Physicochemical and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Gadopiclenol: A New Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelate With High T1 Relaxivity : Investigative Radiology

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles

Physicochemical and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Gadopiclenol

A New Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelate With High T1 Relaxivity

Robic, Caroline PhD*; Port, Marc PhD; Rousseaux, Olivier PhD*; Louguet, Stéphanie PhD*; Fretellier, Nathalie PhD*; Catoen, Sarah PhD*; Factor, Cécile PhD*; Le Greneur, Soizic PhD*; Medina, Christelle PhD*; Bourrinet, Philippe PharmD*; Raynal, Isabelle PhD*; Idée, Jean-Marc PharmD, MS*; Corot, Claire PharmD, PhD*

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000563



In the article, “Physicochemical and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Gadopiclenol: A New Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelate With High T1 Relaxivity”1, which appears in Volume 54, Issue 8 of Investigative Radiology, the sentence “The thermodynamic constant log Ktherm (at very basic pH) of gadopiclenol is of 19.7” should appear as “The thermodynamic constant log Ktherm (at very basic pH) of gadopiclenol is of 18.7.” The value appearing in Table 1 is correct.

Investigative Radiology. 54(12):810, December 2019.

Thirty years after their introduction, it is indisputable that the use of nonspecific gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in neurological, spinal, abdominal, cardiac, and vascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has substantial benefits for evidence-based disease management.1 Notably, MRI with GBCA-based contrast enhancement is crucial for detecting small brain metastases.2

Metastatic brain lesions are, by far, the most common type of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in adults. Population-based studies indicate incidence rates ranging from 8.3 to 14.3 per 100,000 population, and brain metastases affect 8.5% to 9.6% of cancer patients. Moreover, these values are probably underestimated.3 New imaging modalities are associated with a rising incidence of known CNS metastases.3 Neuroimaging is highly dependent on GBCA administration, which dramatically improves CNS lesion detection and depiction, and thus facilitates diagnosis, sometimes enables determination of tumor grade and may guide the treatment.4

It was previously a common strategy to increase the GBCA dose to improve sensitivity during neuroimaging procedures.4 Improved images can also be obtained by using both a higher GBCA dose and a higher magnetic field (3 T vs 1.5 T).5 Gadolinium-based contrast agents were long considered one of the safest classes of drugs.6 However, this perception changed in 2006 after reports that prior GBCA administration is causally linked to the seriously debilitating disease nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF).7–9 Further investigations revealed that NSF was specifically associated with the use of linear GBCAs.10,11 Gadolinium-based contrast agents are classified as linear or macrocyclic agents based on the molecular structure of their polyazapolycarboxylic ligand.12 Linear GBCAs are characterized by a lower kinetic stability than macrocyclic GBCAs.12 Most preclinical studies performed in clinically relevant in vivo models support a causal role of linear but not macrocyclic GBCAs in NSF.13–16

The gradual dissociation of linear GBCAs has been observed in vivo,15,16 and Gd versus endogenous metal transmetallation is proposed as a likely trigger of the proinflammatory and profibrotic pathways involved in NSF.17 It was recently reported that repeated administrations of GBCAs (almost exclusively of the linear category) lead to accumulation in specific areas of the brain, mostly in the dentate nucleus and the globus pallidus, but also at other CNS sites after repeated administrations of linear GBCAs.18,19 Biospeciation studies with linear GBCAs have concluded that the brain tissue contains multiple species of Gd—including chelated and soluble, dissociated and insoluble, and dissociated and soluble—which are likely macromolecule-bound.20–22

The European Union has suspended the use of all linear nonspecific GBCAs, except those dedicated to specific indications (liver or joint imaging).23 The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has also recognized that linear GBCAs are associated with greater retention for a longer duration compared with macrocyclic GBCAs, and has followed a different approach. The FDA states that healthcare professionals should consider the Gd-retention characteristics of each agent when choosing a GBCA for at-risk patients. The FDA has also requested that radiologists minimize repeated GBCA imaging studies when possible, particularly in closely spaced MRI investigations.24

Because procedures using high doses of existing GBCAs are less common, there is a need for new extracellular nonspecific GBCAs allowing detection of more metastatic lesions using high magnet fields and without increasing the dose.4 One obvious way of dealing with this issue is to increase the longitudinal relaxivity of GBCAs to increase the contrast between the lesion and background healthy parenchyma with the classic dose of 0.1 mmol Gd/kg.25,26 A sufficient relaxivity increase could even enable reduction of the Gd dose without lowering the current efficacy associated with extracellular and nonspecific GBCAs.4 All extracellular GBCAs currently on the market have roughly similar relaxivity properties,27 and their use at higher doses is limited due to potential safety concerns.

Gadopiclenol, a new macrocyclic GBCA characterized by a very high r1 relaxivity, is currently under development. In the present article, we aimed to summarize the chemical, physicochemical, and nonclinical pharmacokinetic data regarding gadopiclenol.



The osmolality of a 10-μL sample of gadopiclenol (0.5-M solution) was determined using a Vapro pressure osmometer (Wescor Inc, Logan, UT) pressure. Before each use, the osmometer was calibrated with 3 standards (Opti-Mole; 100, 290, and 1000 mOsm/kg H2O). Measurement was performed in triplicate.


The viscosity was assessed using a Kinexus rotative rheometer (Malvern Panalytical SARL, Orsay, France) at 37°C. The gadopiclenol solution (0.5 M) was loaded between a 60-mm and 2-degree cone and plate. Stresses between 1 and 5 Pa were applied. For each stress, the resulting shear rate was measured. The slope of the curve stress as a function of shear rates gave the viscosity of the test sample.

Log P Value (n-Octanol/Water)

Gadopiclenol was brought into solution in a 50/50 mixture of n-octanol and pH 7.4 phosphate-buffered saline. Mixture was maintained at 37°C during 24 hours under continuous stirring. Subsequently, the 2 phases were taken. Gadopiclenol concentration was then measured in both media by UHPLC (ultra–high-performance liquid chromatography) technique: UHPLC Waters using a column Cortecs T3 150 × 2.1 mm, 1.6 μm (Waters SAS, Guyancourt, France).

Relaxivity Measurements at 20 and 60 MHz

The longitudinal relaxivity of the Gd chelate gadopiclenol was determined based on the spin lattice relaxation time (T1). T1 was measured using Bruker Minispec mq20 and mq60 analyzers (Bruker Biospin, Wissembourg, France) operating at frequencies of 20 MHz (0.47 T) or 60 MHz (1.41 T). In water or human serum, we prepared gadopiclenol solutions at 6 Gd concentrations: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 mM. T1 measurements were performed for the 6 concentrations, using the standard inversion recovery pulse sequence (180°-τ-90°), with the temperature maintained at 37°C ± 0.1°C. T1 was calculated from a monoexponential plot of time versus signal intensity. The longitudinal relaxivity was calculated from the slope of the regression line obtained by plotting 1/T1–1/T1dia versus the concentration of the complex, using the least-squares fitting method.

We determined the transverse relaxation time (T2) using the standard Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill pulse sequence (90°-τ-180°).28,29 T2 relaxation time was calculated from the exponential curve of time versus signal intensity, measured for 6 concentrations. The transverse relaxivity value was calculated from the slope of the regression line obtained by plotting 1/T2–1/T2dia versus the concentration of the complex, using the least-squares fitting method.

Error bars on the relaxivity data were estimated at ±6% via an internal study considering 9 independent samples with measurements performed by 3 experimenters (3 samples each) with Gd dosage via inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy of the highest concentrated samples (5 mM).

Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion Profile Measurements

Proton nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion (NMRD) profiles were determined using a Stelar Spinmaster FFC fast-field-cycling NMR relaxometer (Stelar, Mede [PV], Italy) over a magnetic field strength range of 0.24 mT to 0.24 T. Measurements were performed using 0.6-mL samples in Pyrex tubes with a 10-mm optical dimension. We additionally obtained relaxation rates using Minispec relaxometers mq20 (20 MHz, 0.47 T) and mq60 (60 MHz, 1.41 T) and a Bruker AMX-300 spectrometer (300 MHz). Nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion profiles were determined using Mons University equipment. Values at 3 T were extrapolated from NMRD profiles. Because these measurements were performed at only one concentration, the error bars were estimated at ±10% (internal study on 9 samples with 3 experimenters). Proton NMRD curves were fitted using data processing software that included various theoretical models describing nuclear relaxation phenomena.

Thermodynamic Stability

For the determination of protonation and complexation constants, we performed pH-metric measurements using a thermoregularized cell (25°C ± 0.1°C). An argon stream was run over the solution to avoid carbon dioxide dissolution. We used a Metrohm type T glass microelectrode (Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland) with a low alkaline error. The procedures and apparatus used for potentiometric measurements have been previously described.30 The ionic product of water (pKw = 13.78, at 25°C ± 0.1°C in 0.1 M NMe4Cl) was determined from titrations of acetic acid with a CO2-free NMe4OH solution. The protonation constants of the gadopiclenol ligand were determined from 8 titrations, with ligand concentrations ranging from 1 to 5 mM in the presence of HCl.

We determined the gadopiclenol constant using 5 series of 40 solutions of Gd3+ and ligand (with ligand concentrations of 7.6 × 10−4 mol/L to 1.15 × 10−3 mol/L) plus HCl. These solutions were prepared in stoppered flasks under argon. The total ligand quantity was always slightly greater than the Gd3+ quantity to prevent precipitation of the hydroxide Gd(OH)3. The pH of the solutions was adjusted to values ranging from 2 to 8 by addition of a 5 × 10−2 M NMe4OH solution. After a 30-day stabilization period at 37°C, the solutions were maintained at 20°C for 1 day before pH measurement.

Protometric data were processed by using the PROTAF program31 to obtain the best-fit chemical model and refined overall stability constants. The PROTAF program is based on the weighted least-squares of the residues of the experimental variables (volume of titrant, pH), and allows simultaneous processing of 10 titrations, each including 150 pairs of data (volume, pH).

All experiments were performed at Reims, France in the Institute of Molecular Chemistry.

Kinetic Inertness in Acidic Medium

We investigated the acid-assisted dissociation of the Gd chelates (concentration of 8 × 10−6 M) in a hydrochloric acid solution (37°C, pH 1.2) under pseudo–first-order conditions without control of the ionic strength, by following Gd release in the solution. From an initial 150-mL solution, a 25-mL aliquot was withdrawn and mixed with 1 mL of Arsenazo III [2,2′-(1,8-dihydroxy-3,6-disulfonaphthylene-2,7-bisazo)bisbenzenearsonic acid,2,7-bis(2-arsonophenylazo) chromotropic acid solution; concentration of 5.3 × 10−4 M] without any buffer addition. Fifteen minutes after mixing, spectrometric measurement was assayed at 654 nm in a 10-mm cell. This measurement was performed for each point (Fig. 3). We compared gadopiclenol with gadoterate meglumine (macrocyclic GBCA, Dotarem 0.5 M; Guerbet, Villepinte, France), gadobutrol (macrocyclic GBCA, Gadavist/Gadovist 1 M; Bayer, Berlin, Germany), and gadodiamide (linear GBCA, Omniscan 0.5 M; GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, United Kingdom).

Dissociated Gd3+ (mol%) over time for gadopiclenol, gadoterate, gadobutrol, and gadodiamide under acidic conditions. The concentration of Gd chelates was 8 × 10−6 mol/L in HCl (pH 1.2). Measurements were performed at 37°C using Arsenazo III as the colorimetric indicator.

Dechelation in the Presence of Phosphate and Zn2+

We added 5 mL of a 2.5-mM Gd chelate solution to 5 mL of a 2.5-mM ZnCl2 solution, which were both freshly prepared in phosphate buffer (pH 7, 335 mM). Measurement of the relaxivity at T0 of this mixture was performed extemporaneously. The mixture was then kept at 37°C. At various time-points, 330-μL aliquots were withdrawn and the T1 relaxation time was measured at 37°C. Relaxivity was measured at 20 MHz (ie. 0.47 T) using a Bruker Minispec mq20 instrument. Gadopiclenol was compared with gadoterate meglumine and gadodiamide.

Pharmacokinetics Studies

Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed using gadopiclenol radiolabeled with the gamma emitter 153Gd. 153Gd-gadopiclenol (stated radiochemical purity >98%, specific activity 10.39 mCi/mmol) was prepared by Chelatec SAS, Saint Herblain, France, as a solution at a concentration of 0.428 mmol Gd/mL. All samples were subjected to gamma counting for 1 mn using an automatic controlled gamma counter (Packard Cobra II Auto Gamma, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) with correction for background and counter efficiency. We acquired the total radioactivity and sample weight data using the Debra Management System, versions 5.2 and 5.7 (LabLogic Systems Limited, Sheffield, United Kingdom).

The regulations conformed to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes (Strasbourg, Council of Europe) and achieved the standard of care required by the US Department of Health and Human Services' Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Plasma Pharmacokinetics

We evaluated plasma pharmacokinetics in 3 male and 3 female Beagle dogs (age, 5–6 months; body weight, 7.4–10.5 kg; Charles River, Edinburgh, United Kingdom). Animals received an intravenous (IV) bolus injection (cephalic vein) of 0.2 mmol Gd/kg of 153Gd-gadopiclenol. Blood samples were collected into heparinized tubes by jugular vein venipuncture at 5, 15, and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours postdose.


To assess gadopiclenol elimination, the animals were housed singly in stainless steel metabolism cages, specially designed for the quantitative collection of urine and feces. Except for a period of fasting from overnight predose to 4 hours postadministration, a daily allowance of 400 g of a standard laboratory diet of known formulation (Harlan Teklad Global Diet, code 2021C) and domestic mains tap water were available ad libitum. Holding and study areas had automatic control of light cycles and temperature. Light hours were 7:00 am to 7:00 pm. Ranges of temperature and humidity measured during the study were 20°C to 22°C and 24% to 50%, respectively. We administered 153Gd-gadopiclenol intravenously to Beagle dogs (0.2 mmol Gd/kg; 3 males and 3 females). Urine was collected before IV administration, at 0 to 6 hours and 6 to 24 hours postdose, and then at 24-hour intervals up to termination at 168 hours. Feces were quantitatively collected predose, and then at 24-hour intervals up to termination. Cages were washed daily with water following each sample collection. Cage debris was collected at 168 hours. All samples were retained for analysis. Total radioactivity levels were measured in all collected samples. Urine and plasma samples were analyzed for potential metabolites by HPLC. High-performance liquid chromatography was conducted using an Agilent 1100 Series Liquid chromatograph radiodetector and Packard Model 150TR flow scintillation analyzer (Packard, Downers Grove, IL) at 4°C with a Symmetry C18 column.

Pharmacokinetic Parameter Calculation

The concentration data from urine and plasma were used to calculate selected pharmacokinetic parameters with WinNonlin pharmacokinetic software, version 5.2.1 (Pharsight Corp, Sunnyvale, CA). We implemented a noncompartmental approach consistent with the IV bolus route of administration. Parameters were estimated using actual sampling times relative to the end of each dose administration. We calculated the area under the curve from the plot of plasma total radioactivity versus time, using the linear trapezoidal method with linear interpolation.

Protein Binding

To evaluate the in vitro binding of 153Gd-gadopiclenol to plasma proteins and blood cells of rats, dogs, and humans, we performed equilibrium dialysis at nominal concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 5 μmol/mL (incubation in a water bath set to maintain a temperature of 37°C for 2 hours). After incubation, duplicate aliquots of each half-cell compartment were assayed for radioactivity to determine the plasma protein binding or association with blood cells.


Chemical Structure and Synthesis

Gadopiclenol (Guerbet, Villepinte, France, patent number EP 1931 673 B1, page 8, example 2) is a gadolinium chelate of 2,2′,2″-(3,6,9-triaza-1(2,6)-pyridinacyclodecaphane-3,6,9-triyl)tris(5-((2,3-dihydroxypropyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoic acid) (registry number 933983-75-6; Fig. 1). It has a pyclen-based macrocyclic structure that is highly stable in terms of Gd dissociation and exhibits high relaxivity due to improved water access to the Gd ion. Its molecular weight is 970.11 g/mol, when calculated without the 2 water molecules that coordinate in solution.

Chemical structure of gadopiclenol [gadolinium chelate of 2,2′,2″-(3,6,9-triaza-1(2,6)-pyridinacyclodecaphane-3,6,9-triyl)tris(5-((2,3-dihydroxypropyl)amino)-5-oxopentanoic acid)]. The PCTA parent structure is shown in red. Two water molecules are included to show the coordination in solution.

Pyclen (3,6,9-triaza-1(2,6)-pyridinacyclodecaphane) (registry number 78668-34-5) was alkylated with 3 equivalent of diethyl 2-bromopentanedioate, and the obtained hexaester was saponified to generate the corresponding hexacarboxylic acid derivative. The polyacid was complexed with 1 equivalent of Gd (Gd2O3), and this complex was used in a peptidic coupling reaction with 3 equivalents of 3-aminopropane-1,2-diol to yield the desired hydrophilic and stable macrocyclic chelate.

The molecular structure (Fig. 1) exhibits 6 asymmetric centers that can display 64 stereoisomers in solution.

Gadopiclenol was designed to provide optimal properties regarding its application in MRI, especially in terms of efficacy and safety.

Osmolality, Viscosity, and Hydrophilicity (Log P n-Octanol/PBS)

Gadopiclenol exhibited an osmolality of 843 mOsm/kg H2O. Its log P value in n-octanol/PBS was of −4.2 and its viscosity was 7.6 mPa·s (Table 1).

Osmolality, Relaxivity, Thermodynamic, Conditional Stability Constants, and Kinetic Stability Data of Gadopiclenol and Other Commercial Gadolinium Chelates

Relaxivity in Different Media

Relaxivity values of gadopiclenol in water and in human serum at 3 different magnetic fields (0.47, 1.5, and 3 T) are displayed in Table 1. Gadopiclenol exhibited a high r1 relaxivity in water and human serum. The relaxivity data in human serum suggested no protein binding (Table 1).

Thermodynamic and Conditional Constants

Gadopiclenol conditional constant at pH 7.4 was calculated from the measured thermodynamic constant and from the 4 protonation constants of the ligand (Table 2).

Successive Protonation Constants of Gadopiclenol Ligand (Noted LH4) at 25°C in NMe4Cl Medium (0.1 mol/L)

Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion Profile

Gadopiclenol exhibited an NMRD profile with a high relaxivity, which was stable at high clinical magnetic field (Fig. 2).

Nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion profiles of gadopiclenol and gadoterate in solution with water at 37°C. Bars indicate an uncertainty of ±10% for relaxivity measurements.

Kinetic Stability Under Acidic Conditions

Experiments were performed using gadopiclenol, gadoterate, gadobutrol, and gadodiamide at a highly acidic pH. Figure 3 shows the kinetics of dissociation of these Gd chelates. Gadopiclenol exhibited the highest kinetic stability with a dissociation half-life of 20 ± 3 days at pH 1.2 (Table 1).

Kinetic Dissociation in the Presence of Phosphate and Endogenous Cation (Zn2+)

In the presence of Zn2+ and phosphate, gadodiamide exhibited a sharp decrease of the r1(t)/r1(t0) ratio. Conversely, the relaxivities of gadopiclenol and gadoterate remained constant over the experimental period in the presence of Zn2+ and phosphate (Fig. 4).

Temporal evolution (up to 5 days) of the R1(t)/R1(t0) ratio for gadopiclenol, gadoterate, and gadodiamide, where R1 is the longitudinal relaxation rate. Concentration of GBCAs and ZnCl2 was 2.5 mM in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0, 335 mM). Measurements were performed at 37°C and with a field of 0.47 T.

Pharmacokinetics Studies

Plasma Pharmacokinetics

Table 3 presents the main plasma pharmacokinetics parameters. Figure 5 shows the mean levels of total radioactivity in plasma after bolus administration of 153Gd-gadopiclenol in dogs. The highest mean plasma level of total radioactivity (Tmax) was observed at 5 mn postdose (first sampling). This level then showed a rapid biexponential decline over the first 24 hours postdose. No sex difference was found. The distribution volume was consistent with gadopiclenol distribution within the extracellular water volume.

Results of Pharmacokinetics Studies With 153Gd-Gadopiclenol in Beagle Dogs (Data on 3 Males and 3 Females, Pooled)
Mean (±SD) levels of total radioactivity in plasma plotted versus time following intravenous bolus administration of 153Gd-gadopiclenol (0.2 mmol Gd/kg) to Beagle dogs (3 males and 3 females).


The major excretion route of total radioactivity was via urine. The mean percentages of administered radioactivity excreted by 168 hours postdose were 93.9% in urine and 5.7% in feces. Total excretion was rapid, with approximately 100% of the administered dose excreted during the first 24 hours postdose.

The recovery data from one female dog was excluded from the mean calculations due to the low recoveries in this animal. This might be due to loss of urine at collection as the low recovery was particularly evident in the first urine collection (0–6 hours).


High-performance liquid chromatography analysis revealed the presence of only unchanged gadopiclenol in plasma and urine samples.

Protein Binding

Over the investigated concentration range (0.01–5 μmol/mL), we detected negligible binding of 153Gd-gadopiclenol to plasma proteins in all species (0% in rats, 1.4% in dogs, and 0.5% in humans), which was independent of the concentration. Binding of 153Gd-gadopiclenol to red blood cells was also low in all species (6%–16.7% in rats, 0%–3.2% in dogs, and 0%–0.1% in humans), and was also independent of the concentration.


Gadopiclenol is a new nonspecific macrocyclic GBCA that was designed to exhibit both high relaxivity and high kinetic inertness. Its low-molecular-weight structure and lack of interaction with plasma proteins enable its use for several clinical indications including CNS and breast cancer.

The finding that linear GBCAs are associated with NSF and Gd retention at CNS sites has sparked new interest in alternative MRI contrast agents. Possible options include iron oxide nanoparticles (NPs), iron chelates, or manganese (Mn)-based contrast agents.32–34 Acute and subacute toxicity data are still needed to estimate the safety profile of iron chelates.33 Iron oxide NPs and Mn-based agents have been the subject of considerable research, and are not yet in clinical use for safety, regulatory, economic, or industrial reasons.35

The molecular structure of gadopiclenol was considered to offer the best compromise to get good stabilities (thermodynamic and kinetic), high r1 relaxivity (around 2× that of currently available GBCAs), and the classical characteristics of a nonspecific non–protein-binding agent; that is, low molecular weight and favorable physicochemical properties, including high solubility and low osmolality in water. To ensure good kinetic inertness, gadopiclenol was designed with a macrocyclic ligand structure, which is based on a parent PCTA ligand [2,2′,2″-(3,6,9-triaza-1(2,6)-pyridinacyclodecaphane-3,6,9-triyl)triacetic acid] that contains a pyridine moiety in the macrocyclic polyamine backbone.36 This PCTA structure theoretically permits the coordination of 2 water molecules in the so-called inner sphere. In Figure 1, the PCTA parent structure is shown in red with 7 coordinated arms to Gd3+ and with the 2 water molecules that can complete the 9 coordination links of Gd3+.

The relaxation rate r1 reflects the efficiency of an MRI contrast agent, and is determined by 2 factors. One is the contribution of water molecules directly linked to Gd3+, termed the inner sphere contribution, as described by the Solomon-Bloembergen-Morgan (SBM) theory. The other is the contribution of water molecules that diffuse near the Gd3+ atom but without direct linkage, termed the outer sphere contribution, as described by the Freed theory.37 In the SBM equation, the number of water molecules coordinated to Gd3+ is directly proportional to the relaxation rate:


where (IS) refers to the inner sphere, q is the hydration number (number of bound water nuclei per Gd ion), [CA] is the contrast agent concentration, [H2O] is the water molecule concentration, T1m refers to the T1 relaxation time value of the coordinated water protons, and τm is the residence time of the water molecule in the inner sphere.6

T1m depends on field frequency, as well as on the global correlation time (τc), which is governed by 3 main mechanisms: the rotational diffusion of the complex (1/τr), the thermal transition of the unpaired electrons of Gd between excited and ground states (1/τs), and the water exchange (1/τm). The global correlation time τc is calculated as follows:


where τr represents the rotational correlation time of the Gd chelate, τs is the electronic relaxation time, and τm is the lifetime of the solvent molecule in the Gd chelate.

Examining Equations 1 and 2, it is clear that the residence time should be long enough to increase the probability of relaxation but sufficiently short to allow the relaxed water molecule to undergo efficient exchange with the bulk. Equation 2 shows that of the 3 mechanisms, the fastest process will dominate. With low-molecular-weight complexes, the r1 relaxivity value is driven by the τr component, since small molecules exhibit fast rotational diffusion.6 Gadopiclenol was designed with small hydrophilic pendant arms to increase its global hydrodynamic size. This reduces the rotational diffusion (1/τr), allowing 1/τS to be taken into account in Equation 2, and thus increasing the relaxivity according to the SBM equations. Moreover, these polyalcohol arms may increase the number of water molecules linked by the second sphere mechanism, further increasing the r1 relaxivity of gadopiclenol.38

Gadopiclenol had an r1 longitudinal relaxivity of 11.6 mM−1·s−1 in human serum at 3 T and 37°C, making it the extracellular GBCA with the highest paramagnetic effect. The NMRD profile of gadopiclenol (Fig. 2) shows its very high r1 relaxivity value up to high magnet fields (10.68 mM−1·s−1 at 300 MHz, ie, 7 T field). This pattern is representative of Gd chelates with q = 2, which is a different type of molecular structure compared with other commercial GBCAs that are characterized by a q = 1 hydration number structure.

The thermodynamic constant log Ktherm (at very basic pH) of gadopiclenol is of 19.7. Low values of the protonation constants of the gadopiclenol ligand (Table 2), which are in the same range as those given for PCTA,39 lead to a conditional constant log Kcond value at physiological pH 7.4 of 15.5. This value is in the range of currently marketed GBCAs.12

Under physiological conditions (pH 7.4), GBCAs have low dissociation rates, such that potentially released free Gd concentrations are not quantifiable within an acceptable experimental time. Therefore, experiments to assess and compare the kinetic stabilities of GBCAs are conventionally performed under acidic conditions, in the presence of HCl (pH 1.2) and at 37°C, where dissociation rates are faster.12 Gadolinium chelate dissociation, mediated by either spontaneous or proton-assisted mechanisms,12 is a pseudo–first-order reaction. The dissociation rate is calculated by the following equation:


where [GdL] is the Gd chelate concentration, and kobs is the dissociation constant. Using this equation, the dissociation constant may be graphically determined by plotting ln([GdL]0 − [Gd3+]) as a function of time. The half-life time for Gd chelate dissociation (t1/2) can be calculated as follows:


The model relevance, as well as the dissociation behavior of gadoterate and gadodiamide, has been discussed elsewhere.12

The dissociation curves obtained at pH 1.2 (Fig. 3) demonstrate that the dissociation rates of the Gd chelates were highly dependent on the structural nature of the GBCA ligand. Under our experimental conditions, gadodiamide dissociation was almost immediate, and did not enable determination of kobs and t1/2 values. Compared with the linear GBCA gadodiamide, macrocyclic Gd chelates (gadobutrol and gadoterate) exhibited considerably longer dissociation half-lives. Of all tested GBCAs, gadopiclenol had the longest dissociation half-life, suggesting a very high kinetic stability.

Several parameters are likely to contribute to this property. First, gadopiclenol is characterized by high conformational rigidity, similar to currently available macrocyclic GBCAs.40,41 Second, the addition of substituted arms to the ligand structure introduces an additional steric constraint, thus further enhancing the ligand's conformational rigidity.

Gd chelates can interact with both endogenous ligands (eg, phosphate) and endogenous metals (eg, Zn2+, Ca2+, and Fe2+/3+), as shown in various in vitro and in vivo models.42–49 The clinical relevance of such models has been discussed elsewhere.17,50–52 In vitro relaxivity measurements have been conducted to assess the potential dechelation reaction of gadopiclenol in the presence of phosphate and the endogenous cation Zn2+. These experiments were performed under sensitized conditions to enable measurement of putative Gd dechelation, using a high-concentration phosphate buffer with an equimolar mixture of GBCAs (gadopiclenol, gadoterate, and gadodiamide) and endogenous cations (Zn2+). Under these conditions, the following reaction may occur:


where M is a divalent cation (Zn2+) that exchanges with Gd3+ in the chelate, and is a phosphate anion that forms a precipitate with Gd3+. In the presence of Zn2+ and , the R1(t)/R1(t0) ratio for gadodiamide sharply decreased, suggesting dechelation followed by precipitation of GdPO4. Conversely, the r1 relaxivities of gadopiclenol and gadoterate remained constant over the experimental time in the presence of Zn2+ and , reflecting these complexes' stability toward dechelation in the presence of phosphate and Zn2+.

Osmolality of the gadopiclenol solution is among the lowest among GBCAs. The low volume administered during an MR examination should preclude physiological consequences of osmolality (because of a low osmotic load12) and viscosity of the bolus.

A molecule's octanol-water (or PBS) partition coefficient is a relevant and widely used measure of its hydrophilicity/lipophilicity ratio.53 Log P value (measured in a 50/50 mixture of n-octanol and pH 7.4 phosphate-buffered saline) is consistent with a high hydrophilic structure. Direct comparison with log P values of other GBCAs (measured in butanol/water) is not possible.

The nonclinical pharmacokinetics investigations were performed in dogs using 153Gd-labeled gadopiclenol. Since only the radioactivity is detected in such experiments, radio-HPLC was used to verify that the 153Gd-gadopiclenol ratio exactly represented the bulk material, as recommended.54 The distribution volume was consistent with gadopiclenol distribution within the extracellular water compartment: distribution volume at steady state (239 ± 8 mL/kg) was very similar to the extracellular fluid volume measured by the ferrocyanide method in dogs (237± 27 mL/kg).55 Twenty-four hours after administration of gadopiclenol, almost all the injected dose was found to be excreted mostly in urine. No metabolites were found, no plasma protein binding was evidenced, and no sex-related effects were identified. Overall, the results demonstrated that gadopiclenol pharmacokinetics parameters were very similar to those of other extracellular and nonspecific GBCAs.56

Fries et al57 performed a study in rats, comparing the signal-to-noise ratios of hepatic colorectal metastases and of healthy hepatic parenchyma, lesion enhancement, and contrast-to-noise ratio for gadopiclenol and gadobutrol (both intravenously injected at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg) at 9.4 T. They reported significantly better lesions enhancement with gadopiclenol compared with gadobutrol. Indeed, the current advent of MRI systems operating at high and ultra-high magnetic fields opens new avenues in neuroradiology.4,58 Importantly, the high relaxivity of gadopiclenol in high fields overcomes the issues associated with the low relaxivity of currently available GBCAs in high fields.

Gd-enhanced MRI is crucial for the detection of small metastases2,4,59 and further allows the distinction of metastases from nontumor white matter lesions.2 Several clinical studies show benefits associated with using higher doses of GBCAs. Administration of an additional 0.2 mmol Gd/kg at 30 minutes after the clinical dose of 0.1 mmol Gd/kg of a nonspecific GBCA reportedly improves CNS metastasis detection and lesion conspicuity, sometimes leading to modification of the therapeutic strategy.5,60,61 In addition, single administration of 0.3 mmol Gd/kg has been successfully used for the detection of CNS metastases.62 The high relaxivity and stability properties of gadopiclenol support its potential use at lower doses than classic extracellular GBCAs, allowing equivalent visualization with a higher benefit/risk balance, and its potential to be administered at the current Gd dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, while providing better visualization of CNS lesions due to its very high relaxivity. This may dramatically impact patient management, for example, with regards to selection of surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiation surgery, and so on.4 Further, this GBCA with almost constant relaxivity and no protein binding may facilitate quantitative MRI.4

In conclusion, our present report summarized the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic profiles of gadopiclenol, a new extracellular and macrocyclic nonspecific Gd chelate that exhibits high relaxivity, no protein binding, high kinetic inertness, and a pharmacokinetic profile similar to that of other extracellular nonspecific GBCAs. Gadopiclenol is currently undergoing clinical development.63


The authors express their deep gratitude to Professors Robert N. Muller, Luce Vander Elst, and Sophie Laurent (Department of General, Organic, and Biomedical Chemistry, NMR and Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Mons University, Belgium) for the fruitful discussions on relaxivity and NMRD profiles interpretation. They are also very grateful to Drs Isabelle Déchamp, Françoise Chuburu, and Emmanuel Guillon, Reims Institute of Molecular Chemistry, CNRS UMR 7312, Reims University, France, for the fruitful discussions on thermodynamic constants. The authors thank Marie-Christine De Goltstein, Isabelle Grelet, and Monique Sabatou for the expert technical assistance and Dr Paul Kretchmer for reviewing the English version of the manuscript.


1. Van der Molen AJ. Diagnostic efficacy of gadolinium-based contrast media. In: Thomsen HS, Webb JAW, eds. Contrast Media, Medical Radiology. Diagnostic Imaging. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2014:181–191.
2. Fink KR, Fink JR. Imaging of brain metastases. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:S209–S219.
3. Nayak L, Lee EQ, Wen PY. Epidemiology of brain metastases. Curr Oncol Rep. 2012;14:48–54.
4. Runge VM, Heverhagen JT. Advocating the development of next-generation high-relaxivity gadolinium chelates for clinical magnetic resonance. Invest Radiol. 2018;53:381–389.
5. Ba-Ssalamah A, Nöbauer-Huhmann IM, Pinker K, et al. Effect of contrast dose and field strength in the magnetic resonance detection of brain metastases. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:415–422.
6. Caravan P, Ellison JJ, McMurry TJ, et al. Gadolinium(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: structure, dynamics, and applications. Chem Rev. 1999;99:2293–2352.
7. Abu-Alfa AK. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium-based contrast agents. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2011;18:188–198.
8. Grobner T. Gadolinium—a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:1104–1108.
9. Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2359–2362.
10. Broome DR. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis associated with gadolinium based contrast agents: a summary of the medical literature reporting. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66:230–234.
11. Edwards BJ, Laumann AE, Nardone B, et al. Advancing pharmacovigilance through academic-legal collaboration: the case of gadolinium-based contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-a Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) report. Br J Radiol. 2014;87:20140307.
12. Port M, Idée JM, Medina C, et al. Efficiency, thermodynamic and kinetic stability of marketed gadolinium chelates and their possible clinical consequences: a critical review. Biometals. 2008;21:469–490.
13. Sieber MA, Lengsfeld P, Frenzel T, et al. Preclinical investigation to compare different gadolinium-based contrast agents regarding their propensity to release gadolinium in vivo and to trigger nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like lesions. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2164–2173.
14. Pietsch H, Lengsfeld P, Steger-Hartmann T, et al. Impact of renal impairment on long-term retention of gadolinium in the rodent skin following the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:226–233.
15. Fretellier N, Bouzian N, Parmentier N, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like effects of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in rats with adenine-induced renal failure. Toxicol Sci. 2013;131:259–270.
16. Fretellier N, Idée JM, Dencausse A, et al. Comparative in vivo dissociation of gadolinium chelates in renally impaired rats: a relaxometry study. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:292–300.
17. Idée JM, Fretellier N, Robic C, et al. The role of gadolinium chelates in the mechanism of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a critical update. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014;44:895–913.
18. Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, et al. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology. 2014;270:834–841.
19. Zhang Y, Cao Y, Shih GL, et al. Extent of signal hyperintensity on unenhanced T1-weighted brain MR images after more than 35 administrations of linear gadolinium-based contrast agents. Radiology. 2017;282:516–525.
20. Frenzel T, Apte C, Jost G, et al. Quantification and assessment of the chemical form of residual gadolinium in the brain after repeated administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents: comparative study in rats. Invest Radiol. 2017;52:396–404.
21. Gianolio E, Bardini P, Arena F, et al. Gadolinium retention in the rat brain: assessment of the amounts of insoluble gadolinium-containing species and intact gadolinium complexes after repeated administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Radiology. 2017;285:839–849.
22. Robert P, Fingerhut S, Factor C, et al. One-year retention of gadolinium in the brain: comparison of gadodiamide and gadoterate meglumine in a rodent model. Radiology. 2018;288:424–433.
23. European Medicines Agency (EMA). EMA's final opinion confirms restrictions on use of linear gadolinium agents in body scans. November 11, 2017. Available at: Accessed January 2, 2019.
24. US Food and Drugs Agency (FDA). Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents (GBCAs): Drug Safety Communication - Retained in Body; New Class Warnings. Available at: Accessed January 2, 2019.
25. Kanal E, Maravilla K, Rowley HA. Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:2215–2226.
26. Subedi KS, Takahashi T, Yamano T, et al. Usefulness of double dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for clear delineation of gross tumor volume in stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning of metastatic brain tumors: a dose comparison study. J Radiat Res. 2013;54:135–139.
27. Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, et al. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:715–724.
28. Carr HY, Purcell EM. Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev. 1954;94:630–638.
29. Meiboom S, Gill D. Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum. 1958;29:688–691.
30. Moreau J, Guillon E, Pierrard JC, et al. Complexing mechanism of the lanthanide cations Eu3+, Gd3+, and Tb3+ with 1,4,7,10-tetrakis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane (DOTA)-characterization of three successive complexing phases: study of the thermodynamic and structural properties of the complexes by potentiometry, luminescence spectroscopy, and EXAFS. Chemistry. 2004;10:5218–5232.
31. Fournaise R, Petitfaux C. Study of formation of complexes in aqueous solutions. III. A new method for refinement of stability constants of complexes and other parameters of protometric titrations. Talanta. 1987;34:385–395.
32. Wesolowski JR, Kaiser A. Alternatives to GBCA: are we there yet? Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;25:171–175.
33. Tweedle MF. Science to practice: will gadolinium chelates be replaced by iron chelates in MR imaging? Radiology. 2018;286:409–411.
34. Boehm-Sturm P, Haeckel A, Hauptmann R, et al. Low-molecular-weight iron chelates may be an alternative to gadolinium-based contrast agents for T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2018;286:537–546.
35. Wáng YX, Idée JM, Corot C. Scientific and industrial challenges of developing nanoparticle-based theranostics and multiple-modality contrast agents for clinical application. Nanoscale. 2015;7:16146–16150.
36. Aime S, Botta M, Geninatti Crich S, et al. NMR relaxometric studies of Gd(III) complexes with heptadentate macrocyclic ligands. Magn Reson Chem. 1998;36:S200–S208.
37. Freed JH. Dynamic effects of pair correlation functions on spin relaxation by translational diffusion in liquids. II. Finite jumps and independent T1 processes. J Chem Phys. 1978;68:4034–4037.
38. Botta M. Second coordination sphere water molecules and relaxivity of gadolinium (III) complexes: implication for MRI contrast agents. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2000;399–407.
39. Tircsó G, Kovacs Z, Sherry AD. Equilibrium and formation/dissociation kinetics of some Ln(III)PCTA complexes. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:9269–9280.
40. Meyer D, Schaefer M, Bonnemain B. Gd-DOTA, a potential MRI contrast agent. Current status of physicochemical knowledge. Invest Radiol. 1988;23:S232–S235.
41. Wang X, Jin T, Comblin V, et al. A kinetic investigation of the lanthanide DOTA chelates. Stability and rates of formation and of dissociation of a macrocyclic gadolinium (III) polyazapolycarboxylic MRI contrast agent. Inorg Chem. 1992;31:1095–1099.
42. Rasschaert M, Emerit A, Fretellier N, et al. Gadolinium retention, brain T1 hyperintensity, and endogenous metals: a comparative study of macrocyclic versus linear gadolinium chelates in renally sensitized rats. Invest Radiol. 2018;53:518–528.
43. Fretellier N, Idée J, Bruneval P, et al. Hyperphosphataemia sensitizes renally impaired rats to the profibrotic effects of gadodiamide. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165:1151–1162.
44. Telgmann L, Wehe CA, Künnemeyer J, et al. Speciation of Gd-based MRI contrast agents and potential products of transmetalation with iron ions or parenteral iron supplements. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;404:2133–2141.
45. Robic C, Catoen S, De Goltstein MC, et al. The role of phosphate on Omniscan® dechelation: an in vitro relaxivity study at pH 7. Biometals. 2011;24:759–768.
46. Taupitz M, Stolzenburg N, Ebert M, et al. Gadolinium-containing magnetic resonance contrast media: investigation on the possible transchelation of Gd3+ to the glycosaminoglycan heparin. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2013;8:108–116.
47. Idée JM, Berthommier C, Goulas V, et al. Haemodynamic effects of macrocyclic and linear gadolinium chelates in rats: role of calcium and transmetallation. Biometals. 1998;11:113–123.
48. Cabella C, Crich SG, Corpillo D, et al. Cellular labeling with Gd(III) chelates: only high thermodynamic stabilities prevent the cells acting as 'sponges' of Gd3+ ions. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2006;1:23–29.
49. Laurent S, Elst LV, Copoix F, et al. Stability of MRI paramagnetic contrast media: a proton relaxometric protocol for transmetallation assessment. Invest Radiol. 2001;36:115–122.
50. Swaminathan S. Gadolinium toxicity: iron and ferroportin as central targets. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34:1373–1376.
51. Sieber MA, Steger-Hartmann T, Lengsfeld P, et al. Gadolinium-based contrast agents and NSF: evidence from animal experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1268–1276.
52. Aime S, Caravan P. Biodistribution of gadolinium-based contrast agents, including gadolinium deposition. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1259–1267.
53. Leo A, Hansch C, Elkins D. Partition coefficients and their uses. Chem Rev. 1971;71:525–616.
54. Tweedle MF. Using radiotracers to characterize magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Invest Radiol. 2002;37:107–113.
55. Zweens J, Frankena H, Rispens P, et al. Determination of extracellular fluid volume in the dog with ferrocyanide. Pflugers Arch. 1975;357:275–290.
56. Vogler H, Platzek J, Schuhmann-Giampieri G, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of gadobutrol: a new, neutral, extracellular contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 1995;21:1–10.
57. Fries P, Müller A, Seidel R, et al. P03277—A new approach to achieve high-contrast enhancement: initial results of an experimental extracellular gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 2015;50:835–842.
58. Balchandani P, Naidich TP. Ultra-high-field MR neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1204–1215.
59. Lo SS, Gore EM, et al; Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology-Brain Metastases,. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pre-irradiation evaluation and management of brain metastases. J Palliat Med. 2014;17:880–886.
60. Yuh WT, Engelken JD, Muhonen MG, et al. Experience with high-dose gadolinium MR imaging in the evaluation of brain metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1992;13:335–345.
61. Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Burke VJ, et al. High-dose gadoteridol in MR imaging of intracranial neoplasms. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;2:9–18.
62. Runge VM, Wells JW, Nelson KL, et al. MR imaging detection of cerebral metastases with a single injection of high-dose gadoteridol. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1994;4:669–673.
63. Hao J, Bourrinet P, Desché P. Assessment of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic profile, and tolerance of gadopiclenol, a new high relaxivity GBCA, in healthy subjects and patients with brain lesions (Phase I/IIa Study). Invest Radiol. 2019;54:396–402.

gadopiclenol; magnetic resonance imaging; GBCA; relaxivity; pharmacokinetics; gadolinium; physicochemistry

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.