Share this article on:

Early Postseroconversion CD4 Cell Counts Independently Predict CD4 Cell Count Recovery in HIV-1–Postive Subjects Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy

Kulkarni, Hemant MD*†; Okulicz, Jason F MD‡§; Grandits, Greg MS‡∥; Crum-Cianflone, Nancy F MD‡¶; Landrum, Michael L MD‡§; Hale, Braden MD‡¶; Wortmann, Glenn MD‡#; Tramont, Edmund MD‡**; Polis, Michael MD‡**; Dolan, Matthew MD††; Lifson, Alan R MD‡‡‡; Agan, Brian K MD; Ahuja, Sunil K MD*†§§; Marconi, Vincent C MD‡∥∥

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: August 15th, 2011 - Volume 57 - Issue 5 - p 387-395
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182219113
Clinical Science

Background: The relationship between CD4+ T-cell counts determined soon after seroconversion with HIV-1 (baseline CD4), nadir CD4, and CD4 levels attained during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is unknown.

Methods: Longitudinal, including baseline (at or soon after HIV diagnosis), intermediate (nadir), and distal (post-HAART) CD4+ T-cell counts were assessed in 1085 seroconverting subjects who achieved viral load suppression from a large well-characterized cohort. The association of baseline with post-HAART CD4+ T-cell count was determined after adjustment for other relevant covariates.

Results: A higher baseline CD4+ T-cell count predicted a greater post-HAART CD4+ T-cell count, independent of the nadir and other explanatory variables. Together, baseline and nadir strongly predicted the post-HAART CD4+ count such that a high baseline and lower nadir were associated with a maximal immune recovery after HAART. Likelihood of recovery of the baseline count after HAART was significantly higher when the nadir/baseline count ratio was consistently ≥0.6.

Conclusions: Among viral load suppressing seroconverters, the absolute CD4+ T-cell count attained post-HAART is highly dependent on both baseline and nadir CD4+ T-cell counts. These associations further support the early diagnosis and initiation of HAART among HIV-infected persons.

From the *Veterans Administration Research Center for AIDS and HIV-1 Infection, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX; †Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; ‡Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD; §Infectious Disease Service, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX; ‖Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; ¶Infectious Disease Clinic, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA; #Infectious Disease Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC; **National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; ††Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Wilford Hall United States Air Force Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, TX; ‡‡Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; §§Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; and ‖‖Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Received for publication January 21, 2011; accepted April 21, 2011.

Support for this work (IDCRP-000-03) was provided by the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program (IDCRP), a Department of Defense program executed through the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. This project has been funded in whole, or in part, with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), under Inter-Agency Agreement Y1-AI-5072. This work was also supported by the Veterans Administration Center on AIDS and HIV infection of the South Texas Veterans Health Care System, and a MERIT (R37046326) award from the NIH to S.K.A. S.K.A. is also supported by a VA MERIT award and is a recipient of the Elizabeth Glaser Scientist Award, the Burroughs Wellcome Clinical Scientist Award in Translational Research, and the Doris Duke Distinguished Clinical Scientist Award. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the NIH or the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Defense or the Departments of the Army, Navy or Air Force. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Correspondence to: Hemant Kulkarni, MD, 12023 Waterway Rdg, San Antonio, TX (e-mail:; Vincent Marconi, MD, 341 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Atlanta, GA 30308 (e-mail:

Back to Top | Article Outline


Among HIV-1-infected individuals receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the extent of CD4+ T-cell count recovery varies significantly, despite suppression of the viral load (VL). The clinical implication of this conundrum is significant because suboptimal CD4+ T-cell count recovery1-5 is associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical events.2,6-11 Prior studies have documented the negative impact of a low nadir CD4+ T-cell count on the recovery of CD4+ T-cell counts during HAART12-17 prompting the recommendation to initiate HAART at higher CD4+ T-cell counts. However, much less is known about the relationship between the proximal (baseline) CD4+ T-cell count close to infection and the CD4+ T-cell count recovery during HAART. Conceptually, it is natural to expect that after a potent therapeutic correction, CD4+ T-cell counts should return to pre-infection levels. This expectation would imply that in observational epidemiological studies, one might observe a close association between the baseline and the post-HAART CD4+ T-cell counts. Whether such an association is independent of the known relationship between the nadir and post-HAART CD4+ T-cell counts is currently unclear.

To address these questions, we evaluated a large military cohort of HIV-infected individuals with equal access to health care and in whom CD4+ T-cell counts were available soon after seroconversion, during the untreated disease course, and after initiation of HAART. With this unique resource, we sought to determine whether the baseline CD4+ T-cell counts also (and independently) influenced immune reconstitution as measured using the CD4+ T-cell counts attained during HAART after adjusting for variables known to influence immune recovery.18-29

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study Participants

Data for this study are from HIV-infected participants of the Department of Defense HIV Natural History Study30 who initiated HAART between January 1, 1996, and January 1, 2008, whose characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and are further described elsewhere.31 Subjects who had at least 3 CD4+ T-cell count measurements after 2 years of HAART initiation were included in the present study. All individuals in the military have undergone mandatory HIV screening since the cohort began in 1985 and are tested regularly while on active duty. Enrolled subjects are seen every 6 months for HIV-related evaluations, including CD4 and VL measurements. In addition, interim CD4 and VL taken at other facilities are also entered into the database. Of these participants, 1560 (66%) had baseline and nadir CD4+ counts and at least 3 CD4 measurements available more than 2 years after HAART initiation (definitions of these time points are provided in Figure 1A). We further included only subjects with previously documented HIV-negative tests (seroconverters) and excluded subjects that never reached VL suppression or had an AIDS event after HAART. The latter 2 groups (n = 135) were excluded so that analyses would include subjects who experienced successful HAART treatment thereby reducing many confounders associated with both poor adherence and inadequate CD4 response. These exclusions also made the interpretations from our study relevant to HIV clinics in resource rich settings. Therefore, we finally included 1085 subjects who fulfilled the inclusion criteria shown in Figure 1B. Further, because we also aimed to characterize overall pattern of the CD4+ T-cell count change over time in addition to the 3 aforementioned snapshots, we estimated the CD4+ T-cell count trends over time. For that, we included longitudinally measured CD4+ T-cell counts which were available on 2131 (25,138 CD4 measurement, median; 11.8/participant) and 2180 (36,855 CD4 measurements, median; 16.9/participant) participants before and after HAART was initiated, respectively.





Back to Top | Article Outline


Baseline CD4+ T-cell count was defined as the first CD4+ T-cell count measurement after diagnosis of HIV infection (Fig. 1A). Nadir CD4+ T-cell count was the lowest CD4 measured during disease before HAART initiation. We have observed previously in this cohort that after HAART initiation, there are 2 phases of CD4+ T-cell count changes: phase I after initiation of HAART where there is a rapid increase in CD4+ T-cell counts over the first 2 years, followed by phase II with a slower gain.32 For this reason, in those subjects who had at least 3 CD4+ T-cell count measurements available 2 years post-HAART, we computed for each subject their phase II post-HAART CD4 count. This was defined as the average of all the CD4+ T-cell count measurements available beyond 2 years of therapy, thus approximating the maximum steady-state CD4+ T-cell count level attained.

In our analyses, we also included as covariates the overall exponential VL decay constant computed for the entire duration of therapy and the cumulative VL (defined as the area under the curve obtained using the trapezoidal rule) of the log10 VL from time of initiation of HAART because these 2 parameters were strong independent factors associated with CD4+ T-cell count recovery and AIDS risk during HAART, respectively.31 VL suppression on HAART was defined as attainment of a VL <400 copies per milliliter. In this cohort, VL suppression was achieved in 93% of subjects at 5 years31,32 and was associated with a prominent and durable increase in CD4+ T-cell counts compared with those who did not achieve this virologic threshold on HAART. Pre-HAART VL was defined as the average of all VL measurements 1 year before initiation of HAART (average number of pre-HAART VL measurements were 4.4 with a standard deviation of 5.27). AIDS events were defined using the 1993 classification but did not include CD4 count <200 cells per microliter as an endpoint.34

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical Analysis

We examined the association of baseline and nadir CD4+ T-cell counts with mean phase II CD4+ T cell counts using the following regression models. First, linear regression was used for the outcome of mean phase II CD4+ T-cell count considering the outcome as a continuous variable. We observed that the outcome variable was not normally distributed and continued to be nonnormally distributed even when the logarithmic or square-root transformations were used. Therefore, we could not use the ordinary least squares method for these analyses and instead used a nonparametric regression procedure—quantile regression. Second, we dichotomized the outcome of mean phase II post-HAART CD4 count as < or ≥ 500 cells per microliter. Using this binary outcome, we conducted logistic regression analyses. For both the linear and logistic regressions, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses. Covariates in the multivariate analyses included age at HAART initiation, gender, African American ethnicity, previous receipt of ART, AIDS before HAART, pre-HAART VL, overall VL decay constant during HAART, cumulative VL during HAART, and late HAART era (after calendar year 2000). Time to HAART from HIV diagnosis (or estimated date of seroconversion for known seroconverters), time on HAART, age at HAART initiation, pre-HAART VL, overall VL decay constant, and cumulative VL were included in the model as continuous variables. Also, we used χ2 test for linear trend (expressed as proportion of overall χ2) to determine the possibility of a gradient of association across categories of the baseline and mean phase II CD4+ T-cell counts. Third, to determine the time trends of CD4+ T-cell counts, we conducted nonlinear generalized estimating equations (GEE) modeling on the panel data of CD4 counts indexed from the date of initiation of HAART and extending 6 years before and after HAART initiation. The GEE results were then spline-smoothed using the Stata routine rc_spline by taking annual knots, and 95% confidence interval (CI) bands were computed for these data. The GEE models were computed assuming equal-correlation structure. Prognostic use of baseline and nadir CD4+ T-cell counts was assessed using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the estimated area under this curve. ROC curves were used to plot the bivariate distribution of the true-positive rate (sensitivity) and the false-positive rate (1 specificity) by varying the cut-off for dichotomization over the observed range of values. Area under the ROC curve indicated the predictive accuracy of the test under consideration. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 10.0 (College Station, TX) software package. Statistical significance was evaluated at a type I error rate of 0.05.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Influence of Baseline CD4+ T-Cell Count on CD4 Recovery

The subject characteristics are shown in Table 1. We first conducted univariate linear regression models to determine whether the baseline CD4+ T-cell count predicted the phase II post-HAART CD4 count. Figure 2A shows that there was a strong statistical association between these 2 variables. For each additional CD4+ T cell at baseline, there was a 0.36 cell higher phase II post-HAART CD4 count. Using multivariate linear regression analyses, we observed that (Fig. 2B) independent of VL, nadir CD4+ T-cell count, and other parameters, the baseline CD4+ T-cell count continued to be a strongly associated with the mean phase II CD4+ T-cell count (regression coefficient 0.48).



An important point to consider in our analysis was the variability in the seroconversion window—the duration between the last HIV-negative and first HIV-positive test (Fig. 1A, Table 1). We observed that there indeed was a weak yet statistically significant negative correlation between the width of the seroconversion window and the baseline CD4+ T-cell count (Pearson correlation coefficient = −0.10, P = 0.0013), that is, subjects with longer seroconversion windows had lower baseline CD4 counts. Thus it was possible that our analyses could have been influenced by this negative correlation and the variability in the seroconversion window. We used 2 different approaches to account for this variability. First, we adjusted the association between the baseline and mean phase II CD4+ T-cell counts by additionally including the seroconversion window (SctWin) as a covariate (hollow bar labeled “adjusted for SctWin” in Figure 2B). We found that this association was not substantially influenced by inclusion of seroconversion window. Second, we categorized subjects into 3 groups based on the tertiles of seroconversion window—the tertiles were at 1 year and 1.94 years. Within each tertile group, we estimated the same regression model and found that in all the 3 groups the multivariate strength of association between the baseline and mean phase II CD4+ T-cell counts was comparable. Consistent with these observations, subjects with a baseline CD4+ T-cell count of <500 cells per microliter were 2.27-fold more likely to have a mean phase II CD4+ T-cell count that was <500 cells per microliter (odds ratio: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.75 to 2.94). After adjusting for all potential confounders, this likelihood further increased (odds ratio: 3.19, 95% CI: 2.27 to 4.49).

To assess the association of baseline CD4+ T-cell count on phase II post-HAART CD4+ T-cell count, independent of nadir CD4, we first categorized study subjects according to 3 clinically meaningful strata of nadir CD4+ T-cell counts (Fig. 2C). Within the 3 strata of nadir CD4 counts (<200, 200-349, and ≥350 cells per microliter), the median time at which the nadir CD4 count was recorded before HAART initiation was 1.17, 2.89, and 1.74 months, respectively, suggesting that the pre-HAART nadir CD4 occurred near the time of HAART initiation. We found that the phase II CD4+ T-cell count was strongly predicted by the baseline CD4 count within each stratum of the nadir CD4 cell count before or after the adjustment for seroconversion window (Fig. 2C). Additional analyses were conducted which adjusted for length of follow-up and included a square root transformation of the baseline CD4 count resulting in similar findings (data not shown).

To investigate further the relationship between baseline, nadir, and post-HAART CD4 counts, we stratified subjects according to their baseline (<350, 350-699, and ≥700 cells/μL) and nadir (<200, 200-349, and ≥350 cells/μL) CD4+ cell count and determined the proportion of subjects who attained CD4+ counts 2 years after HAART of <350, 350-699, and ≥700 cells per microliter (Fig. 2D). Within each category of subjects classified by their nadir CD4+ T-cell count, the proportion of subjects on HAART who reconstituted to CD4+ T-cell counts of ≥700 cells per microliter increased in a step-wise manner with increasing baseline CD4+ T-cell count. We tested this statistically by using a combination of the Pearson χ2 test and the χ2 test for linear trend and then estimated the proportion of the total Pearson χ2 that was attributable to a linear association between the categories of baseline CD4+ T-cell count and the mean phase II CD4+ T-cell count (Fig. 2E). We observed that across the categories of nadir CD4+ T-cell count, 50%-74% of the total association was attributable to a clear linear trend between the categories of baseline CD4+ T-cell count and the mean phase II CD4+ T-cell count. The results shown in Figure 2D and 2E together strongly indicated that the association of baseline CD4+ T-cell count and the mean phase II CD4+ T-cell count was largely independent of the nadir CD4+ T-cell count.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Joint Influence of Baseline and Nadir CD4+ T Cell Counts on CD4 Recovery

To investigate further the joint relationship between baseline and nadir CD4+ T-cell counts with the mean phase II CD4+ T-cell counts, we computed the CD4+ T-cell count trajectories 6 years before and after HAART initiation for each of the group of subjects categorized according to their baseline and nadir CD4+ cell count (Fig. 2F). The highest mean phase II CD4+ T-cell counts were found among 3 categories of subjects: those with baseline CD4 counts of ≥700 and nadir CD4 counts of ≥200 cells per microliter (Fig. 2F, groups 8 and 9) and those with baseline CD4 counts of 350-700 cells per microliter and nadirs of ≥350 cells per microliter (Fig. 2E, group 6). To determine whether the actual gain in CD4+ T-cell counts (difference between mean phase II and nadir CD4+ T-cell counts) differed by baseline and nadir CD4 counts, we used quantile regression. In multivariate analysis, we observed that the baseline CD4+ T-cell count had a significantly positive impact on the gain (coefficient 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.26, P < 0.001), whereas the nadir CD4+ T-cell count had a significantly negative impact (coefficient −0.29, 95% CI: −0.40 to −0.18, P < 0.001) on the number of cells gained. These results corroborate those shown in Figure 2F such that for a given nadir CD4 count, a higher baseline CD4+ T-cell count was associated with a larger gain in CD4+ T cells. On the other hand, for a given baseline count, a lower nadir was associated with a larger gain after HAART. The conjoint effects on the predicted number of cells gained are depicted in Figure 3A which shows that a combination of high baseline CD4+ T-cell count and a low nadir CD4+ T-cell count is most likely to be benefited by HAART in terms of the number of cells gained.



Back to Top | Article Outline

Nadir/Baseline CD4+ T-Cell Count Ratio Predicts CD4 Recovery From HAART

Last, to translate these findings into clinically relevant information, we first addressed the following question: Can a composite measure based on the baseline and nadir CD4+ T-cell counts be used to predict the likelihood of immune reconstitution? To answer this question, we generated the ratio of nadir to baseline CD4+ T-cell counts (nadir/baseline ratio) and used the dichotomous outcome of achievement of the baseline CD4+ T-cell count in mean phase II as a measure of adequate CD4 recovery. Using a ROC curve, we observed (Fig. 3B) that the nadir/baseline ratio had a prognostic accuracy of 81% as indicated by the area under the ROC curve. Compared with the predictive accuracy of either baseline CD4+ T-cell count (P = 0.0004) or nadir CD4+ T-cell count (P < 0.0001), the nadir/baseline ratio provided a significantly higher prognostic information. The optimum prognostically useful cut-off for this ratio was 0.6, equivalent to a CD4 decline of 40% from baseline. A ratio larger than this cut-off had prognostic sensitivity of 82.8%, specificity of 66.9%, and accuracy of 77.4%. The likelihood of successful reconstitution (that is achievement of baseline CD4+ T-cell count values during phase II) was 0.83 in subjects with nadir/baseline ratio of ≥0.6 and 0.34 in subjects with a ratio <0.6.

We next assessed the extent to which interindividual variability in immune reconstitution was explained by the nadir/baseline ratio. For these analyses, we considered three outcomes that can conceptually reflect adequate immune reconstitution: achievement of the baseline CD4+ T-cell count during phase II, mean phase II CD4+ T-cell count ≥500 cells per microliter, and a gain of at least 200 CD4+ T cells per microliter during HAART. In the study subjects, 716 (66.0%), 699 (64.4%), and 690 (63.6%) subjects achieved these 3 outcomes, respectively. Using logistic regression analyses, we observed that the nadir/baseline ratio explained 22.2% variability in the outcome of return to baseline CD4+ T-cell count, 3.2% variability in the outcome of mean phase II CD4+ T-cell count ≥500 cells per microliter, and 0.1% variability in the outcome of a gain of at least 200 CD4+ T cells per microliter during HAART. Interestingly, baseline CD4+ T-cell count and nadir CD4+ T-cell count, when considered individually, explained only 14.3% and 0.7% variability in the outcome of return to baseline CD4+ T-cell count suggesting that the nadir/baseline ratio may be tapping synergistic information content of these 2 parameters—a finding that corroborates the ROC curves shown in Figure 3B.

Back to Top | Article Outline


There are 2 major findings of our analyses. First, the baseline CD4+ T-cell count observed during the early stages of HIV infection is a strong predictor of the CD4+ T-cell count attained after HAART, independent of the nadir CD4+ T-cell count and other explanatory covariates that have previously been ascribed to underlie interindividual differences in immunological reconstitution after HAART.1,18-29,35-39 Prior studies have evaluated the impact of CD4 and VL just before initiation of HAART on immune recovery (eg, nadir CD4, pre-HAART VL). However, the impact of proximal parameters such as the degree of initial CD4 depletion during acute HIV infection (especially involving key CD4+ T-cell subsets in lymph nodes and the gut) or the pre-infection CD4 count, as reflected by the baseline CD4, on distal events during HIV disease such as extent and capacity of CD4 reconstitution are lacking. Our observation may have implications for clinical practice because it indicates that among patients with low baseline CD4 postseroconversion, the attainment of predetermined levels of CD4+ T-cell counts such as 500 cells per microliter may be difficult. That is, there might be a maximum ceiling dictated partly by the baseline CD4 which may limit the CD4+ T-cell gains during HAART. Although existence of such a ceiling for an individual patient may be difficult to determine in clinical practice, our results indicate that it may be clinically useful to consider the baseline CD4+ T-cell count as an approximate guideline for targeting the post-HAART recovery. Conversely, patients who presented with high baseline CD4+ T-cell counts may have had high pre-infection CD4 counts and/or a more modest extent of CD4 + T-cell depletion during acute HIV infection indicating a greater immunologic reserve capacity (eg, preservation of naive and central memory CD4 cells) or other associated immunologic advantages during HIV infection allowing for greater CD4+ T-cell recovery after HAART.40-44 However, it is possible that the baseline CD4+ T-cell count may not fully reflect the pre-infection count. Nevertheless, the fact that seroconversion window did not significantly influence our results points toward the clinical utility of this observation. Our findings indicate that the baseline CD4+ T-cell counts measured as close to serconversion as clinically feasible are an important independent indicator of immune recovery potential.

Second, during suppressive HAART, the average cell gain was highly associated with both the nadir and baseline CD4 counts independently. Specifically for a given nadir CD4 count, an individual with a high baseline CD4 would have a greater CD4 cell gain than an individual with a lower baseline CD4. Similarly for a given baseline CD4 count, an individual with a lower nadir CD4 would have a greater gain than an individual with a higher nadir. These novel results suggest that in the presence of HAART, the immune system seeks to attain the previous equilibrium dictated by the earliest CD4+ T-cell count soon after infection.

Our study implies 2 potential considerations for clinical practice. First, we developed a novel marker, the nadir/baseline ratio as one with high degree of association with future course of immune reconstitution after HAART. This finding further implies that (A) it may be useful to have a knowledge of baseline CD4+ T-cell count as close to seroconversion as feasible; and (B) if the CD4+ T-cell count falls below 60% of this value, the situation is less likely to yield to a robust immune reconstitution even if VL suppression is achieved. However, additional clinical studies are needed to directly address this hypothesis. Nevertheless, this finding is in line with the view that early HIV diagnosis and HAART-initiation can be beneficial.45 Second, our study implies that knowledge of the baseline CD4+ T-cell count may provide a clinician with a realistic therapeutic goal for CD4 recovery after HAART.

The strength of our study is that our cohort allowed us to index per subject extensive longitudinal CD4+ T-cell count data from the proximal stages of HIV infection, through the period of CD4 depletion (pre-HAART nadir CD4) and CD4 during HAART. However, there are limitations to this study. First, in the present analyses, we did not describe the particular treatment regimens24 or level of adherence because the vast majority of participants were able to achieve and maintain virologic suppression within the first year of therapy and maintain suppression thereafter independent of regimen used. Additionally, rates of adherence were high overall in this cohort.31 Second, although study participants were part of a well-characterized cohort of HIV-infected individuals who received comparable health care, we cannot exclude the possibility of an indication bias with respect to HAART initiation such that subjects with more advanced disease could have been more likely to have received therapy. Not withstanding this potential limitation, the relationship between the CD4+ T-cell counts assessed during the proximal (baseline), intermediate (nadir), and distal (during HAART) phases of HIV disease course can only be evaluated within the context of an observational study and not a clinical trial which typically lack information on baseline CD4 counts and are for a short duration after HAART initiation. Third, the results of this study may not be readily generalizable to clinical practice because our selection protocol included subjects who achieved VL suppression and did not develop AIDS after HAART initiation. Therefore, our study sample was more likely representative of a population that would have favorable post-HAART CD4 response.

In summary, by capitalizing on extensive longitudinal CD4+ T-cell counts early after seroconversion and corroborating the 3-phased measurements of these counts, we found that the baseline CD4+ T-cell count strongly predicted the CD4+ T-cell count recovery beyond the pre-HAART nadir CD4+ T-cell count. Our findings are novel and previously unrecognized due to the fact that most clinical studies do not have access to early postinfection CD4+ T-cell counts.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors would like to thank our participants for their enormous contributions over the years and the IDCRP HIV Working Group.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Tan R, Westfall AO, Willig JH, et al. Clinical outcome of HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patients with discordant immunologic and virologic responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47:553-558.
2. Grabar S, Le Moing V, Goujard C, et al. Clinical outcome of patients with HIV-1 infection according to immunologic and virologic response after 6 months of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:401-410.
3. van Griensven J, Zachariah R, Rasschaert F, et al. Discordant immunologic and virologic responses to antiretroviral therapy and associated mortality in a large treatment program in Rwanda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;50:556-558.
4. Moore DM, Hogg RS, Chan K, et al. Disease progression in patients with virological suppression in response to HAART is associated with the degree of immunological response. AIDS. 2006;20:371-377.
5. Valdez H, Connick E, Smith KY, et al. Limited immune restoration after 3 years' suppression of HIV-1 replication in patients with moderately advanced disease. AIDS. 2002;16:1859-1866.
6. Moore DM, Hogg RS, Yip B, et al. Discordant immunologic and virologic responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy are associated with increased mortality and poor adherence to therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40:288-293.
7. El-Sadr WM, Lundgren JD, Neaton JD, et al. CD4+ count-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2283-2296.
8. Achhra AC, Amin J, Law MG, et al. Immunodeficiency and the risk of serious clinical endpoints in a well studied cohort of treated HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 2010;24:1877-1886.
9. Ruiz L, Paredes R, Gomez G, et al. Antiretroviral therapy interruption guided by CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in chronically HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS. 2007;21:169-178.
10. Mussini C, Bedini A, Borghi V, et al. CD4 cell-monitored treatment interruption in patients with a CD4 cell count > 500 x 106 cells/l. AIDS. 2005;19:287-294.
11. Miller V, Mocroft A, Reiss P, et al. Relations among CD4 lymphocyte count nadir, antiretroviral therapy, and HIV-1 disease progression: results from the EuroSIDA study. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:570-577.
12. Sterling TR, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. HIV-1 RNA, CD4 T-lymphocytes, and clinical response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2001;15:2251-2257.
13. Egger M, May M, Chene G, et al. Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:119-129.
14. Anastos K, Barron Y, Miotti P, et al. Risk of progression to AIDS and death in women infected with HIV-1 initiating highly active antiretroviral treatment at different stages of disease. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1973-1980.
15. Kaplan JE, Hanson DL, Cohn DL, et al. When to begin highly active antiretroviral therapy? Evidence supporting initiation of therapy at CD4+ lymphocyte counts <350 cells/microL. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:951-958.
16. Tarwater PM, Gallant JE, Mellors JW, et al. Prognostic value of plasma HIV RNA among highly active antiretroviral therapy users. AIDS. 2004;18:2419-2423.
17. Kitahata MM, Gange SJ, Abraham AG, et al. Effect of early versus deferred antiretroviral therapy for HIV on survival. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1815-1826.
18. Grabar S, Pradier C, Le Corfec E, et al. Factors associated with clinical and virological failure in patients receiving a triple therapy including a protease inhibitor. AIDS. 2000;14:141-149.
19. Kaufmann GR, Bloch M, Zaunders JJ, et al. Long-term immunological response in HIV-1-infected subjects receiving potent antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2000;14:959-969.
20. Florence E, Lundgren J, Dreezen C, et al. Factors associated with a reduced CD4 lymphocyte count response to HAART despite full viral suppression in the EuroSIDA study. HIV Med. 2003;4:255-262.
21. Hunt PW, Deeks SG, Rodriguez B, et al. Continued CD4 cell count increases in HIV-infected adults experiencing 4 years of viral suppression on antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2003;17:1907-1915.
22. Robbins GK, Spritzler JG, Chan ES, et al. Incomplete reconstitution of T cell subsets on combination antiretroviral therapy in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 384. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:350-361.
23. Kaufmann GR, Bloch M, Finlayson R, et al. The extent of HIV-1-related immunodeficiency and age predict the long-term CD4 T lymphocyte response to potent antiretroviral therapy. Aids. 2002;16:359-367.
24. Kaufmann GR, Furrer H, Ledergerber B, et al. Characteristics, determinants, and clinical relevance of CD4 T cell recovery to <500 cells/microL in HIV type 1-infected individuals receiving potent antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:361-372.
25. Moore RD, Keruly JC. CD4+ cell count 6 years after commencement of highly active antiretroviral therapy in persons with sustained virologic suppression. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:441-446.
26. Wu H, Connick E, Kuritzkes DR, et al. Multiple CD4+ cell kinetic patterns and their relationships with baseline factors and virological responses in HIV type 1 patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2001;17:1231-1240.
27. Viard JP, Mocroft A, Chiesi A, et al. Influence of age on CD4 cell recovery in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy: evidence from the EuroSIDA study. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:1290-1294.
28. Lederman MM, McKinnis R, Kelleher D, et al. Cellular restoration in HIV infected persons treated with abacavir and a protease inhibitor: age inversely predicts naive CD4 cell count increase. AIDS. 2000;14:2635-2642.
29. Ferraris L, Bellistri GM, Pegorer V, et al. Untangling the immunological implications of nadir on CD4+ cell recovery during suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:149-150.
30. Weintrob AC, Grandits GA, Agan BK, et al. Virologic response differences between African Americans and European Americans initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy with equal access to care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52:574-580.
31. Marconi VC, Grandits GA, Weintrob AC, et al. Outcomes of highly active antiretroviral therapy in the context of universal access to healthcare: the U.S. Military HIV Natural History Study. AIDS Res Ther. 2010;7:14.
32. Marconi VC, Grandits G, Okulicz JF, et al. 2011 Cumulative Viral Load and Virologic Decay Patterns after Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Subjects Influence CD4 Recovery and AIDS. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:17956.
33. Ahuja SK, Kulkarni H, Catano G, et al. CCL3L1-CCR5 genotype influences durability of immune recovery during antiretroviral therapy of HIV-1-infected individuals. Nat Med. 2008;14:413-420.
    34. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. JAMA. 1993;269:729-730.
    35. Gazzola L, Tincati C, Bellistri GM, et al. The absence of CD4+ T cell count recovery despite receipt of virologically suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy: clinical risk, immunological gaps, and therapeutic options. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:328-337.
    36. Torti C, Cologni G, Uccelli MC, et al. Immune correlates of virological response in HIV-positive patients after highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Viral Immunol. 2004;17:279-286.
    37. Mellors JW, Munoz A, Giorgi JV, et al. Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HIV-1 infection. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:946-954.
    38. Rodriguez B, Sethi AK, Cheruvu VK, et al. Predictive value of plasma HIV RNA level on rate of CD4 T-cell decline in untreated HIV infection. JAMA. 2006;296:1498-1506.
    39. Battegay M, Nuesch R, Hirschel B, et al. Immunological recovery and antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:280-287.
    40. Schacker TW, Bosch RJ, Bennett K, et al. Measurement of naive CD4 cells reliably predicts potential for immune reconstitution in HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;54:59-62.
    41. Brenchley JM, Silvestri G, Douek DC. Nonprogressive and progressive primate immunodeficiency lentivirus infections. Immunity. 2010;32:737-742.
    42. Margolick JB, Gange SJ, Detels R, et al. Impact of inversion of the CD4/CD8 ratio on the natural history of HIV-1 infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42:620-626.
    43. Caruso A, Licenziati S, Canaris AD, et al. Contribution of CD4+, CD8+CD28+, and CD8+CD28- T cells to CD3+ lymphocyte homeostasis during the natural course of HIV-1 infection. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:137-144.
    44. Amadori A, Zamarchi R, Chieco-Bianchi L. CD4: CD8 ratio and HIV infection: the “tap-and-drain” hypothesis. Immunol Today. 1996;17:414-417.
    45. Lifson AR, Krantz EM, Eberly LE, et al. Long-term CD4+ lymphocyte response following HAART initiation in a U.S. Military prospective cohort. AIDS Res Ther. 2011;8:2.

    CD4 count; highly active antiretroviral therapy; outcomes; predictors; treatment response

    © 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.