Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Leveraging health care reform to accelerate nurse practitioner full practice authority

Brom, Heather M. PhD, RN, NP-C (Postdoctoral Fellow)1; Salsberry, Pamela J. PhD, RN, FAAN (Associate Dean, Professor)2; Graham, Margaret Clark PhD, CRNP, FAANP, FAAN (Vice Dean, Associate Professor)3

Erratum

In the above article ( Brom, Salsberry, & Graham, 2018 ), one author submitted a correction related to expository acknowledgement of funding.

The corrected statement is supplied below:

“Dr. Heather M. Brom is currently supported by a training grant to the Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research from the National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health (T-32-NR-007104, L. Aiken, PI).”

The authors apologize for the error.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 30(11):662, November 2018.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners: March 2018 - Volume 30 - Issue 3 - p 120–130
doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000023
Health Policy Analysis
Buy
Erratum

Background and purpose: Since development of the nurse practitioner (NP) role, NPs have been advocating for policy allowing them to practice to the full extent of their training. The aim of this research was to determine whether passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) had an impact on expansion of NPs' scope of practice.

Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study of NPs' scope of practice legislation from 1994 to 2016 using regulatory theory. Data sources included annual reports on NP legislation and state-level legislative and media coverage.

Conclusions: Eight states adopted full practice authority (FPA) from 2011 to 2016, representing a two-fold increase compared with the previous 10 years. Seven states adopted Medicaid expansion. Nursing interest groups and politicians shaped their argument in favor of FPA around the increasingly insured population because of the ACA, provider shortages, and rural health care access issues.

Implications for practice: Shaping the discourse of FPA beyond the benefits to the NP profession makes way for broader political interest and participation. Although the future of the ACA is unknown, as the 28 states without FPA continue to advocate for legislative change, they could benefit from the strategies of these newly adapted FPA states.

1Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, and Associate Fellow, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,

2Community Outreach and Engagement, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio,

3College of Nursing, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Correspondence: Heather M. Brom, PhD, RN, NP-C, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Tel: (215) 898-4908; Fax: 215-573-2062; E-mail: hmbrom@nursing.upenn.edu

Competing interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Authors' contributions: H.M.Brom performed all data collection and analysis and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors developed the research project and revised the manuscript for final submission.

Received July 24, 2017

Received in revised form November 20, 2017

Accepted November 29, 2017

© 2018 American Association of Nurse Practitioners
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website