Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Contributions

Do Ultrasound Measurements Reflect Bone Microarchitecture Rather than Bone Mass?

An In Vitro Study of the Rat Femur with the Use of Ultrasound, Densitometry, and Histomorphometry

RICO, HORACIO MD, PhD; HERNÁNDEZ, EMMA R. MD, PhD; PÁEZ, ENRIQUETA MD; SECO, CRISTINA PhD; GÉRVAS, JUAN J. MD, PhD; VILLA, LUIS F. MD

Author Information
  • Free

Abstract

The early skepticism about the role of ultrasound in osteoporosis is decreasing as a result of the growing body of evidence, particularly from prospective studies, that quantitative ultrasound is useful for bone assessment. 1 The basic principle of ultrasound measurements of the skeleton is that the speed at which ultrasound propagates in bone is determined by the mass density and by the “elastic modulus” (inherent material quality) of the bone. 2 Structure is one of the qualities of bone that ultrasound is purported to measure, in contrast to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which measures bone mineral content and density only. Bone structure can be defined in terms of connectivity, porosity, and anisotropy. 3

Trabecular architecture can be measured by histomorphometry, 4 and a good reflection of this parameter is found in the trabecular bone volume, trabecular number, trabecular thickness, and trabecular separation. 4–6 Hans et al 7 and Glüer et al 8 have studied the relationship between ultrasound and histomorphometric parameters that reflect the microarchitecture of the bone. Glüer et al showed a significant association between ultrasound parameters and the microarchitecture of the bone; Hans et al failed to do so. However, the fact that Hans et al studied the calcaneus after amputation in humans and Glüer et al studied bovine specimens may explain this discrepancy.

The rat is a species that displays remodeling patterns that can be superimposed on the human model. Ovariectomy or natural menopause in the rat induces changes similar to those observed in menopausal women. 9 Another important aspect is the similar response to bone treatment in rats and humans, as reported by Abe et al. 10 This means that data on bone mass in rats can be, in part, extrapolated to humans.

The objective of this study, conducted in rat femurs, was to establish a correlation between the values from amplitude-dependent speed-of-bone ultrasound (Ad-SOS), with bone mineral content and density values obtained with DXA, and trabecular architecture (trabecular bone volume, number, thickness, and separation) with histomorphometry in an effort to clarify the discrepancies that surround the comparison of these values, and to assess the usefulness of the Ad-SOS as a way to show the trabecular quantity and quality of the bone.

Methods

Rats

The study was conducted in a sample of 40 Wistar rat femurs; all rats were 150 days old and had a mean weight of 343 ± 37 g. The rats were supplied by the animal laboratory of the University of Alcalá. They all came from litters considered to be normal and were bred in the same habitat and living conditions. All were given free access to water and Panlab type A04 feed (Panlab, Barcelona, Spain), containing 7.1 g/kg calcium and 5 g/kg phosphorous; the energy content of the feed was 3100 kcal/kg. Living conditions (12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness; mean room temperature 22° C and 50% environmental humidity), habitat, and diet met current European Union guidelines. The experimental procedure that was used complied with the guiding principles for the Care and Use of Animals and was approved by the appropriate institutional animal care and surveillance committee. Initial weight was measured by using a biomedical balance with precision digital electronic weighing scales.

Densitometric and Morphometric Studies

All of the rats were killed by exsanguination from the abdominal aorta after receiving 4 mg/100 g sodium pentothal. The femur of each rat was dissected and all soft tissue was removed. Weight was determined with a precision balance with precision digital electronic scales.

The bone mineral content and density of the whole right femur were measured by using techniques described elsewhere 11 with a Norland XR-26 densitometer equipped with a special program for the study of small animals and samples (Norland Co., Fort Atkinson, WI). The instrument was calibrated daily.

Ultrasound Studies

The quantitative ultrasound study (Ad-SOS) was performed by using techniques described elsewhere 12 with a DBM Sonic 1200R machine (Emsor, S.A., Madrid, Spain). The machine was equipped with a caliper that closes tangentially on the diaphysis of the femur to measure its thickness at the same location where the histomorphometric measurement would be carried out. This value is used together with the transit time to calculate the speed of sound through the femur. The instrument transmits at a frequency of 1.25 MHz with 22 W power. Coupling is achieved by using standard ultrasound gel. The DBM Sonic was calibrated daily with a Plexiglas phantom supplied by Emsor.

Histomorphometric Studies

After bone densitometry and Ad-SOS, the femurs were processed by using previously published techniques 13–15 for the histomorphometric study of nondecalcified bone. The specimens were sectioned longitudinally into 7-μm slices on a Microm microtome (Microm, Heidelberg, Germany) and were stained with Goldner stain. After being stained, histomorphometric measurements of bone were made on a Videoplan (Zeiss, Heidelberg, Germany) in two representative regions. Cancellous bone measurements were made 0.50 mm from the distal angle of the growth cartilage to exclude primary cancellous bone. Trabecular bone measurements were made on a strip 0.5 mm wide that covered the entire width of the femoral diaphysis; trabecular bone measurements consisted of trabecular bone volume, number, thickness, and separation.

Statistical Analysis

The results of descriptive statistics are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Precision (coefficient of variation [CV]) was calculated with root-mean-square. Correlation (Fisher r to z test) and simple linear regression analysis were used as appropriate to examine relations between the parameters studied. Simple linear regression was used to generate a representative scattergram of some data. The data were processed on a Macintosh computer using the StatView 4.02 statistical package (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA).

Results

Values corresponding to the parameters studied are shown in Table 1. Table 2 lists the correlations observed between the different parameters. The CV for bone mineral content and density of the whole right femur, determined from six measurements made in three rat femurs at intervals of 3 to 4 days, was 0.8%. The CVs for histomorphometric measurements, determined from six sets of measurements made on six rat femurs at intervals of 3 to 4 days, were less than 4.5%. The precision of the Ad-SOS was determined from five measurements taken in eight femurs at time intervals not exceeding 21 days; the CV was 0.5%.

T1-4
Table 1:
Bone and Ultrasound Characteristics of Femurs of Female Wistar Rats
T2-4
Table 2:
Correlation for Fisher’s r to z Test Between Study Parameters

The Ad-SOS was correlated significantly with all other parameters, with a positive and strongly significant correlation with trabecular bone volume and thickness (r = 0.87 and 0.73, respectively) and a negative correlation with trabecular separation (r = 0.69) (P < 0.0001 in all cases). The correlation was weaker but still significant with trabecular number (r = 0.47, P < 0.0005), bone mineral content (r = 0.38, P < 0.05), and bone mineral density (r = 0.46, P < 0.0005).

Positive correlations were established between the remaining parameters, with the following exceptions (see Table 2): bone mineral content and density with trabecular thickness (r = 0.17 and 0.11, respectively, P = NS) and trabecular number with trabecular thickness (r = 0.13, P = NS). For trabecular separation the correlation was significant in all cases, but it was negative (r = −0.37 to −0.75, P < 0.05–0.0001).

Discussion

Ultrasound exploration is a new noninvasive technique for evaluating bone strength. In theory, ultrasound parameters vary with bone density, elasticity, and microstructure. 2 Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) exploration of bone may make it possible to assess bone properties that currently cannot be evaluated with densitometry techniques. 1,16 Studies have indicated that QUS variables may be influenced by the mechanical properties of bone, 17 which in turn are determined by the bone’s material and structural properties. There is growing interest in determining the true value of QUS measurements as they define density, elasticity, and other specific properties of bone. 1,2,16,18 Nonetheless, few studies have analyzed the relationship between QUS measurements and the corresponding histomorphometric parameters. 18

The equipment used in this study evaluated Ad-SOS and is widely used to study bone mass in humans. 19–21 When the same measurement techniques were used in rats, the results showed a significant correlation between the trabecular microarchitecture of the rat femur and the parameters describing trabecular architecture (trabecular bone volume, number, thickness, and separation) 4 and to a lesser degree, bone mineral content and density measured by DXA. In vitro studies have shown that QUS reflects trabecular orientation independently of bone mineral density. 22 Trabecular architecture is an indicator of bone quality and is an important measurement in the production of osteoporosis 6,23 : it has been shown to be the most significant and discriminatory parameter when differentiating between normal women and subjects with osteoporosis. 23 Trabecular architecture was also correlated with bone resistance, and Bouxsein and Radloff 24 observed a strong correlation between QUS and the mechanical properties of calcaneal trabecular bone. A study by Nicholson et al 25 in human vertebral cancellous bone found that the ability of ultrasound to reflect aspects of trabecular structure is strongly dependent on the direction in which ultrasound measurements are made; their results provided only qualified support for the hypothesis that ultrasound reflects cancellous bone structure independently of bone density.

In histological studies of trabecular bone in rats, Baron et al 26 found that trabecular bone remodeling in female rats of advanced age was similar to that observed in the trabecular bone from the iliac crest in elderly women; trabecular bone findings were similar in young rats and children. These similarities make it possible (within logical limitations, of course) to extrapolate our results on the trabecular bone to humans. Hans et al 7 initially found that ultrasound measurements appeared to reflect bone quantity rather than bone microarchitecture. The conclusion was negative concerning the possibility of using ultrasound to assess structural characteristics. Our sample size, however, was not large enough to generate statistically significant correlations. In addition, the calcaneus is an anisotropic structure, whereas ultrasound interaction in bone is a three-dimensional phenomenon. More recent reports, 27 however, indicate that QUS mainly reflects bone density and elasticity. Glüer et al 8 found a significant association showing that ultrasound velocity is influenced by the trabecular separation and that attenuation is affected by the separation and connectivity and is also dependent on the orientation of the trabeculae.

Our results corroborate those published by Glüer et al 8 but do not dispute those of Hans et al, 7 because the studies were performed with different methods and materials. In previous studies, we had observed in rats a strong correlation between Ad-SOS and bone mass as determined by DXA. 14 Other authors, among them Prins et al, 22 have reported the same correlation in humans, a correlation that Laugier et al 28 expressed as r = 0.94. These data show that ultrasound can reflect aspects of trabecular bone structure and provide qualified support for the hypothesis that ultrasound measurements reflect cancellous bone structure, better and independently, rather than bone mineral content or density.

References

1. Njeh CF, Hans D. Commercial ultrasound instruments. In: Blake GM, Wahner HW, Fogelman I, eds. The evaluation of osteoporosis: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and ultrasound in clinical practice. 2nd ed. London, UK: Martin Dunitz; 1999: 127–146.
2. Blake GM, Wahner HW, Fogelman I. Technical principles of ultrasound. In: Blake GM, Wahner HW, Fogelman I, eds. The evaluation of osteoporosis: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and ultrasound in clinical practice. 2nd ed. London, UK: Martin Dunitz; 1999: 107–126.
3. Vaughan JM. The physiology of bone. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; 1975: 1–27.
4. Parfitt AM. Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols and units: Summary of proposed system. Bone Miner 1988; 4: 1–5.
5. Chavassieux P, Arlot M, Meunier PJ. Clinical use of bone biopsy. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, eds. Osteoporosis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1996: 1113–1121.
6. Recker RR. Biopsies. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA, eds. Principles of bone biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1996: 1333–1342.
7. Hans D, Arlot ME, Schott AM, et al. Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass? A two-dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone 1995; 16: 295–300.
8. Glüer CC, Wu CY, Jergas M, et al. Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 1994; 55: 46–52.
9. Mosekilde L. Assessing bone quality animal models in preclinical osteoporosis research. Bone 1995; 17 (4 suppl): 343S–352S.
10. Abe T, Chow JWM, Lean JM, et al. Estrogen does not restore bone lost after ovariectomy in the rat. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8: 831–838.
11. Seco C, Revilla M, Hernández ER, et al. Effects of zinc supplementation on vertebral and femoral bone mass in rats on strenuous treadmill training exercise. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 508–512.
12. Amo C, Revilla M, Hernández ER, et al. Correlation of ultrasound bone velocity with dual-energy x-ray bone absorptiometry in rat bone specimens. Invest Radiol 1996; 31: 114–117.
13. González-Riola J, Pamies JA, Hernández ER, et al. Influence of electromagnetic fields on bone mass and growth in developing rats: A morphometric, densitometric and histomorphometric study. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 60: 533–537.
14. González-Riola J, Hernández ER, Escribano A, et al. Effect of lead on bone and cartilage in sexually mature rats: A morphometric and histomorphometry study. Environ Res 1997; 74: 91–93.
15. Escribano A, Revilla M, Hernández ER, et al. Effects of lead on bone development and bone mass: A morphometric, densitometric and histomorphometric study in growing rats. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 60: 200–203.
16. Wu C, Gluer C, Lu Y, et al. Ultrasound characterization of bone demineralization. Calcif Tissue Int 1998; 62: 133–139.
17. Lee SC, Coan BS, Bouxsein ML. Tibial ultrasound velocity measured in situ predicts the material properties of tibial cortical bone. Bone 1997; 21: 119–125.
18. Njeh CF, Boivin CM, Langton CM. The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: A review. Osteoporosis Int 1997; 7: 7–22.
19. Ventura V, Mauloni M, Mura M, et al. Ultrasound velocity changes at the proximal phalanges of the hand in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1996; 6: 368–375.
20. Aguado F, Revilla M, Hernández ER, et al. Ultrasound bone velocity on proximal phalanges in premenopausal, perimenopausal, and postmenopausal healthy women. Invest Radiol 1997; 32: 66–70.
21. Blanckaert F, Cortet B, Coquerelle P, et al. Ultrasound velocity through the phalanges in normal and osteoporotic patients. Calcif Tissue Int 1999; 64: 28–33.
22. Prins SH, Jorgensen HL, Jorgensen LV, et al. The role of quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone: A review. Clin Physiol 1998; 18: 3–17.
23. Kimmel DB, Recker RR, Gallagher JC, et al. A comparison of iliac bone histomorphometric data in post-menopausal women and normal subjects. Bone Miner 1990; 11: 217–235.
24. Bouxsein ML, Radloff SR. Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus reflects the mechanical properties of calcaneal trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 839–846.
25. Nicholson PHF, Muller R, Lowet G, et al. Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? Bone 1998; 23: 425–431.
26. Baron R, Tross R, Vugnery A. Evidence of sequential remodeling in rat trabecular bone: Morphology, dynamic histomorphometry, and changes during skeletal maturation. Anat Rec 1984; 208: 137–145.
27. Hans D, Wu C, Njeh CF, et al. Ultrasound velocity of trabecular cubes reflects mainly bone density and elasticity. Calcif Tissue Int 1999; 64: 18–23.
28. Laugier P, Droin P, Laval-Jeantet AM, et al. In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. Bone 1997; 20: 157–165.
Keywords:

Bone mineral density; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; femur; rat; trabecular architecture; ultrasound velocity

© 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.