MSM were more likely than MSW to report good to excellent general health but also more likely to report poor mental health status and diagnoses of depression (26.0% vs. 10.5%, P < 0.001) (Table 2). MSM were significantly more likely than MSW to have a primary health care provider and to have visited their provider in the past year.
MSM were more likely than MSW to have been HIV tested, both in the last year (53.6% vs. 27.2%, P < 0.001) and ever (84.8% vs. 59.7%, P < 0.001) (Table 2). Among MSM, 18-year to 29-year olds (66.0%) were more likely than 30-year to 39-year olds (47.4%, p=0.033) and 50-year to 64-year olds (46.8%, P = 0.022) to have HIV tested in the last year. Self-reported HIV testing in the last year was 65.5% among black MSM (95% CI: 51.6 to 77.1), 61.2% among Hispanic MSM (95% CI: 50.3 to 71.1), and 51.1% among white MSM (95% CI: 42.9 to 59.3).
MSM reported more sex partners in the past year than MSW; 29.1% of MSM and 8.7% of MSW reported ≥4 partners (Table 2). Likelihood of reporting multiple partners among MSM did not vary by age or race/ethnicity. Almost two-thirds (62.9%) of MSM reported using a condom at last sex act, compared with 38.3% of MSW (Table 2). Among MSM, condom use at last sex was more prevalent among 18-year to 29-year olds (65.0%) than among 30-year to 39-year olds (54.9%, P = 0.040) and 50-year to 64-year olds (52.3%, P = 0.017), but did not vary among white, black, and Hispanic MSM.
HIV and Primary and Secondary Syphilis Rates
The number of new HIV diagnoses among MSM increased from 2370 in 2005 to 2499 in 2008 (a 5.4% increase), whereas diagnoses among MSW decreased steadily from 369 in 2005 to 258 in 2008 (a 30.1% decrease). During 2005–2008, there were 9571 new HIV cases among MSM and 1249 among MSW, resulting in an MSM HIV case rate that was 140.4 as high (95% CI: 132.1 to 148.7) as the rate among MSW (2526.9/100,000 vs. 18.0/100,000) (Table 3). MSM/MSW rate ratios varied substantially by age and by race/ethnicity. Among MSM, HIV rates decreased with increasing age; the rate for 18-year to 29-year olds (5956.4/100,000) was almost twice the rate among 30-year to 39-year olds, and 4.6 to 6.2 times as high as the rates among MSM aged 40 and older. Among MSW, 18-year to 29-year olds had the lowest HIV rate (12.1/100,000) of all age groups, leading to the highest MSM/MSW rate ratio (490.3). Among MSM, rates were highest for black MSM (8780.7/100,000), which were double that of Hispanic MSM (3520.7/100,000).
P&S syphilis cases among both MSM and MSW increased steadily, from 496 in 2005 to 895 in 2008 among MSM (an 80.4% increase), and from 84 in 2005 to 114 in 2008 among MSW (a 35.7% increase). The total number of P&S syphilis cases over 4 years was 2678 among MSM and 334 among MSW, resulting in an MSM P&S syphilis case rate that was 147.3 times as high (95% CI: 130.5 to 163.2) as the rate among MSW (707.0/100,000 vs. 4.8/100,000) (Table 3). P&S syphilis rates among MSM followed the same pattern as HIV rates, wherein they decreased with increasing age and were highest among black (2,375.9/100,000), followed by Hispanic MSM (754.1/100,000), who had approximately one-third the rate of black MSM. In every age group, MSM had more than 100 times the rate of P&S syphilis compared with MSW. MSM/MSW rate ratios by race/ethnicity ranged from 183.0 (black) to 255.7 (white).
MSM HIV and Syphilis Trends
Figure 1 shows rates among MSM by age group from 2005 through 2008. There were marked increases in HIV diagnoses among 18-year-old to 29-year-old MSM, with case rates more than doubling from 3078.7/100,000 (95% CI: 2875.7 to 3281.6 per 100,000) in 2005 to 8870.0/100,000 in 2008 (95% CI: 8342.7 to 9397.3 per 100,000) (Fig. 1A). Although the P&S syphilis rate among 18-year-old to 29-year-old MSM in 2005 was lower than the HIV rate that year, it increased much more dramatically, increasing 6-fold to reach 2900.4/100,000 in 2008 (95% CI: 2598.6 to 3202.1 per 100,000) (Fig. 1B). During this period, both HIV and P&S syphilis case rates among 30-year-old to 39-year-old MSM peaked in 2007.
Figure 2 shows rates by race/ethnicity category from 2005 through 2008. After peaks in 2006 and 2007 for Hispanic and black MSM, respectively, HIV rates remained relatively steady (Fig. 2A). P&S syphilis rates increased dramatically for black and Hispanic MSM from 2005 to 2007, with the rate among Hispanic MSM increasing 6-fold, whereas the rate rose steadily for white MSM (Fig. 2B).
The population of MSM in NYC is large, diverse, and has high rates of risky sexual behaviors. There are substantial differences in the characteristics and newly diagnosed infection rates of MSM, as compared with MSW. Our analysis triangulated population-based behavioral surveys and HIV and STD surveillance registries and identified alarmingly high rates and rising trends in 2 epidemiologically linked health conditions among MSM. The planning, implementation, and evaluation of programs and policy to reduce disease burden among MSM will require continued and innovative efforts.
We found that 5% or 1 in every 20 sexually active NYC men reported same-sex behavior in the last year. This is almost double the national prevalence of male same-sex behavior estimated by the 2001–2006 NHANES and 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (both 2.9%), which included respondents of narrower age ranges but used comparable survey questions.1 Given that previous research has indicated that same-sex behavior is more prevalent in large cities,9 the higher prevalence in NYC is not surprising. With the backdrop of a mature HIV epidemic, decade-long syphilis epidemic, and evidence of ongoing sexual risk behaviors, however, the substantial size of this high-risk population means that high rates of disease could persist for some time.
Consistent with NHANES, we found that among major racial/ethnic groups, the prevalence of same-sex behavior was highest among non-Hispanic white men and lowest among non-Hispanic black men. It has been suggested that relative to white MSM, black MSM may not disclose same-sex behavior due to other sensitizing experiences with prejudice (eg, racism) or concerns about losing connections to their communities, and underreporting may be one explanation for observed racial/ethnic distributions among urban MSM.10,11 Alternatively, the higher proportion of white MSM in urban settings could be related to the phenomenon of seeking out large cities for early-life career opportunities that complement the social advantages of living in gay-friendly environments.12
Estimated HIV and syphilis case rates among NYC MSM and MSW were higher than estimated rates at the national level.3 Rates among NYC MSM were an order of magnitude higher; they had HIV and P&S syphilis case rates that were at least 2.5 and 4 times the national rates, respectively. Although reducing racial disparities in STD/HIV infection has been a national health priority, investigators examining MSM and MSW chlamydia and gonorrhea rates13 have proposed that the disparities paradigm be expanded to include sexual behavior. Indeed, compared with NYC MSW, MSM were at least 140 times as likely to be diagnosed with either HIV or P&S syphilis. The much higher HIV diagnosis rates among MSM could be due, in part, to higher testing rates; CHS data showed that 54% of MSM versus 27% of MSW tested for HIV in the past year. Syphilis diagnoses among MSM could be prompting some additional HIV testing and diagnosis. Disparities by sexual behavior could be driven somewhat by differential testing rates, but clearly MSM in NYC are significantly burdened with STD,14–16 and these disparities warrant extra public health attention and resources.
For both HIV and P&S syphilis, case rates among younger NYC MSM (ages 18–29 years) were approximately double the overall MSM rates and increased dramatically between 2005 and 2008. Although our data indicate a possible leveling off of HIV, they show a continued steep rise in syphilis rates in this group. Differing patterns by disease among young MSM could be explained by the fact that approximately 40% of 18-year-old to 29-year-old MSM with newly diagnosed P&S syphilis have already been diagnosed with HIV and are therefore not at risk for incident HIV infection. This hypothesis is supported by the pronounced divergence in HIV and syphilis trends among non-Hispanic blacks, a group in which HIV prevalence is particularly high. The difference could also be attributable to seroadaptive behaviors (eg, serosorting, serodisclosure) used by some MSM to reduce HIV risk17 or to differential effectiveness of prevention programs on the 2 diseases. Nonetheless, increases in syphilis diagnoses indicate ongoing unprotected sex and signal the potential for increases in HIV acquisition among HIV-uninfected young MSM.
Black MSM in NYC had disproportionately high rates of both new HIV and P&S syphilis diagnoses, more than 3 times the overall NYC MSM rates. The elevated HIV rate may reflect higher HIV testing rates among this subgroup; among black MSM CHS respondents, 65% reported HIV testing in the previous year. However, despite high testing rates, there remains a high risk of ongoing transmission. Young black MSM have reported onset of sexual behaviors with other men at younger ages and have been more likely to engage in unprotected receptive anal intercourse with casual partners than their white counterparts, which are possible contributing factors to the disproportionate rise in new diagnoses.18 Black MSM have been found to be diagnosed relatively late with HIV19–21; indeed, in NYC in 2008, a higher proportion of young black MSM (aged 20–29) were diagnosed with AIDS within 1 month of an HIV diagnosis than young white MSM (11% vs. 7%). Furthermore, once HIV infected, black MSM may be less likely to seek or have access to quality care and treatment than white MSM.22–24
Several features of this analysis may have had an impact on denominator estimates and/or case numbers. First, the 2005–2008 CHS sampled only landline telephones. Exclusion of cell phone–only users could introduce a bias if there were meaningful differences between them and the sampled landline users. However, when the 2009 CHS modified its sampling strategy to include cell phone users, there were no major differences in nearly all CHS indicators between 2009 and previous survey years.25 Second, the calculation of rates requires a precise estimation of the size of the relevant population. Socially stigmatized behaviors such as male-to-male sexual contact may be prone to underreporting in surveys, which could lead to underestimation of the MSM population size and consequent overestimation of HIV and syphilis case rates. A sensitivity analysis in which we used the upper limit of the 2005 CHS estimate for prevalence of male same-sex behavior (7.5%), rather than the average 4-year prevalence (5%), increased our cumulative 4-year MSM population from ∼379,000 to ∼550,000 and decreased our MSW population to ∼6,750,000. MSM and MSW new HIV diagnosis rates were recalculated as 1747.7/100,000 and 18.5/100,000, respectively (rate ratio: 94.5); MSM and MSW P&S syphilis rates were 489.0/100,000 and 4.9/100,000, respectively (rate ratio: 98.9). Thus, MSM still had a substantially higher risk of new infections compared with MSW. Third, per surveillance practices at NYC DOHMH, HIV diagnoses are attributed to MSM if the patient reports any history of sex with men before diagnosis; this diverges from practices in syphilis surveillance and the CHS, which ascertain recent reported sexual behavior. Although the comparatively longer period for classifying sexual behavior used in HIV surveillance could overestimate MSM HIV case numbers relative to MSM denominator estimates, data from field interviews of newly diagnosed HIV cases have demonstrated good correlation between ever and past-year MSM behavior (Chi-Chi Udeagu, personal communication, December 4, 2010). Fourth, this analysis was done using separate databases, with HIV rates calculated using one registry and syphilis rates another. This allowed for comparison of rates by only the crudest demographics. Finally, our MSM population estimate would have included some number of men who had been HIV infected before our study period and inclusion of such nonsusceptible persons would have inflated our denominator, resulting in underestimated new HIV diagnosis rates. This may be especially true for older MSM.
Our approach to redistributing the 42% of P&S cases and 29% of HIV cases without reported transmission risk assumed a similar distribution of cases among those with known and unknown risk. In exploratory analyses, we found that white syphilis cases and black and older HIV cases were more likely than other subgroups to be missing risk information. If the proportion of MSM among groups missing this information were in fact different from those for whom it is known, case rates based on our redistribution methods could be overestimated or underestimated. Case rates could be conservative if same-sex behavior was underreported by cases with known risk and some proportion of true MSM cases was misclassified as MSW. For instance, in sensitivity analyses in which we reallocated the proportion of male cases with unknown risk so that all of them were classified as MSM, the new HIV diagnosis rates among MSM and MSW became 2622.7/100,000 and 12.9/100,000, respectively (rate ratio: 203.0); MSM and MSW P&S syphilis case rates changed to 745.1/100,000 and 2.8/100,000, respectively (rate ratio: 267.4). Alternatively, adjusting the proportion of cases with unknown risk so that only 50% were classified as MSM and 50% as MSW yielded new HIV case rates of 2204.7/100,000 and 36.0/100,000 among MSM and MSW, respectively (rate ratio: 61.2), and MSM and MSW P&S syphilis rates of 575.4/100,000 and 12.2/100,000 (rate ratio: 47.3). Results of these sensitivity analyses represent a plausible range within which the true numerators likely lie.
We examined HIV and P&S syphilis epidemics in NYC and found significant overlap between them, with young and non-Hispanic black MSM disproportionately affected by both conditions. It is critical to revise current data systems to enable integration of HIV and STD case data; this would allow for better identification and characterization of the population affected by these synergistic epidemics and would facilitate analyses to drive additional research, programming, and policy. Reducing health disparities associated with sexual behavior and STD is a complex task. A critical step is improving STD/HIV screening and testing coverage to increase the number of persons who are aware of their infections, which can lead to behavior change, decrease secondary transmission, and link infected individuals to care, treatment, and prevention services.26 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2010 STD Treatment Guidelines call for annual STD/HIV screening for sexually active MSM and more frequent screening for MSM who report high-risk behaviors.27 To achieve this, it is imperative that providers are skilled in identifying MSM. A substantial proportion of MSM do not identify as gay. Therefore, providers need to be competent at taking a nonjudgmental sexual history that ascertains sex of sex partners and specific sexual practices with all partners.
We thank our colleagues at the Division of Epidemiology, New York City DOHMH: Leena Gupta, MPH, for conducting the final data check and Donna Eisenhower, DrPH, for her work in conducting and overseeing the annual NYC DOHMH CHS.
1. Xu F, Sternberg MR, Markowitz LE. Men who have sex with men
in the United States: demographic and behavioral characteristics and prevalence of HIV and HSV-2 infection: results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2006. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37:399–405
2. Manning SE, Thorpe LE, Ramaswamy C, et al. Estimation of HIV prevalence, risk factors, and testing frequency among sexually active men who have sex with men
, aged 18-64 years–New York City. 2002. J Urban Health. 2007;84:212–225
3. Purcell DW, Johnson C, Lansky A, et al. Calculating disease rates for risk groups: estimating the national population size of men who have sex with men
Presented at: Program and abstracts of the 2010 national STD prevention conference; March 8–11, 2010; Atlanta, GA
6. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2009. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 20096th edition Lenexa, Kansas AAPOR
9. Laumann E, Gagnon J, Michael R, et al. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. 1994 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press
10. Black D, Gates G, Sanders S, et al. Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography. 2000;37:139–154
11. Millett GA, Flores SA, Peterson JL, et al. Explaining disparities in HIV infection among black and white men who have sex with men
: a meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors. AIDS. 2007;21:2083–2091
12. Catania JA, Canchola J, Pollack L, et al. Understanding the demographic characteristics of urban men who have sex with men
. J Homosex. 2006;51:33–51
13. Scott HM, Bernstein KT, Raymond HF, et al. Racial/ethnic and sexual behavior disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections, San Francisco, 1999–2008. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:315–322
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. . Primary and secondary syphilis among men who have sex with men
—New York city, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:853–856
15. Blank S, Schillinger J, Harbatkin D. Lymphogranuloma venereum in the industrialised world. Lancet. 2005;365:1607–1608
16. Schillinger JA, McKinney CM, Garg R, et al. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 and characteristics associated with undiagnosed infection: New York City, 2004. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35:599–606
17. McDaid LM, Hart GJ. Sexual risk behaviour for transmission of HIV in men who have sex with men
: recent findings and potential interventions. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010;5:311–315
18. Halkitis PN, Brockwell S, Siconolfi DE, et al. Sexual behaviors of adolescent emerging and young adult men who have sex with men
ages 13-29 in New York City. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;56:285–291
19. MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA, Secura GM, et al. Unrecognized HIV infection, risk behaviors, and perceptions of risk among young men who have sex with men
: opportunities for advancing HIV prevention in the third decade of HIV/AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38:603–614
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. . HIV prevalence, unrecognized infection, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men
—five U.S. cities, June 2004–April 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:597–601
21. McGinnis KA, Fine MJ, Sharma RK, et al. Understanding racial disparities in HIV using data from the Veterans Aging Cohort 3-Site Study and VA Administrative Data. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1728–1733
22. Jain S, Schwarcz S, Katz M, et al. Elevated risk of death for African Americans with AIDS, San Francisco, 1996–2002. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006;17:493–503
23. Wong MD, Cunningham WE, Shapiro MF, et al. Disparities in HIV treatment and physician attitudes about delaying protease inhibitors for nonadherent patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:366–374
24. King WD, Wong MD, Shapiro MF. Does racial concordance between HIV positive patients and their physicians affect the time to receipt of protease inhibitors. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1146–1153
25. Corey C, Eisenhower D, Immerwahr S, et al. Including New Yorkers who can only be reached by cell phones in the community health survey: results from the 2008 cell phone survey, 2011 pilot survey. Epi Research Report May 1–8, 2010. Available at: http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/epi/epibrief-cellpilot.pdf
. Accessed July 15, 2011
26. Steele CB, Meléndez-Morales L, Campoluci R, et al. Health disparities
in HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, and tuberculosis: issues, burden, and response. A retrospective review, 2000–2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/healthdisparities
. Accessed March 30, 2011
27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. . Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:1–110
Keywords:© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
HIV/AIDS rates; health disparities; men who have sex with men; syphilis rates