Treatment of HIV infection using antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved steadily since the advent of potent combination therapy. The administration of combination antiretroviral therapies has been shown to suppress plasma HIV-1 RNA to undetectable levels and transformed HIV infection from being life-threatening into a chronic, manageable condition.1,2 Over the past year, a growing body of literature has provided even stronger evidence of the effectiveness of HIV treatment in viral suppression and, in turn, preventing the sexual transmission of HIV. This evidence greatly contributed to an increasing global consensus toward HIV treatment-as-prevention (TasP) initiatives as a means of preventing new HIV infections and HIV-associated morbidity and mortality.3–6
International and U.S. guidelines now recommend universal ART for people living with HIV (PLWH). Once prescribed ART, however, PLWH must optimally adhere to treatment to achieve viral suppression, which in turn improves individual outcomes and reduces HIV transmission to others. Suboptimal ART adherence is associated with virological failure and the emergence of antiretroviral resistance.1,7–9 In the context of HIV-positive people who use drugs (PWUD), the provision of optimal HIV treatment has become a major challenge. Previous studies have shown that HIV-positive PWUD are less likely to have access to and receive regular HIV care, and have lower levels of adherence, which all lead to poor treatment outcomes.10–15 Thus, tailoring intervention approaches to address their specific needs could help optimize HIV treatment outcomes and prevention efforts.
In a recent decade, opioid agonist therapies such as methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) or buprenorphine have been shown to be highly effective in improving treatment outcomes. A recent systematic review among opioid-dependent HIV-positive patients suggests that being maintained on opioid agonist therapies is associated with being prescribed ART and achieving optimal adherence and viral suppression levels.16 PLWH on MMT, however, are highly diverse and beyond the benefit of methadone on HIV TasP efforts. In the broader literature, several factors have been associated with optimal ART adherence.15,17–23 Despite substantial research in this area, previous studies have neither examined theoretically informed correlates of ART adherence nor explored the possible mechanism for optimal adherence among HIV-positive opioid-dependent individuals within drug treatment settings. Identifying subgroups at risk of suboptimal adherence would provide new insight to guide tailored and more effective HIV TasP strategies in this population.
Study Setting and Procedures
Data for this secondary analysis were derived from the Holistic Health for HIV (3H+) project, a randomized controlled trial designed to improve HIV risk reduction and medication adherence among high-risk HIV-positive PWUD. The study design has been described previously.24 Briefly, participants were recruited from community-based addiction treatment programs and HIV clinical care settings within the greater New Haven, CT, using clinic-based advertisements and flyers, word of mouth, and direct referral from counselors. Interested individuals who met inclusion criteria and who provided informed consent were administered the baseline survey using an audio computer-assisted self-interview program. Baseline data collected before randomization were analyzed. All participants were paid for their time to complete the survey. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards at the University of Connecticut and Yale University, and received board approval from the methadone clinic. Clinical trial registration is available at www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01741311).
We recruited 133 participants between September 2012 and January 2018. Individuals were eligible if they: (1) were aged 18 years or older; (2) confirmed HIV-positive status; (3) reported drug- (ie, sharing of injection equipment) or sex-related (ie, condomless sex) risk behavior (past 6 months); (4) met DSM-V criteria for opioid use disorder and stable on methadone (dose ∼80 mg); (5) able to understand, speak, and read English; (6) not actively suicidal, homicidal, or psychotic; and (7) able to provide informed consent. Only those individuals who reported taking ART in the past month were included in the analysis (N = 121).
The dependent variable was optimal ART adherence in the past month, measured using an empirically validated, self-report visual analog scale.25 In this method, participants were asked to indicate the percentage of ART medication taken as directed in the previous month by pointing along a continuous line between 0% and 100%. Optimal ART adherence was defined as adherence of 95% or greater.9
Covariates included in the analysis were based on previous research on adherence as well as findings from other studies conducted within drug treatment settings. Data collected included participant characteristics, including age, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, marital status, educational status, employment status, income, living status, methadone dose, HIV diagnosis duration, and ART status. Other variables included participant health status variables including the most recent viral load and CD4 count. These variables were extracted from their medical record. Viral suppression was defined as clinic-recorded HIV-1 RNA test value <200 copies/mL and high CD4 as CD4 count ≥500 cells/mm.3,26,27
Motivation to adhere to ART was measured using an 18-item, validated scale (for example, “How strong is your intention to take all of your ART medications as directed by your health care provider in the next month?”, and “When you were growing up, how important was it to members of your family to take medications as prescribed?”). Responses were indicated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from not at all (0) to extremely (3), with higher values indicating greater motivation to adhere to ART (α = 0.72).
Data collection also included measures of the information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model constructs related to HIV risk reduction,28 including: (1) Information—HIV risk–related knowledge (range: 0–4); (2) Motivation—readiness to change and intentions to change HIV risk behavior (range: 0–32); and (3) Behavioral Skills—risk reduction skills (range: 0–16).
HIV-related stigma included measures of internalized, anticipated, and enacted HIV stigma assessed using a validated HIV stigma Mechanism Measure.29 Internalized HIV stigma (α = 0.91) was measured with 6 items, including “I feel ashamed of having HIV.” Anticipated HIV stigma (α = 0.90) was measured with 9 items, including “Healthcare workers will treat me with less respect.” Enacted HIV stigma (α = 0.91) was measured with 9 items, including “Family members have avoided me.” Items were rated on 5-point Likert-type scales. Items were averaged to create composite scores with higher scores indicating greater stigma.
Disclosure of HIV status was defined as having any sex where HIV status to the partners was disclosed in the past 6 months. Serostatus disclosure to partners was measured by asking, “In the past 6 months, did you have sex with anyone who you told your HIV status sometime before you had sex?” Responses were reported using a “yes” or “no.” Participants were also asked about their knowledge of partner's HIV status in the past 30 days.
The HIV risk assessment, adapted from NIDA's Risk Behavior Assessment,30 was used to measure several aspects of HIV risk behaviors in the past 30 days, including a measurement of “any” high-risk behavior (sexual or drug-related) as well as measurements of event-level (ie, partner-by-partner) behaviors.
We computed descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and mean values and SDs for continuous variables. After conducting bivariate analyses to examine significant associations with the dependent variable (ie, ART adherence), we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses on those bivariate associations found to be significant at P < 0.10. In addition, we examined the interactive effect of pairs of variables in the main-effects model to determine the moderated effect on optimal ART adherence. Stepwise forward entry and backward elimination methods both showed the same results in examining the independent correlates (P < 0.05) expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and their 95% confidence intervals. Model fit was assessed using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test.31
Next, we incorporated a mediation model to examine the explanatory pathway through which significant correlates, based on multivariable logistic regression, influence optimal ART adherence. We used the SPSS PROCESS macro developed by Hayes (2013), which utilized the logistic regression model to test the mediational effect. As outlined by Baron and Kenny (1986), this macro estimates all paths designated in mediation models (Fig. 1). The indirect effect was calculated as the product of the beta coefficients from 2 regression models (a*b). In addition, the test of the mediational process was further guided by the Sobel test,32 and the bootstrap method.33 Bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals (95%) were calculated to estimate indirect effects using 5000 iterations, and an indirect effect was determined to be significant if the confidence interval did not include 0.33 The following covariates were included in our mediation model: age, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, marital status, education, and income. Estimates were evaluated for statistical significance based on P < 0.05. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 23.34
Table 1 summarizes participant characteristics. The mean age of participants was 49.4 (±8.3) years, and over half of the participants (53.7%) reported cocaine use in the past 30 days. In our sample, 63.6% had achieved optimal adherence and 85.4% were virally suppressed. Self-reported HIV risk behaviors were highly prevalent among participants.
Correlates of Optimal ART Adherence
Table 1 shows the bivariate correlates of optimal ART adherence, and Table 2 shows the independent correlates associated with this outcome in multivariate modeling. Three factors were independently correlated with optimal ART adherence: being virally suppressed (aOR = 6.470, P = 0.038) and having higher motivation to adhere to ART (aOR = 1.171, P = 0.011) were positively correlated, whereas having anticipated HIV-related stigma (aOR = 0.384, P = 0.015) was negatively correlated with optimal ART adherence. Furthermore, we also found a significant interaction effect that involved motivation to adherence to ART combined with drug injection to be correlated with optimal ART adherence (aOR = 1.086, P = 0.049). The results of the post hoc analyses showed that drug injection had significant influence on ART adherence at lower levels of motivation to adhere to ART (Effect = −0.3764, P = 0.033). This effect was, however, nonsignificant at greater levels of motivation to adhere to ART.
Participants in the current study were recruited over the course of 5 years, thus presenting history/maturation as a potential threat to internal validity. We, therefore, redid the analysis for Table 2 adjusting for the year of recruitment in the multivariable model, but there were no significant differences observed in the results (see Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content, https://links.lww.com/QAI/B231).
Test of Mediation
Next, we examined the role of motivation to adhere to ART on the relationship between HIV-related stigma and ART adherence. Participants who anticipated HIV-related stigma were significantly less likely to have higher motivation to adhere to ART (B = −0.583, P = 0.025; path a). Higher motivation to adhere to ART was, in turn, positively associated with optimal ART adherence (B = 0.209, P = 0.037; path b). The relationship between HIV-related stigma and ART adherence also emerged as significant (B = −0.248, P = 0.042; path c). This relationship was, however, nonsignificant after controlling for motivation to adhere to ART (B = −0.127, P = 0.059; path c), thus supporting the hypothesized mediation effect. The formal 2-tailed significance test demonstrated that the indirect effect was significant (Sobel z = −0.121, P = 0.043). Bootstrap results confirmed the Sobel test (Table 3), with a bootstrapped 95% confidence interval around the indirect effect not containing zero (−0.203 to −0.064). All these analyses support our hypothesis of an indirect effect (ie, mediation) of HIV-related stigma on ART adherence through motivation to adhere to ART (Fig. 1).
This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the only study that examines factors correlated with optimal ART adherence in PLWH on methadone–a group of PWUD whose adherence is already increased by virtue of being on opioid agonist therapy.16 Several key findings emerged that provide guidance for tailoring HIV prevention and treatment in PWUD. First, despite the known ART adherence benefits of being prescribed methadone,16 optimal adherence levels remained relatively low but similar to other studies,35,36 suggesting the need for further intervention.
PLWH on MMT often encounter numerous barriers that contribute to suboptimal ART adherence, including ongoing drug use, stigma and discrimination, chaotic lifestyle, and complex array of social, medical, and psychological issues.15,37–41 The finding that viral suppression is associated with optimal adherence has been demonstrated in multiple studies, and similar to these, it was the single most important correlate. Unlike other studies,10,42 ongoing drug use such as cocaine did not adversely influence medication adherence. Clinicians and researchers alike often find viral suppression to be an excellent marker for adherence; yet, identifying suboptimal adherence before virological failure occurs would be an important target for intervention.
The finding that higher levels of motivation to adhere to ART is an important and new finding in PLWH on MMT. Patients with substance use disorders, generally, have lower motivation levels, which include individuals' beliefs and attitudes about the consequences of adherence, perhaps attributed to depressive symptoms (not measured here). As part of future interventions, factors that increase motivation, either by screening and treating underlying depression or better informing patients about the benefits of ART adherence, as stipulated in the IMB feedback model,43,44 could potentially increase motivation levels generally and most importantly focus on ART.
Concerning is the finding that increasing levels of anticipated stigma (ie, fear that stigma will be experienced) are correlated with suboptimal adherence. This finding has been demonstrated elsewhere among PLWH,29,45–47 but less well described in patients with substance use disorders. It is possible that anticipated stigma associated with both HIV infection and drug use may discourage these individuals to disclose their HIV status. This, in turn, may lead to underutilization of available HIV treatment services and suboptimal adherence because of fear of rejection and discrimination. New strategies that specifically address anticipated stigma may enhance ART adherence among HIV-positive methadone-maintained patients as well as their overall health status. One highly effective strategy, HIV TasP,3–6 has the potential to curb HIV incidence at the population level, and they may reduce stigma related to HIV and its effects.47 The scientific evidence behind TasP led to the Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U) campaign,48 which has been rapidly gathering momentum, having been endorsed by more than 400 organizations from 60 different countries including the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.49 This U = U strategy has not, however, transcended drug-using populations regarding uptake. Such strategies remove the absolute need to disclose their HIV status and markedly reduce the negative consequences (eg, HIV-related stigma) to PLWH through the disclosure process and thus may improve adherence to ART.
Our findings further demonstrated that there is a complex interplay between motivation to adhere to ART, injection-related practices, and optimal ART adherence. Although nonsignificant in the current study, similar studies have found that people who inject drugs have been less likely to achieve optimal adherence.10–12 As an extension of previous findings, our results point toward an interactive effect of motivation to adhere to ART and drug injection on individuals' ART adherence. That is, those who injected drugs were likely to report optimal ART adherence only if they had higher motivation to adhere to ART. This highlights the importance of precisely targeting the impact of drug-related risk behaviors, while enhancing motivation to adhere to ART.
The results of this study also provide preliminary evidence of how an individual's anticipated HIV-related stigma may influence their ART adherence, taking into consideration their motivation to adhere to ART. Our data demonstrated a significant mediating effect of motivation for ART adherence in the relationship between HIV-related stigma and ART adherence. That is, HIV-related stigma was negatively associated with motivation to adhere to ART. Higher motivation, in turn, was associated with optimal ART adherence. This mediation effect demonstrates that motivation to adhere to ART may be an important path through which HIV-related stigma influences individuals' adherence to ART. This finding reinforces our previous finding that efforts to improve ART adherence should consider ways to harness motivation so that individuals better adhere to their treatment regimen.
Findings from this study are not without limitations. First, participants were recruited from MMT sites within one county, potentially limiting generalizability of findings to HIV-positive patients on MMT nationwide. Second, we relied on self-reported measures of ART adherence as well as several correlates of adherence, which may have been subject to reporting bias, particularly overestimating adherence and underreporting risk behaviors. Third, the data were cross-sectional in nature, thus limiting our ability to infer direct causation from the associations we found. Fourth, the study sample was relatively small, which may have limited our ability to detect significant associations of other relevant variables. Fifth, the inclusion of participants meeting specific eligibility criteria (eg, able to understand, speak, and read English, not actively suicidal or psychotic, met DSM-V criteria for opioid use disorder, and stable on methadone) may limit our ability to generalize the findings to other risk populations. Despite these limitations, our findings significantly contribute to the literature to date and have important implications for interventions targeting medication adherence among high-risk populations.
There have been substantial advances in the use of ART for the treatment and prevention of HIV infection. Optimal adherence to ART is, however, vital to sustained HIV suppression, reduced risk of HIV transmission, and improved overall health and quality of life.1,2 Findings from this study underscore the complexities surrounding ART adherence among high-risk HIV-positive methadone-maintained patients. Our findings are unique, given the relative dearth of research on ART adherence practices relative to the factors we were able to examine in our analyses. Furthermore, the results make a significant contribution to our understanding of the explanatory pathways through which various factors influence ART adherence. Because HIV prevention efforts rely on the TasP approaches,50,51 future interventions approaches will need to carefully address population-specific needs (eg, harm reduction, overcoming stigma, and improving motivation for medication adherence) that may not be evident, but may strongly influence HIV prevention outcomes.
The authors thank Brian Sibilio and Pramila Karki for the contributions to this trial.
1. Rodger AJ, Lodwick R, Schechter M, et al. Mortality in well controlled HIV in the continuous antiretroviral therapy arms of the SMART and ESPRIT trials compared with the general population. AIDS. 2013;27:973–979.
2. Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, Katlama C, et al. Decline in the AIDS and death rates in the EuroSIDA study: an observational study. Lancet. 2003;362:22–29.
3. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission. New Engl J Med. 2016;375:830–839.
4. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:493–505.
5. Bavinton B, Grinsztejn B, Phanuphak N, et al. HIV treatment prevents HIV transmission in male serodiscordant couples in Australia, Thailand and Brazil. Paper presented at: Journal of the International AIDS Society; July 25, 2017; Paris, France.
6. Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, et al. Sexual activity without condoms and risk of HIV transmission in serodifferent couples when the HIV-positive partner is using suppressive antiretroviral therapy. JAMA. 2016;316:171–181.
7. Zwahlen M, Harris R, May M, et al. Mortality of HIV-infected patients starting potent antiretroviral therapy: comparison with the general population in nine industrialized countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:1624–1633.
8. Gross R, Yip B, Lo Re V III, et al. A simple, dynamic measure of antiretroviral therapy adherence predicts failure to maintain HIV-1 suppression. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:1108–1114.
9. Paterson DL, Swindells S, Mohr J, et al. Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:21–30.
10. Azar P, Wood E, Nguyen P, et al. Drug use patterns associated with risk of non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive illicit drug users in a Canadian setting: a longitudinal analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:193.
11. Li L, Chunqing L, Sung-Jae L, et al. Antiretroviral therapy adherence and self-efficacy among people living with HIV and a history of drug use in Vietnam. Int J STD AIDS. 2017;28:1247–1254.
12. Zhang Y, Wilson TE, Adedimeji A, et al. The impact of substance use on adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected women in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2018;22:896–908.
13. Meyer JP, Althoff AL, Altice FL. Optimizing care for HIV-infected people who use drugs: evidence-based approaches to overcoming healthcare disparities. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1309–1317.
14. Shrestha R, Copenhaver MM. Viral suppression among HIV-infected methadone-maintained patients: the role of ongoing injection drug use and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Addict Behav. 2018;85:88–93.
15. Shrestha R, Karki P, Huedo-Medina TB, et al. Treatment engagement moderates the effect of neurocognitive impairment on antiretroviral therapy adherence in HIV-infected drug users in treatment. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2017;28:85–94.
16. Low AJ, Mburu G, Welton NJ, et al. Impact of opioid substitution therapy on antiretroviral therapy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:1094–1104.
17. Langebeek N, Gisolf EH, Reiss P, et al. Predictors and correlates of adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for chronic HIV infection: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2014;12:142.
18. Sevelius JM, Saberi P, Johnson MO. Correlates of antiretroviral adherence and viral load among transgender women living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2014;26:976–982.
19. Seghatol-Eslami VC, Dark H, Raper JL, et al. Interpersonal and intrapersonal factors as parallel independent mediators in the association between internalized HIV stigma and ART adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74:e18.
20. Kahana SY, Fernandez MI, Wilson PA, et al. Rates and correlates of antiretroviral therapy use and virologic suppression among perinatally and behaviorally infected HIV+ youth linked to care in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68:169.
21. Kalichman SC, Eaton L, Kalichman MO, et al. Medication beliefs mediate the association between medical mistrust and antiretroviral adherence among African Americans living with HIV/AIDS. J Health Psychol. 2017;22:269–279.
22. Ekstrand ML, Heylen E, Mazur A, et al. The role of HIV stigma in ART adherence and quality of life among rural women living with HIV in India. AIDS Behav. 2018;22:3859–3868.
23. Ferro EG, Weikum D, Vagenas P, et al. Alcohol use disorders negatively influence antiretroviral medication adherence among men who have sex with men in Peru. AIDS Care. 2015;27:93–104.
24. Shrestha R, Krishnan A, Altice FL, et al. A non-inferiority trial of an evidence-based secondary HIV prevention behavioral intervention compared to an adapted, abbreviated version: rationale and intervention description. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;44:95–102.
25. Giordano TP, Guzman D, Clark R, et al. Measuring adherence to antiretroviral therapy in a diverse population using a visual analogue scale. HIV Clin Trials. 2004;5:74–79.
26. Bowen EA, Canfield J, Moore S, et al. Predictors of CD4 health and viral suppression outcomes for formerly homeless people living with HIV/AIDS in scattered site supportive housing. AIDS Care. 2017;29:1458–1462.
27. Crepaz N, Tang T, Marks G, et al. Viral suppression patterns among persons in the United States with diagnosed HIV infection in 2014. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:446–447.
28. Huedo-Medina TB, Shrestha R, Copenhaver M. Modeling a theory-based approach to examine the influence of neurocognitive impairment on HIV risk reduction behaviors among drug users in treatment. AIDS Behav. 2016;20:1646–1657.
29. Earnshaw VA, Smith LR, Chaudoir SR, et al. HIV stigma mechanisms and well-being among PLWH: a test of the HIV stigma framework. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:1785–1795.
30. Dowling-Guyer S, Johnson ME, Fisher DG, et al. Reliability of drug users' self-reported HIV risk behaviors and validity of self-reported recent drug use. Assessment. 1994;1:383–392.
31. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, et al. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med. 1997;16:965–980.
32. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodol. 1982;13:290–312.
33. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instr Comput. 2004;36:717–731.
34. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 [computer Program]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; 2015.
35. Malta M, Magnanini MMF, Strathdee SA, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected drug users: a meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2010;14:731–747.
36. Bezabhe WM, Chalmers L, Bereznicki LR, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy and virologic failure: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95:e3361.
37. Bruce RD, Altice FL. Clinical care of the HIV-infected drug user. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2007;21:149–179, ix.
38. Uhlmann S, Milloy MJ, Kerr T, et al. Methadone maintenance therapy promotes initiation of antiretroviral therapy among injection drug users. Addiction. 2010;105:907–913.
39. Palepu A, Milloy MJ, Kerr T, et al. Homelessness and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among a cohort of HIV-infected injection drug users. J Urban Health. 2011;88:545–555.
40. Cioe PA, Gamarel KE, Pantalone DW, et al. Cigarette smoking and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence in a sample of heavy drinking HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Behav. 2017;21:1956–1963.
41. Shrestha R, Altice FL, Sibilio B, et al. HIV sero-status non-disclosure among HIV-infected opioid-dependent individuals: the roles of HIV-related stigma, risk behavior, and social support. J Community Health. 2018:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0560-7.
42. Socías ME, Wood E, Small W, et al. Methadone maintenance therapy and viral suppression among HIV-infected opioid users: the impacts of crack and injection cocaine use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;168:211–218.
43. Horvath KJ, Smolenski D, Amico KR. An empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model of ART adherence in a sample of HIV-positive persons primarily in out-of-HIV-care settings. AIDS Care. 2014;26:142–151.
44. Amico KR, Barta W, Konkle-Parker DJ, et al. The information–motivation–behavioral skills model of ART adherence in a deep south HIV+ clinic sample. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:66–75.
45. Logie CH, Lacombe-Duncan A, Wang Y, et al. Pathways from HIV-related stigma to antiretroviral therapy measures in the HIV care cascade for women living with HIV in Canada. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;77:144–153.
46. Katz IT, Ryu AE, Onuegbu AG, et al. Impact of HIV-related stigma on treatment adherence: systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16(3 suppl 2):18640.
47. Turan B, Hatcher AM, Weiser SD, et al. Framing mechanisms linking HIV-related stigma, adherence to treatment, and health outcomes. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:863–869.
48. Prevention Access Campaign. Risk of sexual transmission of HIV from a person living with HIV who has undetectable viral load. 2018. Available at: https://www.preventionaccess.org/consensus
. Accessed March 24, 2018.
49. The Lancet HIV. U = U taking off in 2017. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e475.
50. Günthard HF, Saag MS, Benson CA, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2016 recommendations of the international antiviral society–usa panel. JAMA. 2016;316:191–210.
51. Volberding PA. HIV treatment and prevention: an overview of recommendations from the 2016 IAS–USA antiretroviral guidelines panel. Top Antivir Med. 2017;25:17–24.