The global prevalence of HIV-1 associated dementia has declined with suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART), yet milder forms of HIV-1 associated neurocognitive disorders persist in 25%–50% in people with chronic HIV-1 infection.1 Factors influencing cognitive outcomes in HIV-1 infected adults on ART include persistent immune activation, genetic predisposition, and irreversible central nervous system (CNS) injury before initiation of ART.1,2 HIV-1 infects the brain early after acute infection, and effective ART reduces plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV-1 RNA levels to below detection limits. Although CSF viral suppression is maintained in most HIV-infected individuals taking ART, higher HIV-1 RNA levels in CSF than plasma are observed in some ART-experienced individuals, a discordance referred to as CSF viral escape.3,4
The prevalence of CSF viral escape is estimated at 4%–21% among ART-experienced HIV+ adults.5–9 Predictors of CSF escape remain poorly defined; potential risk factors include poor CNS penetration by some ART regimens,7 persistent low-level viremia (LLV),8,9 length of time on ART,5,6 drug-resistance mutations (DRMs) in CSF,6,8,10,11 and low CD4 nadir.3,6,8 The relationship between CSF escape and neurological symptoms is unclear among individuals on suppressive ART regimens because CSF HIV-1 RNA levels do not correlate consistently with neurological symptoms.5,8,12 A designation of asymptomatic CSF viral escape has been proposed to classify individuals with CSF HIV-1 RNA up to 200 copies per milliliter, and absence of new or progressive neurological impairment.4,5,13 In contrast, several case series 3,6–8 and case reports 14–29 describe individuals presenting with new neurological symptoms, discordant elevation in CSF HIV-1 RNA, and substantial improvement after switching ART regimens; many cases have unique DRMs in the CSF. However, the mechanisms leading to CSF viral escape are not well defined.
Given variable prevalence and few published cohorts of CSF viral escape, the aim of this study was to analyze temporal patterns and relationships between CSF viral escape and antecedent plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in a cohort of ART-experienced HIV-1-infected individuals. We also evaluated drug resistance mutations in the viral reverse transcriptase (RT), protease, and integrase genes in plasma and CSF from CSF escape cases from the study cohort and 19 published studies.
This is a retrospective case-series of 41 cases from 2 sources: (1) neurology and infectious disease clinics from 5 Boston hospitals [Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston Medical Center and Tufts Medical Center (Tufts MC)]; and (2) NNTC (sites at University of Texas-Galveston, University of California-San Diego, University of California-Los Angeles, and Mount Sinai Medical Center-New York). The NNTC protocol includes neuromedical and cognitive examinations, assessments of comorbidities, and laboratory values for medical, immunologic, and virologic parameters.30 NNTC evaluations yield neuropsychological diagnosis of asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment , mild neurocognitive disorder , HIV-associated dementia (HAD), and neuropsychological impairment due to other factors based on Frascati guidelines.31 The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards at MGH, BWH, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Tufts MC. The institutional review board at each of the 4 NNTC clinical sites approved the research, and subjects signed a written statement of informed consent.
The study was restricted to the calendar period between January 2005 and May 2016. Cases were eligible for inclusion if they were on stable ART regimens for at least 6 months and met either of the following criteria: (1) CSF HIV-1 RNA >50 copies per milliliter when paired plasma HIV-1 RNA were <50 copies per milliliter; or (2) CSF HIV-1 RNA >0.5 log higher than paired plasma levels. NNTC cases were identified by searching the database for subjects with paired plasma and CSF HIV-1 RNA values (within 7 days) (n = 426) before applying the above criteria for CSF escape (n = 29). Boston cases were identified by directly querying HIV providers. A neurological examination was performed in all cases; neurologically symptomatic conditions were defined as symptoms or diagnoses attributable to the CNS, as described.4
Laboratory Measurements and CNS Penetration Effectiveness Calculation
HIV-1 RNA levels were measured in cell-free CSF and plasma at local sites; because of variability by hospital and calendar year, levels reported as undetectable were imputed to the lower limit of detection for the assay (Supplemental Digital Content, Table 1, http://links.lww.com/QAI/A991). The 2010 CNS penetration effectiveness (CPE) score for drug regimens was calculated for each ART regimen.32
HIV Genotypes in Published Studies
Published studies between January 2005 and June 2016 were included if paired plasma and CSF viral load were available, CSF viral load met study criteria for viral escape, and HIV-1 genotype was reported.
Descriptive statistics [means, medians,SD, interquartile range (IQR), percentages, and frequencies] were performed based on variable distribution. Univariate/bivariate tests were conducted using t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, or Fisher exact tests in R (version 3.3.0).
Among Boston and NNTC patients, 41 HIV-1-infected adults met inclusion criteria for CSF viral escape and were included in these analyses. Twenty-nine CSF escape cases were identified from 426 cases with paired plasma and CSF HIV-1 RNA values from the NNTC, a prevalence of 6.8%. Twelve CSF escape cases were identified from the Boston hospitals from approximately 200 patients screened for CSF HIV-1 RNA levels during the study period, an estimated prevalence of 6.0%.
Clinical characteristics for the NNTC and Boston cases are shown in Table 1. The mean age at presentation for the combined cohort was 50 years (SD: 9); 33 men and 8 women. Forty-six percent were non-Hispanic white, and 32% were black. There were no significant differences in age (P = 0.4), sex (P = 0.2), or race (P = 0.5) between the 2 cohorts. The NNTC cohort had higher percentages reporting cocaine and/or amphetamine use (43% vs. 8%) and alcohol use (24% vs. 17%) than the Boston cohort. The median duration of HIV-1 infection in the combined cohort was 17 years (IQR: 13–22), median CD4 T-lymphocyte count 329 cells/mm3 (IQR: 217–388), and median CD4 nadir 21 cells/mm3 (IQR: 2–60). ART regimens at the time of CSF escape consisted of a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) in 31 of 41 cases (76%); PI/r regimens had either at least 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs; n = 29) or an integrase inhibitor (Supplemental Digital Content, Table 2, http://links.lww.com/QAI/A991).
Neurological abnormalities included worsening depression, cognitive symptoms, and/or evidence of HIV-1 associated neurocognitive disorders (n = 24), seizures (n = 3), sensory hypoasthesia and carotid artery dissection (n = 1), and stroke (n = 1); 2 cases had a concurrent diagnosis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and one had CNS lymphoma (Supplemental Digital Content, Table 2, http://links.lww.com/QAI/A991).
All Boston cases had CSF analysis for neurological symptoms, and on average underwent 2 lumbar punctures. The NNTC collects data for clinical and research purposes; 62% of NNTC cases had neurological symptoms at time of lumbar puncture, and on average, each case underwent 7 lumbar punctures. Median CSF HIV-1 RNA levels among NNTC subjects were 1406 vs. 615 copies per milliliter for Boston cases (P = 0.4).
Repeat episodes of CSF escape were observed in 4 cases (No. 14, 21, 29, 36; Supplemental Digital Content, Table 2, http://links.lww.com/QAI/A991); 1 case remained neurologically asymptomatic (No. 29). In case 14 (HAD), consecutive CSF HIV-1 RNA was 1262, 101, and 171,000 copies per milliliter at CSF escape, 3 and 4.5 years later, respectively, whereas case 29 (asymptomatic) had CSF HIV-1 RNA of 141, <50, 180, and 490 copies per milliliter, at CSF escape, 1, 2, and 4 years later (Fig. 1). In case 21 (HAD), CSF HIV-1 RNA was 149 copies per milliliter at CSF escape and 1312 copies per milliliter 2 years later, and in case 36 (stroke), CSF HIV-1 RNA was 53 and 45 copies per milliliter 3 years later (not shown); neopterin level in this case was elevated at 45 nmol/L (normal: 8–28 nmol/L) at the second instance of CSF escape.
Classification of CSF Viral Escape Based on Preceding Plasma HIV-1 RNA Levels
After analyzing all available antecedent plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and their respective relationship to CSF HIV-1 RNA, 4 patterns were evident within 2 broad categories defined by plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (Supplemental Digital Content, Table 3, http://links.lww.com/QAI/A991): incomplete plasma suppression (n = 24) and durable plasma suppression (n = 17). Among cases with incomplete plasma suppression, those with detectable plasma level ≥1000 copies per milliliter or levels between 51 and 999 copies per milliliter during 6 months before escape were defined as high-level viremia (HLV) or LLV, respectively, a cutoff used to differentiate between persistant LLV and virologic failure as previously described.33–35 Cases with durable plasma suppression (undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA levels for 24 monthsbefore escape) were further subdivided as CSF HIV-1 RNA levels <200 copies per milliliter (CSF blip), or levels ≥200 copies per milliliter (CSF escape). Cases with a single viral blip <1000 HIV RNA copies per milliliter 7–24 monthsbefore escape with subsequent return to undetectable levels were considered durably suppressed.36 Plasma and CSF HIV-1 RNA levels and timing of neurological symptoms from representative cases for each CSF viral escape subtype (HLV, LLV, CSF blip, and CSF escape) are depicted in Figure 1.
Among 24 cases with incomplete plasma suppression, notable findings included 67% of HLV cases reporting cocaine and/or amphetamine abuse at time of presentation, a higher proportion than for LLV or durable plasma suppression cases (Table 2). The median calendar year at time of presentation for HLV was 2007, historically earlier than cases classified as LLV (2012), CSF blip (2013), or CSF escape (2011). There were no differences between HLV and LLV cases for duration of HIV infection (15 vs. 18 years; P = 0.3), plasma HIV-1 RNA copies at CSF escape (400 vs. 258 copies/mL; P = 0.1), or CD4 nadir (34 vs. 14 cells/mm3; P = 0.7); CD4 cell count was lower in the HLV subgroup (P = 0.04). Although 6 of 9 LLV subjects had multiple visits with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels between 51 and 999 copies per milliliterbefore CSF escape, in 5 cases, CSF HIV-1 RNA levels were >1 log10 higher than the preceding 12 months of plasma HIV-1 RNA levels. Paired plasma and CSF HIV-1 genotypes were available for 3 LLV cases (Table 3). Although most mutations in plasma and CSF were similar, 2 of 3 LLV cases had unique mutations in CSF (case 1: D67N, N348I, E399D, K20R; case 2: P225L, T74A). Three of 4 cases with repeat escape (No. 14, 21, 29) were classified as having LLV 6 months before the first instance of escape.
Among 17 cases with durable plasma suppression, subgroups classified as CSF blip vs. CSF escape were similar with respect to age, duration of HIV diagnosis, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, and CD4 cell count (Table 2). CSF HIV-1 RNA levels were lower in CSF blip versus CSF escape subgroups (56 vs. 1000 copies/mL; P = 0.001), whereas CSF WBC (P = 0.2) and CSF total protein levels (P = 0.1) were similar. One case classified as CSF escape had multiple thymidine analogue-associated mutations (TAMs; L210W, T215Y, and M41L) in the presence of the M184I mutation (Table 3) on a regimen of abacavir, lamuvidine, and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, effectively resulting in PI/r monotherapy in the CNS compartment (No. 12; Supplemental Digital Content, Table 2, http://links.lww.com/QAI/A991).
Plasma and CSF HIV-1 Genotypes at the Time of CSF Viral Escape
Given that drug-resistant HIV-1 virus has been frequently associated with CSF viral escape, we analyzed HIV-1 mutations from this cohort and published studies. A total of 172 mutations in the RT gene, 135 mutations in the protease gene and 6 mutations in the integrase gene were identified in CSF from 49 cases (Table 4). Fourteen of 49 cases with CSF escape had paired plasma and CSF HIV-1 genotypes (29%) with D67N/G reported as a unique CSF mutation twice. Most plasma genotypes were not reported because of undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA or levels too low to be amplified. The most common CSF mutations in RT were M184V and M184I (19% of all CSF mutations identified). M184V/I mutations were present in CSF isolates among 17 of 23 cases (74%) with plasma HIV RNA ≤50 copies per milliliter. TAMs were present in 20 of 49 cases (40%), most commonly T215Y, D67N, or M41L (Table 4). The most common PI mutations were V82A/T/F/S/I; V32I mutation was present in 3 cases, and has been associated with high level of resistance in combination with other PI mutations.37,38 Two studies reported sequencing the integrase gene in CSF8,39; N155H, L74I, and Q148R mutations were observed as single mutations in the integrase gene, and Y143C was observed in combination with T66I.
This longitudinal analysis of 41 ART-experienced HIV+ individuals with CSF viral escape is one of the largest case-series investigating an uncommon, but increasingly recognized clinical event among ART-treated HIV+ individuals. The estimated prevalence and clinical characteristics of CSF escape were similar between Boston hospitals (6.0%) and NNTC clinical research cohort (6.8%). Four cases had detectable CSF HIV-1 RNA at multiple time points despite plasma suppression, indicative of repeated CSF escape, a phenotype that is not yet well characterized in the literature.13 Cases in this study cohort were classified into 4 subtypes based on plasma HIV RNA levels in the preceding 24 months: HLV(≥1000 copies/mL), LLV(51–999 copies/mL), and plasma suppression with CSF blip or escape (CSF HIV-1 RNA <200 or ≥200 copies/mL). Temporal analysis of antecedent plasma viral loads revealed that cross-sectional definitions of viral escape based on >0.5 log10 higher levels of CSF HIV-1 RNA will include HLV cases, a subtype with sustained plasma viremia. In HLV cases, discordant CSF viral levels could reflect delayed CSF viral clearance or continuous CSF seeding from plasma,40 and therefore, may not necessarily represent compartmentalized virus. In contrast, definitions requiring plasma suppression will miss LLV cases, a subtype previously shown to harbor DRMs in CSF,8 and here shown to have repeat episodes of viral escape. M184V/I were the most frequently observed mutations in all cases present in 74% of CSF isolates from individuals with plasma levels ≤50 copies per milliliter, and frequently occurring in the presence of other DRMs.
By classifying CSF viral escape based on plasma HIV-1 RNA in the 24 months before CSF discordance, we identified differences in clinical characteristics associated with CSF escape subtypes. HLV cases were more likely to use cocaine, amphetamines, and alcohol, behaviors that are frequently linked to suboptimal ART adherence and reduced health care engagement.41 HLV cases also made up a greater proportion of viral escape casesbefore 2010, whereas durable plasma suppression and detectable CSF HIV-1 RNA classified cases represented most CSF escape cases after 2010. This shift in calendar period could represent a change in clinical practices (ie, increased CSF HIV-1 RNA testing for neurological symptoms) because of recent guideline recommendations,42–44 increased use of ultrasensitive HIV-1 RNA assays and/or decreased prevalence of virologic failure because of improved ART regimens. Although low levels of CSF HIV-1 RNA may reflect variability in assay sensitivity and be unrelated to neurological symptoms, a recent study showed that low CSF HIV-1 RNA levels in viral escape were associated with elevated inflammatory mediators and endothelial adhesion molecule VCAM,45 and may not always be benign. One factor that can account for the association with neuroinflammation is secondary escape, defined as discordant CSF and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in the context of a new infection.4 In our series, there were 3 candidates for secondary escape; 2 cases with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and one with CNS lymphoma. As the field begins to harmonize clinical definitions for CSF escape, the epidemiology and associated cofactors of escape subtypes based on previous plasma HIV-1 RNA levels will be a relevant indicator of evolving clinical practices, and may also enable future studies to identify biomarkers linked to virologic failure in the CNS.
HIV-1 has high genetic diversity and recombination, which can result in DRMs when viral replication is incompletely suppressed because of factors such as poor adherence, persistent LLV, and incomplete ART penetration into the CNS. In the present study, over 80% of individuals had HIV-1 infection for greater than 10 years before CSF escape with long exposures to ART, including older regimens, suggesting duration of HIV-infection, ART use, and potential emergence of DRMs are likely contributing factors to CSF escape. Although there has been a declining trend in resistance mutations among HIV+ individuals in resource-rich settings,46 a 2015 study in ART-experienced patients with plasma HIV-1RNA >50 copies per milliliter showed that 12.5% and 19.8% of individuals had unique CSF resistance mutations to RT and protease, respectively; M41L and T215Y, were statistically more prevalent in the CSF.47 In our study, M184V/I, T215Y, D67N, and M41L were the most commonly detected CSF mutations. Three CSF integrase mutations were identified in CSF (N155H, Y143C, and Q148R). Although these mutations are not known to reduce susceptibility to integrase inhibitors in isolation,38 integrase mutations remain important to monitor.
A recent study showed that low-level of CSF HIV-1 RNA was associated with better neurocognitive outcomes, and hypothesized that one mechanism was through DRMs such as M184V, which reduce viral fitness but may stimulate a more effective immune response.9 However, the combination of poor CSF penetration by tenofovir, a widely used NRTI in ART48 and M184V/I mutation leading to emtricitabine or lamuvidine resistance may lower the threshold for subsequent CSF mutations that could lead to NRTI cross resistance.38 The high frequency of M184V/I mutations reported here and in the literature, and simultaneous presence of TAMs in neurologically symptomatic CSF escape raises the possibility that the M184V/I mutations could be a factor influencing CNS viral reservoirs and CSF escape. Future studies that systematically assay CSF DRMs, particularly in neurosymptomatic individuals, will help to understand the impact of M184 and other DRMs on CNS viral reservoir size, their potential impact on neuropathogenesis, and effects on neurological outcomes.
Persistent LLV is associated with plasma virologic failure, and resistance mutations arising from stable HIV-1 reservoirs or ongoing replication cycles may influence viral pathogenesis in the CNS.8,45,49 Three of 4 cases in this series with historical evidence of LLV in plasma had recurrent CSF escape; most but not all were associated with neurological symptoms. In a recent series of longitudinal CSF samples from 75 neurologically asymptomatic HIV+ individuals on ART,13 7 cases had a quantifiable CSF HIV-1 RNA in 2 consecutive samples and remained neurologically asymptomatic.13 These data suggest that dynamic CSF viremia is present among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, and research efforts to identify individuals with CNS viral reservoirs may require CSF profiling irrespective of neurological symptoms.8 An additional consideration is CNS penetration of ART regimens as calculated by CPE score. An “adjusted” CPE score has been proposed as a more relevant score in CSF escape, as it takes into account resistance profiles for the calculation of CNS ART effectiveness.6 Although CPE score at the time of escape was not a distinguishing feature in this series, 6 cases with genotyping from CSF or plasma isolates had mutations that would result in resistance to at least one prescribed ART drug, resulting in a lower “adjusted” CPE score. Together, these findings support the strategy that changes in treatment regimens for CSF escape should be guided by CSF resistance testing, when possible.42–44
This study has several limitations common to retrospective case-series including selection and recall bias, and limitations in data based on chart reviews. In addition, there was no systematic cataloging of CNS escape in the Boston cohort; thus, identification of these cases relied on current providers' recollection of patients, which has the potential to skew analysis toward more recent years and cases with severe neurological symptoms and may lead to underreporting true prevalence. Given that HIV-1 RNA assays are not FDA-approved for CSF quantification and testing has only recently been adopted in US-based guidelines, 42,43 there is considerable heterogeneity in provider practices. As such, neurological symptoms requiring hospitalization or profound cognitive decline are more likely to lead to CSF HIV-1 RNA quantification, whereas milder neurological symptoms may not result in lumbar punctures unless imaging abnormalities are identified.
The precise definitions of CSF viral escape, neurological symptoms that require CSF analysis, and when providers should repeat lumbar puncture after CSF viral escape remains debated. Our estimates suggest that individuals with a recent history of LLV or historical virologic failure with M184V/I mutations are potentially at elevated risk for CSF escape. Given that the search for a curative strategy is a top priority, barriers to cure including LLV on ART and replication-competent HIV-1 virus in the CNS require further study.50 The CSF escape subtypes we propose will help to shed light on the true prevalence, and provide a new conceptual framework for future studies of viral and host factors leading to CSF escape and testing of therapeutics aimed at virus eradication.
1. Heaton RK, Clifford DB, Franklin DR Jr, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy
: CHARTER Study. Neurology. 2010;75:2087–2096.
2. Mukerji SS, Locascio JJ, Misra V, et al. Lipid profiles and APOE4 Allele impact Midlife cognitive decline in HIV-infected men on antiretroviral therapy
. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:1130–1139.
3. Canestri A, Lescure FX, Jaureguiberry S, et al. Discordance between cerebral spinal fluid and plasma HIV replication in patients with neurological symptoms who are receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy
. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:773–778.
4. Ferretti F, Gisslen M, Cinque P, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid HIV escape from antiretroviral therapy
. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12:280–288.
5. Eden A, Fuchs D, Hagberg L, et al. HIV-1 viral escape in cerebrospinal fluid of subjects on suppressive antiretroviral treatment. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1819–1825.
6. Peluso MJ, Ferretti F, Peterson J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid HIV escape associated with progressive neurologic dysfunction in patients on antiretroviral therapy
with well controlled plasma viral load. AIDS. 2012;26:1765–1774.
7. Rawson T, Muir D, Mackie NE, et al. Factors associated with cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA in HIV infected subjects undergoing lumbar puncture examination in a clinical setting. J Infect. 2012;65:239–245.
8. Nightingale S, Geretti AM, Beloukas A, et al. Discordant CSF/plasma HIV-1 RNA in patients with unexplained low-level viraemia. J Neurovirol. 2016;22:852–860.
9. Anderson AM, Munoz-Moreno JA, McClernon D, et al. Prevalence and correlates of persistent HIV-1 RNA in cerebrospinal fluid during antiretroviral therapy
. J Infect Dis. 2016;215:105–113.
10. Liu L, Zhang Y, Wei F, et al. Discordant genotypic resistance and HIV-1 genetic diversity from paired plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples in Chinese settings. J Neurovirol. 2013;19:131–136.
11. Tong CY, Costelloe S, Hubb J, et al. Deep sequencing of HIV-1 in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:1022–1025.
12. Hightower GK, Letendre SL, Cherner M, et al. Select resistance-associated mutations in blood are associated with lower CSF viral loads and better neuropsychological performance. Virology. 2009;394:243–248.
13. Eden A, Nilsson S, Hagberg L, et al. Asymptomatic cerebrospinal fluid HIV-1 viral blips and viral escape during antiretroviral therapy
: a longitudinal study. J Infect Dis. 2016;214:1822–1825.
14. Garvey LJ, Everitt A, Winston A, et al. Detectable cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA with associated neurological deficits, despite suppression of HIV replication in the plasma compartment. AIDS. 2009;23:1443–1444.
15. Gutmann C, Cusini A, Gunthard HF, et al. Randomized controlled study demonstrating failure of LPV/r monotherapy in HIV: the role of compartment and CD4-nadir. AIDS. 2010;24:2347–2354.
16. van Lelyveld SF, Nijhuis M, Baatz F, et al. Therapy failure following selection of enfuvirtide-resistant HIV-1 in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:387–390.
17. Bogoch II, Davis BT, Venna N. Reversible dementia in a patient with central nervous system escape of human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect. 2011;63:236–239.
18. Bingham R, Ahmed N, Rangi P, et al. HIV encephalitis despite suppressed viraemia: a case of compartmentalized viral escape. Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22:608–609.
19. Cornelissen M, Back NK, Burger DM, et al. Selection of an M184V mutation in the cerebrospinal fluid of a treatment-naive HIV-infected individual starting darunavir-based therapy. Antivir Ther. 2011;16:931–935.
20. Pasquet A, Ajana F, Melliez H, et al. Central nervous system HIV replication and HIV-related pachymeningitis in a patient on protease inhibitor monotherapy despite an undetectable plasma viral load. AIDS. 2012;26:1726–1728.
21. Tamarit Mdel P, Quereda C, Gonzalez-Rozas M, et al. HIV type 1 viral encephalitis after development of viral resistance to plasma suppressive antiretroviral therapy
. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012;28:83–86.
22. Khoury MN, Tan CS, Peaslee M, et al. CSF viral escape in a patient with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. J Neurovirol. 2013;19:402–405.
23. Muldoon E, Jordan M, Hadley S. Loss of HIV virologic control originating in the cerebrospinal fluid due to Inadvertent protease inhibitor monotherapy. J AIDS Clin Res. 2013;4:2.
24. Bierhoff M, Boucher CA, Fibriani A, et al. Ongoing HIV replication in cerebrospinal fluid under successful monotherapy. Antivir Ther. 2013;18:641–643.
25. Imaz A, Cayuela N, Niubo J, et al. Short communication: focal encephalitis related to viral escape and resistance emergence in cerebrospinal fluid in a patient on lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy with plasma HIV-1 RNA suppression. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2014;30:984–987.
26. Mangioni D, Muscatello A, Sabbatini F, et al. A case of cerebrospinal fluid viral escape on a dual antiretroviral regimen: worth the risk? Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:1655–1656.
27. Cardenas G, Lopez-Gonzalez M, Monzon-Falconi JF, et al. Relation of cerebrospinal fluid/plasma HIV-RNA discordance with neurocognitive impairment. Natl Med J India. 2015;28:228–232.
28. Guedes BF, Gomes HR, Lucato LT, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus-associated vasculopathy with CNS compartmentalization of HIV-1. J Neurovirol. 2015;21:101–104.
29. Beguelin C, Vazquez M, Bertschi M, et al. Viral escape in the central nervous system with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency Virus-1. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016;3:ofv210.
30. Morgello S, Gelman B, Kozlowski P, et al. The National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium: a new paradigm in brain banking with an emphasis on infectious disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2001;27:326–335.
31. Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker J, et al. Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology. 2007;69:1789–1799.
32. Hammond ER, Crum RM, Treisman GJ, et al. The cerebrospinal fluid HIV risk score for assessing central nervous system activity in persons with HIV. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180:297–307.
33. Mackie NE, Phillips AN, Kaye S, et al. Antiretroviral drug resistance in HIV-1-infected patients with low-level viremia. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:1303–1307.
34. Laprise C, de Pokomandy A, Baril JG, et al. Virologic failure following persistent low-level viremia in a cohort of HIV-positive patients: results from 12 years of observation. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1489–1496.
35. Taiwo B, Gallien S, Aga E, et al. Antiretroviral drug resistance in HIV-1-infected patients experiencing persistent low-level viremia during first-line therapy. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:515–520.
36. Nettles RE, Kieffer TL, Kwon P, et al. Intermittent HIV-1 viremia (Blips) and drug resistance in patients receiving HAART. JAMA. 2005;293:817–829.
37. Mo H, King MS, King K, et al. Selection of resistance in protease inhibitor-experienced, human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects failing lopinavir- and ritonavir-based therapy: mutation patterns and baseline correlates. J Virol. 2005;79:3329–3338.
38. Wensing AM, Calvez V, Gunthard HF, et al. 2015 update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1. Top Antivir Med. 2015;23:132–141.
39. Watanabe K, Honda M, Watanabe T, et al. Emergence of raltegravir-resistant HIV-1 in the central nervous system. Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21:840–841.
40. Ellis RJ, Gamst AC, Capparelli E, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA originates from both local CNS and systemic sources. Neurology. 2000;54:927–936.
41. Feelemyer J, Des Jarlais D, Arasteh K, et al. Adherence to antiretroviral medications among persons who inject drugs in transitional, low and middle income countries: an international systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2015;19:575–583.
42. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-infected Adults and Adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf
. Accessed November 10, 2016.
43. Mind Exchange Working G. Assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: a consensus report of the mind exchange program. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1004–1017.
44. Writing G, Williams I, Churchill D, et al. British HIV association guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-positive adults with antiretroviral therapy
2012 (Updated November 2013. All changed text is cast in yellow highlight). HIV Med. 2014;15(suppl 1):1–85.
45. Nightingale S, Michael BD, Fisher M, et al. CSF/plasma HIV-1 RNA discordance even at low levels is associated with up-regulation of host inflammatory mediators in CSF. Cytokine. 2016;83:139–146.
46. Scherrer AU, von Wyl V, Yang WL, et al. Emergence of Acquired HIV-1 drug resistance almost stopped in Switzerland: a 15-year Prospective cohort analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:1310–1317.
47. Soulie C, Descamps D, Grude M, et al. Antiretroviral-naive and -treated HIV-1 patients can harbour more resistant viruses in CSF than in plasma. Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:566–572.
48. Best BM, Letendre SL, Koopmans P, et al. Low cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of the nucleotide HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor, tenofovir. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59:376–381.
49. Gonzalez-Serna A, Min JE, Woods C, et al. Performance of HIV-1 drug resistance testing at low-level viremia and its ability to predict future virologic outcomes and viral evolution in treatment-naive individuals. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1165–1173.
50. Deeks SG, Lewin SR, Ross AL, et al. International AIDS Society global scientific strategy: towards an HIV cure 2016. Nat Med. 2016;22:839–850.