Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Sex-Related Differences in Inflammatory and Immune Activation Markers Before and After Combined Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation

Mathad, Jyoti S. MD, MSc; Gupte, Nikhil PhD; Balagopal, Ashwin MD; Asmuth, David MD; Hakim, James MD; Santos, Breno MD; Riviere, Cynthia MD; Hosseinipour, Mina MD, MPH; Sugandhavesa, Patcharaphan MD; Infante, Rosa MD; Pillay, Sandy MD; Cardoso, Sandra W. MD; Mwelase, Noluthando MBCHB; Pawar, Jyoti MBBS; Berendes, Sima MD, MPH; Kumarasamy, Nagalingeswaran MD; Andrade, Bruno B. MD, PhD; Campbell, Thomas B. MD; Currier, Judith S. MD, MPH; Cohn, Susan E. MD, MPH; Gupta, Amita MD for the New Work Concept Sheet 319 and AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5175 (PEARLS) Study Teams

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: October 1, 2016 - Volume 73 - Issue 2 - p 123–129
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001095
Basic and Translational Science

Background: Women progress to death at the same rate as men despite lower plasma HIV RNA (viral load). We investigated sex-specific differences in immune activation and inflammation as a potential explanation.

Methods: Inflammatory and immune activation markers [interferon γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, IL-6, IL-18, IFN-γ–induced protein 10, C-reactive protein (CRP), lipopolysaccharide, and sCD14] were measured at weeks 0, 24, and 48 after combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in a random subcohort (n = 215) who achieved virologic suppression in ACTG A5175 (Prospective Evaluation of Antiretrovirals in Resource-Limited Settings). Association between sex and changes in markers post-cART was examined using random effects models. Average marker differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using multivariable models.

Results: At baseline, women had lower median log10 viral load (4.93 vs 5.18 copies per milliliter, P = 0.01), CRP (2.32 vs 4.62 mg/L, P = 0.01), detectable lipopolysaccharide (39% vs 55%, P = 0.04), and sCD14 (1.9 vs 2.3 µg/mL, P = 0.06) vs men. By week 48, women had higher interferon γ (22.4 vs 14.9 pg/mL, P = 0.05), TNF-α (11.5 vs 9.5 pg/mL, P = 0.02), and CD4 (373 vs 323 cells per cubic millimeter, P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, women had greater increases in CD4 and TNF-α but less of a decrease in CRP and sCD14 compared with men.

Conclusions: With cART-induced viral suppression, women have less reduction in key markers of inflammation and immune activation compared with men. Future studies should investigate the impact of these sex-specific differences on morbidity and mortality.

*Division of Infectious Diseases, Center for Global Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;

Johns Hopkins Clinical Trials Unit, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College, Pune, India;

Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD;

§Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA;

Department of Medicine, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe;

Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Nossa Senhora de Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil;

#Les Centres GHESKIO, Port-Au-Prince, Haiti;

**Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina-Lilongwe, Lilongwe, Malawi;

††Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai, Thailand;

‡‡Impacta Peru, San Miguel, Peru;

§§Durban International Clinical Research Site, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa;

‖‖STD/AIDS Clinical Research Laboratory, Instituto de Pesquisa Clinica Evandro Chagas, Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;

¶¶Department of Medicine, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa;

##National AIDS Research Institute (ICMR), Pune, India;

***Malawi College of Medicine-Johns Hopkins University Research Project, Blantyre, Malawi;

†††YRGCARE Medical Center, Chennai, India;

‡‡‡Investigative Medicine Branch, Laboratório Integrado de Microbiologia e Imunorregulação (LIMI), Centro de Pesquisas Gonçalo Moniz (CPqGM), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Salvador, Brazil;

§§§Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO;

‖‖‖Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; and

¶¶¶Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Correspondence to: Jyoti S. Mathad, MD, MSc, Division of Infectious Diseases, Center for Global Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, 420 East 67th Street, 2nd floor, New York, NY 10065 (e-mail:

Supported by the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number UM1 AI068634, UM1 AI068636, UM1 AI106701, and R01AI080417 (to A.G.); the NIH/NIAID Johns Hopkins Baltimore Washington India HIV Clinical Trials Unit (UM1AI069465 A.G., N.G.); the NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR000458 to J.S.M.); the Ujala Foundation (to A.G., N.G., J.S.M.); the Johns Hopkins Center for AIDS Research (1P30AI094189 to A.G.); and the Gilead Foundation (A.G., N.G., J.S.M.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, February 2014, Boston; AIDS Clinical Trials Group Annual Meeting, June 2014, Washington, DC.

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (

Received November 25, 2015

Accepted April 26, 2016

Back to Top | Article Outline


Fifty percent of people living with HIV are women; yet, sex-specific differences in HIV pathogenesis are poorly understood. Studies of sex-based differences are limited to a few studies. One notable sex difference is that women tend to have lower baseline viral loads (VL) than men before initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART).1–4 The sex difference in VL persists even with advanced HIV-1–related immunosuppression.5 Despite this advantage, one study found that women with the same VL as men had 1.6 times the risk of progressing to AIDS.1

The exact mechanism behind this phenomenon is still unclear, but some hypothesize that differences in immune activation are responsible.6 Immune activation is a known risk factor for HIV progression, independent of VL.6 Interferon (IFN) α, for example, has been associated with immune activation and HIV progression.7,8 A higher percentage of dendritic cells in women produced IFN-α in response to HIV stimulation compared with men, which was directly correlated with progesterone levels, suggesting a true sex-related mechanism.9 More robust immune activation in HIV-infected women than in men could explain why women progress to AIDS at the same rate as or faster than men despite lower baseline VLs. Other markers of inflammation and immune activation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), sCD14, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, have been associated with increased progression and mortality in HIV-infected adults.10–12 Studies on sex-related differences in these markers, however, are lacking.

In this study, we sought to (1) characterize inflammatory and immune activation markers in women vs men at weeks 0, 24, and 48 of cART and (2) compare changes in inflammatory and immune activation markers over time by sex with the hypothesis that women would derive less of a decrease in these markers than men after initiating cART. We used a diverse multinational cohort within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5175 Prospective Evaluation of Antiretrovirals in Resource-Limited Settings (PEARLS) trial to assess sex differences in inflammation and immune activation.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study Description

PEARLS ( NCT00084136) was a phase 4, randomized open-label clinical trial conducted from 2005 to 2010 comparing initial cART regimens in 9 countries: Brazil, Haiti, India, Malawi, Peru, South Africa, Thailand, United States, and Zimbabwe.13 Major enrollment criteria included age ≥18 years, HIV infection, CD4 cell count <300 cells per microliter, and ART naive by self-report and chart review (<7 days of cumulative drug exposure before enrollment). During 2005–2007, 1571 eligible adults were enrolled and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment arms—Arm A: efavirenz + co-formulated zidovudine/lamivudine, n = 519; Arm B: unboosted atazanavir + didanosine + emtricitabine, n = 526; and Arm C; efavirenz + co-formulated emtricitabine–tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, n = 526. Study follow-up was completed in May 2010.

In New Works Concept Sheet 319, a random subcohort of 30 people from each country was selected to have additional analyses performed on their stored samples. Those who did not achieve virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <400 copies per milliliter) were excluded. Markers of inflammation [TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-18, IFN-γ–induced protein 10 (IP-10), and CRP] and microbial translocation/immune activation [lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and sCD14] were measured at baseline pre-cART initiation and at weeks 24 and 48 post-cART initiation. The methods for biomarker selection and measurement have been described previously.14 In brief, we selected markers associated with accelerated HIV disease progression. Baseline marker concentrations were measured using stored plasma or serum collected within 14 days before cART initiation. Single laboratories performed testing in batches for each marker to mitigate variability in methodology. IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-α were measured in plasma using a Luminex multiplex cytokine platform (R&D Systems, Inc, Minneapolis, MN); IP-10 was measured in plasma using a commercially available multiplex ELISA-based assay (Meso Scale Discovery, Rockville, MD). CRP was measured using ELISA (CRP Quantikine ELISA; R&D Systems), and microbial translocation markers were measured using commercially available ELISA kits for sCD14 (R&D Systems). LPS was measured from plasma samples using a Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay (LONZA, Walkersville, MD) with previously described modifications.15

Back to Top | Article Outline


Baseline characteristics of men and women were compared using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables or Fisher exact test for discrete variables. Plasma LPS was undetectable for most of the study participants; so, we defined the cutoff as detectable vs undetectable. The remaining measured markers were available as continuous data and were analyzed as such.

Effects of sex, as a primary risk factor, on changes in markers pre- and post-cART initiation were examined using random effects models. Average marker differences and 95% confidence intervals by sex were estimated using multivariable models adjusting for age, country, region, income category (country), body mass index (BMI), baseline CD4, log10 VL, hemoglobin (Hb), and randomized cART arm. A 2-way hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward method) of circulating biomarkers by time point was also performed. Comparison of markers between time points was assessed by the nonparametric Friedman test (matched samples), except for LPS, which was compared as frequency of detectable values between the groups. Using 2-sided P values, statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05. To test the overall trend of variation in concentrations of each marker over time on cART, log10 transformed data were analyzed using Friedman test with a linear trend posttest. Comparison of markers between sexes at each time point after cART initiation was assessed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA), STATA 12.0 (StataCorp., TX), JMP 11.0 (SAS, Cary, NC), and R 3.1.0 (R Development Core Team, Auckland, New Zealand) programs.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We assessed a random sample of 215 individuals who achieved viral suppression by week 24 of cART and had available samples at 0, 24, 48 weeks. As shown in Table 1, there were 105 (48%) women and 110 (51%) men. At entry, women had similar CD4 counts as men (193 vs 168 cells per cubic millimeter, P = 0.37) and were more likely to be black (P < 0.001). Women also had significantly lower Hb (11.5 vs 13.7 g/dL, P < 0.001) and log10 baseline VL (4.93 vs 5.18 copies per milliliter, P = 0.01) but did not differ in age, BMI, or cART type (Table 1).



Back to Top | Article Outline

Differences in Biomarkers at Weeks 0, 24, and 48 by Sex

As shown in Figure 1, at week 0 of cART, women had significantly lower CRP levels (2.32 vs 4.62 mg/L, P = 0.01) and a lower percentage with detectable LPS (39% vs 55%, P = 0.04) compared with men. At week 0, women also had a trend toward lower sCD14 (1.9 vs 2.3 µg/mL, P = 0.06) and insignificantly lower levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-18, and IP-10 compared with men (see Supplemental Digital Content,



In contrast, at week 24, women no longer had significant differences in any of the markers measured, including CD4 (309 vs 292 cells per cubic millimeter, P = 0.21). Compared with men, TNF-α levels in women were higher (12.5 pg/mL in women vs 10.6 pg/mL in men, P = 0.07) and sCD14 (1.5 µg/mL vs 1.9 µg/mL, P = 0.06) and percent detectable LPS were lower (44% vs 57%, P = 0.08), though none of these differences reached statistical significance (see Supplemental Digital Content,

By week 48, women had developed a statistically significant CD4 advantage compared with men (373 vs 323 cells per cubic millimeter, P = 0.02). Despite this, women had higher median levels of TNF-α (11.5 vs 9.5 pg/mL, P = 0.02) and IFN-γ (22.4 vs 14.9 pg/mL, P = 0.05). Differences were not detected in IL-6, IL-18, IP-10, CRP, and percent detectable LPS (see Supplemental Digital Content, Levels of sCD14, however, had equalized between men and women by week 48. Figure 1 summarizes the changes in cytokine levels across all 3 time points for the full cohort (Figs. 1A, B) and also stratified by sex (Figs. 1C, D).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Longitudinal Changes in Biomarkers by Sex

Women experienced an increase in percent detectable LPS between weeks 0 and 48, which trended toward significance (39% at week 0 vs 51% at week 48, P = 0.08) (see Supplemental Digital Content, In the multivariate random effects model adjusted for age, country, region, income category (country), cART regimen, Hb, BMI, and HIV VL, there were statistically significant sex-related differences over time with respect to CD4 count, TNF-α, sCD14, and CRP (Table 2). Women were more likely to have more of an increase over time in CD4 count and TNF-α levels but less likely to have a decrease in sCD14 and CRP levels over time compared with men.



Back to Top | Article Outline


Before cART initiation, women had a more favorable immune profile with higher CD4 counts and lower VL, CRP, detectable LPS, and sCD14 than men. By week 48, however, women had higher levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α compared with men, despite a higher CD4 count. Furthermore, men experienced a greater decrease in sCD14 and CRP levels over time, suggesting that women experience less of a cART-related reduction in inflammation and immune activation.

The median sCD14 among women in this study increased between weeks 24 and 48. Although it is impossible to know if these levels would have continued to rise, sCD14 is an important marker for monocyte/macrophage activation and has been linked to microbial translocation.16 In the SMART study, increased sCD14 was associated with increased all-cause mortality.12 The specific data on HIV progression are less definitive,17–19 but increased sCD14 has been linked to hepatitis C virus progression in HIV-coinfected patients20 and faster progression of carotid intima medial thickness in those with HIV.21

In many HIV studies, increases in sCD14 often occur in conjunction with increases in CRP and IL-6 levels. In our study, IL-6 levels in men steadily decreased after cART initiation in contrast to women, in whom IL-6 steadily increased. Similarly, CRP levels were lower at baseline but higher by week 48 in women vs men. In ACTG A5095, high-sensitivity CRP did not differ by gender at baseline but higher levels were seen at week 96 in women compared with men (6 vs 1.6 mg/L, P = 0.001), with an estimated shift in high-sensitivity CRP by gender of 2.5 mg/L.22 CRP has been studied extensively in HIV populations with reports of increased HIV progression,23,24 HIV treatment failure,25 increased cardiovascular disease,26 tuberculosis,14 and increased risk of maternal mortality.23

There were also notable changes in other biomarkers. TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is associated with immune activation.27 Increased levels of TNF-α before cART initiation have been associated with HIV progression.28 Furthermore, people who progressed to AIDS 1 year after starting cART experienced a smaller decrease in the soluble TNF-α receptor compared with those who did not,29 suggesting that cART-induced decreases in TNF-α are protective against HIV progression. Elevated levels of TNF-α in postpartum women in Botswana were also found to be predictive of major adverse clinical events, including AIDS-defining illnesses and death.30 Therefore, the higher TNF-α levels seen in women compared with men by week 48 could have important long-term clinical implications.

The same could be said of IFN-γ, though the role of this cytokine in HIV progression is less clear. IFN-γ is primarily produced by CD4 cells and natural killer cells. Increased levels, then, may simply reflect an increase in CD4 count. In fact, some studies have shown that increased IFN-γ is associated with favorable outcomes, such as decreased disease progression31,32 and decreased mother-to-child HIV transmission.33 In early infection, though, higher IFN-γ has been implicated in setting a higher viral set point.34,35 Increased IP-10 has also been associated with HIV progression.36 By week 48, women in our study had significantly higher levels of IFN-γ and minimally higher levels of IP-10.

Differences in sex distribution at the study sites could contribute to sex differences in the markers measured. We analyzed the data by country, region, and income category to account for differences in sex distribution; the sex-related associations remained significant. A limitation of our study was that the number of non-HIV morbidities that occurred in the PEARLS study was small. Furthermore, the study was not designed to detect long-term non–HIV-related morbidities, such as cardiovascular events, limiting our ability to detect differences in these outcomes between men and women. Data from a large registry study, however, showed that HIV-infected women had higher relative increases in myocardial infarctions compared with HIV-uninfected women and also HIV-infected men.37,38 Other studies have reported increased risk of ischemic stroke and coronary artery plaques in HIV-infected women.39,40 Our data may provide a starting point for linking inflammation and translocation with these non–HIV-related outcomes even in the setting of suppressed viremia. We were unable to measure levels of other important cytokines, including IL-7, which is important in T-cell proliferation and known to be higher in women than men.41 We also do not have data on the women's menstrual cycle or use of hormonal contraception, which can cause fluctuations in inflammatory cytokines.42–44 Future studies that include women should routinely collect these data. Coinfections with cytomegalovirus or parasites in either men or women can also affect the inflammatory and immune activation pathways. If present, however, these types of infections should have occurred with comparable frequency in both sexes.45–47

Our study provides a unique and informative insight into the differences in inflammation and immune activation after cART initiation in men vs women. Few other studies have examined longitudinal changes, instead of focusing on how baseline inflammation and immune activation levels predict long-term outcomes. Longitudinal analysis allows a more comprehensive understanding of these complex immune changes. A further strength of our analysis is the adequate representation of women in the parent PEARLS study. Even today, a few nonprevention of mother-to-child transmission studies include an appropriate sampling of HIV-infected women. In fact, most of the studies cited above had a much higher proportion of men than women. We are starting to appreciate the impact of sex on the safety and efficacy of cART.48,49 But, similar to lessons learned from studying the independent impact of race on HIV outcomes,50 a dedicated effort to specifically study the impact of sex on HIV outcomes must also be a priority. Future prospective studies should further investigate sex-specific differences in immune activation and inflammation pathways, including mechanism, and whether the different responses in inflammatory markers by sex have a significant impact on all-cause morbidity and mortality.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors thank the Prospective Evaluation of Antiretrovirals in Resource-Limited Setting study participants for volunteering their time and efforts.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Farzadegan H, Hoover DR, Astemborski J, et al. Sex differences in HIV-1 viral load and progression to AIDS. Lancet. 1998;352:1510–1514.
2. Sterling TR, Vlahov D, Astemborski J, et al. Initial plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and progression to AIDS in women and men. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:720–725.
3. Gandhi M, Bacchetti P, Miotti P, et al. Does patient sex affect human immunodeficiency virus levels? Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:313–322.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Differences between HIV-infected men and women in antiretroviral therapy outcomes—six African countries, 2004-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62:945–952.
5. Grinsztejn B, Smeaton L, Barnett R, et al. Sex-associated differences in pre-antiretroviral therapy plasma HIV-1 RNA in diverse areas of the world vary by CD4(+) T-cell count. Antivir Ther. 2011;16:1057–1062.
6. Addo MM, Altfeld M. Sex-based differences in HIV type 1 pathogenesis. J Infect Dis. 2014;209(suppl 3):S86–S92.
7. Giorgi JV, Hultin LE, McKeating JA, et al. Shorter survival in advanced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection is more closely associated with T lymphocyte activation than with plasma virus burden or virus chemokine coreceptor usage. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:859–870.
8. Meditz AL, Haas MK, Folkvord JM, et al. HLA-DR+ CD38+ CD4+ T lymphocytes have elevated CCR5 expression and produce the majority of R5-tropic HIV-1 RNA in vivo. J Virol. 2011;85:10189–10200.
9. Meier A, Chang JJ, Chan ES, et al. Sex differences in the toll-like receptor-mediated response of plasmacytoid dendritic cells to HIV-1. Nat Med. 2009;15:955–959.
10. Ledwaba L, Tavel JA, Khabo P, et al. Pre-ART levels of inflammation and coagulation markers are strong predictors of death in a South African cohort with advanced HIV disease. PLoS One. 2012;7:e24243.
11. Kuller LH, Tracy R, Belloso W, et al. Inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers and mortality in patients with HIV infection. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e203.
12. Sandler NG, Wand H, Roque A, et al. Plasma levels of soluble CD14 independently predict mortality in HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:780–790.
13. Campbell TB, Smeaton LM, Kumarasamy N, et al. Efficacy and safety of three antiretroviral regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1: a randomized clinical trial in diverse multinational settings. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001290.
14. Tenforde MW, Gupte N, Dowdy DW, et al. C-reactive protein (CRP), interferon gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are associated with risk of tuberculosis after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117424.
15. Balagopal A, Gama L, Franco V, et al. Detection of microbial translocation in HIV and SIV infection using the limulus amebocyte lysate assay is masked by serum and plasma. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41258.
16. Brenchley JM, Price DA, Schacker TW, et al. Microbial translocation is a cause of systemic immune activation in chronic HIV infection. Nat Med. 2006;12:1365–1371.
17. Eller MA, Blom KG, Gonzalez VD, et al. Innate and adaptive immune responses both contribute to pathological CD4 T cell activation in HIV-1 infected Ugandans. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18779.
18. Thiebaut R, Charpentier C, Damond F, et al. Association of soluble CD14 and inflammatory biomarkers with HIV-2 disease progression. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1417–1425.
19. Leeansyah E, Malone DF, Anthony DD, et al. Soluble biomarkers of HIV transmission, disease progression and comorbidities. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2013;8:117–124.
20. French AL, Evans CT, Agniel DM, et al. Microbial translocation and liver disease progression in women coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:679–689.
21. Kelesidis T, Kendall MA, Yang OO, et al. Biomarkers of microbial translocation and macrophage activation: association with progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:1558–1567.
22. Shikuma CM, Ribaudo HJ, Zheng Y, et al. Change in high-sensitivity c-reactive protein levels following initiation of efavirenz-based antiretroviral regimens in HIV-infected individuals. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011;27:461–468.
23. Drain PK, Kupka R, Msamanga GI, et al. C-reactive protein independently predicts HIV-related outcomes among women and children in a resource-poor setting. AIDS. 2007;21:2067–2075.
24. Redd AD, Eaton KP, Kong X, et al. C-reactive protein levels increase during HIV-1 disease progression in Rakai, Uganda, despite the absence of microbial translocation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;54:556–559.
25. Shivakoti R, Yang WT, Gupte N, et al. Concurrent anemia and elevated C-Reactive protein predicts HIV clinical treatment failure, including tuberculosis, after antiretroviral therapy initiation. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:102–110.
26. Duprez DA, Neuhaus J, Kuller LH, et al. Inflammation, coagulation and cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected individuals. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44454.
27. Aukrust P, Liabakk NB, Muller F, et al. Activation of tumor necrosis factor–alpha system in HIV-1 infection: association with markers of immune activation. Infection. 1995;23:9–15.
28. Vaidya SA, Korner C, Sirignano MN, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha is associated with viral control and early disease progression in patients with HIV type 1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:1042–1046.
29. Morlat P, Pereira E, Clayette P, et al. Early evolution of plasma soluble TNF-alpha p75 receptor as a marker of progression in treated HIV-infected patients. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008;24:1383–1389.
30. Russell ES, Mohammed T, Smeaton L, et al. Immune activation markers in peripartum women in Botswana: association with feeding strategy and maternal morbidity. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89928.
31. Jiang Y, Zhou F, Tian Y, et al. Higher NK cell IFN-gamma production is associated with delayed HIV disease progression in LTNPs. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33:1376–1385.
32. Darwich L, Cabrera C, Romeu J, et al. The magnitude of interferon-gamma responses to human cytomegalovirus is predictive for HIV-1 disease progression. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;49:507–512.
33. Lohman-Payne B, Slyker JA, Moore S, et al. Breast milk cellular HIV-specific interferon gamma responses are associated with protection from peripartum HIV transmission. AIDS. 2012;26:2007–2016.
34. Stacey AR, Norris PJ, Qin L, et al. Induction of a striking systemic cytokine cascade prior to peak viremia in acute human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, in contrast to more modest and delayed responses in acute hepatitis B and C virus infections. J Virol. 2009;83:3719–3733.
35. Gay C, Dibben O, Anderson JA, et al. Cross-sectional detection of acute HIV infection: timing of transmission, inflammation and antiretroviral therapy. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19617.
36. Jiao Y, Zhang T, Wang R, et al. Plasma IP-10 is associated with rapid disease progression in early HIV-1 infection. Viral Immunol. 2012;25:333–337.
37. Triant VA, Lee H, Hadigan C, et al. Increased acute myocardial infarction rates and cardiovascular risk factors among patients with human immunodeficiency virus disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2506–2512.
38. Lang S, Mary-Krause M, Cotte L, et al. Increased risk of myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients in France, relative to the general population. AIDS. 2010;24:1228–1230.
39. Chow FC, Regan S, Feske S, et al. Comparison of ischemic stroke incidence in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients in a US health care system. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;60:351–358.
40. Looby SE, Fitch KV, Srinivasa S, et al. Reduced ovarian reserve relates to monocyte activation and subclinical coronary atherosclerotic plaque in women with HIV. AIDS. 2016;30:383–393.
41. Napolitano LA, Burt TD, Bacchetti P, et al. Increased circulating interleukin-7 levels in HIV-1-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40:581–584.
42. Bertone-Johnson ER, Ronnenberg AG, Houghton SC, et al. Association of inflammation markers with menstrual symptom severity and premenstrual syndrome in young women. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1987–1994.
43. Campesi I, Sanna M, Zinellu A, et al. Oral contraceptives modify DNA methylation and monocyte-derived macrophage function. Biol Sex Differ. 2012;3:4.
44. Morin-Papunen L, Martikainen H, McCarthy MI, et al. Comparison of metabolic and inflammatory outcomes in women who used oral contraceptives and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in a general population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:529.
45. Deayton JR, Prof Sabin CA, Johnson MA, et al. Importance of cytomegalovirus viraemia in risk of disease progression and death in HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Lancet. 2004;363:2116–2121.
46. Santos-Oliveira JR, Regis EG, Giacoia-Gripp CB, et al. Microbial translocation induces an intense proinflammatory response in patients with visceral leishmaniasis and HIV type 1 coinfection. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:57–66.
47. Orlov M, Vaida F, Williamson K, et al. Antigen-presenting phagocytic cells ingest malaria parasites and increase HIV replication in a tumor necrosis factor alpha-dependent manner. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:1562–1572.
48. Firnhaber C, Smeaton LM, Grinsztejn B, et al. Differences in antiretroviral safety and efficacy by sex in a multinational randomized clinical trial. HIV Clin Trials. 2015;16:89–99.
49. Venuto CS, Mollan K, Ma Q, et al. Sex differences in atazanavir pharmacokinetics and associations with time to clinical events: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5202. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:3300–3310.
50. Ribaudo HJ, Smith KY, Robbins GK, et al. Racial differences in response to antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection: an AIDS clinical trials group (ACTG) study analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1607–1617.

HIV; inflammation; immune activation; sex; women; antiretroviral treatment

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.