The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a prospective first-pass analysis (FPA) dynamic computed tomography (CT) perfusion technique for accurate low-radiation-dose global stress perfusion measurement.
The prospective FPA technique was evaluated in 10 swine (42 ± 12 kg) by direct comparison to a previously validated retrospective FPA technique. Of the 10 swine, 3 had intermediate stenoses with fractional flow reserve severities of 0.70 to 0.90. In each swine, contrast and saline were injected peripherally followed by dynamic volume scanning with a 320-slice CT scanner. Specifically, for the reference standard retrospective FPA technique, volume scans were acquired continuously at 100 kVp and 200 mA over 15 to 20 seconds, followed by systematic selection of only 2 volume scans for global perfusion measurement. For the prospective FPA technique, only 2 volume scans were acquired at 100 kVp and 50 mA for global perfusion measurement. All prospective global stress perfusion measurements were then compared with the corresponding reference standard retrospective global stress perfusion measurements through regression analysis. The CTDIvol32 and size-specific dose estimate of the prospective FPA technique were also determined.
All prospective global stress perfusion measurements (PPRO) at 50 mA were in good agreement with the reference standard retrospective global stress perfusion measurements (PREF) at 200 mA (PPRO = 1.07 PREF −0.09, r = 0.94; root-mean-square error = 0.30 mL/min per gram). The CTDIvol32 and size-specific dose estimate of the prospective FPA technique were 2.3 and 3.7 mGy, respectively.
Accurate low-radiation-dose global stress perfusion measurement is feasible using a prospective FPA dynamic CT perfusion technique.
From the Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Received for publication February 19, 2019; and accepted for publication, after revision, July 14, 2019.
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: This work was supported, in part, by the Department of Radiological Sciences at the University of California–Irvine, by the American Heart Association under award number 17CPRE33650059, and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number 1F30HL13728801A1.
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Correspondence to: Sabee Molloi, PhD, Department of Radiological Sciences, Medical Sciences I, B-140, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. E-mail: email@example.com.
Online date: October 22, 2019