Share this article on:

Emergence of Antiretroviral Therapy Resistance-Associated Primary Mutations Among Drug-Naive HIV-1-Infected Individuals in Rural Western Cameroon

Koizumi, Yusuke MD*†; Ndembi, Nicaise PhD; Miyashita, Michiko MS*; Lwembe, Raphael BVM*; Kageyama, Seiji MD, PhD*; Mbanya, Dora MD, PhD; Kaptue, Lazare MD, PhD; Fujiyama, Yoshihide MD, PhD; Ichimura, Hiroshi MD, PhD*

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: September 2006 - Volume 43 - Issue 1 - p 15-22
doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000226793.16216.55
Basic Science

Summary: The prevalence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) resistance-associated mutations among HIV-1 strains in western Cameroon was evaluated by genotypically analyzing strains isolated from drug-naive individuals. Proviral DNA was extracted from 54 blood samples and amplified by polymerase chain reaction of protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase, and envelope genes. At least 4 clones per sample were analyzed. Of 54 HIV-1 strains, 45 (83.3%) had a concordant subtype or circulating recombinant form (CRF) designation: 40 CRF02_AG, 2 subtype A1, 2 G, and 1 F2. The remaining 9 (16.7%) had a discordant subtype: 6 subtype A1/CRF02_AG, 2 D/CRF02, and 1 G/CRF02. Protease inhibitor-associated primary resistance mutations were found in 4 (7.4%) cases: M46L with full clones in 1 case, and M46I, M46L, and V82A as minor populations in 1 case each. Reverse transcriptase inhibitor-associated primary resistance mutations were found in 5 (9.8%) samples: Y188C in 2 cases, and L100I, M184V, and V75I in 1 case each, although all of these mutations were found as minor populations. This is one of the first reports of the emergence of primary ART resistance mutations among drug-naive, non-B subtype HIV-1-infected individuals in Cameroon. Follow-up studies should be conducted to assess whether these drug-resistant mutants found as minor populations might impact future ART.

From the *Department of Viral Infection and International Health, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan; †Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hematology Division, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan; and ‡ Department of Hematology and Virology at the Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde-I, Yaounde, Cameroon.

Received for publication January 9, 2006; accepted April 24, 2006.

Supported in part by International Scientific Research Program grant 14256005 from Monbu-kagakusho (Ministry of Education and Science).

Reprints: Hiroshi Ichimura, MD, PhD, Department of Viral Infection and International Health, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa 920-8640, Japan (e-mail:

The current mainstream antiretroviral therapy (ART) in developed countries is a combination of reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs). Since its establishment in the late 1990s, ART has benefited many HIV-1-infected patients1,2 and has recently become prevalent even in developing countries. On the other hand, the emergence of mutants resistant to these antiviral agents has become a serious concern. In countries with sufficient treatment modalities, the prevalence of drug-resistant variants has ranged from 10% to 20% among drug-naive patients,3-10 whereas in developing countries, resistance has rarely been reported. Recently, the World Health Organization's (WHO) "3 by 5" policy has promoted ART coverage in low- and middle-income countries. As of June 2005, about 500,000 people were receiving ART in sub-Saharan Africa, although the regional coverage rate was still only 11% of the estimated need. In countries with rapidly scaled-up ART provision such as Kenya, Uganda, and Cameroon, the threat of resistance now exists (3 by 5 progress report, June 2005, WHO/UNAIDS). In Kenya, for example, where ART has been provided for 12% to 17% of the estimated need, the prevalence of resistant strains among drug-naive patients has recently risen from 1% (2002) to 11% (2003) (personal communication). In Botswana, the prevalence of primary mutations against PIs was found to be 4% among drug-naive patients.11

In Cameroon, where all representative major groups and subtypes of HIV-1 cocirculate,12-18 there have as yet been no reports suggesting the emergence of ART resistance-associated primary mutations among drug-naive, HIV-1-infected patients. According to WHO/UNAIDS, as of October 2004, the prevalence of HIV-1 infection in Cameroon was estimated to be 4.8% to 9.8% in adults; the estimated number of people needing treatment was about 95,000; and 12,896 people were reported to have received ART. With a firm political leadership, Cameroon set a national target of providing ART based on WHO guidelines [ie, a combination of 2 nucleotide analog, reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and 1 nonnucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)] to 36,000 people by the end of 2005, which means that the ART-treated population would nearly triple in 1 year (Summary country profile for HIV/AIDS treatment scale-up, WHO/UNAIDS). With such a rapid introduction of ART, this and other developing countries might suffer a phase of drug resistance in the near future.

In the current study, we evaluated the prevalence of drug-resistant strains in previously untreated HIV-1-infected patients at the dawn of the ART era in rural western Cameroon. It has been reported that conventional genotyping tests can underestimate the overall prevalence of resistant strains,19,20 and the importance of minor resistant mutants has been discussed recently.21,22 Therefore, we also investigated the rate of drug-resistant strains found as minor populations.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study Population

Fifty-four HIV-1-infected individuals (24 men and 30 women; mean age ± SD, 32.9 ± 10.1 years) attending antenatal/STD clinics [Infectious Disease Wards of the Maternal and Child Health Clinic (Nkwen) and the Azire Integrated Health Center (Kumbo), both in the northwestern province of Cameroon] were enrolled in this study (Table 1). With thorough ethical clearance and informed consent, blood samples were collected from the individuals in February 2004, when none had been treated with ART. The presence of plasma anti-HIV-1 antibody was screened with an immunochromatography assay kit (Determine HIV 1/2; Abbott, Tokyo, Japan) and confirmed with a microparticle enzyme immunoassay kit (AxSYM HIV1/2; Abbott). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were prepared by Ficoll-Paque Plus (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) density gradient centrifugation. Genomic DNA was extracted from the PBMCs using a DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).



Back to Top | Article Outline

Polymerase Chain Reaction, Cloning, and Sequencing

A region of the HIV-1 group M pol gene including the protease sequence (Pol-PR; corresponding to nt 2265-2555 in HIV-1HXB2) was amplified by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers NYUPOL7 (5′-GGGAATTTTCTTCAGAGCAG-3′) and NYUPOL8 (5′-TCTTCTGTCAATGGCCATTGT-3′) in the first round, and NYUPOL9 (5′-TCCTTAACTTCCCTCAAATCACT-3′) and NYUPOL10 (5′-CTGGCACGGTTTCAATAGGACT-3′) in the second round.23 A region of the HIV-1 pol gene including the reverse transcriptase sequence (Pol-RT; corresponding to nt 2513-3209 in HIV-1HXB2) was amplified by nested PCR with primers RT18 (5′-GGAAACCAAAAATGATAGGGGGAATTGGAGG-3′) and K104 (5′-TGACTTGCCCAATTTAGTTTTCCCACTAA-3′) in the first round, and K101 (5′-GTAGGACCTACACCTGTTCAACATAATTGGAAG-3′) and K102 (5′-CCCATCCAAAGAAATGGAGGAGGTTCTTTCTGATG-3′) in the second round. A region of the HIV-1 pol gene including the integrase sequence (Pol-IN; corresponding to nt 4493-4780 in HIV-1HXB2) was amplified with primers unipol5 (5′-TGGGTACCAGCACACAAAGGAATAGGAGGAAA-3′) and unipol6 (5′-CCACAGCTGATCTCTGCCTTCTCTGTAATAGACC-3′) in the first round, and unipol1 (5′-AGTGGATTCATAGAAGCAGAAGT-3′) and unipol2 (5′-CCCCTATTCCTTCCCCTTCTTTTAAAA-3′) in the second round.24 A region of the HIV-1 env gene including the C2V3 sequence (corresponding to nt 6975-7520 in HIV-1HXB2) was amplified with primers M5 (5′-CCAATTCCCATACATTATTGTGCCCCAGCTGG-3′) and M10 (5′-CCAATTGTCCCTCATATCTCCTCCTCCAGG-3′) in the first round, and M3 (5′-GTCAGCACAGTACAATGCACACATGG-3′) and M8 (5′-TCCTTGGATGGGAGGGGCATACATTGC-3′) in the second round.24

Nested PCR was performed using the AmpliTaq Gold PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification was done with 1 cycle of 95°C for 10 minutes and 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 45°C to 55°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute, with a final extension of 72°C for 10 minutes. PCR amplification was confirmed by ethidium bromide staining of samples electrophoresed on an agarose gel. The PCR products were cloned using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and sequenced as described previously (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Phylogenetic Analysis and Subtyping

The samples were aligned with subtype reference sequences from the Los Alamos database by CLUSTAL W (version 1.81) with minor manual adjustments. Phylogenetic trees were constructed and visualized as described previously.25,26 To improve the accuracy, we used the genotyping tool (, the RIP 2.0 system (, and the REGA subtyping tool ( as needed.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PI and RTI Resistance-Associated Mutations

The PR and RT sequences (297 bp and 697 bp, respectively) were translated into the corresponding amino acids (99 and 232 amino acids, respectively) and analyzed for previously reported drug resistance-associated mutations in subtype B strains.27 For each sample, at least 4 clones were obtained and genotyped to evaluate minor populations.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

GenBank accession numbers of the sequences reported in this study are as follows: DQ461820 to DQ461873 for Pol-PR, DQ461874 to DQ461925 for Pol-RT, DQ461926 to DQ461973 for Pol-IN, and DQ464287 to DQ 464330 for Env-C2V3.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Subtype Distribution

All 54 samples could be analyzed in the PR region. In the RT, IN, and Env regions, 51, 48, and 44 samples were analyzed, respectively. The subtype of each sample was identified. Of the 54 HIV-1 strains, 45 (83.3%) had a concordant subtype or circulating recombinant form (CRF) designation: 40 (74.1%) CRF02_AG, 2 (3.7%) subtype A1, 2 (3.7%) subtype G, and 1 (1.8%) subtype F2. The remaining 9 (16.7%) strains had a discordant subtype or CRF: 6 (11.1%) subtype A1/CRF02_AG, 2 (3.7%) subtype D/CRF02, and 1 subtype (1.8%) G/CRF02. Thus, these 9 HIV-1 strains were considered to be recombinant; and in all cases, CRF02_AG was involved in the recombination.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PI Resistance-Associated Mutations

The overall prevalence of primary PI resistance-associated mutations was 7.4% (4 of 54 cases) (Table 1), although the prevalence of full-clone primary mutations was only 1.9% (1 of 54 cases). There were 3 cases that had strains with primary mutations as minor populations (1 of 4, 1 of 4, and 1 of 5 clones). One patient carried a strain with primary mutation M46L in full clones, and its determined subtype was A1. A mutation at codon 82 (V82I) was detected in full clones from 2 patients, but V82I confers minimal resistance to available PIs. These 2 cases were subtype G and CRF02_AG, in which V82I is regarded as a natural polymorphism.28,29

As minor populations, V82A, one of the most important "cleft" mutations, was detected in 1 case (1 of 5 clones); and the "flap" mutations M46L and M46I 29 were observed in 1 case each (both 1 of 4 clones).

As for secondary mutations, most were detected at polymorphic sites such as codons 10, 20, 36, 63, and 77 (Table 2).29 Of the 54 cases, 51 (94.4%) had the M36I mutation, 1 had M36V, and 1 had M36N. Thus, all except 1 case had a mutation at this site. K20I appeared with a frequency of 85.2% (46 of 54 cases); and together with K20R and K20N, 87.0% of cases had a mutation at this site. These findings are consistent with previous reports showing mutation of codon 36 in more than 80% of non-B subtypes and mutation of codon 20 in more than 50% of subtype A and in more than 80% of subtype G and CRF02_AG.28,30 Other secondary mutations at frequent polymorphic sites were L10V/I (7 cases, 13.0%), L63P (3 cases, 5.6%), and V77I (3 cases, 5.6%). G73S was detected in 1 case (1.9%).



Back to Top | Article Outline

RTI Resistance-Associated Mutations

Of the 51 cases analyzed, 5 (9.8%) had strains with primary RTI resistance mutations as minor populations (Table 1). No case was found to have primary mutations in full clones.

The prevalence of primary mutations associated with NRTI resistance was 3.9% (2 of 51 cases). M184V, a potent inducer of resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine with less potency against multiple drugs,29 was detected in 1 patient (1 of 4 clones), and V75I was detected in 1 case as a minor population (1 of 4 clones).

The prevalence of primary mutations associated with NNRTI resistance was 5.9% (3 of 51 cases). Y188C, which causes intermediate-to-high resistance to nevirapine,29 was detected in 2 cases (04CM058 and 04CM095) (1 of 4 and 1 of 7 clones, respectively). L100I was detected as a minor population (1 of 4 clones) in 1 case. HIV-1 subtype/CRF of the 2 strains with Y188C were different as shown in Table 1 and Figures 1A, B, suggesting that these 2 persons were epidemiologically unrelated.



As for secondary mutations, E44D, which is associated with multi-NRTI resistance,29 was detected in 1 case with full clones; yet there were no coexistent primary mutations.

Secondary mutations as minor populations were omitted from the figure because they were numerous, and their importance is likely much less than that of the other mutations.

Back to Top | Article Outline


In the current study, we found PI and RTI resistance-associated primary mutations in 7.4% and 9.8%, respectively, of drug-naive HIV-1-infected individuals in Cameroon when drug-resistant minor populations were included. This is one of the first reports of the emergence of primary ART resistance-associated mutations among drug-naive, non-B subtype HIV-1-infected individuals in Cameroon.

The current study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of potential resistant strains as minor populations, so we used proviral DNA extracted from PBMCs and analyzed several clones per sample. There is no doubt that direct sequencing of plasma RNA is the gold standard for drug resistance surveillance.31 Recently, however, it has been reported that conventional genotype testing may overlook minor virus populations if their frequencies are less than 25%.19,20 Minor resistant strains that eventually overgrow and affect the clinical course of disease can emerge from levels of virus that are undetectable by conventional assays.32,33 Therefore, we focused on the baseline frequency of the dormant hazard in a newly ART-promoting country.

Unlike developed countries where PI-including regimens are frequently administered, the current first line of ART in Cameroon is the combination of 2 NRTIs and 1 NNRTI, which means that PI use is limited compared with that of industrialized countries. Konings et al23 reported that only secondary mutations associated with PI resistance were detected among drug-naive HIV-1 patients in Cameroon during 2000 to 2002. Nonetheless, in our study, primary mutations of PI resistance were detected in drug-naive patients at the rate of 7.4% as of February 2004. This is consistent with findings by Ndembi et al suggesting the emergence of the drug resistance primary mutations during the last few years (personal communication). The HIV-1 strains with primary mutations were found to be CRF02_AG, subtypes A1 and F2, which circulate in west central Africa. It would, therefore, be natural to explain this phenomenon by simple transmission of the resistant strains from patients treated with PIs in Cameroon, although PI use has been limited in this country. However, the possibility that genetic diversity gave birth to resistant strains in the drug-naive individuals cannot be excluded. In addition, the possibility of laboratory artifact that was induced by PCR error cannot be fully excluded either.

As for RTI resistance, previous reports have not detected primary mutations in sub-Saharan Africa during 1999 to 2003,34,35 including the report by Konings et al36 that was based on samples collected in Cameroon between 2000 and 2002. In our study, samples were collected in western Cameroon in February 2004, and 5 cases (9.8%) yielded HIV-1 strains with primary mutations, although all were found as minor populations. Recently, there have been several reports noting the importance of drug-resistant strains detected as minor populations. Minor drug-resistant HIV-1 populations have been detected both in the early phase of treatment failure32,33 and during successful structured treatment interruption.21 Minor drug-resistant populations undetectable by conventional assays can eventually overgrow and affect the clinical course. They also have been found to persist longer than previously expected in untreated patients, a favorable condition for wild-type virus to overgrow,37-39 which also indicates the risk of resistance transmission even from minor strains. Thus, careful follow-up studies should be conducted to assess whether the drug-resistant mutants found in our study as minor populations might impact future ART.

Most of the published data focusing on minor populations of resistant strains are based on the analysis of subtype B strains using quantitative real-time PCR with specific primers for V82A, L90M, or M184V of RT.21,40 In our study, the entire regions of PR and RT genes were amplified, cloned, and genetically analyzed to identify mutation sites other than these 3. This is particularly important in the context of analyzing non-B subtype HIV-1 strains, which often contain polymorphisms. As a result, we detected some other important mutations as minor populations, such as V82A in the PR gene and V75I/Y188C in the RT gene.

In our study, several non-B subtype-specific polymorphisms were confirmed in the protease gene. First, we detected K20I/N and M36I/N at relatively higher frequencies than previous reports. Because Holguin et al reported that K20I and M36I were detected in all cases of subtype G strains,30 the higher rate can be explained by the fact that most of our samples were CRF02_AG, whose Pol-PR is subtype G. Other secondary mutation sites that we detected, such as L10, L63, and V77, are consistent with previous reports that consider these mutations non-B subtype natural polymorphisms. Secondly, V82I was detected in 2 cases, one of which belonged to subtype G; and the amino acid change could be regarded as a subtype-specific natural polymorphism.28 In this study, there were no other subtype-specific polymorphisms that could cause considerable natural drug resistance.

The subtype distribution of HIV-1 circulating in western Cameroon was found to be slightly different from those of other districts.16-18,23,36 The predominance of CRF02_AG was much more conspicuous in the western district (85%) than in other districts (about 60%), although the prevalences of other constituents such as A1, G, F2, and D were almost identical to those in other reports. As expected, independent recombinants were detected between CRF02_AG and subtype A1, D, or G, although the rate of recombination in this area was slightly lower (16.7%) than in other areas of Cameroon (about 21%).18 Still, the independent recombinants carry the potential hazard of developing natural resistance.

In conclusion, as of February 2004, primary mutations of the HIV-1 protease exist in drug-naive patients in rural western Cameroon, despite little use of protease inhibitors. As the scheduled rapid provision of ART can give rise to resistant strains in developing countries, we should be careful not to overlook the emergence of resistant strains. More importantly, we also observed the emergence of minor populations of both RTI- and PI-resistant strains, which could have been underestimated by conventional surveillance. Thus, careful drug regimen design is needed to prevent the rise of overt resistant strains from minor populations.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Egger M, Hirschel B, Francioli P, et al. Impact of new antiretroviral combination therapies in HIV infected patients in Switzerland: prospective multicentre study. Swiss HIV Cohort study. BMJ. 1997;315:1194-1199.
2. Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:853-860.
3. Little SJ, Daar ES, D'Aquilla RT, et al. Reduced antiretroviral drug susceptibility among patients with primary HIV infection. JAMA. 1999;282:1142-1149.
4. Boden D, Hurley A, Zhang L, et al. HIV-1 drug resistance in newly infected individuals. JAMA. 1999;282:1135-1141.
5. Chaix ML, Descamps D, Harzic M, et al. Stable prevalence of genotypic drug resistance mutations but increase in non-B virus among patients with primary infection in France. AIDS. 2003;17:2635-2643.
6. Tamalet C, Pasquier C, Yani N, et al. Prevalence of drug resistant mutants and virological response to combination therapy in patients with primary HIV-1 infection. J Med Virol. 2000;61:181-186.
7. Salamon H, Wainberg MA, Brenner B, et al. Prevalence of HIV-1 resistant to antiretroviral drugs in 81 individuals newly infected by sexual contact or injecting drug use. Investigators of the Quebec Primary Infection Study. AIDS. 2000;14:F17-F23.
8. Yerly S, Kaiser L, Race E, et al. Transmission of antiretroviral-drug-resistant HIV-1 variants. Lancet. 1999;354:729-733.
9. Alexander CS, Dong W, Schechter MT, et al. Prevalence of primary HIV drug resistance among seroconverters during an explosive outbreak of HIV infection among injecting drug users. AIDS. 1999;13:981-985.
10. Wensing AM, Boucher CA. Worldwide transmission of drug resistant HIV. AIDS Rev. 2003;5:140-155.
11. Bussmann H., Novitsky V., Wester W, et al. Frequency of drug resistant mutations among HIV-1C infected drug-naive patients in Botswana. Presented at: 14th International AIDS conference; 2002; Barcelona. Abstract TuPeB4607.
12. Robertson DL, Anderson JP, Bradac JA, et al. HIV-1 nomenclature proposal. Science. 2000;288:55-56.
13. Gurtler LG, Hauser PH, Eberle J, et al. A new subtype of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (MVP-5180) from Cameroon. J Virol. 1994;68:1581-1585.
14. Simon F, Mauclere P, Roques P, et al. Identification of a new human immunodeficiency virus type 1 distinct from group M and O. Nat Med. 1998;4:1032-1037.
15. Corbet S, Muller-Trutwin MC, Vermisse P, et al. Env sequences of simian immunodeficiency viruses from chimpanzees in Cameroon are strongly related to those of human-immunodeficiency virus group N from the same geographical area. J Virol. 2000;74:529-534.
16. Zhong P, Burda S, Urbanski M, et al. HIV type 1 group M clades infecting subjects from rural villages in equational rain forests of Cameroon. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;31:495-505.
17. Burda ST, Konings FA, Williams CA, et al. HIV-1 CRF09_cpx circulates in the North West province of Cameroon where CRF02_AG infections predominate and recombinant strains are common. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004;20:1358-1363.
18. Ndembi N, Takehisa J, Zekeng L, et al. Genetic diversity of HIV type 1 in rural eastern Cameroon. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;37:1641-1650.
19. Shuurman R, Demeter L, Reicheldorfer P, et al. Worldwide evaluation of DNA sequencing approaches for identification of drug resistance mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2291-2296.
20. Shuurman R, Brambilla D, de Groot T, et al. Underestimation of HIV type 1 drug resistance mutations: results from ENVA-2 genotyping proficiency program. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002;18:243-248.
21. Metzner KJ, Bonhoeffer S, Fisher M, et al. Emergence of minor populations of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 carrying the M184V and L90M mutations in subjects undergoing structured treatment interruptions. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:143-1443.
22. Charpentier C, Dwyer DE, Mammano F, et al. Role of minority populations of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in the evolution of viral resistance to protease inhibitors. J Virol. 2004;78:4234-4247.
23. Konings FA, Zhong P, Agwara M, et al. Protease mutations in HIV-1 non-B strains infecting drug-naive villagers of Cameroon. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004;20:105-109.
24. Ndembi N, Yumo H, Takehisa J, et al. HIV type 1 infection in pygmy hunter gatherers is from contact with Bantu rather than from nonhuman primates. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2003;19:441-445.
25. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotides sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111-120.
26. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406-425.
27. Johnson VA, Brun-Veznet F, Clotet B, et al. Update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1: 2005. Top HIV Med. 2005;13:51-57.
28. Gonzales MJ, Machekano RN, Shafer RW. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse-transcriptase and protease subtypes: classification, amino acid mutation patterns, and prevalence in a Northern California clinic-based population. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:998-1006.
29. Shafer RW. HIV drug resistance database. Genoypic testing for HIV-1 drug resistance [database online]. Stanford University; 2003. Updated November 30, 2003.
30. Holguin A, Paxinos E, Hertogs K, et al. Impact of frequent natural polymorphisms at the protease gene on the in vitro susceptibility to protease inhibitors in HIV-1 non-B subtypes. J Clin Virol. 2004;31:215-220.
31. Bi X, Gatanaga H, Ida S, et al. Emergence of protease inhibitor resistance-associated mutations in plasma HIV-1 precedes that in proviruses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by more than a year. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:1-6.
32. Dykes C, Najjar J, Bosch RJ, et al. Detection of drug-resistant minority variants of HIV-1 during virologic failure of indinavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:1091-1096.
33. Lecossier D, Schulman NS, Morand-Joubert L, et al. Detection of minority populations of HIV-1 expressing the K103N resistance mutation in patients falling nevirapine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38:37-42.
34. Toni T, Masquelier B, Bonard D, et al. Primary HIV-1 drug resistance in Abidjan (Cote d'ivoire): a genotypic and phenotypic study. AIDS. 2002;16:488-491.
35. Handema R, Terunuma H, Kasolo F, et al. Prevalence of drug-resistance-associated mutations in antiretroviral drug-naïve Zambians infected with subtype C HIV-1. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2003;19:151-160.
36. Konings FA, Nyambi PN, et al. V118I substitution in the reverse transcriptase gene of HIV-1 type CRF02_AG strains infecting drug-naive individuals in Cameroon. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004;20:673-678.
37. Barbour JD, Hecht FM, Wrin T, et al. Persistence of primary drug resistance among recently HIV-1 infected adults. AIDS. 2004;18:1683-1689.
38. Brenner BG, Routy J-P, Petrella M, et al. Persistence and fitness of multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 acquired in primary infection. J Virol. 2002;76:1753-1761.
39. Chan KC, Galli RA, Montaner JS, et al. Prolonged retention of drug mutations and rapid disease progression in the absence of therapy after primary infection. AIDS. 2003;17:1256-1258.
40. Hance AJ, Lemiale V, Izopet J, et al. Changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 populations after treatment interruption in patients failing antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 2001;75:6410-6417.

non-B subtype HIV-1; antiretroviral therapy; drug resistance-associated mutations; drug-naive patients; Cameroon

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.