Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Letters to the Editor

Increasing HIV Treatment Optimism but No Changes in HIV Risk Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Vancouver, Canada

Moore, David M. MDCM, MHSc*,†; Cui, Zishan MSc*; Lachowsky, Nathan J. PhD*,‡; Rich, Ashleigh J. MPH*; Roth, Eric A. PhD; Raymond, Henry F. PhD§; Sereda, Paul MSc*; Montaner, Julio MD*,†; Wong, Jason MD, MPH; Armstrong, Heather L. PhD*,†; Hall, David MD; Hogg, Robert S. PhD*,#; the Momentum Study Team

Author Information
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: December 1, 2017 - Volume 76 - Issue 4 - p e98-e101
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001542
  • Free

To the Editors:


Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has dramatically reduced mortality among HIV-positive individuals and has been associated with declining HIV incidence.1–3 Numerous guidelines now recommend ART for all HIV-positive individuals, irrespective of CD4 counts.4–6 These approaches are supported by randomized trials demonstrating the benefits of early ART on improved clinical outcomes for HIV-positive individuals,7 as well as reductions in onward transmission.8

However, concerns remain that changes in HIV risk behavior could undermine “treatment as prevention” (TasP) effectiveness. Previous research studies have found associations between HIV sexual risk behavior and positive attitudes toward ART's preventive value,9 particularly among men who have sex with men (MSM).10,11 Most of this research pre-dates any formal adoption of TasP as policy, but relied on knowledge acquired from peers or health care providers.

Several jurisdictions have recently adopted and are actively promoting TasP.12–14 In British Columbia (BC), Canada, TasP was introduced in 2010 through a pilot project in Vancouver and expanded province wide in 2012.15 Thus, MSM in Vancouver have been exposed to TasP messages for several years through clinicians, the media, and likely discussions with peers and community leaders.16 A previous cross-sectional analysis from our group demonstrated that indeed, higher HIV treatment optimism was associated with risky sex and that HIV-positive MSM had much higher HIV treatment optimism scores than those of HIV-negative/unknown MSM.17 To explore temporal changes in these relationships, we used data from the prospective cohort of the same study of Vancouver-based MSM to examine trends in attitudes regarding the benefits of ART and risky sex over a 3-year period, whereas TasP policy was actively implemented across BC.


We enrolled sexually active MSM aged ≥16 years in a longitudinal study from February 2012 to February 2015, using respondent-driven sampling as a recruitment strategy.18 Enrollment of HIV-negative participants concluded in February 2014, but we continued to enroll HIV-positive participants for an additional year. Seed participants were recruited through community contacts, mobile phone applications, and websites catering to Vancouver-based MSM.19

After providing informed consent, participants completed a self-administered computer-based survey and nurse-administered clinical questionnaire. We collected sexual risk and drug using behaviors using a 6-month recall timeframe. The survey included the HIV treatment Optimism-Skepticism Scale (HOSS), a 12-item validated instrument for measuring attitudes toward HIV and ART.20 Higher HOSS scores indicate increased agreement with benefits of ART. Participants completed follow-up visits every 6 months using a modified version of the enrollment questionnaire. This analysis included data collected until August 31, 2015. The study received approval from the University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, and the University of Victoria.

We performed descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses of data collected at enrollment, using Wilcoxon rank-sum and χ2 tests. We examined trends in HOSS scores, the proportions of participants reporting risky sex [defined as condomless anal sex (CAS) with a serodiscordant/unknown serostatus partner in the previous 6 months], and the proportions agreeing or strongly agreeing with a statement in the HOSS known as the TasP statement (“a person with an undetectable viral load cannot pass on the virus”) in each 6-month period using univariable generalized mixed-effect modeling. In these analyses, calendar time was used as a covariate. We used mixed-effects modeling to examine associations with risky sex and time, with separate models using the full HOSS scores or only TasP statement responses forced into separate models. Final models were determined using backward selection method, where variables with the highest type-III P value at each step were excluded until Akaike Information Criterion was minimized. All variables included in final models were checked for collinearity and interactions. All analyses were stratified based on self-reported HIV status and conducted using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Corporation Cary, NC).


We enrolled 774 participants in the cross-sectional survey; 556 (71.8%) self-reported as HIV negative/unknown and 218 (28.2%) as HIV positive. Of these, 181 (83.0%) were receiving ART at enrollment and 167 (92.3% of those on ART) had a VL <200 copies/mL. None of the HIV-negative participants were receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) at enrollment, and only 8 reported using it by the end of follow-up. The median age was 34 years; 585 (75.6%) were identified as white, 74 (9.6%) Asian, 50 (6.5%) Aboriginal, 35 (4.5%) Latino, and 30 (3.9%) other. A total of 655 (85.6%) were identified as gay, 73 (9.4%) as bisexual, and 46 (5.9%) as other sexual orientations.

Compared with HIV-negative/unknown participants, HIV-positive participants were more likely to be >40 years (74.5% vs. 21.6%; P < 0.001) and white (78.4% vs. 74.5%; P = 0.019) and report an income of ≥$30,000 CAD (28.0% vs. 41.0%; P = 0.001). HIV-positive participants reported more anal sex partners in the previous 6 months (median 4 vs. 3; P < 0.001), were less likely to report always using condoms during anal sex (33.5% vs. 64.0%; P < 0.001), and were more likely to report any risky sex (46.5% vs. 35.4%; P = 0.005). HIV-positive men had higher HOSS scores (median 28 vs. 24; P < 0.001) and were more likely to have heard of TasP (73.3% vs. 43.1%, P < 0.001) and to agree with the TasP statement (45.4% vs. 22.8%; P < 0.001).

A total of 698 participants (90.2%) agreed to participate in the cohort study and 575 (82.4%) completed at least 1 follow-up visit. The median follow-up time was 1.98 years. Among HIV-positive participants, median HOSS scores increased over time (Fig. 1A), from 28 (Q1–Q3: 26–32) in July–December 2012 to 31 (Q1–Q3: 27–35) in January–June 2015 (test of trend P < 0.001). From periods 1–6, the proportions of HIV-positive participants agreeing with the TasP statement and reporting risky sex increased nonsignificantly from 46% to 55% (P = 0.111) and from 29% to 41% (P = 0.656), respectively. Among HIV-negative/unknown participants, HOSS scores also increased (Fig. 1B), from 24 (Q1–Q3: 20–26) to 26 (Q1–Q3: 24–29) in periods 1–6 (P < 0.001), as did TasP statement agreement (20%–36%, periods 1–6; P < 0.001). However, proportions of HIV-negative men reporting risky sex were unchanged (30% in period 1 and 27% in period 6; P = 0.104).

Trends in risky sex, HOSS scores and agreement with the TasP statement [“a person with an undetectable viral load (VL) cannot pass on the virus”], among study participants 2012–2015. A, Self-reported HIV-positive participants; (B) self-reported HIV-negative or unknown serostatus participants.

In multivariate mixed-effects models, adjusted for age, income, partner number, sexual sensation seeking scores, substance use, and other HIV prevention behaviors, HOSS scores were associated with risky sex for HIV-positive (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.12) and for HIV-negative/unknown MSM (aOR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.06). The TasP statement agreement was not associated with risky sex for either HIV-positive (aOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.81) or HIV-negative participants (aOR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.32) in adjusted models.


We observed increasing awareness regarding the preventive value of ART among HIV-negative MSM and increases in HOSS scores among both HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM prospectively followed from July 2012 to June 2015 in Vancouver. These attitude changes occurred over a period when TasP was actively promoted by the BC Ministry of Health. However, we did not observe proportional changes in MSM reporting risky sex over the same period for either HIV-negative or HIV-positive men, suggesting that TasP promotion in BC is not undermining other HIV prevention measures, such as condom promotion.

The TasP agreement was low (20%) among HIV-negative/unknown participants in 2012, but reached 43% by the second half of 2015, suggesting that diffusion of this knowledge among HIV-negative MSM is approaching that of HIV-positive MSM (54% in last period). This level of TasP agreement among HIV-positive MSM is similar to that recently reported in Australia (46.2%), using a slightly different TasP knowledge assessment,21 but much higher than was reported for HIV-negative MSM (10.0%).

This study has a number of limitations. First, CAS with a serodiscordant/unknown serostatus partner may not be an accurate measure of risk behavior, given the increasing availability of PrEP for MSM in industrialized countries and that virologically suppressed HIV-positive individuals are very unlikely to transmit HIV.22 However, we have found that CAS with a known HIV-positive partner is associated with a greater incident HIV risk.23 Furthermore, there was no PrEP use reported at enrollment,24 and only 8 participants reported any use during follow-up,25 suggesting validity of this measure of risky sex in our setting. Second, our primary outcome measure of risky sex over a 6-month period did not include a frequency component. Last, individuals retained in the cohort may differ from those lost to follow-up, potentially affecting trends we did or did not observe.

In conclusion, we found proportional increases of HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM in Vancouver reporting agreement with the preventive benefit of ART over time, during a timeframe when TasP policy was actively implemented. We found no proportional changes of MSM reporting sexual acts putting them at risk of transmitting or acquiring HIV during the same period. This study offers some reassurance that risk compensation may not inevitably occur as TasP is promoted.


The authors thank our study participants, office staff, community advisory board, community partners (Health Initiative for Men, YouthCO HIV & Hep C Society, and Positive Living Society of BC) and Erin Ready for her assistance in revising the manuscript. The authors also thank bioLytical Laboratories for providing HIV test kits.


1. Montaner JS, Lima VD, Harrigan PR, et al. Expansion of HAART coverage is associated with sustained decreases in HIV/AIDS morbidity, mortality and HIV transmission: the “HIV Treatment as Prevention” experience in a Canadian setting. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87872.
2. Fang CT, Hsu HM, Twu SJ, et al. Decreased HIV transmission after a policy of providing free access to highly active antiretroviral therapy in Taiwan. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:879–885.
3. Das M, Chu PL, Santos GM, et al. Decreases in community viral load are accompanied by reductions in new HIV infections in San Francisco. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11068.
4. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2016.
5. Gunthard HF, Aberg JA, Eron JJ, et al. Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2014 recommendations of the international antiviral Society-USA panel. JAMA. 2014;312:410–425.
6. British HIV Association. British HIV Association Guidelines for the Treatment of HIV-1-Positive Adults With Antiretroviral Therapy 2015. London, United Kingdom: British HIV Association; 2015.
7. Lundgren JD, Babiker AG, Gordin F, et al. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:795–807.
8. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:493–505.
9. Crepaz N, Hart T, Marks G. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and sexual risk behavior: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2004;292:224–236.
10. Katz MH, Schwarcz SK, Kellogg TA, et al. Impact of highly active antiretroviral treatment on HIV seroincidence among men who have sex with men: San Francisco. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:388–394.
11. Schwarcz S, Scheer S, McFarland W, et al. Prevalence of HIV infection and predictors of high-transmission sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:1067–1075.
12. San Francisco Department of Public Health. San Francisco HIV Prevention Plan. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Department of Public Health; 2010.
13. Department of Health, District of Columbia. DC Jurisdictional HIV Prevention Plan for 2012–2015: Situational Analysis. Washington, DC: Department of Health, District of Columbia,; 2012.
14. Department of Health, Government of New South Wales. New South Wales HIV Strategy 2016–2020. North Sydney, Australia: Department of Health, Government of New South Wales; 2015.
15. British Columbia Ministry of Health. From Hope to Health: Towards and AIDS-Free Generation. Victoria, BC, Canada: British Columbia Ministry of Health; 2012.
16. Carter A, Lachowsky N, Rich A, et al. Gay and bisexual men's awareness and knowledge of treatment as prevention: findings from the Momentum Health Study in Vancouver, Canada. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18:20039.
17. Forrest JI, Cui Z, Sereda P, et al. Factors associated with HAART optmism among men who have sex with men in the era of expanded access to antretroviral therapy in Vancouver, Canada. In: 22nd Canadian Conference on HIV/AIDS Research. St, John's, Canada: Pulsus Group Inc; 2014.
18. Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 2002;49:11–34.
19. Moore DM, Cui Z, Lachowsky N, et al. HIV community viral load and factors associated with elevated viremia among a community-based sample of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Vancouver, Canada. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr.2016;72:87–95.
20. Van de Ven P, Crawford J, Kippax S, et al. A scale of optimism-scepticism in the context of HIV treatments. AIDS Care. 2000;12:171–176.
21. Holt M, Lea T, Schmidt HM, et al. Increasing belief in the effectiveness of HIV treatment as prevention: results of repeated, national surveys of Australian gay and bisexual men, 2013–15. AIDS Behav. 2016;20:1564–1571.
22. Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, et al. Sexual activity without condoms and risk of HIV transmission in serodifferent couples when the HIV-positive partner is using suppressive antiretroviral therapy. JAMA. 2016;316:171–181.
23. Lachowsky N, Cui Z, Sereda P, et al. HIV Incidence Rate and Predictors Among Gay and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Vancouver: Additional Benefit of an Administrative Health Data Linkage. In: 25th Annual Canadian Conference on HIV/AIDS Research, Winnepeg, Canada: Canadian Association for HIV Research; 2016.
24. Lachowsky NJ, Lin SY, Hull MW, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness among gay and other men who have sex with men in vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. AIDS Behav. 2016;20:1408–1422.
25. Khaketla M, Lachowsky N, Armstrong HL, et al. 4-year Trend in Awareness and Use of HIV PrEP Among GbMSM in Vancouver, Canada. In: Conference on Retroviruses and Opporunistic Infections. Seattle, USA: International Antivrial Society; 2017.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.