In the combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) era, small elevations in cutaneous melanoma risk have been observed in people with HIV (PWH) compared with people without HIV.1,2 But, findings have been inconsistent across studies, with some large studies finding no elevation.3,4 Compared with uninfected individuals, PWH have melanomas diagnosed at later stages and have worse survival after melanoma diagnosis.5–7 Although melanoma risk is increasing in the U.S. general population,8 age-adjusted incidence rates have not shown an increasing trend in the HIV population.4 However, the absolute melanoma burden may still increase over time due to aging of the HIV population.
Established risk factors for melanoma include age, fair skin pigmentation, and ultraviolet radiation.9 Unlike most cancers with elevated risk in PWH, melanoma does not have a known infectious etiology. Melanoma risk is increased among immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients10,11 and melanoma is particularly responsive to immunotherapy,12 suggesting a potential role for immune dysfunction in its development. Among PWH, little is known about the relationship of immunosuppression (as measured by CD4 T-lymphocyte count), plasma HIV RNA viral load, and ART with melanoma risk. We used data from a large, North American cohort collaboration to examine the associations of these HIV-specific characteristics with melanoma incidence.
Our study population consisted of adults with HIV from 17 interval and clinical cohorts from the United States and Canada contributing to the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD) with available data on cancer diagnoses and follow-up during 1996–2009. Participating NA-ACCORD cohorts report demographic and clinical data, including laboratory test results and ART.13 A standardized protocol was used to ascertain cancer diagnosis information through review of medical records and pathology reports and through linkage to cancer registries.14 Each participating cohort obtained institutional review board approval.
Analyses were restricted to individuals of non-Hispanic/Latino white race because only 8 melanoma diagnoses occurred in individuals of other races or ethnicities. At-risk time for melanoma began at the last of: January 1, 1996 (the first year of the ART era), start of cohort-specific cancer diagnosis ascertainment, 360 days before first CD4 count, or 360 days before first HIV RNA measurement. At-risk time ended at the first of: melanoma diagnosis, death, end of cohort-specific cancer diagnosis ascertainment, 360 days after last CD4 count, or 360 days after last HIV RNA measurement. We excluded individuals with <2 CD4 count or <2 HIV RNA measurements to limit to individuals who were likely more engaged in care and for whom we could capture changes in CD4 and HIV RNA.
CD4 count, HIV RNA, and ART use were considered as time-varying characteristics. Values were updated every 30 days using linear interpolation. Furthermore, values for the first CD4 count and HIV RNA measurements were carried backward 360 days, whereas the last measurements were carried forward 360 days, as described previously.15 ART use was categorized as ever vs. never, with any time after the initiation of ART considered as ART-exposed. Any use of antiretrovirals, including mono-, dual-, and triple-therapy, was considered ART use because initial analyses demonstrated similar melanoma incidence rates across different ART use categories.
Melanoma incidence was calculated overall and compared with expected incidence using a standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Expected incidence was based on general population rates for non-Hispanic/Latino whites in strata of age, sex, and calendar period based on data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program cancer registries.16,17 Incidence was also calculated within subgroups stratified by: time-updated CD4 count category, time-updated HIV RNA suppression status (suppression defined as ≤500 copies per milliliter), time-updated ART status, as well as by sex, transmission risk, time-updated age and calendar period, and average annual ultraviolet B (UVB) exposure based on zip code of residence. Average annual residential UVB exposure was calculated by linking residential zip codes to daily estimates of cloud-adjusted noon-time UVB radiation from a national database,18 a method that has effectively been used to capture sun exposure in previous studies.19,20 Cox regression was used to estimate the associations of these characteristics with melanoma incidence in the HIV population using study follow-up time as the time scale. Associations of time-updated CD4 count, time-updated HIV RNA level, and time-updated ART status with incident melanoma were also estimated after adjusting for sex, time-updated age and calendar year, average annual residential UVB, and cohort.
Lags of 180 days, 360 days, and 720 days (approximately 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively) were considered, in which CD4 count, HIV RNA, and ART use were defined based on the values of these measurements at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years before at-risk time for melanoma diagnosis. These measures allowed for evaluation of the influence of these HIV-related factors at earlier time points in the melanoma development process, and provided estimates that are less susceptible to bias from reverse causation.
As values of CD4 count, HIV RNA, or ART use at a single point in time may have limited influence on melanoma risk, we also estimated associations with moving averages of CD4 count and HIV RNA level, and proportions of ART-exposed time, during time-updated 720-day intervals before at-risk time for melanoma diagnosis. Moving averages are calculated by averaging the values assigned every 30 days within each 720-day interval. Associations with averages/proportions were also examined with a 180-day lag (associations with averages/proportions during the previous 180–900 days).
The 17 NA-ACCORD cohorts included in this analysis contributed data from 92,620 PWH during 1996–2009. Of these, 15,571 were excluded because they did not have follow-up time as defined above or because they had <2 CD4 count or <2 HIV RNA measurements. Of the remaining population, 43,115 people of non-white race or Hispanic/Latino ethnicity were excluded. The final study population consisted of 33,934 non-Hispanic/Latino individuals of white race.
Of these 33,934 individuals, 92% were male. When follow-up started, 46% had never been exposed to ART, but of these, 77% initiated ART during follow-up. At the start of follow-up, the median age was 42 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 35–49] and the median calendar year was 2000 (IQR = 1997–2004). The median average annual UVB exposure was 36 mW/m2 (IQR = 27–47), measures equivalent to exposure in Indianapolis, IN (≈27 mW/m2), San Francisco, CA (≈36 mW/m2), and Las Vegas, NV (≈47 mW/m2).
Eighty incident melanoma cases were identified (incidence rate 40.75 per 100,000 person-years). This incidence rate was not elevated when compared with the non-Hispanic/Latino white general population incidence reported by SEER (expected melanoma count = 69.6, SIR = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91 to 1.43). Within the HIV population, melanoma incidence was significantly higher among older people [hazard ratio (HR) per decade increase = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.82; Table 1] and people living in areas with an average annual UVB ≥35 mW/m2 (HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.08 to 2.86). In multivariable analyses (Table 1), older age remained significantly associated with melanoma incidence (HR per decade increase = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.89), whereas a borderline-significant increase in incidence was observed with higher average annual UVB (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 0.99 to 2.65). Among the 59% of PWH with transmission risk information, men who have sex with men had the highest melanoma incidence (40.5 per 100,000 person-years), but the elevation compared with other known transmission risk groups was not statistically significant (adjusted HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.47 to 3.35).
Associations of current CD4 count and HIV RNA level, and previous ART exposure, with melanoma incidence were not statistically significant (Table 1). When CD4 count and HIV RNA measures were considered with a lag or as moving averages, associations remained null (Table 2). In the lag analysis, persons with ART exposure at least 720 days before at-risk time had significantly higher melanoma incidence than those without exposure before that time point (HR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.02 to 5.05), although this association did not remain significant in a multivariable analysis. Likewise, we found that persons with a higher proportion of ART-exposed time during the 720 days immediately before at-risk time (0–720 days before) or during the 720 days with a 6-month lag before at-risk time (180–900 days before) had significantly higher melanoma incidence. In multivariable analyses, both associations remained statistically significant (0–720 days before: HR per 10% increase in proportion of ART use = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.30; 180–900 days before: HR per 10% increase in proportion of ART use = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.28).
Our study found no clear evidence that melanoma incidence was elevated in PWH or related to HIV-specific factors, such as CD4 count and HIV RNA level, despite higher incidence of melanoma diagnoses among persons with more ART exposure. Important melanoma risk factors in the general population, such as age and UV exposure, were confirmed in our HIV population. That our general population melanoma risk estimates were not stratified by UVB exposure could lead to an inaccurate SIR. However, our SIR estimate of 1.15 is within the bounds of the summary SIR adjusted for ethnicity from the most recent meta-analysis of melanoma risk associated with HIV in the ART era (SIR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.12 to 2.01).1 Melanoma risk is more strongly elevated in other immunosuppressed populations, such as solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients.10,11 In those settings, melanoma development may be influenced by population-specific factors, such as UV-sensitizing properties of immunosuppressant medications.11,21–23
For many HIV-associated cancers, clear relationships have been identified with HIV-specific characteristics, most frequently inverse associations between CD4 count and risk.24 However, most HIV-associated cancers have well-defined viral etiologies25 and HIV-associated elevations in risk far higher than that observed for melanoma,3,4 indicating a stronger role for HIV-specific factors. In our study, estimated associations of virologic and immunologic status with melanoma risk were not statistically significant and near the null value, even after accounting for possible confounders such as age. This lack of observed associations was consistent across different measurement approaches, including lagged and cumulative exposures. These findings are in line with one previous study that did not identify clear associations between melanoma risk and immunologic or virologic status.2 One caveat is that HIV infection can influence biologic processes that may not be well captured by CD4 count and HIV RNA level, including increased immune activation and inflammation.26 Associations might also change as the HIV population ages further and immune deficiencies are compounded by immunosenescence.
There were suggestive associations of increased risk with ART exposure. Because effective ART can be a powerful determinant of CD4 count and HIV RNA, this finding seems at odds with the lack of associations with virologic and immunologic status. However, ART use is also an important indicator of engagement in clinical care, and as a result, could likely serve as the strongest indicator of enhanced clinical surveillance for skin cancer (frequent skin examinations and treatment of precancerous lesions). Awareness that cutaneous cancers, especially Kaposi sarcoma, are more common among HIV patients than other persons14,27 may have sensitized clinicians to be more vigilant for skin disease during clinical encounters. In this study, we did not have information on clinical visit frequency or other factors that might help evaluate the influence of increased opportunities for melanoma diagnosis.
NA-ACCORD is one of the largest and most representative cohorts of PWH in the United States and Canada.13 Cancer diagnoses were ascertained through standardized protocols, enhancing the reliability and consistency of the data. Despite these strengths, because melanoma is uncommon, there was limited statistical power to conduct analyses within some subgroups, such as non-white individuals, who we excluded from the analysis. Also, although we accounted for residential geography, we lacked information on other important determinants of individual UVB exposure, such as time spent outdoors or tanning bed usage. For strong risk factors such as UVB and skin phenotype, a small amount of residual confounding might mask weak effects of HIV-specific risk factors.
In conclusion, we did not identify a significant elevation in melanoma risk in the HIV population compared with the general population, and HIV-specific risk factors, such as CD4 count and HIV RNA level, were not associated with melanoma risk. We found that melanoma is more frequently diagnosed among ART-treated people, possibly resulting from increased surveillance for skin conditions among people engaged in clinical care. Beyond this finding, melanoma risk factors among PWH seem to be the same as those identified in the general population. As such, PWH can be advised to follow prevention practices focused on reducing UVB exposure, as recommended for the general population.
The authors thank all individuals involved with the NA-ACCORD collaboration, including staff, investigators, and patients, for their invaluable contributions to this work.
APPENDIX 1. NA-ACCORD Collaborating Cohorts and Representatives
AIDS Clinical Trials Group Longitudinal Linked Randomized Trials: Constance A. Benson and Ronald J. Bosch; AIDS Link to the IntraVenous Experience: Gregory D. Kirk; Fenway Health HIV Cohort: Stephen Boswell, Kenneth H. Mayer and Chris Grasso; HAART Observational Medical Evaluation and Research: Robert S. Hogg, P. Richard Harrigan, Julio SG Montaner, Benita Yip, Julia Zhu, Kate Salters and Karyn Gabler; HIV Outpatient Study: Kate Buchacz and J.T.B.; HIV Research Network: Kelly A. Gebo and R.D.M.; Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort: R.D.M.; John T. Carey Special Immunology Unit Patient Care and Research Database, Case Western Reserve University: Benigno Rodriguez; Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States: M.A.H.; Kaiser Permanente Northern California: M.J.S.; Longitudinal Study of Ocular Complications of AIDS: Jennifer E. Thorne; Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study–II: Charles Rabkin; Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: Joseph B. Margolick, Lisa P. Jacobson and Gypsyamber D'Souza; Montreal Chest Institute Immunodeficiency Service Cohort: Marina B. Klein; Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study: Abigail Kroch, Ann Burchell, Beth Rachlis, Anita Rachlis, Patrick Cupido and Joanne Lindsay; Retrovirus Research Center, Bayamon Puerto Rico: Robert F. Hunter-Mellado and A.M.M.; Southern Alberta Clinic Cohort: M.J.G.; Study of the Consequences of the Protease Inhibitor Era: Steven G. Deeks and Jeffrey N. Martin; Study to Understand the Natural History of HIV/AIDS in the Era of Effective Therapy: Pragna Patel and J.T.B.; University of Alabama at Birmingham 1917 Clinic Cohort: Michael S. Saag, Michael J. Mugavero and James Willig; University of California at San Diego: William C. Mathews; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill HIV Clinic Cohort: Joseph J. Eron and Sonia Napravnik; University of Washington HIV Cohort: Mari M. Kitahata, Heidi M. Crane and Daniel R. Drozd; Vanderbilt Comprehensive Care Clinic HIV Cohort: Timothy R. Sterling, David Haas, Peter Rebeiro, Megan Turner, Sally Bebawy and Ben Rogers; Veterans Aging Cohort Study: A.C.J., R.D., and David Fiellin; Women's Interagency HIV Study: Stephen J. Gange and Kathryn Anastos.
NA-ACCORD Study Administration
Executive Committee: R.D.M., Michael S. Saag, Stephen J. Gange, Mari M. Kitahata, K.N.A., M.A.H., Marina B. Klein, Rosemary G. McKaig and Aimee M. Freeman; Administrative Core: R.D.M., Aimee M. Freeman and Carol Lent; Data Management Core: Mari M. Kitahata, Stephen E. Van Rompaey, Heidi M. Crane, Daniel R. Drozd, Liz Morton, Justin McReynolds and William B. Lober; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Core: Stephen J. Gange, K.N.A., Jennifer S. Lee, Bin You, Brenna Hogan, Jinbing Zhang, Jerry Jing, Bin Liu, Fidel Desir, Mark Riffon, Elizabeth Humes, and Sally Coburn.
1. Olsen CM, Knight LL, Green AC. Risk of melanoma
in people with HIV
/AIDS in the pre- and post-HAART eras: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95096.
2. Silverberg MJ, Chao C, Leyden WA, et al. HIV
infection, immunodeficiency, viral replication, and the risk of cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:2551–2559.
3. Hernandez-Ramirez RU, Shiels MS, Dubrow R, et al. Cancer
risk in HIV
-infected people in the USA from 1996 to 2012: a population-based, registry-linkage study. Lancet HIV
4. Park LS, Tate JP, Sigel K, et al. Time trends in cancer
incidence in persons living with HIV
/AIDS in the antiretroviral therapy
era: 1997–2012. AIDS. 2016;30:1795–1806.
5. Rodrigues LKE, Klencke BJ, Vin-Christian K, et al. Altered clinical course of malignant melanoma
-positive patients. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:765–770.
6. Shiels MS, Copeland G, Goodman MT, et al. Cancer
stage at diagnosis in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus and transplant recipients. Cancer
7. Coghill AE, Shiels MS, Suneja G, et al. Elevated cancer
-specific mortality among HIV
-infected patients in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2376–2383.
8. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer
Statistics Review, 1975–2012. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer
9. Tucker MA, Goldstein AM. Melanoma
etiology: where are we? Oncogene. 2003;22:3042–3052.
10. Grulich AE, van Leeuwen MT, Falster MO, et al. Incidence of cancers in people with HIV
/AIDS compared with immunosuppressed transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;370:59–67.
11. Robbins HA, Clarke CA, Arron ST, et al. Melanoma
risk and survival among organ transplant recipients. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:2657–2665.
12. Shah DJ, Dronca RS. Latest advances in chemotherapeutic, targeted, and immune approaches in the treatment of metastatic melanoma
. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:504–519.
13. Gange SJ, Kitahata MM, Saag MS, et al. Cohort profile: the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD). Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:294–301.
14. Silverberg MJ, Lau B, Achenbach CJ, et al. Cumulative incidence of cancer
among persons with HIV
in North America: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:507–518.
15. Dubrow R, Qin L, Lin H, et al. Association of CD4+ T-cell count, HIV
-1 RNA viral load, and antiretroviral therapy
with Kaposi sarcoma risk among HIV
-infected persons in the United States and Canada. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75:382–390.
16. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Incidence—SEER 9 Regs Research Data, Nov 2016 Sub (1973–2014) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment>—Linked to County Attributes—Total U.S., 1969–2015 Counties. Rockville, MD www.seer.cancer
.gov: National Cancer
Institute, Division of Cancer
Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch; 2017.
17. Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer
Control and Prevention. SEER*Stat Software. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. 2017. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/
. Accessed June 1, 2017.
18. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer Data Product: Erythemal UV Exposure. Greenbelt, MD: Goddard Space Flight Center; 2004.
19. Freedman DM, Cahoon EK, Rajaraman P, et al. Sunlight and other determinants of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in black and white participants in a nationwide U.S. study. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177:180–192.
20. Cahoon EK, Engels EA, Freedman DM, et al. Ultraviolet radiation and Kaposi sarcoma incidence in a nationwide US cohort of HIV
-infected men. J Natl Cancer
21. Herman M, Weinstein T, Korzets A, et al. Effect of cyclosporin A on DNA repair and cancer
incidence in kidney transplant recipients. J Lab Clin Med. 2001;137:14–20.
22. Hofbauer GF, Attard NR, Harwood CA, et al. Reversal of UVA skin photosensitivity and DNA damage in kidney transplant recipients by replacing azathioprine. Am J Transpl. 2012;12:218–225.
23. Strong Rodrigues K, Oliveira-Ribeiro C, de Abreu Fiuza Gomes S, et al. Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:33–50.
24. Clifford GM, Franceschi S. Cancer
risk in HIV
-infected persons: influence of CD4(+) count. Future Oncol. 2009;5:669–678.
25. Schulz TF. Cancer
and viral infections in immunocompromised individuals. Int J Cancer
26. Lane HC. Pathogenesis of HIV
infection: total CD4+ T-Cell pool, immune activation, and inflammation. Top HIV
27. Silverberg MJ, Leyden W, Warton EM, et al. HIV
infection status, immunodeficiency, and the incidence of non-melanoma
. J Natl Cancer