The risk of instability after total hip arthroplasty (THA) ranges between 1% and 3.2% after primary surgery, and can reach 7% or even more after revision THA.1 - 3
The sciatic nerve originates from the L4 to S3 segments of the lumbosacral plexus and travels through the greater sciatic notch to reach the posterior compartment of the thigh just beneath the piriformis tendon. Anatomical variants do exist, and in 10% to 15%, one division of the sciatic nerve passes through the piriformis muscle and the other below it.4 Sciatic nerve lesion will lead to a disabling loss of sensitivity over the top of the foot and inability to extend the foot dorsally (known as foot drop).
Posterior approach to the hip (Moore or Southern approach) is one of the most popular approaches to the hip for primary and revision THA. Through this approach, the sciatic nerve can be identified but is also at risk of iatrogenic lesions.
The incidence of sciatic nerve lesions during a THA is around 1% to 3%.5 Prevalence of sciatic nerve lesions (entrapment, incomplete tear, stretching) secondary to THA dislocation has been reported to be approximately 3%.6 , 7 In the absence of previous lesion to the nerve, iatrogenic risk of lesion after closed reduction is rare.
To our knowledge, there are less than 10 cases of sciatic nerve entrapment around the femoral neck stem after closed reduction of dislocated THA reported in the literature.2 , 8 - 12
We report the case of sciatic nerve entrapment after closed reduction of posteriorly dislocated THA with the aim of highlighting the importance of careful postreduction neurovascular assessment and prompt surgical management in case of nerve injury.
An 87-year-old woman was referred to our university hospital emergency department because of sudden disabling pain in the left buttock following an attempt to stand up from a sitting position.
On clinical examination, she presented with a shortened, flexed, and internally rotated left leg without any neurovascular impairment. Standard radiographs confirmed a posterior-superior dislocated left THA (Figure 1).
THA was implanted 13 years earlier through a posterior Moore approach. She sustained a revision surgery 3 years earlier through the same posterior approach for mobile implants exchange secondary to three episodes of posterior instability. Since the last revision, the patient did not experience any further episode of instability.
Given the circumstances, it was decided to perform a closed reduction of the left THA under general anesthesia using the Bigelow maneuver (traction in line followed by abduction and external rotation). Postreduction stability was tested immediately after the reduction and the hip redislocated at 90° of flexion and 45° of internal rotation. A second closed reduction was performed. According to the surgeon, the second closed reduction was much more difficult than the previous one. Nonetheless, immediate operating room control radiograph showed a reduced left THA (Figure 2).
As soon as the patient was awake, she reported of severe radiating left lower limb pain with plantar flexion of the foot. Neurologic examination confirmed a complete sciatic nerve palsy. One hour after the second closed reduction, we performed an iatrogenic dislocation of the left THA under light sedation and obtained a relief of the pain, but no improvement of the neurologic symptoms.
A CT was not sensitive enough to rule out a sciatic nerve lesion due to the radiologic artifacts. Sciatic nerve entrapment was highly suspected based on the symptoms. Open exploration was performed. The surgery was performed through a posterior approach. The sciatic nerve was identified enrolled around the neck of the femoral stem (Figures 3 and 4). The sciatic nerve was swollen along 3 cm, without discoloration or crushing. A neurolysis was performed along the path of the nerve up to the quadratus femoris muscle and the external rotators muscles of the hip. The nerve was then unrolled over the femoral neck and gently put back in an anatomical position (Figure 5).
After the neurolysis, open reduction of the left dislocated THA was performed. Postoperative radiograph done on the day of surgery showed a suitable reduction of the left THA.
The postoperative course was characterized by the persistence of a foot drop. She was discharged from our unit 10 days after the surgery. A partially recovering foot drop was present 6 months after the surgery. She was walking using a foot drop splint and one cane. Radiograph showed no sign of complication.
This lavishly illustrated case highlights the importance of meticulous neurovascular assessment after closed reduction of a dislocated THA, which also questions the relevance of postreduction stability testing of the hip after closed reduction of THA dislocation. This testing procedure seems to have a low impact on the modalities of treatment and does not come without any complication as dramatically shown in this case.
To our knowledge, there are six cases of sciatic nerve entrapment after closed reduction of dislocated THA reported in the literature.2 , 8 - 12 Dislocation after revision THA seems to be at higher risk of sciatic nerve entrapment. The higher rate of dislocation and the presence of scar tissues are two reasons to explain this higher risk. In our case, the entrapment was responsible for a permanent deficit to the sciatic nerve by traction and compression.13
Nerve compression by a hematoma is part of the differential diagnosis and advocates early exploration and drainage.12 , 14 CT could show such a lesion. Hemostasis disruption could orientate the diagnosis, and coagulation analysis is required.
We assume that the manoeuver of stability testing after the first closed reduction has probably led to the sciatic nerve entrapment. This complication could have been avoided with adequate sedation and complete muscular relaxation. Abstaining from stability testing would also have probably averted the nerve damage. Stability testing after closed reduction should be done with restriction because accurate measurement of the articular range-of-motion to the limit of stability has low impact on the modalities of treatment. Repeated attempts to reduce a THA dislocation come with an increased risk of complications.
Difficulty in reduction of a dislocated THA could indicate a sciatic nerve impingement. If suspected, performing an open reduction should be recommended. In case of difficult reduction or previously revised THA, the use of live low-dose fluoroscopy might reduce the risk of dislocation or could show soft-tissue impingement.
Studies showed that at the time of the THA procedure, intraoperative stability tests were effective and suggested that reaching 50° of internal rotation with a flexed hip should assure a stable hip.15 As it is an intraoperative procedure, it offers a direct view of the femoral neck in the event of a sciatic nerve entrapment.
In the presence of clinical signs, suggesting a sciatic nerve lesion after a closed reduction of THA dislocation, we do recommend prompt open exploration and reduction. This risk of open conversion should be explained to each patient in the preoperative consent.
Our institution guidelines were modified after this case because we now avoid stability testing after reduction of THA dislocation. This testing procedure comes with substantial risk and has a low impact on the modalities of treatment.
1. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF: Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:1788–1792.
2. Chan JH, Ballal MS, Dheerendra S, et al: Entrapment of the sciatic nerve following closed reduction of a dislocated revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93-B:274–276.
3. Woo RY, Morrey BF: Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64-A:1295–1306.
4. Varenika V, Lutz AM, Beaulieu CF, Bucknor MD: Detection and prevalence of variant sciatic nerve anatomy in relation to the piriformis muscle on MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2017;46:751–757.
5. DeHart MM, Riley LH Jr: Nerve injuries in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999;7:101–111.
6. Weber ER, Daube JR, Coventry MB: Peripheral neuropathies associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58-A:66–69.
7. Wilson JN, Scales JT: The Stanmore metal on metal total hip prosthesis using a three pin type cup: A follow-up of 100 arthroplasties over nine years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973;95:239–249.
8. Haque S, Sundararajan S: Entwinement of sciatic nerve around a total hip prosthesis following closed reduction of dislocated total hip replacement. Pol Orthop Traumatol 2013;78:273–275.
9. Lazansky MG: Complications revisited: The debit side of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973;95:96–103.
10. Leversedge FJ, Gelberman RH, Clohisy JC: Entrapment of the sciatic nerve by the femoral neck following closed reduction of a hip prosthesis: A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:1210–123.
11. Ng J, Marson BA, Broodryk A: Foot drop following closed reduction of a total hip replacement. BMJ Case Rep 2016;2016:bcr2016215010.
12. Stockley I, Bickerstaff D: Sciatic nerve palsy following reduction of a dislocated prosthesis: Brief report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70-B:329–330.
13. Lundborg G, Rydevik B: Effects of stretching the tibial nerve of the rabbit: A preliminary study of the intraneural circulation and the barrier function of the perineurium. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1973;55-B:380–401.
14. Fleming RE Jr, Michelson CB, Stinchfield FE: Sciatic paralysis: A complication of bleeding following hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61-A:37–39.
15. Tanino H, Sato T, Nishida Y, Ito H: Intraoperative stability test of total hip arthroplasty. ORS 2014 Annual meeting. Poster No 1808, New Orleans, Louisiana.