Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Planimetry of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Debl, Kurt MD*; Djavidani, Behrus MD; Seitz, Johannes MD; Nitz, Wolfgang PhD; Schmid, Franz-Xaver MD; Muders, Frank MD*; Buchner, Stefan MD*; Feuerbach, Stefan MD; Riegger, Günter MD*; Luchner, Andreas MD*

doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000178362.67085.fd
Original Article

Background: The aim of the study was to determine whether noninvasive planimetry of aortic valve area (AVA) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is feasible and reliable in patients with valvular aortic stenosis in comparison to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and catheterization.

Methods and Results: Planimetry of AVA by MRI (MRI-AVA) was performed on a clinical magnetic resonance system (1.5-T Sonata, Siemens Medical Solutions) in 33 patients and compared with AVA calculated invasively by the Gorlin-formula at catheterization (CATH-AVA, n = 33) as well as to AVA planimetry by multiplane TEE (TEE-AVA, n = 27). Determination of MRI-AVA was possible with an adequate image quality in 82% (27/33), whereas image quality of TEE-AVA was adequate only in 56% (15/27) of patients because of calcification artifacts (P = 0.05). The correlation between MRI-AVA and CATH-AVA was 0.80 (P < 0.0001) and the correlation of MRI-AVA and TEE-AVA was 0.86 (P < 0.0001). MRI-AVA overestimated TEE-AVA by 15% (0.98 ± 0.31 cm2 vs. 0.85 ± 0.3 cm2, P < 0.001) and CATH-AVA by 27% (0.94 ± 0.29 cm2 vs. 0.74 ± 0.24 cm2, P < 0.0001). Nevertheless, a MRI-AVA below 1,3 cm2 indicated severe aortic stenosis (CATH-AVA < 1 cm2) with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100% (ROC area 0.98).

Conclusions: Planimetry of aortic valve area by MRI can be performed with better image quality as compared with TEE. In the clinical management of patients with aortic stenosis, it has to be considered that MRI slightly overestimates aortic valve area as compared with catheterization despite an excellent correlation.

From the *Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum der Universität, Regensburg, Germany; †Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Klinikum der Universität, Regensburg, Germany; and ‡Klinik und Poliklinik für Herz-, Thorax- und herznahe Gefäβchirurgie, Klinikum der Universität, Regensburg, Germany.

Received January 27, 2005 and accepted for publication, after revision, May 19, 2005.

Kurt Debl and Behrus Djavidani contributed equally to the article as first author.

Reprints: Kurt Debl, MD, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum der Universität, F.J.-Strauss-Allee 11, 93042 Regensburg, Germany. E-mail:

© 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.