Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Prophylactic efficacy of lithium, valproic acid, and carbamazepine in the maintenance phase of bipolar disorder

a naturalistic study

Peselow, Eric D.; Clevenger, Steven; IsHak, Waguih W.

International Clinical Psychopharmacology: July 2016 - Volume 31 - Issue 4 - p 218–223
doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000097
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Buy

Mood stabilizers are used clinically for the management of bipolar disorder. Prophylactic therapy with mood stabilizers is the primary treatment for preventing depressive and manic relapses in bipolar patients once they are stabilized. In this study, we examined the relative efficacy of the three most commonly used mood-stabilizing agents: lithium (Li), valproic acid (VPA), and carbamazepine (CBZ), in preventing relapse episodes. A total of 225 patients with bipolar disorder were included in the present analysis. Patients taking Li, VPA, or CBZ were followed up for up to 124 months, until suffering a manic, mixed, or depressive episode (relapse), or until the end of the study/study termination (no relapse), whichever came first. The median unadjusted survival time was 36 months for patients taking VPA, 42 months for patients taking CBZ, and 81 months for patients taking Li. These results indicate that patients stayed longer on Li, suggesting that it might have been better tolerated than either CBZ or VPA. χ2-Analysis showed that patients taking Li were significantly less likely to experience relapse during the observational period than patients taking either VPA or CBZ (P<0.05). A Cox regression model showed that the hazard of experiencing relapse was significantly predicted by the total number of depressive (P=0.007) and manic symptoms (P=0.02) assessed before the observation period. In addition, after controlling for symptom covariates, the hazard of experiencing relapse was 1.66 times (95% confidence interval 1.03–2.67) or 66% higher for patients taking VPA compared with patients taking Li (P=0.037). Although the hazard of experiencing relapse was higher for patients taking CBZ compared with those taking Li, the risk was not elevated by a significant amount. Notwithstanding the limitations of the naturalistic design of this study, the differences in relapse prevention and survival time observed in these medications show Li fairing relatively better in prophylactic therapy.

aNew York Medical College, Richmond University Medical Center and Freedom From Fear, Staten Island, New York

bWestern University for Health Sciences, Pomona

cCedars-Sinai Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA

Correspondence to Waguih William IsHak, MD, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 8730 Alden Drive, Thalians E-132, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA Tel: +1 310 423 3515; fax: +1 310 423 3947; e-mail: waguih.ishak@cshs.org

Received March 24, 2015

Accepted August 25, 2015

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.