Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Elevated HIV Prevalence and Correlates of PrEP Use Among a Community Sample of Black Men Who Have Sex With Men

Eaton, Lisa A., PhD*; Matthews, Derrick D., PhD, MPH; Bukowski, Leigh A., MPH; Friedman, M. Ruvel, PhD, MPH; Chandler, Cristian J., PhD, MPH; Whitfield, Darren L., PhD, MSW§; Sang, Jordan M., MPH; Stall, Ron D., PhD The POWER Study Team

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: November 1, 2018 - Volume 79 - Issue 3 - p 339–346
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001822
Prevention Research

Background: The HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men (BMSM) demands urgent public health attention. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly efficacious option for preventing HIV, but characteristics of PrEP use among community samples of BMSM are not well-understood.

Methods: A serial cross-sectional survey assessment (N = 4184 BMSM reporting HIV-negative/unsure status) and HIV testing were conducted at Black Gay Pride events in 6 US cities in 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.

Results: HIV prevalence was higher among BMSM self-reporting current PrEP use (1 of 3 participants) than BMSM not self-reporting current PrEP use (1 of 5 participants) [32.3%, N = 103/319 vs. 20.0%, N = 639/3,193, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 2.15]. BMSM reporting current PrEP use (N = 380) were more likely to report having a greater number of male sex partners (aOR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.03), a sexually transmitted infection diagnosis (aOR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.88 to 3.16), and stimulant drug use (aOR = 2.05, 95% CI, 1.21 to 3.47) when compared with BMSM not reporting current PrEP use (N = 3804). PrEP use increased from 4.7% (2014) to 15.5% (2017) (aOR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.25). Among PrEP users, inability to afford health care coverage was associated with testing HIV-positive (aOR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.24 to 3.56).

Conclusions: The high prevalence of HIV infection among BMSM reporting PrEP use is concerning. It does not, however, challenge the efficacy of PrEP itself but rather the uptake of the surrounding preventative package including behavioral risk reduction support, sexually transmitted infection treatment, and medication adherence counseling. Further research to understand barriers to fully effective PrEP is needed to guide operational and behavioral interventions that close the gap on incident infection.

*Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT;

Departments of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology;

Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA; and

§School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Correspondence to: Lisa A. Eaton, PhD, Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, 2006 Hillside Road, Storrs, CT 06269-1248 (e-mail:

Supported by NIH (R01NR013865 and R01MH109409).

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Received March 12, 2018

Accepted July 09, 2018

Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.