Share this article on:

Assessing the Public Health Impact of HIV Interventions: The Critical Role of Demographics

Dimitrov, Dobromir PhD*,†; Kuang, Yang PhD‡,§; Mâsse, Benoît R. PhD

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: June 1st, 2014 - Volume 66 - Issue 2 - p e60–e62
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000133
Letters to the Editor

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

*Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

§Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

CHU Sainte-Justine Research Centre, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

D.D. is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. 5 U01 AI068615-03).

The remaining authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (

To the Editors:

HIV continues to spread and take the lives of millions around the world. Advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART) have substantially extended survivorship without completely removing the risk of transmission. Some preventive interventions have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials,1,2 but their effectiveness remains to be confirmed at community levels where the optimized level of implementation may not be replicable.

In a recent analysis, Kato et al3 estimated the potential impact of expanding ART and combination prevention in Vietnam. Other mathematical models have also been used to project the public health impact of HIV prevention into sexually active populations.4–10 Presented results in these modeling studies necessarily depend on various assumptions regarding population demographics, sexual behavior, and HIV transmission. With focus on the impact of the interventions, the primary interest falls on the ability of the proposed preventive method to reduce transmission, its acceptability by the targeted groups, the willingness of potential users to follow prescribed regimen and the public health risks associated with the new product (such as the spread of drug resistance associated with antiretroviral products). However, insufficient evidence is presented to justify the way processes of: (1) population recruitment, including immigration and sexual maturation, and (2) population departures, including emigration, age- and gender-specific mortality, infection-induced fatalities, and sexual inactivity, are modeled. In this commentary, we discuss the merits of the demographic assumptions used in Kato et al,3 among other commonly used, and outline the need for their systematic reassessment.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Most of the published models on intervention impact assume that the number of individuals joining the population per year is constant (constant recruitment)3,6–8,10–12 or proportional to the total population size (proportional recruitment).4,5,9,13,14 In sexually active population with no immigration, constant recruitment implies that the same number of people reach sexual maturity annually. That may be an acceptable approximation over short periods of time, but becomes troublesome when the simulation period increases. The progression of HIV infection from acquisition to full-blown AIDS and death is incredibly slow and delayed even further by ART. Therefore, a meaningful impact of prevention intervention should be expected over several decades, which may explain why simulation periods of 20–50 years are used in mathematical models. Projections, presented in Kato et al,3 are more than 40 years. If the population growth rate is 1% as currently estimated for Vietnam,15 the cumulative growth over 40 years will be 49%. In comparison, the population in sub-Saharan Africa, which is impacted the most by the HIV epidemic, is growing at a rate of 2.2% per year16 and is expected to be more than double by 2050.17 It is not realistic to expect that the number of 15 year olds in these populations will remain the same over several decades. Proportional recruitment seems to address this issue but has the deficiency of connecting the current population size directly to the number of new recruits, that is, any change in the population size affects the cohort that joins the community instantaneously. However, the cohort of 15 year olds is more likely to depend on the population size when they were conceived, that is, 16 years before their sexual maturation. A delayed proportional mechanism, which is certainly more appropriate when sexually active populations are simulated, adds computational complexity and limits the analytical tools available to study the model behavior (comparison between some recruitment mechanisms is shown in Fig. 1A).



Another popular modeling decision is to assume that the cohort joining the population consists entirely of susceptible individuals.3–12,14 In sexually active populations, the newcomers may be adolescents reaching sexual maturity or adults migrating into the community. We may agree that the prevalence of HIV among sexually inactive teenagers could be negligible because of the success of worldwide prevention strategies in mother-to-child transmission. However, that may not be the case for the migrating individuals. This is particularly important when analyzing populations with steady influx of people, such as the men-who-have-sex-with-men community in San Francisco or large metropolitan areas in Sub-Saharan Africa. Recent data from King County, Washington (including Seattle area), show that over a period of 5 years, 3 times more HIV-positive individuals have moved in than left the county. Ignoring the immigration of infected individuals, one may draw an imprecise picture of the drivers of the HIV epidemic or overestimate the projected impact of prevention interventions which target uninfected young adults by agglomerating all newcomers into that group (Fig. 1B).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Population departures are most often modeled assuming proportional rates of population losses per year because of sexual inactivity, HIV-related or HIV-unrelated causes, etc.3–10 Problems with such assumptions arise in populations with strong gender imbalance in HIV-unrelated deaths (background mortality). Data from South Africa suggest that the mortality is higher among 15–49-year-old men than among women even though the number of HIV-related deaths among women is larger.18 The influence of this differential gender mortality on the dynamics of the HIV epidemic is unclear, but it may partially compensate for the stronger HIV toll on women. Additionally, both HIV mortality and acquisition risk differ by age, which suggests the importance of the age structure to the epidemic dynamics. Unfortunately, stratification by age requires individual-based models or models with large number of compartments and sophisticated parameterization. However, some published studies have shown that the complexity is manageable and feasible.13 In-depth analyses are necessary to determine when differences in departure rates between population subgroups have to be taken into consideration.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Kato et al,3 as well as other modelers,5,8,10,11 assume that recruitment and departures are balanced (equal in size) before the start of the HIV epidemic. Assuming that before the introduction of HIV the population size remains constant implies persistent population decline when HIV-related fatalities are added to the departures and may result in substantial population reduction for more than 20–50 years. This is inconsistent with the observed demographic trends in Vietnam and even in countries with significantly higher HIV prevalence. Alternatively, modelers often assume that the population in the presence of HIV is already at equilibrium when new prevention is introduced.4,6,12 This is obtained by simulating the HIV epidemic for sufficiently long time until all compartments show negligible changes in size. Unfortunately, in the process of achieving “equilibrium,” all epidemic conditions including transmission rates and survival time of the infected individuals are kept unchanged for periods often longer than the time HIV has been circulating in the population. In reality, the introduction of various treatment options at different times has affected the transmission and mortality rates. Even if the epidemic parameters are selected “to fit” historic epidemic data (usually HIV prevalence), they will most likely represent the “average HIV epidemic” over the whole period toward dynamic stability rather than the state of the epidemic at the end of the period (the current time at which point the intervention will be initiated). However, no parameter adjustments can be made when equilibrium is reached because that will destabilize the population and lead to a new steady state.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The way we model demographic processes may have little impact on short lasting epidemics but shall not be neglected for simulations over extended time periods, typically used to evaluate HIV prevention interventions. Demographic assumptions affect the projected HIV epidemic by controlling the intake of new susceptible individuals and the removal of infected individuals from the population. They also alter the HIV prevalence in different subgroups and therefore play an important role in determining the forces of infection between different compartments. The influence of the demographic assumptions on the projected effectiveness of HIV interventions is rarely the focus of modeling analyses but deserves the attention of the researchers who work in the field of HIV prevention, as the role of mathematical modeling to intervention evaluations increases.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors are grateful to Danielle Buch, medical writer/editor at the Applied Clinical Research Unit of the CHU Sainte-Justine Research Centre for revision and editing of the article.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al.. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:399–410.
2. Abdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, et al.. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science. 2010;329:1168–1174.
3. Kato M, Granich R, Bui DD, et al.. The potential impact of expanding antiretroviral therapy and combination prevention in vietnam: towards elimination of HIV transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:e142–e149.
4. Abbas UL, Anderson RM, Mellors JW. Potential impact of antiretroviral chemoprophylaxis on HIV-1 transmission in resource-limited settings. PLoS One. 2007;2:e875.
5. Cox AP, Foss AM, Shafer LA, et al.. Attaining realistic and substantial reductions in HIV incidence: model projections of combining microbicide and male circumcision interventions in rural Uganda. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87:629–634.
6. Dimitrov DT, Masse BR, Boily MC. Beating the placebo in HIV prevention efficacy trials: the role of the minimal efficacy bound. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62:95–101.
7. Sorensen SW, Sansom SL, Brooks JT, et al.. A mathematical model of comprehensive test-and-treat services and HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in the United States. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29098.
8. Supervie V, Garcia-Lerma JG, Heneine W, et al.. HIV, transmitted drug resistance, and the paradox of preexposure prophylaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:12381–12386.
9. Vickerman P, Terris-Prestholt F, Delany S, et al.. Are targeted HIV prevention activities cost-effective in high prevalence settings? Results from a sexually transmitted infection treatment project for sex workers in Johannesburg, South Africa. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:S122–S132.
10. Wilson DP, Coplan PM, Wainberg MA, et al.. The paradoxical effects of using antiretroviral-based microbicides to control HIV epidemics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:9835–9840.
11. Abbas UL, Anderson RM, Mellors JW. Potential impact of antiretroviral therapy on HIV-1 transmission and AIDS mortality in resource-limited settings. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41:632–641.
12. Boily MC, Bastos FI, Desai K, et al.. Changes in the transmission dynamics of the HIV epidemic after the wide-scale use of antiretroviral therapy could explain increases in sexually transmitted infections—results from mathematical models. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31:100–112.
13. Bacaer N, Pretorius C, Auvert B. An age-structured model for the potential impact of generalized access to antiretrovirals on the south African HIV epidemic. Bull Math Biol. 2010;72:2180–2198.
14. Granich RM, Gilks CF, Dye C, et al.. Universal voluntary HIV testing with immediate antiretroviral therapy as a strategy for elimination of HIV transmission: a mathematical model. Lancet. 2009;373:48–57.
15. United Nations Statistics Division. UNdata Country Profile—Viet Nam. 2013. Available at: Accessed March 27, 2014.
16. Executive Board of the United Nations Development programme and of the United Nations population Fund (2007) UNFPA global and regional programme, 2008–2011. Available at: Accessed March 27, 2014.
17. Population Reference Bureau. 2013 World Population Data Sheet. 2013. Available at: Accessed March 27, 2014.
18. Statistics South Africa. Mid-year Population Estimates. 2010. Available at: Accessed March 27, 2014.
© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins