Methods to assess the effectiveness and acceptance of information and communication technology-based assistive technology for older adults: a scoping review : International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Journal Logo

Review Articles

Methods to assess the effectiveness and acceptance of information and communication technology-based assistive technology for older adults: a scoping review

Tónay, Gabriellaa,b; Pilissy, Tamása,c; Tóth, Andrása,c; Fazekas, Gábora,d

Author Information
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 46(2):p 113-125, June 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000571

Abstract

An aging society is a growing challenge for families, social and rehabilitation service providers, and economies. Information and communication technology-based assistive technology can bolster the independence of older adults (65 years and above) and reduce their burden on caregivers. Currently, there is no unified methodology to assess the effectiveness and acceptance of these technologies. The present study undertakes a scoping review to (1) identify and characterize the methods for assessing the acceptability and usability of information and communication technology-based assistive technologies, (2) explore the advantages and disadvantages of the assessment methods, (3) determine the possibilities of combining the assessment methods and (4) define the most commonly used assessment method and set of outcome measures. The literature was searched in MEDLINE, Scopus, IEEE Cochrane and Web of Science bibliographic databases using the keywords defined by reviewers for articles in English published between 2011 and 2021. Of the 1696 matches, 31 met the inclusion criteria. It was found that a combination of different assessment methods was common in outcome measurements. Of the 31 studies, assessment methods were combined in 21 studies and multiple questionnaires were used in 11 studies. The most common technique of outcome measurement was the use of questionnaires (81%), conducting interviews (48%) and recording usability-performance measures (39%). The advantages and disadvantages of the assessment methods could not be determined in the selected studies in this scoping review.

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid