Share this article on:

Antiretroviral Drug Resistance in a Respondent-Driven Sample of HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men in Brazil

Bermúdez-Aza, Elkin Hernan MD, MSc; Kerr, Ligia Regina Franco Sansigolo MD, PhD; Kendall, Carl PhD; Pinho, Adriana Araujo MSc; de Mello, Maeve Brito PhD; Mota, Rosa Salani MSc; Guimarães, Mark Drew Crosland PhD; Alencar, Cecilia Salete MSc; de Brito, Ana Maria PhD; Dourado, Ines Costa PhD; da Batista, Sonia Maria Batista MSc; Abreu, Fabiano BSc; de Oliveira, Lisangela Cristina MSc; de Souza Moraes, Adão MSc; Benzaken, Adele Schwartz MD, PhD; Merchan-Hamann, Edgar MD, PhD; de Freitas, Gisele Maria Brandão MD, MSc; McFarland, Willi MD, PhD; Albuquerque, Elizabeth PhD; Rutherford, George W MD, MSc; Sabino, Ester MD, PhD

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: August 15th, 2011 - Volume 57 - Issue - p S186-S192
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31821e9c36
Supplement Article

Background: There are few studies on HIV subtypes and primary and secondary antiretroviral drug resistance (ADR) in community-recruited samples in Brazil. We analyzed HIV clade diversity and prevalence of mutations associated with ADR in men who have sex with men in all five regions of Brazil.

Methods: Using respondent-driven sampling, we recruited 3515 men who have sex with men in nine cities: 299 (9.5%) were HIV-positive; 143 subjects had adequate genotyping and epidemiologic data. Forty-four (30.8%) subjects were antiretroviral therapy-experienced (AE) and 99 (69.2%) antiretroviral therapy-naïve (AN). We sequenced the reverse transcriptase and protease regions of the virus and analyzed them for drug resistant mutations using World Health Organization guidelines.

Results: The most common subtypes were B (81.8%), C (7.7%), and recombinant forms (6.9%). The overall prevalence of primary ADR resistance was 21.4% (i.e. among the AN) and secondary ADR was 35.8% (i.e. among the AE). The prevalence of resistance to protease inhibitors was 3.9% (AN) and 4.4% (AE); to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 15.0% (AN) and 31.0% (AE) and to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 5.5% (AN) and 13.2% (AE). The most common resistance mutation for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was 184V (17 cases) and for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 103N (16 cases).

Conclusions: Our data suggest a high level of both primary and secondary ADR in men who have sex with men in Brazil. Additional studies are needed to identify the correlates and causes of antiretroviral therapy resistance to limit the development of resistance among those in care and the transmission of resistant strains in the wider epidemic.

From *Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; †Universidade Federal do Ceará; ‡Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA; §Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública/Fiocruz; ‖CICT/Fiocruz; ¶Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; **Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães/Fiocruz; ††Instituto de Saúde Coletiva/Universidade Federal da Bahia; ‡‡Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; §§Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Santos; ‖‖UniBrasil; ¶¶Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Itajaí; ***Fundação Alfredo da Matta; †††Universidade de Brasília; ‡‡‡Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Campo Grande; §§§University of California, San Francisco; and ‖‖‖LIM 03, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

This work was carried out by the Federal University of Ceará with technical and financial support of the Ministry of Health/Secretariat of Health Surveillance/Department of STD, AIDS and Viral Hepatitis through the Project of International Technical Cooperation AD/BRA/03/H34 between the Brazilian Government and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime-UNODC.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Correspondence to: Ligia Regina Franco Sansigolo Kerr, MD, PhD, Departamento de Saúde Comunitária, Rua Prof. Costa Mendes 1608-5, andar, CEP: 60.430-971, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil (e-mail:;

Back to Top | Article Outline


The Brazilian epidemic of HIV-1 is biologically complex and includes several subtypes and recombinant genomes as well as regional differences in the distribution of these clades.1-3 HIV-1 develops extensive genetic diversity and can acquire mutations to develop antiretroviral drug resistance (ADR). The presence of ADR is a major obstacle to successful treatment, affecting the efficacy of drug regimens and mortality rates.4-6 Since the introduction of universal access to highly active antiretroviral therapy in Brazil in 1996, a substantial decrease in HIV-related morbidity and mortality has been observed.7 However, there have been concerns about the emergence and transmission of ADR,8 especially in specific subpopulations such as men who have sex with men (MSM).

Based on worldwide studies, the prevalence of transmitted drug-resistant HIV-1 variants ranges from 1.4% to 28.9%.9,10 In some South American and Caribbean countries, a low prevalence of primary drug resistance mutation has been reported.11-13 Recent studies from different sites in Brazil have found the prevalence of primary ADR to range from 1.4% to 12.7%.14-16 Some studies have reported even higher prevalences17 with the highest 25% in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced patients and 37% in ART-naïve patients.18 As a result, in the last years, the Brazilian Ministry of Health began monitoring ADR in samples in the most populated state capitals.19

Although the occurrence of primary ADR is well documented, less is known about mechanisms and risk factors for transmission. Possible ways that may facilitate transmission of resistant virus include reductions in immune function, repeated exposure by the same partner, specific high-risk sexual practices, or concentration of resistant HIV in certain sexual networks.20,21

A relatively recent systematic review of MSM in the global HIV epidemic found a ninefold higher prevalence of ADR compared with other groups in middle- to low-prevalence countries. In Brazil, MSM are 29 times more likely to be infected than the general population.22 MSM in Latin America as a whole are the principal risk group for HIV infection and account for the greater part of incident infection. Despite the fact that MSM have accounted for most new cases for many years in Brazil and surveillance is a central part of the government's strategy, the MSM population has been relatively understudied to date. Part of the reason is the difficulty of reliably sampling this population. Recently respondent-driven sampling (RDS) has become available to access hard-to-reach populations in studies focusing on behavioral and biologic surveillance, epidemiologic studies, and evaluation of program interventions.23 RDS generates a quasiprobability sample, and although there is controversy about its analysis and interpretation,24 it is a significant advance over snowball sampling in limiting the selection biases inherent in relying on a few participants to recruit substantial numbers of others, in reaching diverse social networks, and in providing a basis for statistical adjustment of recruitment patterns to produce population estimates. Since RDS was introduced in South America in 2005, there have been relatively few studies conducted among MSM.25 None of these surveys explored transmission patterns based on HIV genotype analysis nor did they determine the occurrence of ADR in participants.

This study describes HIV-1 diversity and the prevalence of antiretroviral resistance mutations based on sequence analyses of the protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) genes in HIV-1 strains isolated from MSM recruited by RDS in all five regions of Brazil.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study Population

We conducted a cross-sectional study using RDS in nine Brazilian cities located in all five macroregions of the country designated by the Ministry of Health for a population-based national evaluation: Manaus (north), Recife and Salvador (northeast), Campo Grande (central west), Belo Horizonte, Rio de Janeiro, and Santos (southeast), and Itajaí and Curitiba (south) as shown in Figure 1. In brief, the RDS methods followed standardized protocols developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for behavioral surveillance. In each city, several study-eligible seeds are selected who recruit up to three other MSM and so on until the sample size is met and equilibrium is achieved on key variables. The recruitment began in October 2008 and ended in July 2009. The overall sample included 3515 men who reported having sex with another man in the last 12 months, were 18 years of age or older, and resided in one of the nine cities. The rapid test for HIV was offered to all participants and HIV infection was measured by finger stick rapid HIV test. Whole blood was used in all the diagnostic tests, and the study followed the national algorithm for rapid testing (Portaria no. 34 de 28/07/05 da Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde): first the Rapid Check HIV-1 & 2 (Núcleo de Doenças Infecciosas [NDI], Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil) and Bio-Manguinhos HIV-1 & 2 (Instituto de Tecnologia em imunobiologicos, Bio-Manguinhos, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) were administered at the same time followed by a third test in case the previous two tests were discrepant. Those who tested HIV-positive were invited to give a sample to proceed with genotype testing. The HIV-1 serostatus of each of those subjects who agreed to genotype testing was further confirmed by commercial enzyme-linked immunoassay and Western blot. Of the 299 (9.5%) found to be infected with HIV, 178 (59.5%) samples were available and sufficient for genotype testing. The study was approved by the Brazilian National Ethical Committee (CONEP 14494) and written informed consent for all the procedures was obtained from each participant.



Back to Top | Article Outline

Molecular Analyses

The DNA of the 178 samples was extracted from the buffy coat using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's procedure. The HIV-1 pol gene was amplified using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to obtain one fragment containing the entire protease (PR) gene and approximately 700 base pairs of the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene as previously described.26 Amplified products from the second-round PCR were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen); the concentrations were quantified by ultraviolet absorbance spectrophotometry using the Nanodrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). Purified PCR products were sequenced using the ABI Prism Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (Applied BioSystems, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol in an Applied BioSystems ABI 3100 automatic sequencer (Applied BioSystems). All sequences obtained were assembled with Sequencher 4.7 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI) software and manually edited to identify mixtures. To define the subtype of each strain, we used interface software27 that automatically submits the sequences to two programs: recombinant identification program and basic local alignment tool. Recombinant strains and sequences that did not yield concordant subtype results were manually reviewed using the bootscanning technique in SIMPLOT. The RT and PR regions of the virus were analyzed for drug-resistant mutations according to World Health Organization guidelines using the latest update of the Stanford Surveillance Drug Resistance Mutations Calibrated Population Resistance Tool ( according to the latest update.28

Genbank accession numbers of the sequences presented in this study are HQ127459 to HQ127620.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical Analyses

We used the chi-square test for comparing proportions and the Student t test for continuous variables as appropriate; P < 0.05 was considered significant. These analyses were performed using Stata Version 10.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). For producing population prevalence estimates, adjustments were made to account for the sampling design. RDS is a chain referral sampling method that collects information on the size of each participant's network (degree) and uses this to calculate the probability of selecting for each participant. Additionally, as implemented here for a national sample, we combined individual recruitment weight (W) for each participant (i) from each city (h) as

where Rih is the degree of the network, Mh is the proportion of MSM in the city related to the total sample size, and n is the total sample size. We estimated Mh as follows: 1) we used the proportion of adult men (18 years or older) who reported ever having sex with a man in the last 12 months as reported in a population-based survey conducted by the Brazilian government for each city listed in this study or region of the country where the city was located; 2) we multiplied this proportion multiplied by the adult male population 18 years old or older in that city found in the Brazilian national census to derive the estimated number of MSM for each city; and 3) we summed the numbers of MSM for all the nine cities and calculated the proportion that those MSM (Mh) in each city would represent in the total sample (n).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Of the 178 samples tested, we were able to sequence 162 (91.0%) successfully.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Sociodemographic Profiles of the Study Participants

Socioepidemiologic data could be linked to 143 (88.3%) of the 162 samples sequenced; they are presented in Table 1. The mean age of participants was 32.6 years, 40.2 years for the ART-experienced group and 29.1 years for the ART-naïve group. The regions with the largest number of samples were the south and southeast followed by the northeast.



Sexual activity for 10 or more years was reported by 78.8% in the ART-naïve group and 99.3% in the ART-experienced group (P < 0.001). Always using condoms regardless of the type of partner was reported in 21.3% of the ART-naïve group and 28.0% of the ART-experienced group. Additionally, exchange of sex for money in the last 12 months was reported by 28 (18.5%) subjects; 22 (84.6%) of them were in the ART-naïve group. Thirty (19.7%) participants reported that they had paid for sex; 58.6% of these were in the ART-naïve group (results not shown).

As presented in Table 1, characteristics were generally equivalent between the two groups, except for age and the number of years of sexual activity, which were higher in the ART-experienced group. In addition, we found a higher proportion of treated patients in the south/southeast region.

Back to Top | Article Outline

HIV Subtyping

Table 2 shows overall data on subtypes and mutations. Clade B was the most common in the two groups: 66.8% (ART-naïve) and 91.1% (ART-experienced). We found recombinants in 10 (6.1%) samples, nine of which classified as BF (5.5%) and one as a BC mosaic (0.6%). The BF recombinants were all classified as F for the PR region and as B for the RT region. The BC sequence was C for the PR and B for the RT region. The BF recombinants were from seven ART-naïve and two ART-experienced subjects and from all regions except the central west. The sequence classified as BC was from an ART-naïve individual from the southeast region.



Geographically, we found that clade B predominated in all regions except for the south, where non-B samples constituted 50% (10 of 20). The prevalence of the B clade was 92.3% in the north, 90.6% in the northeast, 89.5% in the central west and 80.0% in the southeast. Recombinant samples were obtained from all the regions except the central west; the largest number was from the south region.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Circulation of Resistance Mutations

The distribution of the three most common types of mutations is shown in Figure 2. The most common mutations were 184V (17 cases) in 6.1% of ART-naïve and 25.0% of ART-experienced cases and 103N (16 cases) in 10.1% of ART-naïve and 13.6% of ART-experienced cases. Drug resistance mutations were present in 21.4% of ART-naïve and in 35.8% of ART-experienced participants. The prevalence of protease inhibitor-resistant mutations was 3.9% in ART-naïve and 4.4% in ART-experienced, of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant mutations 15.0% in ART-naïve and 31.0% in ART-experienced and for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor 5.5% in ART-naïve and 13.2% in ART-experienced participants. The mutations for RT at positions 77, 100, 106, 179, and 230 were not detected in any of the samples nor were they detected for PR at positions 23, 32, 36, 47, 50, 53, 76, 83, and 85. Mutations did not cluster geographically. Table 3 summarizes the demographic characteristics of ART-naïve subjects according to their drug resistance status. Of all factors considered, greater than 11 years of schooling and clade B genotype more common among MSM with ADR mutations.





Back to Top | Article Outline


Most studies on HIV diversity and primary and secondary resistance in Brazil are based on convenience samples collected at facilities such as AIDS referral clinics, anonymous HIV testing services, or blood banks. In this study, we described the molecular characteristics of part of the HIV-1 pol genomic region isolated from MSM recruited from the community at large in each of the five geographic regions in Brazil using RDS sampling. Although we are not able to claim that the sample represents all Brazilian MSM, this is the first study in Brazil to focus on samples from diverse geographic areas and collected with an appropriate technique to sample a hard-to-reach population. We found high rates of both primary and secondary ADR (21.4% and 35.8%, respectively) with great potential impact on the prevention of the spread of resistance and on the health outcomes for persons under HIV care.

Our results support previous findings. All the major Brazilian circulating subtypes (B, C, and F) of group M were found with predominance of the B clade except in the south region where subtype C was found in half of the samples.29,30 Less common HIV clades were also detected in different geographic regions such as subtype C in the north region, which argues for the need to track the simultaneous circulation of less common HIV forms as part of a more extensive characterization of the Brazilian MSM HIV epidemics. Diverse clades in circulation may denote different points of introduction, modes of transmission, and different networks requiring specifically targeted outreach programs.

Surveillance of primary resistant strains will become increasingly important for countries where ART is scaling up rapidly. The worldwide prevalence of transmitted drug-resistant HIV-1 variants fluctuates according to the characteristics of the population and the methodology of the studies.9 Of note, Brazil was one of the first countries in the world to offer universal access to ART and achieved a high level of coverage. Previous convenience samples in Brazil demonstrate drug resistance levels range below 13%14-16 with the exception of one study in the harbor city of Santos where ADR reached 37%.18 Most of these studies did not assess rates of resistance by risk exposure or other epidemiologic data. A recent study by Sprinz and colleagues31 evaluated 387 ART-naïve patients from 20 outpatient clinics from 13 cities in Brazil. Primary resistance was detected in only nine (5.2%) of 173 MSM, and no difference was found with regard to any risk factors. The higher prevalence of resistance among ART-naïve MSM (19.3%) in our study could be the result of differences in the recruitment methods and type of population studied. In the Sprinz study, the samples were collected from outpatients not receiving treatment, and it is likely that the time between initial infection and genotype testing was longer than in our study. Resistant strains are less fit and when there is no selection by antiretroviral drugs, ADR tends to disappear or at least diversity narrows.32,33 Through its modified chain-referral methods, RDS permits us to identify links between ART-naïve and ART-experienced individuals and, although these links could be friendship or acquaintance links, we can reasonably assume that some are sexual links. The proportion of sexual links between ART-experienced and ART-naïve individuals in our study may be higher than in Sprinz, accounting for our results. Alternatively, there could be some other form of selection bias in study convenience samples that resulted in underestimation of primary ADR.

Our data indicate a statistical association of ADR with higher education level and genotype B, probably reflecting an association with the network of the ART-naïve subjects of this particular sample. Drug resistance studies in Brazil need to incorporate epidemiologic and behavioral data and to use these findings to support enhanced secondary prevention methods. Additionally, although numbers are small, there is a suggestion that the mutation variants are different in the ART-experienced and ART-naïve groups. This may be the result of the fact that some mutations are less fit and will disappear soon without drug selection or it may suggest that primary resistance is being transmitted by a particular subgroup of individuals under treatment. Phylogenetic analysis of these samples may give us clues on how this transmission occurs.

In conclusion, our data suggest a high level of development and transmission of HIV-resistant strains among MSM in Brazil. Additional information involving the exploration of new hypotheses that investigate the factors associated with transmission of HIV-resistant strains in MSM, including “upstream” causal factors related to ART supply, adherence, and prevention, are urgently needed. A national ADR surveillance system should be a public health priority for monitoring resistance and to guide interventions to reduce the development and transmission of resistant strains of HIV.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors thank both the Department of STD, AIDS and Viral Hepatitis of the Ministry of Health (CSV 234/07) and FAPESP-Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2004/15856-9) for funding the research; Center for Global Health Equity of the Tulane University for technical support; the Institute for Global Health of the University of San Francisco California where the project was conceived; and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for supporting L.R.F.S.K.'s postdoctoral (BEX 3495/06-0) and E.H.B.-A.'s doctoral studies. The authors thank Dr Márcio Antônio de Sá and Dr Gerson Pereira for coordinating the Project in the 10 cities on behalf of the NSAHD; and Dr Ana Roberta Pati Pascom (from NSAHD) and Dr Aristides Barbosa (from the Centers of Diseases Control and Prevention/GAP Brazil) for their technical and implementation assistance in the RDS methodology in Brazil. The authors are grateful to all the volunteers who participated in the study.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Dumans AT, Soares MA, Machado ES, et al. Synonymous genetic polymorphisms within Brazilian human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 subtypes may influence mutational routes to drug resistance. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:1232-1238.
2. Brigido LF, Nunes CC, Oliveira CM, et al. HIV type 1 subtype C and CB Pol recombinants prevail at the cities with the highest AIDS prevalence rate in Brazil. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007;23:1579-1586.
3. Santos AF, Schrago CG, Martinez AM, et al. Epidemiologic and evolutionary trends of HIV-1 CRF31_BC-related strains in southern Brazil. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45:328-333.
4. Deeks SG, Gange SJ, Kitahata MM, et al. Trends in multidrug treatment failure and subsequent mortality among antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients with HIV infection in North America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1582-1590.
5. Jakobsen MR, Tolstrup M, Sogaard OS, et al. Transmission of HIV-1 drug-resistant variants: prevalence and effect on treatment outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:566-573.
6. Moreno S, Lopez Aldeguer J, Arribas JR, et al. The future of antiretroviral therapy: challenges and needs. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:827-835.
7. Nunn AS, Fonseca EM, Bastos FI, et al. Evolution of antiretroviral drug costs in Brazil in the context of free and universal access to AIDS treatment. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e305.
8. Machado ES, Afonso AO, Nissley DV, et al. Emergence of primary NNRTI resistance mutations without antiretroviral selective pressure in a HAART-treated child. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4806.
9. Booth CL, Geretti AM. Prevalence and determinants of transmitted antiretroviral drug resistance in HIV-1 infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59:1047-1056.
10. Vercauteren J, Wensing AM, van de Vijver DA, et al. Transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 is stabilizing in Europe. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1503-1508.
11. Kijak GH, Pampuro SE, Avila MM, et al. Resistance profiles to antiretroviral drugs in HIV-1 drug-naive patients in Argentina. Antivir Ther. 2001;6:71-77.
12. DiazGranados CA, Mantilla M, Lenis W. Antiretroviral drug resistance in HIV-infected patients in Colombia. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:e298-e303.
13. Perez L, Alvarez LP, Carmona R, et al. Genotypic resistance to antiretroviral drugs in patients infected with several HIV type 1 genetic forms in Cuba. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007;23:407-414.
14. Brindeiro RM, Diaz RS, Sabino EC, et al. Brazilian Network for HIV Drug Resistance Surveillance (HIV-BResNet): a survey of chronically infected individuals. AIDS. 2003;17:1063-1069.
15. Soares MA, Brindeiro RM, Tanuri A. Primary HIV-1 drug resistance in Brazil. AIDS. 2004;18(suppl 3):S9-S13.
16. Barreto CC, Nishyia A, Araujo LV, et al. Trends in antiretroviral drug resistance and clade distributions among HIV-1-infected blood donors in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41:338-341.
17. Pedroso C, Queiroz AT, Alcantara LC, et al. High prevalence of primary antiretroviral resistance among HIV-1-infected adults and children in Bahia, a northeast state of Brazil. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45:251-253.
18. Sucupira MC, Caseiro MM, Alves K, et al. High levels of primary antiretroviral resistance genotypic mutations and B/F recombinants in Santos, Brazil. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007;21:116-128.
19. Inocencio LA, Pereira AA, Sucupira MC, et al. Brazilian Network for HIV Drug Resistance Surveillance: a survey of individuals recently diagnosed with HIV. J Int AIDS Soc. 2009;12:20.
20. Gorbach PM, Drumright LN, Javanbakht M, et al. Antiretroviral drug resistance and risk behavior among recently HIV-infected men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47:639-643.
21. Yerly S, Junier T, Gayet-Ageron A, et al. The impact of transmission clusters on primary drug resistance in newly diagnosed HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2009;23:1415-1423.
22. Baral S, Sifakis F, Cleghorn F, et al. Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000-2006: a systematic review. Plos Med. 2010;4:e339.
23. Magnani R, Sabin K, Saidel T, et al. Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS. 2005;19(suppl 2):S67-S72.
24. Goel S, Salganik MJ. Assessing respondent-driven sampling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:6743-6747.
25. Kendall C, Kerr LR, Gondim RC, et al. An empirical comparison of respondent-driven sampling, time location sampling, and snowball sampling for behavioral surveillance in men who have sex with men, Fortaleza, Brazil. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(suppl):S97-S104.
26. Sa Filho DJ, Sanabani S, Diaz RS, et al. Analysis of full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genome reveals a variable spectrum of subtypes B and f recombinants in Sao Paulo, Brazil. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005;21:145-151.
27. Araujo LV, Soares MA, Oliveira SM, et al. DBCollHIV: a database system for collaborative HIV analysis in Brazil. Genet Mol Res. 2006;5:203-215.
28. Bennett DE, Camacho RJ, Otelea D, et al. Drug resistance mutations for surveillance of transmitted HIV-1 drug-resistance: 2009 update. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4724.
29. Ferreira JL, Thomaz M, Rodrigues R, et al. Molecular characterisation of newly identified HIV-1 infections in Curitiba, Brazil: preponderance of clade C among males with recent infections. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008;103:800-808.
30. Rodrigues R, Scherer LC, Oliveira CM, et al. Low prevalence of primary antiretroviral resistance mutations and predominance of HIV-1 clade C at polymerase gene in newly diagnosed individuals from south Brazil. Virus Res. 2006;116:201-207.
31. Sprinz E, Netto EM, Patelli M, et al. Primary antiretroviral drug resistance among HIV type 1-infected individuals in Brazil. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009;25:861-867.
32. Walter H, Low P, Harrer T, et al. No evidence for persistence of multidrug-resistant viral strains after a 7-month treatment interruption in an HIV-1-infected individual. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;31:137-146.
33. Hance AJ, Lemiale V, Izopet J, et al. Changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 populations after treatment interruption in patients failing antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 2001;75:6410-6417.

HIV-1; men who have sex with men; respondent-driven sampling; Brazil; antiretroviral resistance

Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.