Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Epidemiology and Social Science

Dominant Effects of CCR2-CCR5 Haplotypes in HIV-1 Disease Progression

Winkler, Cheryl A*; Hendel, Houria; Carrington, Mary*; Smith, Michael W*; Nelson, George W*; O’Brien, Stephen J; Phair, John§; Vlahov, David; Jacobson, Lisa P; Rappaport, Jay; Vasilescu, Alexandre#; Bertin-Maghit, Sebastien; An, Ping*; Lu, Wei**; Andrieu, Jean-Marie**; Schächter, François††; Therwath, Amu†††; Zagury, Jean-François†††

Author Information
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: December 1st, 2004 - Volume 37 - Issue 4 - p 1534-1538
doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000127353.01578.63


The inhibitory role of chemokines on HIV type 1 (HIV-1) replication was revealed in 1995,1 and the following year, the receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 were identified as the major coreceptors for HIV-1 cell entry.2-4 Since then, gene polymorphisms in the chemokine system have been investigated intensively in AIDS cohorts to define their role in HIV-1 resistance and pathogenesis.5 A 32-bp deletion, CCR5 Δ32, was found in the main chemokine coreceptor for transmitted R5 HIV-1 strains. This deletion introduces a premature stop codon, which results in a truncated protein not expressed on the cell surface and is associated with resistance to HIV-1 infection in homozygotes and a 2- to 4-year delay in developing AIDS in heterozygotes.6,7 A conservative replacement of valine by isoleucine in a transmembrane domain of the chemokine receptor CCR2 was also shown to delay time to AIDS by 2-4 years, although the mechanism for this effect is unknown.8 Finally, the A allele at position 59029G/A, found only on the CCR5 promoter haplotype P1, was associated with rapid progression to AIDS.9-11 The 59029A allele has been reported to upregulate transcription in reporter assays9 and to be associated with higher numbers of CCR5-expressing CD4+ cells.12 These 3 AIDS-affecting alleles occur on 3 haplotypes: 64I.P1.+, +.P1.+, and +.P1.Δ32 for CCR2, CCR5 promoter, and CCR5 open reading frame, respectively, with + representing the most common allele at each locus. Although other polymorphisms have been identified in the CCR5 region,13-15 they are in linkage disequilibrium with the ones mentioned above, are very rare, or have little or no effect on HIV-1 pathogenesis. Associations between HIV-1 disease and genetic variants of the ligands for chemokine coreceptors have also been described.16-19

The AIDS-modifying effects of CCR2 64I, CCR5 Δ32, and CCR5 promoter gene polymorphisms on longitudinal seroconverter cohorts have been confirmed,20,21 but the degree of their influence was quite variable likely due to differences in cohort design and power.22 The present study analyses CCR5 and CCR2 haplotypes in the GRIV cohort,23-28 bringing into new light the temporal effects of the chemokine receptor gene polymorphisms.



The GRIV cohort was established in 1995 in France to generate a collection of DNA samples for studies of genetic factors that may influence the rate of progression to AIDS.24 To avoid potential confounding associated with racial/ethnic differences and population substructure in the analysis, only Caucasians of European descent were recruited from hospital-based AIDS units throughout France. Slow progressors (SP) were defined as asymptomatic individuals who had tested HIV-1 seropositive for >8 years with a CD4+ cell count of >500/mm3 in the absence of antiretroviral therapy. Of the SP, 150 had follow-up for 3 years after enrollment in the GRIV cohort. Rapid progressors (RP) were stringently defined as having a CD4 cell count of <300/mm3 <3 years after the last seronegative test. Complete genotyping was available for 80 RP and 250 SP.

As an intermediate control group, we used European American seroconverters from the US-based ALIVE29 and MACS30 natural history cohorts from whom subjects meeting the criteria for the GRIV RP or SP were excluded. This seroconverter group is reasonable as a control group for 3 reasons: 1) the US-based controls are of Caucasian European ancestry; 2) the allele frequencies of CCR2 64I, CCR5 Δ32, and CCR5 P1 among the European American population are quite similar to those previously reported for western European cohorts31,32; and 3) because the MACS and ALIVE cohorts are true cohorts of seroconverters, they predominantly represent subjects whose diseases progress at average rates. By excluding RP and SP from this group, we obtained an effective control group for the very rapid and slow GRIV groups.

Genetic Typing of CCR5 Δ32, CCR2 64I, and CCR5 P1

Genotypes for CCR5 P1-P4, CCR5 +/Δ32, and CCR2 V64I were obtained by single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis, polymerase chain restriction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, and 5′-endonuclease (TaqMan) assay as previously described.8,10,11 Because the CCR5 promoter haplotype P1, but not P2-P4, was found to modify AIDS in previous studies, we grouped the CCR5 P2, P3, and P4 haplotypes into a single covariate, P2-P4, in the analysis. The haplotypes considered are thus +.P1.+, 64I. P1.+, +.P1.Δ32, and +.P2-P4.+ for CCR2, CCR5 promoter, and CCR5 open reading frame, respectively, where + represents the most common allele.10,11 For brevity, the haplotypes are abbreviated P1, 64I, Δ32, and P2-4, respectively. The P1 haplotype (frequency [f] = 35%) includes the subset of haplotypes HHE (f = 30%), HHF1 (f = 3.0%), and HHG1 (f = 2%) as reported by Gonzalez et al.33

Statistical Analysis

Because of the complete linkage disequilibrium within the region with both CCR2 64I and CCR5 Δ32 always occurring with CCR5 P1 but never together on the same haplotype, we did not consider the independent affects of the CCR2 and CCR5 alleles on progression but instead analyzed the effects of haplotypes containing the 3 loci. For each haplotype, we compared each of the groups (RP and SP) with the intermediate control group and RP with SP (Table 1). To test the hypothesis that the protective effects of CCR5 Δ32 and the accelerating effects of CCR5 P1 would influence late events in SP, the haplotype distributions between progressing SP and slow SP were compared under the dominant model (see Results and Table 2). Statistical significance was determined by Pearson χ2 and Fisher exact tests (2 × 2 contingency tables). Confidence intervals for odds ratios (OR) were calculated using PROC FREQ in SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The hypothesis that the effects of CCR5 Δ32 and CCR5 P1 occur disproportionately in early progression was tested by the likelihood ratio statistics comparing the results of the proportionately odds model (function polr) to a multinominal model (function multinom).34 Because CCR2 64I and CCR5 Δ32 are each in complete linkage disequilibrium with CCR5 P1, haplotypes were easily determined by inspection.

Table 1
Table 1:
Frequency Distributions ofCCR2-CCR5 Haplotypes for the Dominant Genetic Model and of CCR2-CCR5 Diplotypes
Table 2
Table 2:
Distribution ofCCR2-CCR5 Haplotype Among Patients With 3 Years of Clinical Follow-up After Enrollment in the GRIV Cohort According to the Dominant Model


Table 1 presents the distribution of homozygotes and heterozygotes (dominant model) for haplotypes by comparing the considered haplotype with all other haplotypes. The strongest associations were observed for individuals with either CCR5 P1 or CCR5 Δ32. The CCR5 P1 haplotype was strongly associated with rapid progression, with the highest frequency of P1 carriers observed for RP compared with either SP (OR = 2.96; P = 0.00006) or the intermediate control group (OR = 2.10; P = 0.01), demonstrating that the CCR5 P1 haplotype is dominantly associated with rapid progression. In contrast to CCR5 P1, CCR5 Δ32 heterozygotes were underrepresented in RP compared with either SP (OR = 0.16; P = 0.00004) or the intermediate control group (OR = 0.25; P = 0.007). Heterozygotes for the CCR5 Δ32 haplotype were slightly more frequent, and heterozygotes for CCR5P1 slightly less frequent, in SP than in the intermediate control group, although neither tendency was significant. These results suggested that both CCR5 Δ32 and CCR5 P1 haplotypes exert their effects very early, because the largest distortion in haplotype frequencies was noted for RP compared with the intermediate control group with smaller differences observed between SP and the intermediate control group. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the results of a regression model (proportional odds) that assumes that effects are constant, to the results of a regression model (multinomial) that allows the effects to vary with time; the comparison indicated that the effect of CCR5 Δ32 differed significantly from a constant effect (P = 0.04), while the effect of CCR5 +/P1/+ did not differ significantly (P = 0.12).

To determine the effects of haplotype pairs (diplotypes) on progression, we examined the distribution of diplotypes among SP, RP, and the intermediate control group (Table 1). The P2-4/P2-4 diplotype was neutral, because the frequency was nearly identical among the 3 groups (f = 21%-22%). Individuals carrying 1 CCR5 Δ32 haplotype, regardless of the second haplotype, tended to be underrepresented in RP and overrepresented in SP. By comparing RP with the intermediate control group, we observed that the CCR5 P2-4/Δ32 diplotype is strongly protective (OR = 0.11; P = 0.01).

Of SP, 150 had follow-up clinical visits over 3 years: 45 remained slow SP with no treatment and stable CD4+ cell counts (<20% decline in CD4+ T-cell count); 47 progressing SP had sharp declines in CD4+ cell counts to <400/mm3 and/or received antiretroviral therapy; and 58 had a slow decrease in CD4+ cell counts that remained >500/mm3. There were no significant differences among progressing SP, slow SP, and the remaining 58 SP (P > 0.3; Table 2), confirming that the AIDS-modifying genetic factors that influence viral cell entry exert their effects early in HIV-1 infection.


In this study, comparison of subjects progressing in the first three years after HIV-1 infection with average progressors showed that CCR5 Δ32 and CCR5 P1 have a strong influence early in HIV-1 infection. The effect of these factors tended to be stronger on early progression than on late progression, although this tendency was significant only for CCR5 Δ32. It is likely that initial viral load is diminished by the presence of CCR5 Δ32 and increased by CCR5 P120,21; however, we could not access this because early set point RNA levels were not available for the GRIV cohort. Carrying CCR5 Δ32 and not CCR5 P1 might provide an initial advantage in limiting CD4+ cell depletion early in infection. As a consequence, patients with CCR5 Δ32 would be more likely to be SP according to our criteria (CD4+ cell counts of >500/mm3 for at least the first 8 years after HIV-1 seroconversion) as shown by the increase of patients with CCR5 Δ32 and the decrease of those with CCR5 P1 among SP compared with the intermediate control group (Table 1).

These studies demonstrate that while both CCR5 Δ32 and CCR5 P1 are dominant, the protective effect of CCR5 Δ32 may be more influential because patients with the CCR5 Δ32/P1 diplotype were 60% more likely to be SP or in the intermediate control group than RP; however, these are to be considered as trends due to the small number of individuals carrying the CCR5 Δ32/ P1 diplotype (Table 1). CCR5 P1 was found in some10,19 but not other9,11 studies to be recessive. The current study provides convincing evidence that CCR5 P1 is dominant but only when the trans (second) haplotype carried by an individual is CCR5 P2, P3, or P4. We were unable to assess the dominance of CCR5 P1 in individuals with either CCR5 Δ32 or CCR2 64I because the groups were underpowered; however, there appeared to be a tendency for CCR5 Δ32, but not CCR2 64I, to mitigate the accelerating effects of CCR5 P1 in trans. The epidemiologic evidence that CCR5 P1 acts early to increase the risk of AIDS progression and CD4+ T-cell loss is consistent with evidence that CCR5 P1 has been associated with higher transcriptional levels9 and increased numbers of CCR5-expressing CD4+ cells (12αα), thus providing more targets for HIV-1 binding. Studies have consistently shown that set point HIV-1 levels are predictors of AIDS progression35,36; therefore genetic factors that modify chemokine receptor availability may have long-term effects on HIV-1 pathogenesis. The early detrimental effects of CCR5 P1 suggest that HIV-1-infected carriers of this factor could be considered for early therapeutic surveillance.

We did not observe a significant association of the CCR2 64I haplotype on slow or rapid progression (Table 1), unlike observations in some other studies20; however, the comparison of SP with the intermediate control group or RP suggests that in the absence of CCR5 +/P1/+, CCR2 64I tends to be protective. Globally, the pattern of protection brought by CCR2 64I seems complex, with a trend for an early protective effect against rapid progression (Table 1) and a trend for delayed protection shown by an increased frequency among SP but modulated by CCR5 P1 (Table 1). This observation is in agreement with the findings of Ioannidis et al37 who studied perinatally infected children. The antagonistic effect of the CCR5 P1 haplotype on the CCR2 64I haplotype in trans (Table 1) suggests that upregulation of CCR5 by CCR5 P1 may be more important than the presence or absence of CCR2 64I. The functional role of CCR2 64I remains an enigma both because the valine to isoleucine substitution is conservative and occurs within a transmembrane domain and CCR2 is a minor HIV-1 coreceptor with little evidence that it binds to HIV-1 in vivo. It is possible that CCR2 64I is tracking other yet unidentified polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with CCR5 or other nearby chromosome 3 chemokine receptors.8,11

Follow-up data were available for a subset of SP. As shown in Table 2, among SP with signs of progression or remaining stable after 3 years, the CCR5 Δ32 and CCR2 64I haplotype frequencies were quite similar; this suggests that these genetic factors do not provide long-term protection, in agreement with results of previous studies.8,9,24,25 Similarly, the frequencies of CCR5 P1 and CCR5 P2-4 haplotypes were also similar among SP regardless of their progression status. These results support our observation that CCR2-CCR5 genetic factors function early and may have little influence on later events triggering CD4+ T-cell loss in individuals whose conditions have been stable for ≥8 years, in agreement with results of previous studies.37,38 This suggests that other genetic, viral, or environmental factors may be responsible for the long-term maintenance of nonprogression.


The authors are grateful to all the patients and the medical staff who kindly collaborated in this project.


1. Cocchi F, DeVico AL, Garzino-demi A, et al. Identification of RANTES, MIP-1A, and MIP-1B as major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells. Science. 1995;270:1811-1815.
2. Feng Y, Broder CC, Kennedy PE, et al. HIV-1 entry cofactor: functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 1996;272:872-877.
3. Deng H, Liu R, Ellmeier W, et al. Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1. Nature. 1996;381:661-666.
4. Alkhatib G, Cambadiere C, Broder CC, et al. CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1A, MIP1B receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophages-tropic HIV-1. Science. 1996;272:1955-1958.
5. O’Brien SJ, Moore JP. The effect of genetic variation in chemokines and their receptors on HIV transmission and progression to AIDS. Immunol Rev. 2000;177:99-111.
6. Samson M, Libert F, Doranz BJ, et al. Resistance to HIV-1 infection in Caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. Nature. 1996;382:722-725.
7. Dean M, Carrington M, Winkler C, et al. Genetic restriction of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS by a deletion allele of the CKR5 structural gene. Science. 1996;273:1856-1862.
8. Smith MW, Dean M, Carrington M, et al. Contrasting influence of CCR2 and CCR5 variants on HIV-1 infection and disease progression. Science. 1997;277:959-965.
9. McDermott DH, Zimmerman PA, Guignard F, et al. CCR5 promoter polymorphism and HIV-1 disease progression. Lancet. 1998;352:866-870.
10. Martin MP, Dean M, Smith MW, et al. Genetic acceleration of AIDS progression by a promoter variant of CCR5. Science. 1998;282:1907-1911.
11. An P, Martin MP, Nelson GW, et al. Influence of CCR5 promoter haplotypes on AIDS progression in African-Americans. AIDS. 2000;14:2117-2122.
12. Shieh B, Liau YE, Hsieh PS, et al. Influence of nucleotide polymorphisms in the CCR2 gene and the CCR5 promoter on the expression of cell surface CCR5 and CXCR4. Int Immunol. 2000;12:1311-1318.
13. Kostrikis LG, Huang Y, Moore JP, et al. A chemokine receptor CCR2 allele delays HIV-1 disease progression and is associated with a CCR5 promoter mutation. Nat Med. 1998;4:350-353.
14. Mummidi S, Ahuja SS, Gonzalez E, et al. Genealogy of the CCR5 locus and chemokine system gene variants associated with altered rates of HIV-1 disease progression. Nat Med. 1998;4:786-793.
15. Mummidi S, Bamshad M, Ahuja SS, et al. Evolution of human and non-human primate CC chemokine receptor 5 gene and mRNA. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:18946-18961.
16. Winkler C, Modi W, Smith MW, et al. Genetic restriction of AIDS pathogenesis by an SDF1 chemokine gene variant. Science. 1998;279:389-393.
17. McDermott DH, Beecroft MJ, Kleeberger CA, et al. Chemokine RANTES promoter polymorphism affects risk of both HIV infection and disease progression in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. AIDS. 2000;14:2671-2678.
18. An P, Nelson GW, Wang L, et al. Modulating influence on HIV/AIDS by interacting RANTES gene variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10002-10007.
19. Liu H, Chao D, Nakayama EE, et al. Polymorphism in RANTES chemokine promoter affects HIV-1 disease progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4581-4585.
20. Ioannidis JP, Rosenberg PS, Goedert JJ, et al. Effects of CCR5-delta32, CCR2-64I, and SDF-1 3′A alleles on HIV-1 disease progression: an international meta-analysis of individual-patient data. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:782-795.
21. Tang J, Shelton B, Makhatadze NJ, et al. Distribution of chemokine receptor CCR2 and CCR5 genotypes and their relative contribution to HIV-1 seroconversion, early HIV-1 RNA concentration in plasma and later disease progression. J Virol. 2002;76:662-672.
22. Huber C, Pons O, Hendel H, et al. Genomic studies in AIDS: problems and answers. Development of a statistical model integrating both longitudinal cohort studies and transversal observations of extreme cases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2003;57:25-33.
23. Hendel H, Caillat-Zucman S, Lebuanec H, et al. New class I and II HLA alleles strongly associated with opposite patterns of progression to AIDS. J Immunol. 1999;162:6942-6946.
24. Hendel H, Cho Y-Y, Gauthier N, et al. Contribution of cohort studies in understanding HIV pathogenesis: introduction of the GRIV cohort and preliminary results. Biomed Pharmacother. 1996;50:480-487.
25. Rappaport J, Cho Y-Y, Hendel H, et al. The CCR5 32 bp deletion confers resistance to fast progression among HIV-1 infected heterozygous individuals. Lancet. 1997;349:922-923.
26. Hendel H, Henon N, Lebuanec H, et al. Distinctive effects of CCR5, CCR2, and SDF1 genetic polymorphisms in AIDS progression. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998;19:381-386.
27. Flores-Villanueva P, Hendel H, Caillat-Zucman S, et al. Associations of MHC ancestral haplotypes with resistance/susceptibility to AIDS disease development. J Immunol. 2003;170:1925-1929.
28. Vasilescu A, Heath SC, Ivanova R, et al. Genomic analysis of Th1-Th2 cytokine genes in AIDS: identification of IL4 and IL10 haplotypes and their association to disease progression. Genes Immun. 2003;4:441-449.
29. Vlahov D, Graham N, Hoover D, et al. Prognostic indicators for AIDS and infectious disease death in HIV-infected injection drug users: plasma viral load and CD4+ cell count. JAMA. 1998;279:35-40.
30. Phair J, Jacobson L, Detels R, et al. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome occurring within 5 years of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type-1: the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1992;5:490-496.
31. Libert F, Cochaux P, Beckman G, et al. The Δccr5 mutation conferring protection against HIV-1 in Caucasian populations has a single and recent origin in northeastern Europe. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:399-406.
32. Struyf F, Thoelen I, Charlier N, et al. Prevalence of CCR5 and CCR2 HIV-coreceptor gene polymorphisms in Belgium. Hum Hered. 2000;50:304-307.
33. Gonzalez E, Bamshad M, Sato N, et al. Race-specific HIV-1 disease-modifying effects associated with CCR5 haplotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:12004-12009.
34. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics in R. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2002:203-205.
35. Mellors JW, Kingsley LA, Rinaldo CR, et al. Quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma predicts outcome after seroconversion. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:573-579.
36. Mellors JW, Rinaldo CR, Gupta P, et al. Prognosis in HIV-1 infection predicted by the quantity of virus in plasma. Science. 1996;272:1167-1170.
37. Ioannidis JP, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Rosenberg PS, et al. Effects of CCR5-delta32 and CCR2-64I alleles on disease progression of perinatally HIV-1 infected children: an international meta-analysis. AIDS. 2003;17:1631-1638.
38. Mulherin SA, O’Brien TR, Ioannidis JP, et al. Effects of CCR5-delta32 and CCR2-64I alleles on HIV-1 disease progression: the protection varies with duration of infection. AIDS. 2003;17:377-387.

AIDS; CCR2; CCR5; haplotype; HIV; disease progression

© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.