Share this article on:

Addition of Single-Dose Tenofovir and Emtricitabine to Intrapartum Nevirapine to Reduce Perinatal HIV Transmission

Chi, Benjamin H MD, MSc*†; Chintu, Namwinga MBChB, MMed, MTrop*; Cantrell, Ronald A MPH*†; Kankasa, Chipepo MD, MMed; Kruse, Gina MSc*; Mbewe, Felistas RN, BSc*; Sinkala, Moses MBChB, MPH†§; Smith, Peter J PhD; Stringer, Elizabeth M MD, MSc*†; Stringer, Jeffrey S. A MD*†

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: June 1st, 2008 - Volume 48 - Issue 2 - p 220-223
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181743969
Brief Report: Epidemiology and Social Science

Objective: To determine the impact of adjuvant single-dose peripartum tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) on intrapartum/early postpartum HIV transmission.

Methods: In the setting of routine short-course zidovudine (ZDV) and peripartum nevirapine (NVP) for perinatal HIV prevention, participants were randomized to single-dose TDF (300 mg)/FTC (200 mg) or to no intervention in labor. Six-week infant HIV infection was compared according to actual-use drug regimens.

Results: Of 397 women randomized, 355 (89%) had infants who were alive and active at 6 weeks postpartum. Of these, 18 (5.1%) were infected in utero and 6 (1.8%) were infected intrapartum/early postpartum. Among the 243 who used ZDV and NVP, intrapartum/early postpartum transmission was not reduced among infants whose mothers received TDF/FTC compared with those who did not (2 of 123 [1.6%] vs. 3 of 109 [2.8%]; P = 0.67). Among the 49 infants whose mothers did not receive antenatal ZDV but who had confirmed NVP ingestion, transmission similarly did not differ (0 of 19 [0%] vs. 1 of 26 [3.4%]). TDF/FTC was not significantly associated with reduced overall transmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3 to 1.6), even when other antiretroviral drugs were considered (adjusted OR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8).

Conclusions: Adjuvant peripartum single-dose TDF/FTC did not reduce perinatal transmission. Whether a higher dose might be effective remains unknown but should be studied in settings in which NVP is used without antenatal ZDV.

From the *Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia; †Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; ‡University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia; §Catholic Medical Missions Board, Lusaka, Zambia; and the ∥University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Received for publication December 21, 2007; accepted March 14, 2008.

Supported by the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation (EGSA 19-02). Additional investigator salary or trainee support is provided by the National Institutes of Health (K23-AI01411, K01-TW05708, and K01-TW06670).

Correspondence to: Benjamin H. Chi, MD, MSc, Plot 1275 Lubutu Road, PO Box 34681, Lusaka, Zambia (e-mail:

Despite worldwide expansion of programs to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission, as many as 1000 infants still become infected with the virus each day.1 Combination antiretroviral drug regimens can virtually eliminate perinatal HIV transmission but are impractical for routine use in many resource-constrained settings.2 As a result, a priority has been placed on identifying efficacious yet simple prophylactic regimens. Because of their long half-lives and demonstrated tolerability,3,4 tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) have been proposed as candidate drugs for perinatal HIV prevention.5

We performed a randomized trial of intrapartum TDF/FTC to reduce nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance in the setting of single-dose intrapartum and neonatal nevirapine (NVP).6 A secondary outcome of the study protocol was perinatal HIV transmission. When we analyzed the data according to study arm allocation, difference in transmission between control (8.0%) and intervention (5.6%) arms did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.40).6 In this report, we further explore the impact of adjuvant TDF/FTC on perinatal HIV transmission using actual-use data.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We conducted a randomized trial at 2 public health clinics in Lusaka, Zambia. The methods have been described elsewhere.6 Briefly, HIV-infected pregnant women were identified and enrolled into the study between 28 and 38 weeks of completed gestation. We excluded women who had previously used antiretroviral drugs and those who qualified for antiretroviral therapy (ART) based on World Health Organization criteria.7 Random allocation to study arms was performed on arrival to the study facility in labor. Participant mothers and their babies were followed up at 2 weeks and 6 weeks postpartum. Newborn and infant dried blood spots were collected at birth and at 6 weeks of life, respectively, and were tested for HIV DNA with the Roche Amplicor HIV-1 DNA Test Version 1.5 (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ). Two consecutive positive DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were required for diagnosis of HIV. Transmission was considered intrauterine if the birth and 6-week results were both positive and intrapartum/early postpartum if the baby tested HIV-negative at birth but positive at 6 weeks.8

As part of the routine antenatal care at the study sites, all women who did not immediately qualify for ART were offered zidovudine (ZDV) from 32 weeks of gestation onward and intrapartum NVP.9 All HIV-exposed newborns were given a 2-mg/kg dose of NVP syrup before discharge, and their mothers were provided with a week-long supply of ZDV syrup to be administered at 4 mg/kg twice daily. To assess uptake of and adherence to antenatal ZDV, we collected pharmacy refill information. We then calculated the participant's medication possession ratio (MPR),10 a measure of adherence that describes the proportion of days the participant had ZDV on hand from drug initiation to delivery. Because of high rates of NVP nonadherence reported in previous studies,11 we analyzed cord plasma to verify ingestion of the drug. We used a previously published methodology for NVP detection by means of high-performance liquid chromatography.12 The lower limit of quantification was set at 0.01 μg/mL. Participants randomized to the intervention arm were administered TDF (300 mg) and FTC (200 mg) in a combination dose under direct observation.

We analyzed categoric variables using the Fisher exact test. Two-tailed t tests were used for normally distributed continuous variables, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare parameter medians when distribution was not believed to be normal. Odds ratios were used to estimate relative risk. To determine the independent contribution of each antiretroviral drug component (ie, short-course ZDV, intrapartum NVP, intrapartum TDF/FTC) on perinatal HIV transmission, we built logistic regression models. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The study was approved by the University of Zambia Research Ethics Committee (Lusaka, Zambia) and the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board (Birmingham, AL).

Back to Top | Article Outline


We randomized 397 women between March 16, 2005 and February 13, 2007. Three women (1%) delivered a stillborn baby, and 9 (2%) had babies who were born alive but died before 6 weeks of life. Between birth and 6 weeks, 30 (8%) mother-child pairs were lost to follow-up. HIV transmission data were thus available for 355 (89%) mother-infant pairs.

Of the 355 mother-infant pairs included in this analysis, 180 (51%) were allocated to the intervention arm and 175 (49%) were allocated to the control arm. NVP was detectable in infant cord blood among 292 (82%) of 355 women, a figure similar to previous studies in Lusaka.11,13 ZDV use in the antenatal period was confirmed by means of pharmacy records in 294 (83%) of 355 women. Among them, median gestational age at initiation was 33.0 weeks; average duration from initiation until delivery was 36.8 days. By the MPR metric, 159 (54%) of 294 demonstrated perfect adherence.

Overall, 24 (7%) of 355 infants were infected with HIV by 6 weeks of life. Of these cases, most occurred during the intrauterine period (n = 18) when compared with the intrapartum/early postpartum period (n = 6). As previously reported,6 transmission rates were similar between intervention and control arms for intrauterine (4% vs. 6%; P = 0.63), intrapartum/early postpartum (1% vs. 2%; P = 044), or overall (6% vs. 8%; P = 0.40) transmission. When compared with nontransmitting mother-infant pairs, transmitting pairs had lower mean maternal CD4 counts at baseline (379 cells/μL [SD = 106] vs. 485 cells/μL [SD = 208]; P < 0.001), had a shorter mean duration of ZDV prophylaxis (25 days [SD = 18] vs. 38 days [SD = 24]; P = 0.03), and were less likely to have viral load <400 copies/mL immediately after delivery (5% vs. 31%; P < 0.01). Women who transmitted HIV to their babies also started antenatal ZDV later in pregnancy (median: 35 vs. 33 weeks; P = 0.05). No differences were noted among other demographic, medical, and delivery characteristics (Table 1).



Among 243 participants with confirmed ZDV and NVP use, addition of TDF/FTC was not associated with statistically different rates of intrapartum/early postpartum (2 of 123 [1.6%] vs. 3 of 109 [2.8%]; P = 0.67) or overall (5 of 126 [4.0%] vs. 11 of 117 [9.4%]; P = 0.12) HIV transmission. Similarly, among the 49 infants whose mothers did not use antenatal ZDV-but in whose cord plasma, we detected NVP-the addition of intrapartum TDF/FTC did not significantly reduce transmission in the intrapartum/early postpartum period (0 of 19 [0%] vs. 1 of 26 [3.4%]) or overall (3 of 22 [13.6%] vs. 2 of 27 [7.4%]; P = 0.65) (Table 2). Perinatal HIV transmission observed with other antiretroviral drug regimens is shown in Table 2, including 7 women with missing NVP cord plasma data. In an unadjusted model, intrapartum TDF/FTC was not associated with a statistically significant reduced risk for overall HIV transmission (odds ratio = 0.7, 95% confidence interval: 0.3 to 1.6). This result was virtually unchanged when we considered concomitant use of ZDV or NVP in multivariable analysis (Table 3).





Back to Top | Article Outline


In this secondary analysis, we used measures of adherence and study arm allocation to compare the relative efficacy of different antiretroviral drug regimens for perinatal HIV prevention. We observed a trend toward reduced HIV transmission when TDF/FTC was added to a regimen of antenatal ZDV and intrapartum NVP in unadjusted analysis. In multivariable models, however, there was not an independent protective effect associated with TDF/FTC.

As recommended by the World Health Organization, all participants in this trial were first screened for ART eligibility. Those who met local criteria for treatment were excluded from consideration; those who did not were offered antenatal ZDV and peripartum NVP and were approached about the study.9 In this setting, overall intrapartum/early postpartum transmission was <2%. An adjuvant intervention to NVP-even if shown to be effective-would likely have low incremental benefit. Our results suggest that when the infrastructure for antiretroviral drug distribution is available, efforts should focus on improved antenatal HIV prophylaxis. Earlier access to ZDV during pregnancy or use of more efficacious combination regimens could have reduced HIV transmission in our study setting, because three quarters of these cases occurred during the intrauterine period.

In settings in which antenatal ZDV is not used and single-dose NVP is the standard of care, it is possible that an adjuvant intrapartum intervention such as TDF/FTC may hold promise, because HIV transmission around the time of birth is more likely. Work in Lusaka, for example, reported a 9% intrapartum/early postpartum transmission rate when NVP was used alone.14 Similar results (8%) were demonstrated in the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 024 study, a multicenter perinatal HIV prevention trial conducted in Tanzania, Malawi, and Zambia.15 For these settings, work may be needed to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant TDF/FTC at higher drug dosages. We dosed TDF/FTC (300 mg/200 mg) based on assumptions regarding sustained intracellular drug levels through the NVP “tail.” More recent studies suggest that if infant prophylaxis is the goal, however, higher TDF doses may be required to achieve adequate placental transfer.16,17 Such regimen modifications could further reduce NNRTI resistance among mothers ingesting intrapartum NVP as well.6

We recognize several limitations to this secondary analysis. Because of the generally high levels of ZDV uptake (83%) and NVP adherence (82%), the number of participants not using either antiretroviral drug was small. This limited the precision of our HIV transmission estimates among prophylaxis subgroups. Participants who initiated ZDV generally had high levels of adherence according to MPR. Adherence may have been falsely high, however, because drug pick-ups were timed with regular antenatal appointments. Because of the poor discernability in our MPR measure-more than half had perfect adherence based on this metric-we relied on duration on antenatal ZDV (ie, time from initiation to delivery) in our multivariable analysis.

In summary, addition of intrapartum TDF (300 mg) and FTC (200 mg) to single-dose NVP did not reduce perinatal HIV transmission. The low infant infection rates observed around the time of birth suggest that adjuvant regimens may have only a small incremental impact on intrapartum/early postpartum transmission when antenatal ZDV and peripartum NVP are available. Adjuvant interventions such as ours, however, may hold promise for settings in which only peripartum NVP is used. Future studies should consider increased dosages of adjuvant TDF/FTC, given the drugs' pharmacokinetics in pregnancy and their proven efficacy in reducing postpartum viral drug resistance.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors acknowledge Drs. Ram Parvataneni, Dwight Rouse, John Hauth, Alice Goepfert, and Sue Cliver for their role in project oversight. They also thank the study staff and study participants for their hard work and cooperation.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Bolton-Moore C, Mubiana-Mbewe M, Cantrell RA, et al. Clinical outcomes and CD4 cell response in children receiving antiretroviral therapy at primary health care facilities in Zambia. JAMA. 2007;298:1888-1899.
2. World Health Organization. Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating Pregnant Women and Preventing HIV Infection in Infants in Resource-Limited Settings: Towards Universal Access. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2006.
3. Saag MS, Cahn P, Raffi F, et al. Efficacy and safety of emtricitabine vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:180-189.
4. Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:191-201.
5. Flynn P. PACTG 394 and PACTG/IMPAACT 1064: role of tenofovir in PMTCT. Presented at: IMPAACT Leadership Retreat; 2006; Baltimore.
6. Chi BH, Sinkala M, Mbewe F, et al. Single-dose tenofovir and emtricitabine for reduction of viral resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor drugs in women given intrapartum nevirapine for perinatal HIV prevention: an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370:1698-1705.
7. Stringer JS, Zulu I, Levy J, et al. Rapid scale-up of antiretroviral therapy at primary care sites in Zambia: feasibility and early outcomes. JAMA. 2006;296:782-793.
8. Bryson YJ, Luzuriaga K, Sullivan JL, et al. Proposed definitions for in utero versus intrapartum transmission of HIV-1. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1246-1247.
9. Chi BH, Chintu N, Lee A, et al. Expanded services for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission: field acceptability of a pilot program in Lusaka, Zambia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45:125-127.
10. Sikka R, Xia F, Aubert RE. Estimating medication persistency using administrative claims data. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:449-457.
11. Stringer JS, Sinkala M, Maclean CC, et al. Effectiveness of a city-wide program to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission in Lusaka, Zambia. AIDS. 2005;19:1309-1315.
12. Laurito TL, Santagada V, Caliendo G, et al. Nevirapine quantification in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Application to bioequivalence study. J Mass Spectrom. 2002;37:434-441.
13. Stringer JS, Sinkala M, Stout JP, et al. Comparison of two strategies for administering nevirapine to prevent perinatal HIV transmission in high-prevalence, resource-poor settings. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;32:506-513.
14. Stringer JS, Sinkala M, Chapman V, et al. Timing of the maternal drug dose and risk of perinatal HIV transmission in the setting of intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine. AIDS. 2003;17:1659-1665.
15. Chi BH, Wang L, Read JS, et al. Timing of maternal and neonatal dosing of nevirapine and the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: HIVNET 024*. AIDS. 2005;19:1857-1864.
16. Rodman J, Flynn P, Shapiro D, et al. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in HIV-1 infected pregnant and their infants [abstract 115]. Presented at: 13th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, 2006; Denver.
17. Arrive E, Chaix ML, Nerrienet E, et al. The TEmAA ANRS 12109 Phase II Trial, step 1: tolerance and viral resistance after single-dose nevirapine and short-course of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 [abstract 45b]. Presented at: 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2008; Boston.

emtricitabine; HIV; nevirapine; perinatal HIV prevention; tenofovir; Zambia

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.