier with some modifications (13,14). Briefly, male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with Nembutal (pentobarbitone, 50 mg/kg body wt, intraperitoneally). The left kidney was perfused in situ via the abdominal aorta with 10 ml of Hank's balanced salt solution (HANKS; pH 7.4), followed by 5 ml of HANKS containing collagenase (2.6 mg/ml, 0.9 U/mg, clostridium histolyticum, Serva, Heidelberg, Germany). At the end of the perfusion, small pieces of cortex were removed and incubated in HANKS containing 0.65 mg/ml collagenase for approximately 30 min at 32°C. Nephron segments were dissected under a stereomicroscope in cold microdissection buffer (HANKS containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). The recovered nephron segments were measured individually with an ocular micrometer, and isolated segments (50 mm) were immediately subjected to incubation with phage as described below. Endothelial cells and basement membrane were removed by the collagenase treatment, allowing the direct access of phage to the basolateral tubular cell surface. Counting of cells revealed 360 cells/mm of isolated CCD and 300 cells/mm for isolated PCT (15).

Affinity Purification of Binding Phage

Isolated rat kidney tubules (50 mm) were preincubated in 200 μl of phage incubation buffer (HANKS [pH 7.4] containing 1% low-fat milk and 100 μM chloroquine) for 15 min at 37°C to adapt the cell metabolism and to reduce hypothermic effects on the cytoskeletal network and on membrane protein trafficking (16). Phage libraries (1010 transducing units (TU) of LL9 or CL10) were added, followed by further incubation for 40 min at 37°C, allowing internalization of ligand activated receptors. Reactions were stopped with ice-cold phage incubation buffer, tubules centrifuged at 700 × g for 3 min, washed twice with 25 ml of phage incubation buffer, once with 25 ml HANKS, and transferred with a 75-μl Micro/pettor (SMI, Berkeley, CA) to 1.5-ml tubes. After incubation of tubules with 400 μl of 0.1 M glycine-HCl (pH 2.2) for 5 min, the acid-eluted fraction, containing phage that were attached to the cell surface with low affinity, was removed by centrifugation. The pH of the pelleted tubules (cell-associated fraction) was neutralized by adding 200 μl of HANKS, supplemented by 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4). Trypan blue staining (4 mg/ml) revealed that more than 98% of tubular cells remained intact during the acidic elution. Tubules were lysed with 0.5% Tween 20, and phage titer was determined. Phage were amplified using “starved” K91 Escherichia coli cells and purified as described (17). An aliquot of 1010 TU of purified phage was reapplied in a subsequent round of biopanning. After the third or fourth round of panning, individual phage clones were isolated, single-strand DNA were prepared, and the unique nucleotide region of the pIII protein encoding the random peptides was sequenced using the oligonucleotide primer 5′ GTTTTGTCGTCTTTCCAGACG 3′.

To gain insight into the potential specificity of biopanning experiments on intact kidney tubules ex vivo, we performed similar experiments in vitro on the well-characterized polarized cell line T84 (human colon carcinoma), which is known to express several functional binding proteins in the basolateral domain (18). Briefly, T84 cells were grown near confluence in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and Ham's F12 nutrient mixture (19). Cells were detached by mild trypsinization, washed to remove residual trypsin, and suspended in 1 ml of HANKS containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and 0.1% bovine serum albumin. Upon incubation for 1 h at 25°C in the presence of phage libraries LL9 or CL10 (1010 TU), cells were washed five times with phage buffer. Acid-eluted and cell-associated fractions were separated as described above. Phage were then amplified, purified, and subjected to the next round of biopanning.

Determination of Phage Titer by Plaque Assay

Phage were titered by infecting E. coli K91 cells in the logarithmic growth phase with serial dilutions of eluted phage. Upon incubation at 37°C for 15 min, melted soft-agar (55°C) was added and the mixture was plated onto LB-agar. The number of plaques, representing areas of reduced bacterial growth due to infection with individual phage, was determined. Typically, between 200 and 1000 plaques were counted, and the number of phage corresponding to 1 cm of tubule length was calculated.

Quantitation of Phage-Binding and Competition Assay

To quantify binding of a selected phage, we incubated tubules (25 mm) at 37°C for 40 min according to the selection procedure described above, except that the phage library equivalent was replaced by 1010 TU of an amplified individual phage clone. In competition experiments, the selected phage and its corresponding synthetic peptide or irrelevant control peptides (MHNRHPMIKH or PSRHIPPQL) were added simultaneously, with peptide concentrations ranging from 100 nM to 100 μM. To analyze the effect of the peptide on phage binding, we preincubated tubules and synthetic peptide for 15 min before adding phage. Alternatively, the peptide was added 15 min after exposure of the tubules with the phage. Phage were then recovered and quantitated from the cell-associated fraction by plaque assay. The binding specificity of the CCD motif was further assessed by incubation of 104 T84 cells (or other cell lines) with 1010 TU of a purified, individual phage clone in the presence or absence of the competing peptide or a control peptide at 37°C for 40 min. Because suitable rat cell lines were not available, epithelial cell lines from other species were used. The number of bound or internalized phage was determined from the cell-associated fraction, and the results expressed as a ratio to the binding of an irrelevant phage.

Detection of Phage Binding by Fluorescence Microscopy

Microdissected tubules (25 mm) were incubated in phage incubation buffer in the presence of 1010 TU of a purified, individual phage clone for 2 or 40 min at 37°C in the presence or absence of 10 μM synthetic peptide. Tubules were extensively washed, and phage attached to the cell surface were eluted by acidic buffer as described above. The pelleted tubules were taken up in 100 μl of HANKS (pH 7.4), subjected to cytospin centrifugation for 10 min at 600 × g onto glass cover slides, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 25°C. When T84 cells were used, approximately 104 cells were subjected to cytospin centrifugation for 2 min at 600 × g, followed by paraformaldehyde fixation. Tubules or cells were washed three times with sodium/phosphate/sucrose/triton buffer (NAPST) (100 mM disodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 120 mM sucrose, 0.5% Triton X-100 to permeabilize cells) and blocked for 30 min with buffer NAPSTM (NAPST buffer containing 1% low-fat milk). Upon incubation with mouse monoclonal anti-M13 phage IgG (Pharmacia, Duebendorf, Switzerland) for 1 h at 25°C, samples were washed three times with buffer NAPSTM, followed by incubation for 30 min with fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands). After extensive washing, cells were mounted on glass cover slips using a Slow-Fade-Antifade kit (Molecular Probes). Samples were analyzed by confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 410, Zeiss, Goettingen, Germany) using a laser for excitation of fluorescein at 488 nm. The emission signal for fluorescein was captured with a band pass at 510 to 525 nm.

Results

Selection of Phage with Preferential Binding to Microdissected Intact Kidney Tubules

Three independent experiments of screening the linear non-apeptide phage-display library LL9 on isolated intact CCD yielded the peptide motif ELRGD(R/M)AX(W/L), containing an RGD sequence and additional, highly conserved flanking residues (Table 1). The individual sequences ELRGDMAAL and ELRGDRAHW were selected predominantly in all three independent panning experiments conducted and were recovered eight and seven times, respectively. Different nucleotide triplets were observed for a given amino acid residue of the conserved motif, indicating a true selection for the amino acid motif rather than an overrepresentation of a certain nucleotide sequence in the original phage library. The conserved peptide motif ELRGD(R/M)AX(W/L) was absent in screenings of the circular decapeptide phage-display library CL10 and was recovered only from the cell-associated fraction of CCD. The acid-eluted fraction did not yield phage fitting to a common consensus sequence. Phage bearing the consensus ELRGD(R/M)AX(W/L) were absent in screenings using PCT from which phage with the consensus K(X)3 TNHP were selected (Table 1).

T1-11
Table 1:
Peptides selected from microdissected intact kidney tubulesa

Binding Studies with Purified Phage

To assess the specificity of the selected phage, we incubated isolated intact CCD or PCT with purified phage expressing the peptides ELRGDMAAL or ELRGDRAHW, selected from CCD, the peptide KMGGTNHPE, selected from PCT, or a random linear nonapeptide (Figure 1). Analysis of the cell-associated fractions revealed 39-fold increased binding of either ELRGDMAAL- or ELRGDRAHW-displaying phage to CCD compared with control phage. Furthermore, phage that displayed peptides with the consensus sequence ELRGD(R/M)AX(W/L) bound at 16-fold higher levels to CCD than to PCT, indicating their clear preference for CCD. The KMGGTNHPE-displaying phage was less specific for a defined tubule type. Its binding to PCT was twofold higher than to CCD, but binding to PCT was 10-fold higher than that of control phage. Because this motif did not mediate highly tubule-specific binding, we did not analyze further the binding properties. Control phage showed similar binding to both tubule types. The resistance of phage binding to acidic elution suggested internalization of phage upon binding to its cognate receptor. Tubules were incubated with phage for 40 min at 37°C in the presence of 100 μM chloroquine, which prevents endosome/lysosome fusion (20). Incubation of tubules for a prolonged period of time at 37°C (2 h) in the absence of chloroquine led to a significant decrease of phage recovery (not shown), suggesting lysosomal degradation of the phage.

F1-11
Figure 1:
Binding of purified phage to microdissected cortical collecting ducts (CCD) and proximal convoluted tubules (PCT). Isolated tubules were incubated with 1010 transducing units (TU) of purified ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage particles, selected from CCD, K(X)3TNHP-displaying phage, selected from PCT, or with control phage expressing a random peptide. Recovered phage were titered from the cell-associated fractions (▪) or from the acid-eluted fractions (□). Data represent mean ± SD of the number of phage plaques on lawns of bacterial cells, determined from seven independent experiments.

The cell specificity of the ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage was examined further by determining phage binding to various epithelial cell lines (Table 2). Whereas binding to cell lines or to microdissected PCT was low, ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage bound with a high preference to isolated CCD (39-fold over control phage). This phage showed relatively high binding (13.9-fold over control phage) to colon carcinoma epithelial T84 cells but not to colon carcinoma SW620 cells. Surprisingly, binding to MDCK cells, a cell line derived from canine kidney with some features of CCD, was not significantly increased, indicating low expression levels of the corresponding receptor in this transformed cell line.

T2-11
Table 2:
Relative binding of ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage to isolated tubules and cell linesa

Inhibition of Phage Binding to Microdissected CCD by Coincubation with Synthetic Peptide

Competition assays revealed significantly inhibited binding of ELRGDMAAL- or ELRGDRAHW-displaying phage to CCD after preincubation of tubules with synthetic peptide (not shown) or when the peptide was added simultaneously with phage (Figure 2). A random control peptide had no effect. The synthetic peptide did not affect phage binding and recovery after a 15-min preincubation of tubules with phage, suggesting receptor internalization upon ligand binding. The half-maximal inhibition (IC50) of either ELRGDMAAL- or ELRGDRAHW-displaying phage binding to CCD by the synthetic peptide ELRGDMAAL was approximately 500 nM (Figure 2B).

F2-11
Figure 2:
Effect of synthetic peptides on the binding of ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage to CCD. Microdissected CCD were incubated with 1010 TU of the ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage for 40 min at 37°C. (A) CCD were incubated with phage in the absence of synthetic peptide (▪), in the presence of 10 μM synthetic peptide ELRGDMAAL added either simultaneously with phage (□, 0 min), or 15 min after phage addition to the tubules ([UNK]). [UNK], simultaneous incubation of tubules with phage and random control peptide. Bound phage were quantitated by plaque assay. (B) Inhibition of CCD binding of ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage by a random control peptide (▴) or by the synthetic peptide ELRGDMAAL (□). Data represent the percentage of maximal phage binding obtained in the absence of synthetic peptide. Error bars indicate mean ± SD from three independent experiments.

Internalization of ELRGDMAAL-Displaying Phage upon Binding to Microdissected CCD

To identify ligands for the receptor-mediated endocytosis pathway, we performed biopanning at 37°C for 40 min, and phage that were resistant to acidic buffer elution were selected from the cell-associated fraction. Isolated tubules were centrifuged onto glass coverslips by cytospin, and the localization of CCD-bound phage was visualized by confocal microscopy (Figure 3). The focus of the confocal microscope was set through the center of the two cell layers of the centrifuged tubule. After a 2-min incubation time, a multifocal staining pattern restricted to the CCD cell surface indicated binding of ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage to the basolateral membrane (Figure 3, D and J). A scattered staining of phages was observed after 40 min, typical for endosomal localization (Figure 3F). Incubation of CCD with a control phage (Figure 3, A and B) or with ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage in the presence of 10 μM synthetic peptide (Figure 3, G and H) resulted in background immunofluorescence. Incubation of PCT with ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage resulted in no detectable immunofluorescence and was not distinguishable from that of control phage (not shown).

F3-11
Figure 3:
Localization of CCD-binding phage ELRGDMAAL by immunofluorescence. Microdissected CCD were incubated with 1010 TU of purified ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage particles (C through J) or with control phage (A,B) either for 2 min (A through D, I, and J) or for 40 min (E through H) at 37°C. CCD were simultaneously incubated with ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage and the corresponding synthetic peptide (G, H). Subsequently, tubules were centrifuged by cytospin onto glass coverslips followed by fixation with paraformaldehyde, permeabilization with Triton-X 100, and immunostaining using anti-M13 antibody and fluorescein-labeled secondary antibody. The left panel depicts Nomarski images and the right panel shows immunofluorescence images. Magnifications: ×200 in A through H, ×800 in I and J).

Selection of Phage with Preferential Binding to Colon Carcinoma T84 Cells

Because the CCD-binding motif ELRGDMAAL exhibited considerable binding to T84 cells, we tested the specificity of the ex vivo selection on kidney tubules by performing analogous experiments on T84 cells. We screened phage-display peptide libraries on colon carcinoma T84 cells and recovered phage expressing circular peptides with the consensus RGDLGXL(K/R) (Table 3). Like the CCD-binding motif, this peptide contains an RGD sequence but different, highly conserved flanking amino acids. Whereas the T84-binding peptide was recovered exclusively in a circular form, caused by a structural constraint imposed by two cysteine residues flanking the variable region, the CCD binding peptide was selected exclusively from the linear library and is not structurally constrained.

T3-11
Table 3:
Peptides recovered from colon carcinoma T84 cellsa

Incubation of T84 cells with library LL9 yielded predominantly phage with the consensus sequences NFYXGXRSL and VHXWD. These sequences, which were not analyzed further, may have higher affinity for their putative receptors on T84 cells than the linear sequence ELRGD(R/M)AX(W/L). This may explain the absence of ELRGD(R/M)AX(W/L)-displaying phage among phage recovered from T84 cells.

Analysis of the Binding Specificity of the Two Distinct RGD Ligands for Either CCD or Colon Carcinoma T84 Cells

Binding of purified phage expressing the linear CCD-motif ELRGDMAAL, the circular T84-motif CQARGDLGKIRC, or a control peptide sequence was determined for both microdissected CCD and T84 cells (Figure 4). Binding to CCD compared with control phage was 39-fold increased for the ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage and 5.4-fold for the CQARGDLGKIRC-displaying phage, demonstrating a 7-fold preference of ELRGDMAAL- over CQARGDLGKIRC-displaying phage for CCD. In addition, the peptide CQARGDLGKIRC inhibited binding of CQARGDLGKIRC-displaying phage to CCD with an IC50 of 1 μM (not shown), compared with the IC50 of 500 nM of the ELRGDMAAL peptide (Figure 2B). Both phage showed approximately twofold increased binding to PCT compared with control phage (not shown). These results indicate a clear preference of the putative CCD cell surface receptor to bind the linear motif ELRGDMAAL.

F4-11
Figure 4:
Comparison of binding of phage displaying the ELRGDMAAL or the CQARGDLGKIRC motif to either CCD or T84 cells. T84 cells in suspension (104) (A) or microdissected CCD (2.5 cm) (B) were incubated with 1010 TU of purified phage expressing a random control peptide (▪), the CQARGDLGKIRC peptide (□), or the ELRGDMAAL peptide ([UNK]). Data represent mean ± SD of the number of bound phage determined from the cell-associated fractions from three independent experiments.

Binding studies on T84 cells revealed 42- and 14-fold increased binding of CQARGDLGKIRC- and ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage over control phage, respectively, demonstrating a 3-fold preference of the CQARGDLGKIRC over the ELRGDMAAL motif for T84 cells. Although the CQARGDLGKIRC-Displaying phage bound at threefold higher levels to T84 cells than ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage, similar IC50 values of approximately 100 nM were obtained for both motifs in competition assays with the corresponding peptides (not shown).

Internalization of CQARGDLGKIRC-Displaying Phage upon Binding to T84 Cells

T84 cells incubated with CQARGDLGKIRC-displaying phage were centrifuged by cytospin onto glass coverslips. The localization of phage was analyzed by immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy. After 2 min of incubation at 37°C, phage binding was restricted to the cell surface, whereas the distributed pattern of phage staining observed after 40 min indicated internalization of phage via the endocytotic pathway (Figure 5). Experiments using ELRGDMAAL-displaying phage resulted in a distribution pattern similar to that of CQARGDLGKIRC-displaying phage, but staining was much less intense and control phage did not result in a detectable immunofluorescence signal (not shown).

F5-11
Figure 5:
Internalization of CQARGDLGKIRC-displaying phage upon binding to T84 cells. T84 cells in suspension were incubated with 1010 TU of purified CQARGDLGKIRC-displaying phage particles for 2 min (A, B) or 40 min (C, D) at 37°C. Subsequently, cells were centrifuged by cytospin onto glass coverslips followed by paraformaldehyde fixation, Triton-X 100 permeabilization, and immunostaining using anti-M13 antibody and fluorescein-labeled secondary antibody. Nomarski images are presented in the left panel, and immunofluorescence images are presented in the right panel. Magnification, ×400.

Discussion

We describe here a novel method of screening phage-display peptide libraries ex vivo on microdissected intact kidney tubules. No alternative approach exists for identifying peptide ligands that bind selectively to receptors expressed on the basolateral membrane of the renal tubular epithelium. We applied phage libraries displaying either linear nonapeptides or circular decapeptides and identified a linear peptide ligand with the consensus ELRGD(R/M)AX(W/L) that binds preferentially to the basolateral cell surface of CCD. The specificity of this motif for CCD was demonstrated by the low levels of binding to PCT and to a range of epithelial cell lines derived from different tissues, including cervix, breast, lung, colon, and kidney. Furthermore, this motif was absent in screenings using microdissected PCT. Screening isolated intact PCT yielded phage with the consensus peptide motif K(X)3TNHP. Using this motif mediated a 10-fold increased binding to PCT compared with control phage, but binding to PCT was only 2-fold higher than to CCD. In analogy to the observed molecular heterogeneity of the vascular endothelium of different organs (5,6), our results provide evidence for a kidney tubule segment specific individuality of the basolateral cell surface.

The CCD-binding motif ELRGD(R/M)AX(W/L) was exclusively displayed in the linear form. In contrast, biopanning the polarized epithelial T84 cells yielded the peptide motif RGDLGXL(K/R) exclusively in the circular form. Both the CCD- and the T84-binding phage showed high specificity for and affinity to their target cells, suggesting binding to different receptors. Phage binding resisted low pH treatment, and low concentrations of the corresponding synthetic peptides competitively inhibited phage binding to target cells, with IC50 concentrations in the high nanomolar range. In addition, the significant decrease in phage recovery in the absence of chloroquine suggests that the CCD- and the T84-peptide ligands are internalized upon ligand binding and undergo lysosomal degradation.

The selection of ligands with an RGD sequence and binding to putative integrin receptors is not surprising. Both polarized cell types, CCD cells and colon epithelial T84 cells, exhibit interactions of their basolateral cell surface with the extracellular matrix. Integrin receptors play an important role by interacting with extracellular matrix proteins and adhesion molecules of neutrophils or pathogenic microorganisms (21).

The estimated number of approximately 50 phage particles bound per cell is relatively low. This phenomenon has been observed previously (8) and may be explained by the large size of phage particles. Phage binding to a receptor might sterically hinder the binding of additional phage to receptors located in close proximity. In addition, phage binding may cause internalization of other still unoccupied receptors.

The CCD and T84 motif both contain an RGD sequence, known to mediate binding to the integrin family of receptors (21). The presentation and the residues that flank the RGD sequence clearly are different between the two ligands and seem to be essential for rendering cell specificity and high affinity binding. The linear CCD-binding motif ELRGD(R/M)AX(W/L) contains a positively charged arginine or a methionine at position + 1, relative to the RGD sequence, whereas the circular T84-binding peptide RGDLGXL(K/R) has a hydrophobic leucine residue at this position. Whereas both the CCD- and the T84-binding motifs have a hydrophobic residue at position +4 (W/L or L, respectively), a positively charged amino acid (K/R) at position +5 is characteristic for the T84-motif. Furthermore, the CCD motif contains a glutamate and a leucine residue at positions -2 and -1, whereas the region upstream of the RGD sequence of the T84 peptide is less conserved but contains an uncharged or a positively charged residue at position -1. Although the identity of the specific integrin receptor for both RGD ligands is unknown, it is unlikely that they bind to the αv integrin expressed in tumor vasculature (22) and in the vascular endothelium of the kidney (23), because folding and flanking residues of the CCD, the T84, and the αv integrin ligand (ACDCRGDCFCG) clearly are different.

RGD-recognizing integrins have been shown to be present in endosomes of a variety of cells (24), and integrin-mediated gene delivery vectors led to enhanced gene transfer into different cell lines (25,26,27). Using tracheal epithelial cells, Colin et al. (28) presented evidence for a clathrin-coated pit-dependent endocytic internalization of an RGD-oligolysine/DNA complex. In an approach to achieve gene transfer with synthetic virus-like particles via the integrin-mediated endocytosis pathway, Erbacher et al. (29) coupled the peptide CYGGRGDTP, present in fibronectin, vitronectin, and type I collagen, to polyethylenimine/DNA complexes. They observed markedly improved efficiency of gene transfer into HeLa cells of up to 100-fold over control. In contrast, the phage expressing the ELRGDMAAL peptide bound preferentially to CCD and showed only slightly increased binding to HeLa cells compared with a random control phage. Both peptides are not structurally constrained. Their main differences involve charge and length of the side chain of the residues in position -2 and -1, relative to the RGD sequence, with Glu, Leu in the CCD motif and Gly, Gly in the fibronectin-derived peptide. Evidence that changes in the amino acid context can dramatically affect the binding properties of RGD ligands has been provided by other investigators (21,30).

The kidney consists mainly of nonproliferating, terminally differentiated cells. Viral vector delivery to these cells is relatively inefficient, probably as a result of the lack of high affinity viral receptors on the cell surface (31,32). Nephron segment-specific peptide ligands, such as the ELRGD(R/M)AX(L/W) peptide, potentially could be used for the development of kidney-specific delivery vectors, either by direct incorporation into viral vectors such as adenovirus (33,34), by coupling to polyethylenimine (29,35) or oligolysine (26,27), or by indirect coupling to viral vectors or liposomes using polyethylene glycol (36). Alternatively, genetically modified filamentous bacteriophage could be used for gene transfer into mammalian cells (37,38,39). Alternative ligands may be identified by screening other defined tubular segments or isolated CCD using different libraries and conditions, e.g., in the presence of synthetic peptide.

Selective targeting of renal tubular epithelial cells may be achieved either through retrograde infusion, with possible applications to target papilla and outer medulla, or by arterial perfusion, which seems most promising for the targeting of glomerular cells or cortical segments (34,40,41,42). Targeting of epithelial cells via arterial delivery may be more challenging. Perfusion of the kidney for 40 min with high titer modified adenovirus led to the transduction of kidney cortical vasculature but not parenchymal cells (34). However, McDonald et al. (34) used an adenovirus whose fiber protein contained a ligand that has been shown previously to mediate homing to endothelial cells (5,23). It is likely that this fiber-modified adenoviral vector was trapped in endothelial cells. Access of vectors from the blood stream to parenchymal cells may be facilitated by interventions that act on tight junctions and enhance transendothelial migration. Arap et al. (43) demonstrated that a phage homing specifically to tumor endothelium had spread from the blood vessels into the tumors after circulation for 24 h. Similarly, arterial perfusion of vectors modified with a ligand specific for basolateral epithelial cells and circulation for a prolonged period of time may allow homing to the basolateral epithelial cell surface.

A notable finding in our study is the relatively low but significant cross-reactivity of the CCD-binding phage with T84 cells (13.9-fold over control) and that of the T84-binding phage with CCD (5.4-fold over control), suggesting at least some expression of both putative receptors on either cell type. CCD and colon epithelium play a role in the regulation of salt transport, and colonic epithelial T84 cells show enzyme activities comparable to those of primary cultured rabbit CCD cells (44).

Surprising, phage binding to MDCK cells, a cell line derived from canine kidney that is widely used as a cell model for CCD, was very low. Culturing of the cells could have led to dedifferentiation resulting in dramatically diminished expression of the putative integrin receptor, probably involved in adhesion of the basolateral membrane with the extracellular matrix. Another explanation is the species difference, because tubules were microdissected from rat and MDCK cells are derived from canine kidney. It is not surprising that the expression of cell surface receptors in cell lines differs from that in the native system. Cell dissociation disrupts intercellular communications and extracellular attachments. It has been shown that kidney tubular cells lose their epithelial polarity within minutes after dissociation (45,46). Our results emphasize the need for a native system of living cells to retain proper differentiation for the identification and characterization of ligands and their corresponding cell surface receptors. In addition to the disadvantage of altered differentiation of cell lines, the basolateral membrane of cells grown on culture dishes is directed toward the solid surface of the dish and is not directly accessible for analysis.

The presented method was designed to select high affinity binding phage undergoing internalization upon binding to their putative cell surface receptors and allowed the identification of a ligand that binds selectively to the basolateral membrane of CCD. Additional binding sequences may be identified by modification of the conditions chosen for the binding or elution of phage, such as temperature, pH, the presence or absence of the ions Mg2+ or Ca2+, or elution with specific known ligands. Different types of phage-display libraries with distinct presentation and length of the displayed peptide sequences could be applied to search for alternative motifs. In addition, affinity purification can be performed by inclusion of competing synthetic peptides, e.g., ELRGDMAAL in the case of CCD (8). The screening of phage-display libraries ultimately tends to result in the selection of the “best-fit” sequence, and only one or few distinct peptide sequences are obtained after several rounds of panning (5,8,43). Phage with lower affinity to their putative receptors or phage binding to receptors that are expressed at lower abundance may be found by analyzing clones after fewer rounds of affinity purification. Although these sequences may be less abundant or display a lower affinity to their corresponding receptors, they may be highly specific for the cell type of interest and be useful for the development of cell-type specific vectors.

The versatility of phage-display and biopanning using the present approach is expected to lead to the identification of additional ligands with tubule segment-specific binding properties (analogous to the CCD ligand) but will also result in the selection of high affinity non-cell-type specific ligands (analogous to the PCT ligand). Characterization of these ligands may contribute to the refinement of the current knowledge on interactions among endothelium, extracellular matrix, and epithelium and may help in the development of cell-specific, systemic delivery applications in the kidney.

We thank Maddalena Lis for excellent technical assistance; Dr. Charles A. Parkos, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, for helpful suggestions; and Dr. Kurt Baltensperger for helpful advice in confocal microscopy and Dr. Robert R. Friis for critical reading of the manuscript, both from the Department of Clinical Research, University of Berne. This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation No. 3100-059511.99 (A.O.), No. 3200-050820.97 (F.J.F.), and No. 31-52427.97 (L.M.).

1. Maunsbach AB, Christensen EI: Functional ultrastructure of the proximal tubule. In: Handbook of Physiology, edited by Windhager EE, New York, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp 41 -107
2. Wade JB, Stanton BA: Structural correlates of transport in distal tubule and collecting duct segments. In: Handbook of Physiology, edited by Windhager EE, New York, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp 169-226
3. Ruoslahti E: Integrins as receptors for extracellular matrix. In: Cell Biology of Extracellular Matrix, edited by Hay ED, New York, Plenum Press, 1991, pp 343 -363
4. Koivunen E, Arap W, Rajotte D, Lahdenranta J, Pasqualini R: Identification of receptor ligands with phage display peptide libraries. J Nucl Med 40: 883 -888, 1999
5. Pasqualini R, Ruoslahti E: Organ targeting in vivo using phage display peptide libraries. Nature 380: 364-366, 1996
6. Rajotte D, Arap W, Hagedorn M, Koivunen E, Pasqualini R, Ruoslahti E: Molecular heterogeneity of the vascular endothelium revealed by in vivo phage display. J Clin Invest 102: 430-437, 1998
7. Barry MA, Dower WJ, Johnston SA: Toward cell-targeting gene therapy vectors: Selection of cell-binding peptides from random peptide-presenting phage libraries. Nat Med 2: 299 -305, 1996
8. Mazzucchelli L, Burritt JB, Jesaitis AJ, Nusrat A, Liang TW, Gewirtz AT, Schnell FJ, Parkos CA: Cell-specific peptide binding by human neutrophils. Blood 93: 1738 -1748, 1999
9. Ivanenkov VV, Felici F, Menon AG: Targeted delivery of multivalent phage display vectors into mammalian cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1448: 463 -472, 1999
10. Zangani D, Darcy KM, Masso-Welch PA, Bellamy ES, Desole MS, Ip MM: Multiple differentiation pathways of rat mammary stromal cells in vitro: Acquisition of a fibroblast, adipocyte or endothelial phenotype is dependent on hormonal and extracellular matrix stimulation. Differentiation 64: 91 -101, 1999
11. Augustin HG, Kozian DH, Johnson RC: Differentiation of endothelial cells: Analysis of the constitutive and activated endothelial cell phenotypes. Bioessays 16: 901 -906, 1994
12. Burritt JB, Bond CW, Doss KW, Jesaitis AJ: Filamentous phage display of oligopeptide libraries. Anal Biochem 238: 1-13, 1996
13. Burg MB, Orloff J: Oxygen consumption and active transport in separated renal tubules. Am J Physiol 203: 327-330, 1962
14. Schafer JA, Watkins ML, Li L, Herter P, Haxelmans S, Schlatter E: A simplified method for isolation of large numbers of defined nephron segments. Am J Physiol 273: F650 -F657, 1997
15. Vogt B, Favre H: Na+,K(+)-ATPase activity and hormones in single nephron segments from nephrotic rats. Clin Sci (Colch) 80: 599-604, 1991
16. Breton S, Brown D: Cold-induced microtubule disruption and relocalization of membrane proteins in kidney epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 155 -166, 1998
17. Smith GP, Scott JK: Libraries of peptides and proteins displayed on filamentous phage. Methods Enzymol 217: 228-257, 1993
18. Parkos CA, Colgan SP, Madara JL: Interactions of neutrophils with epithelial cells: Lessons from the intestine. J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 138 -152, 1994
19. Murakami H, Masui H: Hormonal control of human colon carcinoma cell growth in serum-free medium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 3464-3468, 1980
20. Poole B, Ohkuma S: Effect of weak bases on the intralysosomal pH in mouse peritoneal macrophages. J Cell Biol 90: 665-669, 1981
21. Ruoslahti E: RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12: 697 -715, 1996
22. Koivunen E, Gay DA, Ruoslahti E: Selection of peptides binding to the alpha 5 beta 1 integrin from phage display library. J Biol Chem 268: 20205 -20210, 1993
23. Rabb H, Barroso-Vicens E, Adams R, Pow-Sang J, Ramirez G: Alpha-V/beta-3 and alpha-V/beta-5 integrin distribution in neoplastic kidney. Am J Nephrol 16: 402 -408, 1996
24. Pol A, Ortega D, Enrich C: Identification of cytoskeleton-associated proteins in isolated rat liver endosomes. Biochem J 327: 741 -746, 1997
25. Hart SL, Knight AM, Harbottle RP, Mistry A, Hunger HD, Cutler DF, Williamson R, Coutelle C: Cell binding and internalization by filamentous phage displaying a cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp-containing peptide. J Biol Chem 269: 12468 -12474, 1994
26. Colin M, Harbottle RP, Knight A, Kornprobst M, Cooper RG, Miller AD, Trugnan G, Capeau J, Coutelle C, Brahimi-Horn MC: Liposomes enhance delivery and expression of an RGD-oligolysine gene transfer vector in human tracheal cells. Gene Ther 5: 1488 -1498, 1998
27. Harbottle RP, Cooper RG, Hart SL, Ladhoff A, McKay T, Knight AM, Wagner E, Miller AD, Coutelle C: An RGD-oligolysine peptide: A prototype construct for integrin-mediated gene delivery [see comments]: Hum Gene Ther 9: 1037 -1047, 1998
28. Colin M, Maurice M, Trugnan G, Kornprobst M, Harbottle RP, Knight A, Cooper RG, Miller AD, Capeau J, Coutelle C, Brahimi-Horn MC: Cell delivery, intracellular trafficking and expression of an integrin-mediated gene transfer vector in tracheal epithelial cells. Gene Ther 7: 139-152, 2000
29. Erbacher P, Remy JS, Behr JP: Gene transfer with synthetic virus-like particles via the integrin-mediated endocytosis pathway. Gene Ther 6: 138 -145, 1999
30. Koivunen E, Wang B, Ruoslahti E: Phage libraries displaying cyclic peptides with different ring sizes: Ligand specificities of the RGD-directed integrins. Biotechnology (N Y) 13: 265-270, 1995
31. Tomko RP, Xu R, Philipson L: HCAR and MCAR: The human and mouse cellular receptors for subgroup C adenoviruses and group B coxsackieviruses: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 3352 -3356, 1997
32. Wickham TJ, Segal DM, Roelvink PW, Carrion ME, Lizonova A, Lee GM, Kovesdi I: Targeted adenovirus gene transfer to endothelial and smooth muscle cells by using bispecific antibodies. J Virol 70: 6831-6838, 1996
33. Reynolds P, Dmitriev I, Curiel D: Insertion of an RGD motif into the HI loop of adenovirus fiber protein alters the distribution of transgene expression of the systemically administered vector. Gene Ther 6: 1336 -1339, 1999
34. McDonald GA, Zhu G, Yongsheng L, Kovesdi I, Wickham TJ, and Sukhatme VP: Efficient adenoviral gene transfer to kidney cortical vasculature utilizing a fiber modified vector. J Gene Med 1: 103-110, 1999
35. Kircheis R, Kichler A, Wallner G, Kursa M, Ogris M, Felzmann T, Buchberger M, Wagner E: Coupling of cell-binding ligands to polyethylenimine for targeted gene delivery. Gene Ther 4: 409-418, 1997
36. Romanczuk H, Galer CE, Zabner J, Barsomian G, Wadsworth SC, O'Riordan CR: Modification of an adenoviral vector with biologically selected peptides: a novel strategy for gene delivery to cells of choice [see comments]. Hum Gene Ther 10: 2615 -2626, 1999
37. Larocca D, Kassner PD, Witte A, Ladner RC, Pierce GF, Baird A: Gene transfer to mammalian cells using genetically targeted filamentous bacteriophage. FASEB J 13: 727 -734, 1999
38. Kassner PD, Burg MA, Baird A, Larocca D: Genetic selection of phage engineered for receptor-mediated gene transfer to mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 264: 921 -928, 1999
39. Larocca D, Witte A, Johnson W, Pierce GF, Baird A: Targeting bacteriophage to mammalian cell surface receptors for gene delivery [see comments]. Hum Gene Ther 9: 2393 -2399, 1998
40. Moullier P, Friedlander G, Calise D, Ronco P, Perricaudet M, Ferry N: Adenoviral-mediated gene transfer to renal tubular cells in vivo. Kidney Int 45: 1220 -1225, 1994
41. Zeigler ST, Kerby JD, Curiel DT, Diethelm AG, Thompson JA: Molecular conjugate-mediated gene transfer into isolated human kidneys. Transplantation 61: 812 -817, 1996
42. Zhu G, Nicolson AG, Cowley BD, Rosen S, Sukhatme VP: In vivo adenovirus-mediated gene transfer into normal and cystic rat kidneys. Gene Ther 3: 298 -304, 1996
43. Arap W, Pasqualini R, Ruoslahti E, Engvall E, Vaheri A: Cancer treatment by targeted drug delivery to tumor vasculature in a mouse model. Science 279: 377 -380, 1998
44. Dharmsathaphorn K, McRoberts JA, Mandel KG, Tisdale LD, Masui H: A human colonic tumor cell line that maintains vectorial electrolyte transport. Am J Physiol 246: G204 -G208, 1984
45. Gumbiner B: Generation and maintenance of epithelial cell polarity. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2: 881 -887, 1990
46. Rebelo L, Carmo-Fonseca M, Moura TF: Redistribution of microvilli and membrane enzymes in isolated rat proximal tubule cells. Biol Cell 74: 203-209, 1992
Copyright © 2001 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.